AGENDA #5e
MEMORANDUM
TO: Chapel
Hill Town Council
FROM: Chapel
Hill Public Arts Commission
RE: Artist
Selection Policies for Municipal Art Programming
DATE: April
1, 2008
In
response to the Chapel Hill Town Council’s February 25, 2008 petition
requesting information on policies and procedures governing selection for the
Town’s municipal art programming, the Chapel Hill Public Arts Commission offers
this memorandum and the attached documents: the Percent for Art Ordinance
(2002), the Percent for Art Resolution and the Percent for Art Program
Implementation Procedures.
How
much control does the Town currently have over public art programming?
The
Town has almost total control over the programming and activity of the Chapel
Hill Public Arts Commission (CHPAC) and will continue to do so after CHPAC is
brought under Town management upon the hire of the Public Art Administrator
this spring. Since CHPAC meetings are open to the public and Town Council
deliberations are public, there are also many opportunities for citizens to
voice opinions.
- Although
an independent 501c3, CHPAC follows the rules and regulations contained in the
Town Procedures Manual; CHPAC Board Members are appointed by the Town Council.
- Town
appropriations for public art are made in response to a program proposal and
corresponding budget request submitted annually by CHPAC and discussed and
approved by Town Council. Funds under the approved budget are released every
other month in response to CHPAC invoices to the Town.
- CHPAC
is held accountable to the Town Council for its expenditures. Financial reports
are submitted to the Town Finance Office quarterly throughout the year. A
formal report, including a financial report is submitted annually to the Town
Finance Office at the end of each fiscal year. CHPAC is also subject to audits
like other Town departments
How
are Percent-for-Art projects managed and artists selected?
- Percent-for-Art
(PFA) projects are managed in accordance with the directives of the
Percent-for-Art Ordinance, which was adopted by Town Council in 2002.
- The
Town decides which public development projects qualify for one percent for
art and each project must be approved by the Town Council. CHPAC then
works with Town officials and Town staff to draft plans for the PFA
projects.
- CHPAC
prepares a call to artists, which is circulated to local artists and
nationwide.
- Artists
are selected by the Public Art Review Committee (which comprises local
arts professionals, a representative of CHPAC, elected officials, Town
staff and others) and recommended for the approval of the Town Council at
its public meetings.
- Implementation
is managed jointly with the Town.
- All
PFA finances stay under the control of the Town and are not transferred to
CHPAC.
Should
calls for Percent-for-Art proposals be restricted to local artists?
- The
principal criteria in the selection of public artists for projects are artistic
excellence and the ability to realize a successful project. These criteria
respect the interests of Chapel Hill’s citizens as well as its artists.
- Opportunities
for our local artists would be severely limited if other U.S. towns and cities
had a policy of restricting eligibility to their local artists.
- Public
artists, who undertake major projects integral to new developments, require
skills and experience not generally found in studio artists or even sculptors.
These include experience and knowledge of architecture, landscaping and so-on,
since the public art process involves extensive interaction with architects,
engineers, contractors and others whose needs must be met by the artist. This
experience is characteristic of the public artists like Larry Kirkland,
Mikyoung Kim and Janet Echelman who have been awarded contracts for large
projects in Chapel Hill. Few North Carolina artists qualify in this way and few
have acquired the teams needed to implement these complex projects from
conception through installation.
- These
essential elements of success may explain why, of the 67 applications for the
Art Area II commission for the Lot 5 project, only three applicants were from North
Carolina. North Carolina artists had been strongly encouraged to apply and the
RFQ was circulated through local, regional, and state-wide artists’ networks in
North Carolina. Of the four finalists for Lot 5’s Art Area II commission, one
was from Chapel Hill.
How does CHPAC ‘empower’ local artists?
- Of
a total Town appropriation of $150,000 for fiscal year 2007/2008, approximately
85 percent is spent in the Chapel Hill/Triangle area
- Most
CHPAC programs involve local artists (Chapel Hill/Orange County/Triangle area)
- Artist
in Residence (100 percent)
- Community
Art Project (100 percent)
- Exhibitions
(60 percent Chapel Hill/Orange County/Triangle; 40 percent regional or
national). In the past two years 42 Orange County artists were given feature
exhibitions by CHPAC. The Orange County Artist Guild’s total membership is 117
artists, which suggests that the CHPAC has recently showcased one third of the
county’s artists.
- Black
History Month (100 percent)
- Sculpture
Visions (78 percent NC; 22 percent regional or national)
- Percent
for Art: The Town has eight PFA projects that have either been completed or are
in various stages of development. Of these eight commissions, three were
created by local artists.
- By
mobilizing additional citizen volunteers and connecting artists with
communities CHPAC has a catalytic effect on the enrichment of the community
through art
Is Chapel Hill’s public art cost
effective?
- CHPAC
Board Members are volunteers and commit long hours outside meetings to create
and manage CHPAC programs
- The
Commission mobilizes additional volunteers from the community to assist in
managing the Community Art and Artist-in-Residence programs
- Public
art is widely recognized as an economic tool that contributes to making a town
an attractive venue for businesses.
Attachment:
1. Guiding
Documents http://www.chapelhillarts.org/about_documents.php
(p. 3).