AGENDA #2a

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager

 

FROM:            Kay Johnson, Finance Director

 

SUBJECT:      Budget Issues and Preliminary Estimates for 2006-07 Budget

 

DATE:                        January 12, 2006

 

 

Attached is a discussion of Budget Issues and Preliminary Estimates for the 2006-07 Budget.  The paper reviews the status of the current year’s budget and presents preliminary estimates for next year’s budget.  The estimates for next year have been prepared in a format which shows a base budget with possible additions for both the General Fund and the Transportation Fund.

 

The estimates are only preliminary, because we have not yet received departmental budget requests, advisory board requests or held public hearings.  We have only made preliminary estimates of the costs for the move to the new Town Operations Center. 

 

We look forward to receiving Council direction as we proceed in budget preparation.

 


BUDGET ISSUES AND PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES

FOR 2006-07 BUDGET

 

GENERAL FUND

 

Brief Update on Current Year Budget

 

Revenue in the current year is on target with budgeted amounts except:

 

 

General Fund expenditures appear to be reasonable in comparison with the budget.  We have imposed limits on department costs in recent years’ budgets that make it less likely that there will be significant unused funds at the end of this year.  In the past, the Police Department has often been able to return a substantial amount in lapsed salaries back to the General Fund.  Because of recruitment and retention efforts undertaken this year, we do not anticipate a material underexpenditure relative to the budget this year.  In addition, as fuel prices have increased, we still may face the need to take budget originally allocated for other purposes to cover the fuel cost increases in the General Fund. 

 

In the Transportation Fund, personnel costs, fuel costs and maintenance costs are running higher than normal at this time of year.  Personnel costs may be underbudgeted because of overtime needs. Unusually low maintenance costs in 2004-05 have not recurred in 2005-06.  The volatility of fuel prices significantly impacts the Transportation budget, and we are concerned that costs may exceed our original estimates for 2005-06.  However, these possible additional costs would be covered by the increased amount of State subsidy. 

 

Overall Budget Issues for 2006-07

 

Key issues for the upcoming budget for 2006-07 include:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assumptions and Preliminary Estimates of Major Revenues in the General Fund for 2006-07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In summary, we estimate total General Fund revenue in 2006-07 of about $47.0 million.  In addition we anticipate a normal use of $800,000 in funds carried forward from 2005-06.

 

General Fund Cost Issues and Preliminary Estimates for 2006-07

 

Base Budget

 

The base budget includes revenues and costs to continue current Town programs at the current level of service. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Potential Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Considering the issues noted above, attached is a summary of our preliminary cost estimates for a General Fund base budget for 2006-07, and estimates for potential additions to the General Fund base budget. 

 

Fund Balance in the General Fund

 

Changes in accounting and reporting regulations caused fund balance to increase by almost $2 million at the end of 2004-05.  The Town no longer has to maintain a reserve equivalent to the value of employee leave balances.  As a result, fund balance is at 18% of our budget for 2005-06, higher than the Town policy recommendation of at least 12%.  Preservation of fund balance at about 13.5% would be prudent, because our debt service payments are high in comparison with our total expenditures.  At the time we financed the Town Operations Center, bond rating agencies noted that the Town’s ratio of debt service to total expenditures would increase above the average rate for similar governments with our bond ratings after that new borrowing.  The bond rating agencies will value the fund balance as an offsetting factor when evaluating the overall economic health of the Town.  We expect that a higher fund balance could help us retain our AAA and AA+ bond ratings, which allow us to have a low cost of borrowing. 

 

Nonetheless, the Council could reasonably consider using about $2 million for one-time capital improvements projects or other one-time costs.  Fund balance could still remain at about 13.5% of the budget.  The Council could also consider using a portion of the balance for projects that we might otherwise finance through debt, for example, the possible improvements to the Community Center.

 

Beyond 2006-07

 

The Council will need to continue to review the plan for the issuance of the remaining General Obligation debt of $25 million, authorized in November 2003, along with issuances for planned capital improvements.  If the Council proceeds with the planned bond sale in fall of 2006, we anticipate an additional debt service payment of about $800,000 in 2007-08.  Debt service on existing debt will increase by about $326,000 from 2006-07 as well, since we elected to pay reduced principle on the Town Operations Center debt in the first two years, to ease debt service payments in 2005-06 and 2006-07. 

 

General Fund Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

These additions would require additional revenue of about $3.6 million next year for a total estimate of $48.8 million in expenditures.  We have shown the total revenues available including $2.8 million in fund balance comprised of $800,000 in normal carry-forward and $2 million in a one-time use, with a remaining balance available of $266,000 in revenue over costs.

 

As the Council establishes the budget for 2006-07 other factors would need to be considered.  We have not yet received departmental budget requests; although, we anticipate requests for additional police services for the downtown, additional fire protection services and more complete estimates of the costs associated with the new Town Operations Center.  We also anticipate that additional costs associated with long-range transit planning. 

 

TRANSPORTATION FUND

 

Preliminary Revenue Estimates for 2006-07

A major issue for the Transportation Fund each year is the level of federal operating and capital grants and State operating assistance available for transportation services. Revenue estimates include:

·         Our preliminary estimate of federal operating assistance includes almost flat funding of $1,115,000. 

·         We anticipate that we will receive State operating assistance of $3,396,000 for 2005-06, $896,000 more than we budgeted.  A portion of the increase is one-time and a portion is continuing.  We estimate that in 2006-07 we will receive $2,934,000, an increase of $434,000 over the 2005-06 budget.

·         We anticipate that the University and Carrboro will continue to contribute to the system at current levels. 

·         Our preliminary estimate of total revenues available for next year would be about $12.7 million.

 

Preliminary Cost Estimates for 2006-07

 

·         Estimates include expected medical insurance increase of 11% ($111,000).

 

·         Workers’ compensation increases of 12% over the current year’s estimated actual for a budget increase of $66,000.

 

·         Unemployment costs are estimated to increase by $11,000.

 

·         We have increased the fuel budget from about $1,253,000 to about $1,763,000 ($510,000).  We used a rate of $2.50 per gallon and $2.20 per gallon to cover an anticipated increase in the average cost per gallon for buses and other transportation vehicles, respectively.  Of that total increase, $130,000 is attributable to the additional miles required for six months working from the new Town Operations Center.  We made our calculations using the number of total weekdays for half a year multiplied by the average number of buses leaving per day together with the additional round trip distance (8 miles) from the current site to the new Town Operations Center site.

 

·         We had preliminarily estimated that electricity costs will increase by $63,000 ($12,000 because of price increases, $46,000 for the additional cost for the new Town Operations Center, and $5,000 for transition costs).

 

The total preliminary estimate of costs to continue current routes and fare free service is about $13.2 million next year.  Expenditures at this level could require about $460,000 in additional revenue of which approximately $154,000 would need to come from the Town with the balance from our partners. 

 

Potential additions to the base budget for transportation include general market and merit adjustments beginning in October of 2006 of about $223,000.  With the addition of the pay adjustments, costs exceed revenues by about $683,800.  If the potential additions were funded, the Town would need to contribute approximately $228,000 and the balance would need to come from our partners.  The Transportation Fund has adequate fund balance at the 12% of budget level, but does not have additional fund balance available for the 2006-07 budget.

 

OTHER FUNDS

Initial review of parking revenues and parking activity for the Town’s off-street parking lots this year indicates that parking revenues would be adequate to cover parking expenses and debt service.  However, Parking Lot 5 is expected to close in early 2007.  We estimate that we will forgo approximately $130,000 in revenue from the lot in 2006-07.  We have calculated that some of the current use will go towards filling other lots and on-street parking at a higher rate than we currently have.  Since we do not have a regular lot attendant, we do not anticipate a significant cost reduction associated with closing Lot 5.

For the Town’s public housing program, we expect a reduced subsidy in 2006-07.  Estimation is made more difficult, because the federal government is requiring a new budgetary year for public housing.  The federal subsidy will be determined on a calendar year basis; although we will continue to budget on a fiscal year basis.  As a result, we may need to amend the public housing budget mid year, when we learn of the amount of the subsidy for public housing for the second half of the fiscal year. 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.      Article on Bond Strategists: Top Forecaster Sees U.S. Recession from Bloomberg.com, January 2, 2006 (p. 8.1).

2.      General Fund Preliminary Revenue Estimates for 2006-07 (p. 10).

3.      General Fund Preliminary Cost Estimates for 2006-07 (p. 11).

4.      Transportation Fund Preliminary Revenue Estimates for 2006-07 (p. 12).

5.      Transportation Fund Preliminary Cost Estimates for 2006-07 (p. 13).

6.      General Fund Projections 2005-06 to 2009-2010 (p. 14).