to: Roger L. Stancil, Town Manager
from: Dwight Bassett, Economic Development
Officer
Brian Curran, Chief of Police
Carlo Robustelli, Mayoral Aid
subject: Council Petition on Panhandling
date: October 15, 2008
The purpose of this report to respond to Council Member’s Czajkowski petition to Council made on June 25, 2008 regarding Challenges to Downtown, and to provide additional information.
This memorandum includes background information on past efforts to facilitate positive changes on challenges facing downtown. Town Manager, Roger Stancil asked staff members Dwight Bassett, Carlo Robustelli and Chief Curran to meet and work to gather information to present back to Council. The staff, including Terrie Gale, met with Carson Dean and Meg McGurk to discuss and gather information.
The group discussed various reports and documents that address the current downtown issues and would be appropriate to present to the Council, as follows:
The Report of the Homelessness Task Force Report (January 2008) shares a number of statistics on student attitudes and knowledge of panhandling in downtown.
The attached Programming in Chapel Hill shows
initiatives dating back to 1990 when IFC moved their community kitchen and
emergency to Rosemary Street. The Downtown Partnership has lead efforts
to improve the downtown environment for the good of businesses.
In 2006 the Partnership contracted with Master Degree
students from the UNC Department of City and Regional Planning to assess how communities around the country address such issues. This report, “What
to do with Change,” is attached to this memorandum. This report it describes
the measures that other communities such as Burlington, VT and Madison, WI, have taken to improve their downtowns. The group felt it important to point
out two caveats in comparing the efforts of these communities to Chapel Hill:
The downtown street in Burlington, VT where panhandling is prohibited within 15
feet of any doorway is a street closed to vehicles, so that panhandlers
continue to have significant space where they may solicit. 2) Madison, WI is a much bigger community, so that even if panhandling is restricted downtown,
there are other commercial areas where panhandling is allowed. Also, The Madison
Police must also see the panhandling occur and issue a warning before
the panhandler may be charged.
In an email, dated July 7, 2008, Police Attorney Terrie
Gale discusses Wilmington’s (NC) approach to panhandling. She states that Wilmington has far more areas outside of downtown where panhandling is allowed. Asheville’s ordinance is also discussed; its restrictions are similar to Chapel Hill’s
rules for nighttime panhandling, except enforced day and night. Madison’s
ordinance regarding panhandling is also addressed..
The Committee felt that the attached PATH Outreach data also reflected an improving climate for panhandling and homelessness in Chapel Hill. For the FY 2007 to 2008 - 358 homeless people were reached, and 50 of those were enrolled in the PATH program. Of those 50 people, 21 received community mental health services, 5 received alcohol/substance abuse treatment, 40 had housing plans put in place and 11 entered stabilized housing with two people receiving rental assistance.
The attached 2007-2008 CH Police Annual Report show a tremendous decline in the number of panhandling issues reported. The Report shows 28 reported incidents in 2005-2006 and only 14 in 2007-2008. That would equate to a 50% decline between 2005 and 2008.
This information is presented to Council in response to a Council request. It was our directive to gather information and present it back to Council for consideration.
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2008 Homelessness Report (p. 3).
2. Programming 071108 (p. 18).
3. What to do with Change Report – 2007 (p. 22).
4. Email from Terrie Gale, Chapel Hill Police (July 7, 2008) (p. 44).
5. Chapel Hill Versus Madison, WI Panhandling ordinance (p. 46).
6. PATH Outreach Data (New Hope) (p. 50).
7. Police Statistics (p. 53).