An Introductory Discussion of the
Background Information for a Discussion among
Members of
Members of the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of
January 13, 2008
I. Introduction
On Sunday, January 13, members of
the Chapel Hill Town Council, members of the Buildings and Grounds Committee of
the UNC-Chapel Hill Board of Trustees, and selected members of the Town staff
and University administration will meet for an informal discussion of the
University’s plans for
II. Historical Information
A. Previous cycles of planning for
Four University
committees plus committees representing each of Chapel Hill and Carrboro,
working with the firms of JJR Incorporated and Parson Brinckerhoff, produced a
report that considered both the Horace Williams Property and the Mason Farm
Property (including the area containing the
As the main
campus master
http://research.unc.edu/cn/asg_present.ppt.
Reconsideration of the interaction between the status of the HW Airport and any development on the adjoining property led to the creation of a new land use plan in May 2004 that assumed closure of the HW Airport. A PowerPoint presentation of the 2004 plan for Carolina North is available at
http://research.unc.edu/cn/ASG2004.ppt. The Horace Williams Citizens Committee (HWCC)
was formed in 2003 (in parallel with the
Chancellor
Moeser formed the Leadership Advisory Committee (LAC) in early 2006 with University
administrators, faculty, and technical experts augmented by representatives
from Carrboro, Chapel Hill,
B. Master Plan for the UNC Main Campus and
The Master Plan for the UNC Main Campus was first completed and approved in March 2001. The most recently updated version of the Master Plan was completed in March 2006 and is available at
http://www.fpc.unc.edu/CampusMasterPlan/Campus_Design_Guidelines_LowBandwidth/UNC-Update061907.pdf. With approval of the bond referendum in the fall of 2000 and the University’s subsequent allocation of additional funds for new construction, renovation, and infrastructure, essentially all of the opportunities for development on the main campus identified in the Master Plan have been either used or committed. Carolina North represents the primary opportunity for expansion of core University activities. Carolina North also represents an opportunity to extend the University’s research mission, strengthen research connections with the private sector, and enhance contributions to economic development.
The
C.
Community
Input to University’s Planning for
III.
Planning
for
A.
Planning
Initiated by the University
The vision statement for Carolina North developed during the early planning work for Carolina North is reproduced below.
Carolina
North will be first and foremost a campus, conceived in the academic mission
and ideals of the
Carolina
North will best serve the university and the state if it also strengthens the
local community, enhances its quality of life, respects its character and
values, and embraces its spirit of collaboration. Much more than a technology
park or overflow space for main campus, Carolina North will be a tree-shaded
campus for living and learning, where people can live, work and study in one
place. This and other progressive measures will help make Carolina North a
model of sustainability — a campus that is socially, environmentally, and
economically sound.
Rapid
changes in education, research, and engagement mean that the university must
pursue new opportunities in new ways:
In May 2005, May 2006, and September 2007 the University’s Board of Trustees adopted separate resolutions that address Carolina North. Those resolutions are reproduced below.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
May 26, 2005
WHEREAS, Carolina North is The University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill’s planned living and learning campus, designed to expand Carolina’s
multiple missions, boost innovation and redefine the University’s engagement
with the region and the state, and
WHEREAS, the University’s research enterprise already fuels economic
activity for the state, and the University strives to build upon that at
Carolina North, attracting private companies to partner with University faculty
and transforming research into products and services to improve quality of
life, and
WHEREAS, Carolina North will be a catalyst for the economic
transformation of our state, generating jobs and tax revenues, and
WHEREAS, the University values the service its Area Health Education
Centers (AHEC) Program provides to the people of North Carolina and is
committed to maintaining that service, and
WHEREAS, the University has conducted an extensive study to identify
alternative airport sites for Medical Air Operations and has determined that
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
strongly endorses the vision for and urgency of Carolina North as being
critical to the education, research and service missions of the University and
to the economic well-being of the state, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees affirms and values the services that
the Area Health Education Centers (AHEC) provides to the people of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees believes that the continued long-term
use of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the University pledges its willingness to assist a sponsor in
a search for a new airport.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF
May 25, 2006
In response to the presentation and discussion concerning
Carolina North at yesterday’s Board meeting, Mr. Perry, Chair of the Buildings
and Grounds Committee, moved approval and adoption of the following resolution.
Mr. Burnett seconded the motion and it carried.
WHEREAS, Carolina North is The University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill’s planned living and learning campus, designed to
expand Carolina’s multiple missions, boost innovation and redefine the
University’s engagement with the region and the state, and
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2005, the Board of Trustees expressed by
resolution its support for Carolina North, and
WHEREAS, the Chancellor has established the Carolina North
Leadership Advisory Committee to provide the University with a wide cross
section of community thought on the principles that should guide the University
in preparing for the development of Carolina North, and
WHEREAS, in addition to representatives from the three
local governments and other community leaders, several representatives from our
Board of Trustees (specifically Trustees Perry and Winston, with Trustee
Burnett serving as an alternate) serve on the Carolina North Leadership
Advisory Committee; and
WHEREAS, as previously identified by this Board, there is
now an urgent need to develop Carolina North. Conditions have evolved from 17
years ago, when the University first identified the importance of developing
this tract of land and commenced the planning process for the property. Federal
funding for research is declining and facilities for public-private
partnerships are needed. In addition, there are very few new building sites
still available on campus. And, many of our existing buildings do not lend
themselves to the kinds of faculty interaction, interdisciplinary
collaboration, and government and business engagement that are needed if the
University is to use its resources most effectively and efficiently to address
society’s pressing needs and attract jobs and economic activity to the entire
state.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
reaffirms its commitment to seek out and listen to community input regarding
the principles that should guide the development of Carolina North;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
welcomes the work of the Carolina North Leadership Advisory Committee and looks
to that process to provide important input that will help guide the
University’s development efforts, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
directs the Chancellor to report to the Board of Trustees on the completed work
product of the Carolina North Leadership Advisory Committee at the Board of
Trustees’ March 2007 meeting; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
directs the Chancellor to submit zoning and land development applications for
Carolina North to the applicable local governmental jurisdictions no later than
October 1, 2007.
Mr. Burnett stated that the Carolina North
Resolution may be interpreted as a further commitment of the Board of Trustees
to its obligation of service to the people of the State. Also embodied in the
resolution is an invitation to people in the community to join the University
in expanding efforts in a timely manner.
Chair Schwab expressed agreement with Mr. Burnett’s
statement, and added that it is too important an issue not to take action on as
it relates to the future of the University for the next 50-75 years.
RESOLUTION
September 26, 2007
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2005, and May 25, 2006, the Board of
Trustees expressed by resolution its strong support for the development of a
campus at Carolina North designed to expand Carolina’s multiple missions, boost
innovation, and redefine the University’s engagement with the region and the
state; and
WHEREAS, the Carolina North Plan presented to the Board of
Trustees today is the result of many months of study and deliberation and
incorporates a wide cross section of community input as a result of Chancellor
Moeser’s leadership efforts to engage the community in a dialogue about
Carolina North over the past 18 months. These community discussions have
included the Carolina North Leadership Advisory Committee and the report with
guiding principles it produced; the Infrastructure Workshops that explored
sustainable models of development as a fundamental principle of development at
Carolina North; and monthly community meetings that charted the course of an
evolving land use plan; and
WHEREAS, to meet an urgent need for advancing University
research technologies, on August 10, 2007, the University filed with the Town
of Chapel Hill the initial concept drawings for a special use permit for the
Innovation Center, the first building to be developed at Carolina North; and
WHEREAS, as a follow-up to the application for a special use
permit for the
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
commends the Chancellor for advancing the planning for Carolina North in such
an open and inclusive manner; and hereby approves the Carolina North Plan; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees
approves both the 50-year vision of the Carolina North Plan and the 15-year
Phase 1 segment of the Carolina North Plan and directs the Chancellor to refine
the Carolina North Plan consistent with the Board’s discussion so that at the
appropriate time the Chancellor may present the Carolina North Plan to the Town
of Chapel Hill.
Mr. Winston moved approval of the resolution, which
also approves the Carolina North Plan. The motion approved unanimously.
The report of the LAC was presented to Chancellor Moeser by Professor Ken Broun, who chaired the LAC, at the end of January 2006. That report is included in this briefing book as Appendix B. An appendix to the LAC report presents the principles proposed by the participants for consideration in the LAC process. The complete report is also available on line at
http://research.unc.edu/cn/FINAL_LAC_REPORT.pdf.
The firm of BioHabitats, Inc. was engaged to conduct an ecological assessment of the entire Carolina North property. The purpose of this assessment was to provide advice to the University regarding which portions of the property were most suitable for development and which portions were most suitable for conservation. The Introduction and Conclusion Sections from the final report are included here. The full report is available online at
http://research.unc.edu/cn/ecological_assessment.pdf.
I . I n t ro d u c t i o n
Biohabitats was engaged to perform an
ecological assessment of a tract of land, herein referred to as Carolina North,
owned by the
A. Brief History of
Part of the Carolina North tract was
bequeathed to the
Notable Planning Events
2003
Horace Williams Advisory Committee
worked with Ayers Saint Gross architectural firm to design a conceptual plan for
Carolina North.
Initial planning sessions created
several committees to address specific issues of the project-Executive Committee,
Advisory Committee, External Relations, Infrastructure, New Business
Development, and University Uses.
Town of
2004
The
Horace Williams Citizens’ Committee updated its report.
Ayers
Saint Gross updated its conceptual plan.
2005
Talbert & Bright engineering and
planning firm presented an airport relocation study to the Board of Trustees.
UNC
Board of Trustees endorsed a vision for Carolina North.
B. Scope of Work, Objectives, and Site Description
Biohabitats was retained by Ayers Saint
Gross in July, 2006 to perform an ecological assessment of the Carolina North
property and, based on the ecological, cultural, historic and recreational
characteristics of the site and to determine the suitability of the site to
support development without compromising ecological stability and integrity.
Biohabitats gathered pre-existing data, collected field data, inventoried and characterized the site, analyzed the data and
generated inventory, analysis, and development suitability and resource conservation
maps. Biohabitats used information gathered at a public review meeting on November
6, 2006 to inform the inventory maps. The assessment protocol and subsequent
maps were peer reviewed by university professors and staff on November 28,
2006. Two final public review sessions were held on December 13, 2006.
Biohabitats was assisted in this effort
by the John R. McAdams Company, Inc. (JRM), who identified and documented
federal, state and local environmental regulations pertaining to the site’s
development and identified potential regulatory features on the site. The site
encompasses approximately 1,000 acres. It is located west of
V I I I . C o n c lu s i o n s
Biohabitats
has conducted an ecological analysis and assessment of the Carolina North
property to inform the master planning effort that is currently underway. The
analysis relied on GIS as a powerful tool to compile, analyze and present a
broad set of metrics and associated attributes. Three composite analyses were
developed that can be used to determine areas most suitable for conservation, areas
most suitable for development, and areas suitable for development with
appropriate BMPs or restrictions.
In September 2006, the University initiated
a series of Infrastructure and Sustainable Design Workshops with University
staff, consultant teams and invited community representatives to provide
guidance and input on development strategies for Carolina North. These workshops lasted through February,
2007. The five working groups discussed
principles, strategies, metrics and goals for transportation, natural
habitat/landscape/water quality, water/wastewater/stormwater, building typology
and energy generation/consumption/utilities.
The resulting vision, which continues to evolve, was “Carolina North
will be characterized by continual discovery, assessment, learning, and
improvement. It will increase the
vitality of people, the economy, and the planet, and it will teach through its
activities, processes, and environment.”
The discussions about possible Principles,
Strategies, Metrics, and Goals were integrated across the work groups and
grouped under four major themes: 1) climate, culture and place, 2) climate
neutrality, 3) conservation, efficiency and reliability, and 4) collaboration,
education, training and outreach. These
crossover discussions reflect the integrated planning and systems thinking that
were integral to the University’s approach to sustainability planning. The complexity of these issues and their
interrelated nature challenged the workshop participants to see how each
workgroup’s issues related to the others.
The workshops built a foundation for
sustainability features that will be used in continuing discussion and planning
of Carolina North. As the University
works with the town and other partners, it is expected that the focus will
shift from goals and metrics to implementation and evaluation. To
be the model of sustainability means to lead and innovate, not just follow
today’s norms. This leadership and innovation is also an important part of the
University’s mission.
In January 2007 Mr. Roger Stancil, Chapel Hill Town Manager, provided an update for the Town Council on matters related to Carolina North. (Please see Appendix C for a copy of that report and the associated action by the Council.)
Beginning on March 27, 2007, the University
conducted a total of seven essentially monthly public meetings on the Carolina
North plan for interested members of the community. The purposes were to provide information on
the status of the plan, to provide an opportunity for questions and to gather
feedback that could be used in refining the plan. As the individual summaries below will
indicate, the early meetings also included examples of the programmatic
activities (research and teaching) that are likely to be located at Carolina
North. Participants were encouraged to
complete and submit comment cards at each meeting. All comment cards were transcribed and posted
on the Carolina North web site.
PowerPoint presentations from these community sessions were also made
available through the Carolina North web site.
Community
Meeting 1: March 27, 2007
Two identical sessions, one at 3:30 p.m. and
the second at 5:30 p.m. were conducted at the
The three programmatic presentations for
these sessions are listed below.
The three planning scenarios presented in
these sessions are listed below.
The total footprint in any scenario used only
approximately 250 acres of the site, representing 50 years, and possibly more,
of University development.
Community
Meeting 2: April 26, 2007
Two identical sessions, one at 3:30 p.m. and
the second at 5:30 p.m. were conducted at the
The three programmatic presentations are
summarized below.
The three planning scenarios from the March
community meeting were each presented in modified form. These presentations indicated how they had
been refined in response to feedback received during the first meeting and also
as a result of additional planning work.
These presentations also included overlays illustrating subsystems
within the plans. Examples of overlays
include pedestrian/bicycle access, transportation systems, open spaces, and
provisions for energy infrastructure.
Community
Meeting 3: May 29, 2007
Two identical sessions, one at 3:30 p.m. and
the second at 5:30 p.m. were conducted at the
The total projected development in this
summary was approximately 2.55 million square feet to be built on approximately
65 acres of the Carolina North site.
Community
Meeting 4: June 21, 2007
Two identical sessions, one at 3:30 p.m. and
the second at 5:30 p.m., were conducted at the
The presentation of the planning scenario
covered multiple dimensions of the planning agenda as listed below.
The projected program for Phase I (15 years)
was updated to reflect removal of
Two sets of projections of parking
requirements were presented for the 15-year period covered by Phase I. The first set of projections was based on
recommendations from a consultant to the Town of
Community
Meeting 5: July 31, 2007
One session beginning at 4:00 p.m. was
conducted at the
The presentation included the 50-year
proposed development footprint, the 15-year proposed development footprint, and
the projected program for the first 15 years of development at Carolina North.
Community
Meeting 6: August 28, 2007
One session beginning at 4:00 p.m. was
conducted at the
Community
Meeting 7: October 4, 2007
One session beginning at 4:00 p.m. was
conducted at the
This presentation covered the updated
50-year development footprint, the 15-year development footprint, and the
projected program for the first 15 years.
Revisions to the plan included additional recreation fields and a plan
for early use of undeveloped space for recreation fields that might subsequently
be used for one or more buildings. This
update also included provision for a water reclamation facility located on the
Carolina North development site. In this
way the Trustees and interested members of the community were able to see the
possible evolution in the use of portions of the site over the development
horizon. This presentation also included
examples of road cross-sections for all road types contemplated for Carolina
North as listed below.
These schematics illustrated the integrated
planning for bicycle paths, pedestrian walkways, landscaping with water
management capabilities, and utility corridors.
B. Foundation Studies Conducted
Jointly with the Community
The firm of TranSystems was engaged to conduct a transit study, both to provide input for the Town’s preparation of its 2035 Transportation Plan and to evaluate the transportation impact of Carolina North. This study is under way and is expected to conclude in the first quarter of 2008. Funding for the study is being shared by the Town of Carrboro, the Town of Chapel Hill and UNC-Chapel Hill (the three partners in the Chapel Hill Transit System), and a monitoring committee with representation from each of the three partners is overseeing the work. (Please see Appendix D for a copy of the RFP for this study as well as a status update as of January 2008.)
The firm of
TischlerBise was engaged by the University to conduct a Fiscal Impact Analysis
of Carolina North. This study is under
way and is expected to conclude early in the second quarter of 2008. Funding for this study is being provided by
the University and the work is being overseen by a committee with
representatives from the Town of
IV.
For the meeting on January 13 the
University will present a summary of the Carolina North Plan. The basis for the Carolina North portion of
the presentation will be the material presented to the University’s Board of
Trustees in draft form in July 2007 and then for action in September 2007. When the Board of Trustees reviewed the draft
plan for Carolina North (July 2007), they also approved the site proposed for
the
The main segments of the presentation for January 13 are listed below.
Copies of the presentation will be distributed at the meeting on January 13. Anyone interested in reviewing related background in advance can find material on the Carolina North Plan at http://research.unc.edu/cn/BOT_presentation_sept_07.pdf.
Appendices