AGENDA #11

 

MEMORANDUM

 

TO:                  Mayor and Town Council

 

FROM:            W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager

Ralph D. Karpinos, Town Attorney

 

SUBJECT:       Supplemental Report on Towing from Private Lots

 

DATE:             January 14, 2002

 

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide additional comment regarding this item, which was deferred at the Council’s November 26, 2001 meeting.

 

BACKGROUND

 

After the Town Council scheduled, for the November 26, 2001 meeting, the proposed ordinance on towing from private lots, copies of the proposed ordinance were sent to a number of individuals and groups who had indicated an interest in the subject matter.  The Mayor and Council have received one written response thus far.   At the request of a member of the Council, this memorandum comments on issues raised by that letter.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Included in the main agenda materials on this item is a November 7, 2001, letter from Dorothy Bernholz, at Carolina Student Legal Services.  The letter discusses a number of issues related to towing of vehicles from private lots.  Her comments and our responses follow: 

 

1.      The comments under the first issue in the letter point out some of the difficulties that have arisen because of encounters between vehicle owners and tow companies both at the scene of an attempted tow and in the Courts.  One of the principal objectives of the attached proposed ordinance is to avoid such encounters by requiring sufficient notice so that citizens are adequately warned and do not park in areas where they can be subject to towing. 

 

The proposed ordinance would make it unlawful to tow from a lot where such notice is not provided.  No current provision of law expressly makes the failure to have a sign prior to towing a code or statutory violation.  Thus, the objective of the ordinance is not to provide a remedy for persons whose vehicles have been improperly towed, but rather to create a situation where citizens are warned so that they do not park in locations where they are at risk of having their vehicles towed at all.

 

Although the Ordinance provides for both criminal and civil penalties, we would expect that the civil process, including seeking a Court Order to require the mandated signs, would be the primary enforcement process used. 

 

2.      The comments under the second issue in the letter suggest that the two different size requirements in the proposed ordinance and State law can create confusion.  To avoid that confusion, we recommend the ordinance be modified to require the same minimum sign size as that required under N.C.G.S. Sec. 20-219.2 (24 inches by 24 inches).

 

3.      Under the second issue in her letter, Ms. Bernholz proposes additional requirements for private property owners beyond those contained in the attached proposed ordinance and beyond those expressly authorized by the local bill enacted last year by the General Assembly. These are not directly related to the concerns that prompted the request for special legislation last year and, thus were not part of the legislative request.  The Council may consider if these are matters it wants to address.

 

4.      Ms. Bernholz proposes that the Council appoint a committee to review issues related to regulation of towing prior to adoption of any new ordinance.  Based on the types of calls that have been received at Town Hall from persons whose vehicles have been towed, as well as the other remedies available through the Courts to persons whose vehicles have been allegedly improperly towed, we do not believe it is necessary at this time for the Council to appoint such a committee or consider the enactment of further regulations.   

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

1.      That the Council receive public comment this evening and consider enactment of the attached Ordinance.

2.      That the Ordinance, if enacted, be modified to adjust the size of the signs required to 24 inches by 24 inches.

3.      That the Ordinance, if enacted, be adjusted to have an effective date of March 1, 2002.

4.      That further consideration of the additional regulations and committee proposed by the letter be deferred to allow an opportunity for the Council to assess the effectiveness of the Ordinance in addressing the issues which prompted the legislative request and Ordinance. 

 

If the Council wishes at this time to pursue the enactment of additional regulations of private towing companies and appoint the committee proposed by the letter, we would also suggest this matter be referred to the Manager and the Town Attorney for a determination of the staffing and budgetary implications and the Town’s legal authority to regulate such matters. 

 

We believe, however, that the Council can still consider the proposed ordinance, with the size correction indicated above at this time.