AGENDA #13
MEMORANDUM
TO: |
Roger L. Stancil, Town Manager |
FROM: |
Bruce Heflin, Assistant Town Manager |
|
Bill Webster, Interim Director of Parks & Recreation |
SUBJECT: |
Revised Phasing Plan for the Southern Community Park Project |
DATE: |
January 8, 2007 |
PURPOSE
Adoption of the attached resolution would establish a new phasing plan based on a construction and contingency budget of $3,568,000. The resolution would also authorize the Town Manager to re-bid the Southern Community Park project based on the Council’s priorities.
BACKGROUND
In 1986, and 1989, Chapel Hill voters approved parks bonds, portions of which were used to purchase the Southern Community Park property. In 1997, and 2001, Orange County voters approved parks bonds that included funds designated for the Southern Community Park.
In July 2000, the Town Council appointed the Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee. On March 25, 2002, the Town Council adopted the Report of the Southern Community Park Conceptual Plan Committee and directed the Town Manager to prepare an implementation plan. The Orange County Board of Commissioners adopted the park Concept Plan on March 5, 2003.
On May 9, 2005, the Council approved the Special Use Permit application for the Southern Community Park, which included an expanded parking lot and traffic calming on Dogwood Acres Drive. The Council also stipulated that the traffic calming plan for Dogwood Acres Drive be approved by the Council.
On January 9, 2006, the Council considered a traffic calming plan for the Town-maintained section of Dogwood Acres Drive at the proposed Southern Community Park. The Council received a petition asking that a number of issues related to parking and safety on Dogwood Acres Drive be considered. The Council postponed action and asked advisory boards to consider the traffic calming plan.
In April 2006, the Town received revised cost estimates for the park that indicated a rise in prices by about 30 percent since the previous cost estimate was completed in December 2004.
On April 13, 2006, the Project Planning Committee discussed the concerns of residents and the revised cost estimates. The Committee agreed to recommend that the Council revise the project’s parking and phasing plans.
On April 24, 2006, the Council adopted a new phasing plan and tentative budget for the Southern Community Park based on updated cost estimates.
Six bids were received and opened on August 31, 2006. All bids were substantially higher than the project’s budget. On December 4, 2006 the Council rejected all bids for construction of the project.
DISCUSSION
Current Phasing Plan: When bids were opened in August 2006 the low bid for the current phase one exceeded the available budget for the project by around $1,400,000. The current phase one plan includes the following features:
Recommended Phasing Plan: We have hired an independent cost estimating and value engineering firm to evaluate the building program in relation to the budget. We are currently reviewing the engineering firm’s full list of recommendations. However, based on our review of its major recommendations we believe that the following revised phasing plan would allow us to build a project that could be built within the project’s established construction and contingency budget of $3,568,000.
We would also bid as add alternates the following features:
The major changes in this recommended plan include the following:
Parks and Recreation Trust Fund Grant: The project budget includes a $500,000 grant. We believe that this grant could be endangered if we fail to build the greatest mix of recreation amenities possible. State staff that administer the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund grant have advised us that it would be better to build one each of the various recreational elements even if identified Town needs would indicate a preference to build more of one type of facility. The need to preserve the grant resulted in our recommendation to build only one basketball court and one athletic field in order to allow funds to be used for other features.
OPTIONS FOR PHASE
ONE BASE BID OF THE SOUTHERN COMMUNITY
PARK WITH A CONSTRUCTION BUDGET OF $3,568,000
POTENTIAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS |
CURRENT PHASING PLAN |
PROPOSED PHASING PLAN |
40 parking spaces on Dogwood Acres Dr. |
● |
|
110 parking spaces in Northeast portion of Park (no connection to 15-501) |
● |
|
Art |
● |
● |
Restroom |
● |
● |
3 athletic fields w irrigation and fence |
● |
|
1 athletic field w irrigation and fence |
|
● |
Trails including greenway to Dogwood Acres Dr. |
● |
● |
Large picnic shelter |
● |
● |
Meadow Play Area |
|
● |
Dog Park |
● |
● |
Basketball Court (1) |
● |
● |
Basketball Court (second court) |
● |
|
In-Line Hockey Court |
● |
|
Play Area and equipment |
● |
● |
Disk Golf Course |
● |
● |
PROGRAM ELEMENTS NOT INCLUDED IN ANY IDENTIFIED OPTIONS |
|
|
Maintenance Building |
|
|
Lights for Athletic Fields |
|
|
Small picnic shelter |
|
|
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommendation: The Commission met on November 15, 2006 and reviewed the entire park program without the benefit of the most up-to-date cost estimates. Please see the attached recommendations. Instead of recommending a specific phase one program the Commission prioritized the individual program elements. The proposed phasing plan differs from the Parks and Recreation Commission’s recommended priorities in the following key areas, primarily because of the need to address the requirements of the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund grant:
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommended Tier 1 Amenities
Restroom |
Included |
Soccer fields (2) |
One field included |
Grade area for 3rd field |
Included |
Play Area |
Included |
Large Picnic Shelter |
Included |
Portion of the Northern Parking Lot |
Not included |
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommended Tier 2 Amenities
Greenway Trail Extension |
Included |
Basketball Courts |
One court included |
In line Hockey Courts |
Grading included, court as an add-alternate |
Portion of the Northern Parking Lot |
Not included |
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommended Tier 3 Amenities
Third Soccer Field |
Not included |
Dog Park |
Included |
Meadow |
Included |
Small Picnic Shelter |
Not included |
Dogwood Acres Drive Parking Lot |
Not included |
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommended Tier 4 Amenities
Maintenance Building |
Not included |
Budget for the Southern Community Park: The project budget contains revenues from both Town and Orange County sources as follows:
PROPOSED REVENUES
1997 Orange County Parks Bond |
1,000,000 |
2001 Orange County Parks Bond |
2,000,000 |
Proposed Borrowing |
600,000 |
Payment in Lieu Recreation Area |
81,000 |
1995 PARTF Grant |
500,000 |
Sale of Land to Schools |
148,000 |
Reimbursement for Design of Recycling Center |
3,000 |
|
|
Total Proposed Revenues |
4,332,000 |
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Construction and Contingency |
3,568,000 |
Additional Expenditures 1 |
145,000 |
Prior Expenditures 2 |
619,000 |
|
|
Total Proposed Expenditures |
4,332,000 |
1 Includes testing, reserve for playground equipment, OWASA tap fees, and burial of a utility line.
2 Prior expenditures include construction of the Scroggs Athletic/Soccer Field, Southern Community Park concept plan, park design, surveying, and art.
Next Steps: Once the Council adopts a revised phasing plan we would complete our evaluation of the independent consulting engineer and prepare new bid documents based on the Council’s priorities. We would then bid the project as soon as possible, possibly as early as late January or early February. Our goal would be to have a bid opening in late February.
Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommendation: The Commission met on November 15, 2006 and voted unanimously (8-0) to recommend that program elements be built in a priority order, in the event that funds are insufficient to build the entire park. Please see the attached recommendation.
Staff Recommendation: We recommend that the Council adopt the attached resolution establishing a revised phasing plan for the Southern Community Park and authorizing the Manager to re-bid the project.
1. Map of Southern Community Park (p. 8).
2. Parks and Recreation Commission’s Recommendations (p. 9).