Table 7.
Goals Assessment
SOURCE |
EXISTING GOAL STATEMENTS |
EFFECTIVENESS FOR MITIGATION |
The Comprehensive Plan presents guidelines for urban services |
The comprehensive plan outlines goals, objectives, and |
|
Comprehensive Plan |
and rural buffer zones, conservation of Chapel Hill’s natural |
implementation strategies. This plan allows the town to |
|
setting, and the establishment of greenways and bike trails. |
make guidelines that best benefit Chapel Hill. |
|
|
This utility will finance and manage stormwater runoff, soil |
Chapel Hill |
Adopt a dedicated source of funding for stormwater management |
erosion, and sedimentation control in Chapel Hill. This will help |
Comprehensive Plan |
no later than 12/1/2004 |
mitigate flood problems caused by unmaintained or failing |
|
|
stormwater infrastructure. |
|
|
The guidelines are clearly defined. However, there is concern |
The purpose of the Development Ordinance is to protect the health |
with the RCD which permits streets "where there is a practical |
|
safety and welfare of the town and its surrounding area. This is to |
necessity." Some of the regulations may allow too much leeway. |
|
be accomplished through zoning regulations and restrictions in |
Still, town zoning sets very important standards and guidelines |
|
|
Chapel Hill |
for future development. The revised Development Ordinance |
|
|
will address more stringent RCD and stormwater management |
|
|
guidelines. |
1998 Chapel Hill |
|
The plan incorporates other ordinances such as the RCD into its |
Greenways |
The greenway plan provides a direction for the physical |
future plans. The goals are realistic, realizing potential problems |
Comprehensive |
development of the greenway system. |
as well as making important recommendations pertaining to land |
Master Plan |
|
acquisition. This plan provides the best alternative to |
|
|
conventional development. |
Table 7. (continued)
Goals Assessment
SOURCE |
EXISTING GOAL STATEMENTS |
EFFECTIVENESS FOR MITIGATION |
|
||
|
The University is committed to a development plan that prevents |
The Town may rely on the University to maintain or decrease the |
|
||
any increase in the volume of stormwater runoff leaving |
amount of runoff in transition areas between Town property and |
|
|||
the campus, the rate at which runoff leaves the campus, or the |
University property. The Town may also analyze mitigation |
|
|||
pollutant load conveyed in that runoff. |
ideas used by the University plan (i.e. porous pavement |
|
|||
|
|
installation, rainwater collection systems, vegetated roofing). |
|
||
Capital |
The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) is a financial plan for the |
The Town can use the CIP to identify specific funding amounts |
|||
Improvements |
Town's major capital and infrastructure needs. The CIP identifies |
and sources for mitigation projects over the next 15 years (see |
|||
Program |
capital needs, establishes priorities, identifies potential funding |
Table 4 for individual funding sources.) |
|||
(2001-2016) |
sources and includes needs for which sources have not been |
|
|||
|
identified. |
|
|||
This program is an attempt to provide relief for flood victims by |
Through this program, incentives and funding is available to the |
||||
endorsing management that will increase the community’s |
Town to protect itself from future flooding damages. |
||||
protection from flood damages. |
|
||||
|
|
||||
Project Impact seeks to assist communities in becoming disaster- |
This funding could be very useful to reduce losses for the Town, |
||||
|
resistant and thereby minimizing flood losses. |
but mitigation options will be approached from a regional |
|||
|
|
perspective. |
|||
|
Under the CRS, flood insurance premium rates are adjusted to |
||||
System- National |
CRS is another government program that recognizes and |
reflect reduced flood risk resulting from community activities that |
|||
Flood Insurance |
rewards actively mitigating communities. |
meet the goals of the CRS: (1) reduce flood losses; (2) facilitate |
|||
Reform Act 1994 |
|
Accurate insurance rating; and (3) promote the awareness of |
|||
|
|
flood insurance. |
|||