MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  Mayor and Town Council

 

FROM:            W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager

 

SUBJECT:       Issues for Legislative Discussion 

 

DATE:             February 16, 2001

 

PURPOSE

 

The Town Council has selected the issues listed below as key discussion items for today’s meeting with Senators Kinnaird and Lee and Representatives Hackney and Insko.

 

ISSUES LIST

 

On February 12, the Council endorsed the following list of issues to discuss with the legislative delegation:

 

 

On February 12, the Council also endorsed the Regional Legislative Agenda of the Triangle J Council of Governments, which is attached for your reference (included in Attachment 2).


ATTACHMENTS

 

  1. February 12 Memorandum, “Consideration of Potential Legislative Issues,” (p. 3).
  2. February 12 Memorandum, “Petition Requesting Support of the Regional Legislative Agenda of the Triangle J Council of Governments,” with Triangle J Council of Governments Regional Legislative Agenda (p. 5).
  3. February 16 Memorandum from Mayor Waldorf, “Transportation Funding Options,”    (p. 13).
  4. “Funding Sources,” from the regional transportation study (p. 14).
  5. “Transit 2001” Executive Summary, pp. 12-14 (p. 33).
  6. February 15 Memorandum from Mayor Waldorf, “University Towns and Cities Meeting” with Minutes (p. 36).
  7.  February 11 article from The News & Observer, “Politics, growth, and the ‘Mother, may I?’ rule” (p. 41).

 


ATTACHMENT #1

AGENDA #13a

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  Mayor and Town Council

 

FROM:            W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager

 

SUBJECT:       Consideration of Potential Legislative Issues 

 

DATE:             February 12, 2001

 

BACKGROUND

 

The Council will meet with the local legislative delegation on February 16 to discuss issues for the coming year.  The Council may find it helpful to discuss potential legislative issues at tonight’s meeting, in preparation for the legislative breakfast.

 

The deadline for submission of local bills to Legislative Bill Drafting in the N.C. Senate is 4 p.m. on Wednesday, March 14, 2001.  Bills must be filed for introduction in the Senate by 3 p.m. on March 21.  The N.C. House has not yet adopted its deadline rules. 

 

The tentative Council calendar includes an item for February 26 that sets the scope and calls a public hearing for potential legislative requests.  The hearing is scheduled for March 5.  We recommend adopting the legislative issues that same night in order to meet the March 14 bill-drafting deadline.

 

Part B of this agenda item also includes a separate proposal from Council Member Evans, requesting support of the Regional Legislative Agenda of the Triangle J Council of Governments and a State-wide mandatory program for recycling bottles and cans. 

 

POTENTIAL ISSUES

 

Protecting Town Revenues.  We recommend that the Council ask legislators to protect existing local government revenue sources, including the following:

 

 

This is the basic State-shared revenue list over which the State has control.  In the last fiscal crisis, the State froze the utility franchise tax, intangibles tax, wine and beer tax, and inventory taxes at the then-current levels, and the State retained all the growth in these revenue sources from 1993 until 1997.

 

In addition, Governor Martin attempted to withhold the State fire protection funds for local governments and suspended payments for two quarters. (We were receiving $296,000 at that time.)  However, Gov. Martin eventually reinstated all the payments.  Our fire payments now are $850,000 annually.

 

Opposing Preferential Treatment.  House Bill 4, sponsored by Rep. Bob Hensley of Wake County, proposes providing full retirement benefits to police officers after 25 years of service.  This bill, if passed, would reduce the basic service requirements needed for unreduced retirement benefits from 30 years to 25 years for police officers.  We believe that providing preferential benefits for one class of municipal employees is not consistent with sound personnel management practices.  The N.C. League of Municipalities consistently opposes such preferential benefits.  We recommend that the Council consider opposing this proposal.  

 

Opposing State-Mandated Disciplinary Procedures for Law Enforcement Officers.  House Bill 5, also sponsored by Rep. Hensley of Wake County, would set rules and procedures for how municipalities must handle disciplinary actions of law enforcement officers.  No police officer could be discharged, suspended, or demoted for disciplinary reasons, except for just cause.  According to the bill, local governments would be required to establish procedures that include hearings before a “fair and impartial board of hearing officer,” among other provisions.  We believe that such local personnel decisions should be made at the local level, and that the Town’s policies already include provisions for fair hearings that apply to all employees. 

 

Supporting New Sources of Transportation Revenues.  The Legislature’s Transportation Finance Committee has recommended measures consisting of a 2-cent increase in the gas tax and an increase in various fees that would result in $550 million in new revenues for road maintenance and construction and a Public Transportation Trust Fund.  

 

Recycling of Bottles and Cans.  A mandatory State-wide program for recycling bottles and cans is an issue included in a separate agenda item prepared by Council Member Evans. 

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council consider a list of potential legislative issues for discussion at the Legislative Breakfast on February 16. 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

  1. July 11, 2000 Memorandum from Town Attorney, with information on passage of local bill requests (p. 3).
  2. Resolution Adopting Legislative Program for 1999, with information on legislative action (p.6).

 


ATTACHMENT #2

AGENDA #13b

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  Mayor and Town Council

 

FROM:            Pat Evans, Council Member

 

SUBJECT:       Petition Requesting Support of the Regional Legislative Agenda of the Triangle J Council of Governments

 

DATE:             February 12, 2001

 

The Triangle J Council of Governments has compiled its list of legislative issues for the General Assembly to consider.  A copy of the Triangle J Regional Legislative Agenda is attached.  I request that the Council adopt:

 

 

I have also requested that the issue of State-wide mandatory recycling of bottles and cans be included and added to our list of requests for the legislative breakfast.

 

With the change in our meeting time with the legislative delegation, I will be unable to attend the breakfast on February 16.  

 

SUMMARY

 

The Triangle J Council of Government’s priorities include:

 

Providing Revenue Options for Local Government:  Any local government revenue source that is currently available to one or more local governments in the State should be available to all local governments uniformly throughout the state. 

 

Protecting State-Shared Revenues for Local Government:  Protection of existing local government revenue sources from “degradation” or repeal.

 

Growth Management and Smart Growth Strategy:  A clear and concise growth management policy for the State is needed.

 

Transportation Planning and Funding:  Additional State funding of the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), and local transit authorities, with multi-modal planning for the region.

 

Environmental Issues:  Financial and tax incentives following up on the Ambient Air Quality Act enacted in 1999 to encourage the use of alternative fuels.

 

Affordable Housing:  Recurring funds for the N.C. Housing Trust Fund to provide new home ownership opportunities with affordable rental homes.

 

Electric Utility Deregulation:  Strong concerns about any deregulation of the electric utility industry.

 

ALSO FOR CONSIDERATION

 

Statewide Recycling of Bottles and Cans:  This issue is not addressed in the Triangle J agenda list, but I feel that it is important to keep the issue alive.  Our landfills will not continue to support the current level of discarded recyclable materials, and I advocate State-wide mandatory recycling of bottles and cans.            

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Council adopt:

 

 

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

1.  Regional Legislative Agenda, Triangle J Council of Governments.

 

   


RESOLUTION A

 

A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE 2001 REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE AGENDA OF THE TRIANGLE J COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (2001-02-12/R-16a)

 

WHEREAS, the member governments of the Triangle J Council of Governments have compiled a legislative agenda for the purpose of conveying the information to the General Assembly for its review, consideration, and approval; and,

 

WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill supports the regional efforts of the Triangle J;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill hereby declares its support of the Triangle J Council of Governments’ 2001 Regional Legislative Agenda.

 

This the 12th day of February, 2001.

 


RESOLUTION B

 

A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A STATEWIDE, MANDATORY PROGRAM FOR RECYCLING OF BOTTLES AND CANS (2001-02-12/R-16b)

 

WHEREAS, the State’s landfills will not be able to contain the growing amounts of discarded materials; and,

 

WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill supports recycling of bottles and cans;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill hereby declares its support for a State-wide, mandatory program for recycling of bottles and cans.

 

This the 12th day of February, 2001.


 

Regional Legislative Agenda

2001 Session of the North Carolina General Assembly

Priority Legislative Issues for Member Local Governments of the

Triangle J Council of Governments

 


 


            As the North Carolina General Assembly convenes its 2001 Session the member local governments of the Triangle J Council of Governments have compiled their respective legislative agendas for the purpose of conveying this important information to the General Assembly for its review, consideration and approval.  After taking into consideration the various challenges that will be confronting the legislature during its 2001 Session, it is the intent of Triangle J's member local governments that this Regional Legislative Agenda serve as an aid to the legislative delegations serving Lee, Chatham, Orange, Durham, Wake and Johnston Counties in assisting our cities, towns and counties with their legislative needs.   The following information has been set forth in priority form for this purpose and is supported by an attachment that provides rationale statements, data and other support material:

 

TOP PRIORITIES

 

Provide Revenue Options for Local Government:  In the face of almost insurmountable growth issues demanding local government services within Region J -- transportation, schools, water, sewer, elderly care, public safety, courts, solid waste, etc. --  it is imperative that the legislature provide options to local government to address these needs.  An overarching principle that we propose is that any local government revenue source that is presently available to one or more local governments in the state should be available to all local governments uniformly throughout the state.  Triangle J COG's local governments seek approval of a local option sales tax, impact fees and/or taxes, land transfer fees, increased court cost fees, etc. on a reasonable basis, and, should there be an option provided on sales tax, it is further expected that elimination of the application of this tax to food would be included.  New funding options approved by the legislature would be expected to be subject to final approval by local referendum.

 

Protect State-Shared Revenues for Local Government: While new revenue sources are pursued in an environment of significant state needs due to litigation, natural disasters, and state programs, it is equally as important to local government that existing state-shared local government revenues "e protected from degradation and/or repeal.  Commitments from legislative delegations are sought to protect existing local government revenue sources.

 

Growth Management and Smart Growth Strategy:  Paramount among the issues for Region J's local governments are growth management and "Smart Growth" strategies.  Recommendations have been provided to the state's Legislative Study Commission on Smart Growth setting forth five strategies for the development of a state policy on growth management and regional principles to guide growth.  This incentive based planning partnership calls upon the state to establish a clear and concise growth management policy based on these regional principles and calls for the creation of a "Smart Growth Toolbox" that would extend incentives for implementation of the state's policy.  The toolbox includes a number of inducements such as allowance of the "transfer of development rights," inclusionary zoning and housing programs, expanded local revenue sources for community and regional infrastructure, along with state funding for planning, infrastructure financing, affordable housing, environmental programs, open space/farm land, rural economic development, downtown/main street development, and other economic development incentives. Triangle J COG's local governments seek approval of the foregoing, along with adequate authority and financial support to provide adequate public facilities necessary to any "Smart Growth" strategy and state policy.

 

Transportation Planning and Funding:  Multi-modal planning for the myriad transportation needs of Region J is a substantive issue for the future of our local governments and the region.  Funding of the Transportation Improvements Plan (TIP), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO's), Rural Planning Organizations (RPO's), Powell Bill Funds, local transit authorities and the Triangle Transit Authority are very important, and additional state funding is needed.  Moreover, Triangle J COG's local governments advocate and seek a fundamental change in the state's planning/organizational structure currently in use to allow for more formal input by local government and a funding formula that provides adequate financial resources to address the ever-growing transportation needs of our region. Follow up on RPO legislation is needed to address regional transportation planning needs.  Clearly the challenge for North Carolina is that adequate funding must be provided by the legislature to assure that our state can meet its many transportation needs.  Road and bridge maintenance funding is sought to adequately maintain existing infrastructure.  Additionally, the General Assembly is urged to grant local enabling authority for the use of video cameras for red light violation apprehension and enforcement to any town or city in the Triangle J region requesting such authority.  Finally, it is requested that the General Statutes be amended to require that the N.C. Department of Transportation pay for the non-betterment cost for relocation of city/county utilities that are relocated for a state highway improvement project -- inclusive of regional public utilities. 

 

 

OTHER PRIORITIES

 

Water Quality and Infrastructure:  Long term water quality planning and wastewater treatment needs continue to be important topics for the region. Hydrological modeling in Jordan Lake and protection measures for the Upper Neuse and Cape Fear Rivers are extremely important and will require support from state government.  Support from our local legislative delegations is sought for both financial resources and regulatory control to meet environmentally sound water and sewer infrastructure resources for the region.  Additional funding for the Clean Water Management Trust Fund is also sought.

 

Environmental Issues: Attention to air quality tops the environmental issues important to Region J local governments.  Support is sought for financial and tax incentives following up on the Ambient Air Quality Act (SB 953) enacted in 1999 to encourage the use of alternative fuels.  Linkage of air quality to the "Smart Growth Toolbox" and growth management strategies is important.  Solid waste management legislation is sought to strengthen local governments' role in recycling and authority to charge reasonable fees for recycling activities. Additionally, Triangle J COG's local governments seek funding of the state's Million Acres Initiative, along with other open space and green space concerns, inclusive of increased funding for farm land preservation and other similar economic development activities.

 

Aging and Long Term Care Needs for the Older Population:  Care for the growing population of older Americans within our communities is an integral part of the regional concerns of our local governments.   Triangle J COG's local governments seek appropriation of funds for "Home and Community Based Services" ($15 Million recurring), along with funds for "Senior Centers" ($3 Million).  Additional legislative needs sought during the 2001 Session include enhancements for direct care staff who assist with in-home care and long term care settings to address high turnover rates in care provider settings, statutory provisions defining criminal acts which would preclude long term care facilities from hiring employees with criminal records, and state protection for older residents in adult care homes that house mixed populations  (mental illness with substance abuse).

 

Affordable Housing:  Affordable housing, as an element of land use planning and growth management, is key to quality of life in the region.  Accordingly, Triangle J COG's local governments seek approval of statutory amendments that allow inclusionary housing provisions of the "Smart Growth Toolbox" referenced in the Growth Management Strategies of this agenda.  Appropriations by the General Assembly authorizing recurring funds for the North Carolina Housing Trust Fund to provide new home ownership opportunities, along with affordable rental homes for the disadvantaged are also sought.

 

Economic Development:  Continued financial support of the World Trade Center and its link to the global trade market is sought to assure continued economic vitality for the region.  Over time this support has been as much as $300,000 per year.  State support, in terms of existence and facilitation, of the various Foreign Trade Zones in the region and the state is also encouraged.

 

Electric Utility Deregulation:  Triangle J COG's local governments express strong concern about any decision by the legislature to deregulate the state's electric utility industry.  However, should deregulation occur in North Carolina, legislation should include provisions for local government decision-making authority regarding zoning, land-use controls, etc. and should bar any preemption of traditional local government authorities.  Conservation and emission pollution control requirements on electric generation and distribution must be a part of any deregulation legislation.  Clear authority for local governments to aggregate electric utility services is sought should deregulation occur.

 

Indigent and Uninsured Health Care Delivery Costs:  The influx of immigrant residents into the region has manifested itself in an ever-increasing demand on local health care services; subsequently, county governments find themselves bearing major expenses for indigent and uninsured health care delivery costs.  Accordingly, Triangle J COG's local governments seek legislation to provide state appropriations to finance health care delivery for immigrant residents who are not sponsored, and/or who are not insured regardless of nationality and citizenship.

 

Miscellaneous

Personnel:  Revisions to certain provisions of the North Carolina General Statutes are sought to clarify the application of particular personnel and employee guidelines.  In the general administration of the various aspects of the council of government's business affairs, the Council generally follows the provisions of GS 160A, Article 7, Part 4 regarding personnel for the public employees of the Council.  Language is sought in the 2001 Session to clearly state the authority upon which the Council conducts its business in this regard. 

 

State LRO Funding:  The state has for many years provided an appropriation of a small stipend (currently $55,000 per Lead Regional Organization through the Division of Community Assistance) in support of regional planning and economic development.  Triangle J seeks the continuation and substantial increase in this amount of funding (to $100,000) for Lead Regional Organizations.  Individual units of local government have faithfully enacted release resolutions as required by the appropriation legislation to demonstrate local support.  Based on the performance and experience of over ten years of local government support for this funding, it is further recommended that the need for resolutions to release these funds no longer be required.

 

Triangle J Council of Governments

Mission Statement

 
 

 


To serve as an intergovernmental organization for local elected officials that works proactively on regional issues in order to sustain and improve the quality of life for our citizens.

 


 

ATTACHMENT #3

 

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  Town Council Members

 

FROM:            Mayor Waldorf

 

SUBJECT:       Transportation Funding Options 

 

DATE:             February 16, 2001

 

Attached are two pieces of information that might inform our discussion on new sources of revenue for transportation.

 

Attachment 1 is an excerpt from the transportation study that mayors Coble, Lang, Tennyson, and I have been directing.  (The full brochure is at the printer.)

 

The “New State Funding’ chart reflects revenues that would be generated statewide if the recommendations of the Transportation Finance Study Commission are enacted.

 

The “other funding” charts show what could be raised in the Triangle with various revenue options.

 

The mayors will be visiting Triangle area municipalities and boards of commissioners to present our findings.  We will offer a recommendation and seek advice.  Our goal is to achieve regional consensus on the need for more funding and best sources for revenue.

 

Attachment 2 is an excerpt from the Transit 2001 report, issued in January 1997.  Council Member Brown mentioned this at our meeting the other night.

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

·        “Funding Sources,” from the regional transportation study (p.).

·        “Transit 2001” Executive Summary, pp. 12-14 (p.).