AGENDA# 1a(2)
BUDGET WORKING PAPER
TO: W. Calvin Horton, Town
Manager
FROM: Patricia W. Thomas, Personnel Director
SUBJECT: Cost Elements of Recommended Pay Adjustments
DATE: May 17, 2000
Cost elements of the recommendations for October 1, 2000 implementation are :
|
Total cost October 1 |
Adjust up to new minimum or new probationary step |
Up to next nearest step (includes flat dollar payment to assure a 4.5% minimum increase is paid) |
1 additional step to relieve compression |
4.5% average merit increase above Job Rate |
|
|
Employees below Job Rate: |
Above Job Rate |
||
General |
$789,000 |
$118,000 |
$372,000 |
$182,000 |
$117,500 |
Transportation |
$242,000 |
$61,200 |
$92,800 |
$ 68,000 |
$20,000 |
Housing |
$42,000 |
$13,200 |
$18,800 |
$ 3,000 |
$7,000 |
Parking |
$15,000 |
$7,500 |
$6,000 |
$ 1,500 |
0 |
Total: |
$1,088,000 |
$199,900 |
$489,600 |
$254,700 |
$144,500 |
Percentage |
|
18% |
45% |
23% |
14% |
The average employee increase to implement the plan is approximately 5.6% in the General Fund. Because positions in the other funds are more significantly behind the labor market, the average increase Town-wide is approximately 6.5%.
I believe it is important to note, however, that about 23% of the recommended increase, or about 1.5% of the 6.5%, is for relief of compression in the pay structure. Reduction of compression has been an important issue for the Council and employees. *
About another 15% of the total, or 1% of the 6.5%, is to bring employee pay rates up to a pay rate more competitive in the local labor market. This, too, is an important objective addressed by the Council. If we are to be able to attract and retain top quality employees, I believe we need to pay wages at least near the top quartile -- 75th percentile -- of the local market.
So, addressing compression and aiming for the 75th percentile of the labor market comprises a significant part of the cost of our recommendations for pay increases this year – approximately 2.5% of the 6.5% average employee increase. The remainder of the cost for increases are attributable to the cost of step / career advancement increases for employees in the Developmental Range and merit pay increases for employees in the Performance Range.
*
Further
reduction of compression by providing an additional step for employees with
5 or more years of service would have
cost another $600,000 and was not recommended
for the Council’s consideration this year.