AGENDA #4a
to: |
Roger L. Stancil, Town Manager |
from: |
Rae Buckley, Housing
and Neighborhood Services Senior Planner |
subject: |
Response to Orange County Organizing Committee’s Living Wage Policy Proposal |
date: |
April 24, 2009 |
The purpose of this report is to provide an informational response to the Orange County Organizing Committee (OCOC) proposal that the Town of Chapel Hill adopt a living wage of $13.00 per hour for all full-time employees.
On April 17, 2009, members of the OCOC Living Wage Research Action Team presented a request that the Town establish a living wage policy in the FY 2009-2010 Budget consisting of a baseline wage of $13.00 per hour for all full-time employees with an index for automatic annual wage increases.
The OCOC living wage rate proposal is based on the North Carolina Justice Center Living Income Standard rate for Orange County which presents an estimate of the costs for a two person household (one adult/one child) for housing, food, childcare, health care, transportation, other necessities, and taxes. For Orange County the estimated wage is $17.73 per hour/40 hour work week. Please see Attachment 1 for the North Carolina Justice Center’s Living Income Standard for Orange County.
The OCOC living wage rate proposal of $13.00 per hour removes the estimated cost of health care and transportation from the North Carolina Justice Center Living Income Standard rate to reflect the benefits received by Town employees.
Below, we present information about local entities surrounding
Chapel Hill that currently have a living wage policy.
|
Date of Enactment |
2008-2009 Living Wage Rate |
Annual Increase Index |
Durham County |
2004 |
$10.95 |
Automatic index. 7.5% above Federal Poverty Guidelines for family of four. |
City of Durham |
1998 |
$10.95 |
Automatic index. 7.5% above Federal Poverty Guidelines for family of four. |
Durham County Board of Education |
2004 |
$10.95 |
Automatic index. 7.5% above Federal Poverty Guidelines for family of four. |
Orange County |
1998 |
$10.12 |
No automatic index. Raises have been based on the Federal Poverty Guidelines for family of four and adjusted for the Raleigh/Durham Area. |
Town of Carrboro |
2001 |
$10.12 |
No automatic index. Raises have been based on the Federal Poverty Guidelines for family of four and adjusted for the Raleigh/Durham Area. |
The Durham County Board of Commissioners adopted a living wage policy in 2004 that set a minimum compensation rate for employees of not less than seven and one-half percent (7.5%) above the Federal Poverty Guidelines, as defined by the Bureau of Census, for a family of four. The rate is calculated by the County Manager and incorporated into the County’s pay plan on a yearly basis.
The Durham City Council adopted a living wage policy in 1998 that set a minimum compensation rate of $7.55 per hour for all employees except seasonal part-time employees. Since that time, increases to the living wage rate were calculated every other year at 5% above the poverty threshold standards set by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for a family of four. In January of 2009, the Durham City Council adopted a revision to the living wage policy that follows the methodology of Durham County for living wage determinations and increases, setting a minimum compensation rate for employees of not less than seven and one-half percent (7.5%) above the Federal Poverty Guidelines.
The Durham County Board of Education adopted a living wage policy for all full-time employees of the Durham Public Schools in 2004. The policy states that the Durham Public Schools shall use the rate provided by the Durham County Manager and shall be calculated by July 1st of each year.
The Board of Orange County Commissioners adopted a living wage policy in 1998 that set a rate of $8.00 per hour for all employees. Since that time the Board has approved increases to the living wage based on a determination of the Federal poverty level for a family of four as adjusted for the Raleigh-Durham Region based on the American Chamber of Commerce Research Association’s cost of living index.
The Town of Carrboro Board of Aldermen established a living wage policy in 2001, which is currently documented in the Town’s pay plan. The Town of Carrboro follows the methodology of Orange County for living wage determinations and increases, using the Federal poverty level for a family of four as adjusted for the Raleigh-Durham Region based on the American Chamber of Commerce Research Association’s cost of living index.
Below, we present a financial analysis of the OCOC living wage policy proposal.
Position Title |
Number of Positions |
Hours Per Week |
Hourly Wage |
Annual Salary |
OCOC Living Wage Request |
|
|
$13.00 |
$27,040 |
Firefighter, Level 1 & Master |
34 |
56 |
$11.76 - $12.82 |
$34,256 - $37,328 |
Solid Waste Collector |
5 |
40 |
$12.29 - $12.75 |
$25,562 - $26,528 |
Transit Operator I and Service Attendant |
5 |
40 |
$12.43 - $12.90 |
$25,862 - $26,841 |
Construction Worker I and II |
4 |
40 |
$11.70 - $12.90 |
$24,345 - $26,841 |
Lifeguard |
1 |
40 |
$12.90 |
$26,841 |
Total Positions |
49 |
|
|
|
Firefighter Positions: Firefighters work nine or ten 24-hour shifts per 28 days, some of which is spent asleep or “on-call.” Some municipalities create different wage rates to reflect the variation of activity throughout a firefighter’s shift but the Town does not follow this practice.
Consequently, the hourly wage for a firefighter is based on a 56-hour work week, 2,912 hours per year as opposed to a 40-hour per week, 2,080 hours per year position. This calculation difference results in an hourly wage rate for firefighters that is less than the proposed hourly rate of $13.00 per hour. However the annual salary for a firefighter is well above the annual salary generated by a $13.00 per hour position.
We do not believe that the 56-hour per week employees should be considered to make less than $13.00 per hour, however we have provided information and calculations throughout this memorandum for both 56-hour per week employees and 40-hour per week employees.
Average cost per hour of Town benefits for employees earning less than $13.00 per hour |
||||
|
Retirement |
Health (flat rate, no average) |
Life and Disability |
Total |
40- and 56-hour per week employees |
$1.22 |
$3.96 |
$0.16 |
$5.34 |
40-hour per week employees |
$1.26 |
$3.96 |
$0.17 |
$5.39 |
Annual Cost of Employee/Child Health Care to the Town |
Annual Cost of Employee/Child Health Care to the Employee |
Value of Health Coverage Above Salary |
Hourly Value of
Health Coverage Above Hourly Wage |
$10,722 |
$2,477 |
$8,245 |
$3.96 |
Number of Employees |
Hours per week |
Budget Impact |
49 |
56 and 40 hours per
week |
$137,077 |
15 |
40 hours per week |
$13,583 |
Below, we present the FY 2009-2010
budgetary impact of the National Low Income Housing Coalition housing wage that
includes the cost of salary and benefits both 56-hour per week employees and
40-hour per week employees that currently earn less than $15.31 per hour.
Please see Attachments 5 and 6 for a description of this analysis.
Number of Employees |
Hours per week |
Budget Impact |
155 |
56 and 40 hours per
week |
$796,929 |
107 |
37.5 and 40 hours
per week |
$340,273 |
Below, we present a discussion of the OCOC living wage policy proposal that addresses the value of Town employee benefits and the issue of wage compression.
In an effort to make this information more specific to Town of Chapel Hill, the OCOC subtracted the cost of transportation, assuming that an employee living in Chapel Hill would not have transportation expenses because of the Town’s fare-free transportation system. To better represent healthcare costs for Town of Chapel Hill employees, the cost of healthcare that was estimated for a two person (one adult, one child) household was also subtracted from this figure because of the Town’s benefits package. These modifications result in an hourly wage of $13.69. Because of the other benefits the Town provides, the OCOC reduced the wage calculation to $13.00.
Staff Comment: Below, we
present a comparison of the OCOC living wage rate proposal and a comparable
Town wage that reflects the monetary value of the Town’s benefits for a
forty-hour a week employee who earns less than $13.00 per hour.
|
OCOC Proposal |
Town Comparison |
NC Justice Center Living Income Standard |
$17.73 |
$17.73 |
Subtract Transportation |
$1.28 |
$1.28 |
Subtract Health |
$2.76 |
$3.96 |
Subtract Estimate of Town Benefits |
$0.69 |
|
Subtract Town Benefits |
|
$1.43 |
|
$13.00 |
$11.06 |
We have not conducted an analysis of the North Carolina Justice Center’s cost estimates that comprise the organization’s determination of a Living Income Wage rate for Orange County. However, we believe that the Town’s compensation package of both wages and benefits exceeds the value of the OCOC living wage rate proposal of $13.00 per hour.
Regarding the cost of healthcare, we believe that the quality of the Town’s employee healthcare coverage could be valued on the private market at a much higher rate than the cost the Town is able to negotiate with its Preferred Provider Organization.
Staff Response: We believe the issue of wage compression will be most relevant to those employees who earn the same amount or just above the OCOC living wage rate proposal. Employees clustered in this wage group with more experience, seniority, or supervisory responsibility could resent a pay increase that removes the significance of these attributes. This issue would be particularly relevant to departments with large numbers of employees that are clustered in the same wage group.
In the City of Durham, living wage increases also include increases to the wages for employees that are clustered in the same wage group. Doing so increases the budgetary impact of a living wage policy.
The OCOC living wage rate proposal is
based on a wage determined by the North Carolina Justice Center. This amount
could be increased by following the Consumer Price Index. Below, we present
the Consumer Price Index increases for 2002-2008.
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2.4% |
1.9% |
3.3% |
3.4% |
2.5% |
4.1% |
0.1% |
Staff Response: We believe an automatic annual increase to the living wage rate could create additional wage compression issues, especially in flat budget cycles such as FY 2009-2010. Since the employee pay plan is evaluated on an annual basis by the Council, we believe a living wage should be evaluated on an annual basis as part of the employee pay plan.
Staff Comment: We believe that the connection drawn by the OCOC between an employee’s choice of where to live and the Town’s wages is an assumption that leaves out many other relevant factors that affect an employee’s choice of where to live.
We recommend that the Manager consider a Council recommendation to adopt a living wage policy of $11.06 an hour that would establish a living wage for all full-time employees and that the living wage rate be evaluated on an annual basis as part of the employee pay plan.
1. North Carolina Justice Center Living Income Standard, by County (p. 9).
2. Employees Currently Earning Less than $13.00 per Hour (p. 10).
3. 2009-2010 Hourly Cost of Benefits (p. 11).
5. 2009-2010 Budgetary Impact < $15.31 per hour for 40 and 56 hour per week employees (p. 14).
6. 2009-2010 Budgetary Impact < $15.31 per hour for 40 hour per week employees (p. 18).