MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Town Council
FROM: W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager
SUBJECT: I-40 Congestion Management Study, Phase
II Update
DATE:
This memorandum summarizes the status of the I-40
Congestion Management Study. The
consultant has released a set of preliminary recommendations for public comment
on a proposed high occupancy vehicle network and related improvements. It is anticipated that the Durham-Chapel
Hill-Carrboro Transportation Advisory Committee will request public comment on
these preliminary recommendations in February 2002.
In May 2000, Phase I of the I-40 High Occupancy Vehicle/Congestion Management Study was completed. Phase I of the I-40 High Occupancy Vehicle/Congestion Management Study was intended to identify and provide preliminary analysis of transportation strategies designed to relieve congestion in the Research Triangle region. The I-40 Study was funded by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
The I-40 High Occupancy Vehicle/Congestion Management Phase I Study reviewed several strategies and recommended the following strategies be included for more detailed analysis in the Phase II Study:
·
Traditional Capacity Improvements-general widening for all traffic.
·
High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes-lanes restricted to use by vehicles with 2 or more
occupants
·
High Occupancy Toll Lanes-High occupancy vehicle lanes that allow single
occupant vehicles at certain times of day but charge a toll to those vehicles.
·
Public Transit-express buses operating along the I-40 corridor.
·
Intelligent Transportation Systems-Systems designed to provide motorists with
real time data about congestion and operating conditions.
·
Freeway Management-Improving freeway capacity through operational improvements.
·
Transportation Systems Management-Small scale operational improvements such as
signal timing, designed to improve peak hour capacity.
·
Transportation Demand Management-Employer based efforts to encourage employees to
use alternative modes of transportation.
The Phase I Study recommended that the following
strategies not be included in the Phase II analysis:
·
Toll Road-Charging a fee to use the highway
·
Truck Lanes-Restricting trucks to limited lanes during peak periods
·
Express Lanes-Identifying lanes for through traffic only.
·
Ramp Restrictions/Closures-Limiting traffic entering highway at on ramps to
improve the peak period congestion.
·
Congestion Pricing-Charging a variable fee to use the highway during peak periods.
Phase II of the I-40 Congestion Management Study was
initiated in August,2000. The consultant
team of Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas completed a preliminary
evaluation in November,2001. Public
meetings were held in early December in
The consultants analyzed traffic conditions
anticipated in 2025 along major corridors within the
The consultants also evaluated the feasibility of
implementing high occupancy vehicle lanes along several major corridors and
assessed the overall impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on future
congestion. The analysis found
significant portions of the road network, over 100 miles, able to support high
occupancy vehicle lanes (Attachment 1). They determined that full implementation of
high occupancy vehicle lanes would result in a reduction of hours of delay in
2025 from 366,000 to 297,000.
The consultants also identified which corridors
could support high occupancy vehicle lanes in 2005 and 2015 (Attachments 2 and
3). Portions of I-40, from NC54 to the
Johnson County line and I-540 could support high occupancy vehicle lanes in
2005 and 2015.
Given the limited funding available to construct
high occupancy vehicle lanes the consultant has recommended an initial 2025
system for high occupancy vehicle lanes. This network would include I-40 from
The consultant also prepared a “bottleneck”
analysis, reviewing the impact of making improvements at key interchanges along
I-40 to improve traffic flow. The consultant found that improvements to the
The consultant’s preliminary recommendations for the
implementation of a high occupancy vehicle lane system along I-40, from
It is anticipated that the Durham-Chapel
Hill-Carrboro Transportation Advisory Committee will review the results of the
preliminary analysis and recommendations in
February 2002. We expect that the
Transportation Advisory Committee will request public comment on the
preliminary recommendations. At that
time the Council could provide specific comments to the Transportation Advisory
Committee. The consultant expects to
continue with preliminary engineering during this period and prepare a draft
and final report in May 2002.
1. Map of 2025 HOV Coridors (p.
4).
2. Map of 2005 HOV Corridors
(p.5).
3. Map of 2015 HOV Corridors
(p.6).
4. Recommended Initial 2025 HOV
System (p.7).