MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD BY
THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, MONDAY, APRIL 22, 1991
AT 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Howes called
the meeting to order.
Council Members in
attendance were Julie Andresen, Joyce Brown, Joe Herzenberg, Nancy Preston,
Alan Rimer, Arthur Werner and Roosevelt Wilkerson. Council Member James C. Wallace was absent excused. Also in
attendance were Assistant to the Mayor Lisa Price, Town Manager Cal Horton,
Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and Florentine Miller, Public Works
Director Bruce Heflin, Planning Director Roger Waldon, Assistant to the
Attorney Richard Sharpless and Town Attorney Ralph Karpinos.
Item 1 - Ceremonies
Mayor Howes
recognized the distinguished military service of Second Lieutenant Matthew
Karres. Mayor Howes expressed the
community's appreciation for Mr. Karres' efforts.
Mayor Howes
recognized the community service of Niesha Clark, Phillip Sherman, Theodore
Yawars, and students at Ephesus Elementary School relative to National Youth
Services Day.
Item 2 - Hearings
There were no
hearings.
Item 3 - Petitions
Patricia Davies
request that the Council consider renaming the 751 Pritchard Avenue Extension
housing neighborhood to Umstead Court apartments. She said that such a renaming would give community residents a
better outlook and broader long-term perspective.
COUNCIL MEMBER
WILKERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PRESTON, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MS.
DAVIES' PETITION TO THE TOWN MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Henry Whitfield urged
the Council to maintain twice per week refuse collection as a means of insuring
and maintaining the community's appearance.
Mr. Whitfield said that shifting to once per week collection would
provide negligible estimated savings per residence. He stated that most residents favored the current method of
refuse collection.
COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PRESTON, TO RECEIVE MR. WHITFIELD'S
PETITION. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Pauline Grimson
stated that approximately seventy residents of her neighborhood had signed a
petition concerning the University's plans to site a power line. Ms. Grimson said that procedures permitting
the University to dig up area streets for this purpose were being
questioned. She stated that a public
comment forum should be held during the planning stages of the proposed project.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE TOWN
MANAGER.
Council Member
Andresen said she hoped that such public discussions would be permitted on the
matter. Council Member Rimer suggested
that the Town staff examine all utility processes relative to siting of
facilities.
THE MOTION WAS PLACED
ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
David Biggs,
representing the Student Environmental Action Coalition, stated that a public
forum on the University's proposed land-use plan would be held on Tuesday,
April 30th at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber. He urged Council Members and citizens to attend the forum. Mayor Howes thanked Mr. Biggs for notice of
the meeting.
Ben Perry provided a
brief overview of his father's career in the Town's fire service, noting that
he faithfully served the community for thirty years. Mr. Perry said it was appropriate to name a fire facility in his
father's honor. He also provided
several examples of Town facilities named after former Town officials.
COUNCIL MEMBER
PRESTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE
TOWN MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Council Member Brown
suggested that the Council encourage the University's more active involvement
in a traffic reduction study to be coordinated by the Town's Transportation
Board. Council Member Werner suggested
that the Mayor write a letter to University officials encouraging their involvement. Mayor Howes said he would do so.
Council Member Brown
requested a report from the staff concerning the naming of the entry road to
the Friday Continuing Education Center as Laurel Hill Parkway. Mr. Horton said that information on this
matter could be provided to the Council.
Council Member Rimer noted that many different materials had been
printed with the Laurel Hill Parkway roadway designation.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRESEN, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE TOWN
MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
Council Member Brown
noted that the week of April 21st was alternative transportation week. She encouraged citizens to use such means of
transportation.
Mayor Howes noted
that Apple Chill had been postponed to April 28th due to inclement
weather. He also noted that a ceremony
and celebration by the Soviet Sister Cities program would be held in the
Council Chamber on April 28th at 3:00 p.m.
Council Member Werner
said he thought it would be inappropriate for the Town to continue its Chamber
of Commerce membership in the event that the Chamber chose to form a political
action committee. Mayor Howes said it
would be appropriate to further discuss the matter at a budget work
session. He added that a formal
resolution on the matter could be brought before the Council. Council Member Andresen said that the matter
needed to be discussed further by the Council.
Council Member Wilkerson noted that he had inquired how the matter might
be handled. Mr. Horton said that the
main question was whether the Town as a body should continue to be a member of
the Chamber. Council Member Rimer said
he was opposed to the Chamber's political action committee concept. Noting the good works of the Chamber, he
said that the Council had no choice but to withdraw the Town's membership if a
political action committee were formed.
Item 4 - Minutes
Council Member
Preston requested two modifications to the minutes of March 25th.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PRESTON, TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF
MARCH 25TH AS AMENDED. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Council Member
Herzenberg requested two modifications to the minutes of April 2nd.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON, TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF
APRIL 2ND AS AMENDED. THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Council Member
Preston requested two modifications to the minutes of April 4th.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER, TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF
APRIL 4TH. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
PRESTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF APRIL
8TH. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
Item 5 -
Chapel Hill North Special Use Permit Request
Planning Director
Roger Waldon noted that Council Member Wallace had requested that a memorandum
on this matter be distributed to the Council in his absence. Mr. Waldon said that the staff continued to
recommend the adoption of Resolution 1a with conditions. He briefly reviewed the changes in the
staff's recommendation.
Council Member
Andresen inquired how funds for the traffic signal at Eubanks Road and NC 86
would be maintained, in the event that the Department of Transportation elected
not to install the light in the near term.
Mr. Waldon said that one of the proposed conditions of approval provided
that the Town would hold these funds until necessary warrants were met or until
three years after project completion.
Mr. Horton noted that the Town had received a letter from the North
Carolina Department of Transportation stating that three warrants were
currently met. He added that the
Department preferred to have more than one warrant met prior to the
installation of a signal.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1A.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED TO ADD A STIPULATION THAT THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NOT EXCEED THE
NUMBER STIPULATED IN THE TOWN'S DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. THE MOTION DIED FOR LACK OF A SECOND.
Council Member Werner
noted that the Council had previously discussed the possibility of limiting
hours at the proposed service station.
Mr. Horton said that there was no reasonable basis in the Town's
land-use regulations to limit hours for this type of business. Council Member Preston noted that the
Planning Board's recommendation was to limit hours at the service station. She inquired what hours were
recommended. Mayor Howes said the hours
of 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. were recommended.
Council Member Preston noted that a random sampling of Town service
stations found that at least two such facilities were open twenty-four hours a
day.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
AND COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER ACCEPTED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION 1A TO
LIMIT HOURS OF SERVICE STATION OPERATION TO 6:00 A.M. TO 11:00 P.M.
Town Attorney Karpinos
said that based on his research, it would not be advisable for the Council to
have a condition limiting hours of operation in the special use permit. Council Member Rimer inquired whether the
Council's concern for the safety of convenience store employees would be a
defensible legal argument. Mr. Karpinos responded that if the Council chose to
include the condition, this could be one possible defense argument. Council Member Werner added that noise
levels also entered into the proposed condition for limiting hours of
operation. Mr. Karpinos emphasized the
need to have as many defensible reasons as possible on the record in order to
defend the proposed condition of approval.
Council Member
Andresen said that if the service station were approved, it would be preferable
to limit its hours of operation.
Council Member Andresen stated that the proposed development would have
a substantial impact on the adjoining Northwood neighborhood. She noted safety and appropriateness
concerns about siting a service station in such close proximity to an existing
neighborhood. Council Member Andresen
expressed her support for a condition to prohibit the inclusion of a service
station in the Chapel Hill North development.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO MODIFY PROPOSED CONDITION NUMBER
TWENTY-ONE, LIMITING SERVICE STATION HOURS OF OPERATION TO 6:00 A.M. TO 11:00
P.M.
Council Member
Herzenberg noted that a service station/convenience store on West Rosemary
Street remained open all night without causing any major problems. Council Member Wilkerson noted that their
had been some incidence of robbery and other crime at the facility.
THE MOTION TO AMEND
RESOLUTION 1A TO LIMIT SERVICE STATION HOURS WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND
ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 7-1, WITH MAYOR HOWES VOTING NO.
COUNCIL MEMBER
ANDRESEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN TO AMEND RESOLUTION 1A TO NOT
PERMIT SITING OF A SERVICE STATION ADJACENT TO AN EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MOTION FAILED TO PASS BY A TIED VOTE OF
4-4, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN, BROWN, HERZENBERG AND WILKERSON SUPPORTING
THE MOTION.
Council Member Rimer
inquired whether condition number twenty-one would require the installation of
double-walled tanks at the service station.
Mr. Waldon said yes.
Council Member Brown
inquired how federal environmental protection regulations were enforced. Mr. Horton responded that as many of these
regulations as possible were enforced by the Town and other local and state agencies. Council Member Rimer noted the important
role of the state in enforcing environmental regulations such as those
affecting underground storage tanks.
Mr. Horton noted that
the conditions for designing and constructing a park and ride lot were still
tenuous, with no reliable source of funding identified. Mayor Howes noted that the proposed
conditions of approval contained limited language about a proposed park and
ride facility. Mr. Horton said that
stipulation twenty provided that space could be provided for a park and ride
lot or additional office space in the future.
Council Member
Wilkerson inquired about material differences between the special use permit
proposal and the Council-approved master use plan. Mr. Horton responded that the special use permit application
substantially conformed to the original master use plan. Council Member Wilkerson inquired about the
defensibility of a denial of the permit request. Mr. Horton said that the Council would be well-justified in
approving an application where the special use application substantially
conformed to the master land-use plan.
He noted that such a condition could be similarly overturned by the
Council's broad powers in land-use matters.
Council Member
Wilkerson expressed concern that the Council had been placed in an
uncomfortable position of making a decision based on sketchy information at the
master use plan stage. Council Member
Andresen said that the proposed shopping center had appeared desirable in the
proposed master plan, while the proposed high-rise structures did not. She inquired about the possibility of the
Design Review Board reviewing the application.
Mr. Horton responded that there would be no difficulty in routing the
application materials to the Board for its review and consideration. Mr. Karpinos noted that this arrangement
could be accommodated in proposed condition of approval number
thirty-five. Council Member Rimer said
that such an arrangement would work to the applicant's advantage.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
AND COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER AGREED TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT CONCERNING DESIGN
REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION.
Council Member Rimer
noted that the Chapel Hill North application had been submitted during his
tenure on the Town's Planning Board. He
said that there had not been much change in the master plan since its original
submittal. Council Member Rimer
stressed the need for public participation safeguards as early in the
development review process as possible.
RESOLUTION 1A AS
AMENDED WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 5-3, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN, BROWN AND
WILKERSON VOTING NO.
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CHAPEL HILL NORTH PHASE I (SUP
17-10) (91-4-22/R-1a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Chapel Hill North
Phase One development, proposed on property identified as Chapel Hill Township
Tax Map 17, Lots 10, 11, and 38, if developed according to the overall site
plan (sheet SP-3), site circulation plan (sheet SP-4), storm drainage plan
(sheets C2-A, B, and C), utility plan (sheets C3-A, B, and C), site plan
(sheets C4-A, B, and C), tree protection plan (sheet L-1), overall landscape
plan (sheets L-2, 3, and 4), detailed landscape plan (sheets L-5 and 6), and
buffer sections (sheet L-7), all dated
July 31, 1990 (revised November 1, 1990) would:
1. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
2. Comply
with all required regulations and standards of the Development Ordinance,
including all applicable provisions of Articles 12, 13 and 14, and with all
other applicable regulations;
3. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the
value of contiguous property, or be a public necessity; and
4. Conform
with the general plans for the physical development of the Town as embodied in
the Development Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan.
These findings are
conditioned on the following:
1. That
construction begin by April 22, 1993 (two years from the date of the Council
approval) and be completed by April 22, 1999 (eight years from the date of the
Council approval).
2. That
the 12-inch ductile iron water line on NC 86 be extended across the entire NC
86 frontage. Final detailed plans for
this and all utility extensions and improvements shall be submitted to Orange
Water and Sewer Authority, the NC Department of Transportation, and the Town
Manager for approval prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
3. That a
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for the entire 40-acre tract, based on
the Town's Hydros computer model, be approved by the Town Manager prior to
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit for Phase I.
4. That
the stormwater detention/retention facilities be designed so that:
-no
encroachment into required landscape buffers is necessary
-several
smaller detention facilities will be located throughout the site
5. That
Sheets SA-16, SP-2, and L-4 be revised to show only three points of access, two
from NC 86 and one from Weaver Dairy Road.
The "right-in/right-out only" access on NC 86 (shown directly
across from Northwood Drive) should be deleted.
6. That
Perkins Drive and one of the access drives off NC 86 be redesigned as one
curved continuous public street.
7. That
the site design be adjusted to allow a transit route which extends up to the
main buildings. The Town shall accept
maintenance of the route through dedication or through maintenance agreements
with access easements.
8. That
the right-of-way for Perkins Drive be dedicated before issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit for the phase of development which includes that portion of
the site. The right-of-way can be
dedicated either along the existing Perkins Drive alignment, or entirely on
Chapel Hill North property.
9. That
the southernmost entrance (right-in, right-out only) to the bank/office
building off Perkins Drive be omitted from the plans unless a raised island is
constructed in the exit to discourage left-turn movements.
10. That
Perkins Drive and one of the access drives from NC 86 be dedicated as public
street(s), designed and constructed to Class C standards, to withstand transit
service. These streets are to be
accepted for maintenance by the Town.
Pavement design should be based on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests,
but must meet or exceed Town standards.
The cross-sections are to include sidewalks. The Perkins Drive cross-section shall include sidewalk only on
the west side of the drive.
11. That
one of the following options be used for the northernmost entrance off NC 86:
-prohibit
drive cuts less than 250 feet from the NC 86 right-of-way, or
-install
a raised median which would prohibit left-turn movements from the entrance
drive for the same distance
12. That
one of the following options be used for the southern entrance from NC 86:
-close
the gas station access closest to NC 86, or
-install
a raised median which would prohibit left-turn movements from the entrance
drive, or
-provide
four 12-foot lanes, one of which would be a left-turn lane into the gas station
entrance
13. That
the entrances off NC 86 have a separation of at least 500 feet.
14. That
the northernmost entrance off NC 86 be at least 600 feet south of the Eubanks
Road intersection.
15. That
main parking areas and drive aisles be constructed to Town standards. Designated overflow parking areas may be
constructed of semipermeable materials such as turfstone.
16. That
the following roadway improvements be made:
a)NC 86
1.That
additional right-of-way to create a 100-foot right-of-way to accommodate four
through travel-ways, curb and gutter, left turn lanes, bike lanes, and sidewalk
be dedicated along this site's frontage.
2.That
1.5 lanes of additional travel-way (18 feet) and four feet of bike lane with
30" curb and gutter be constructed along this site's frontage.
3.That
a five-foot sidewalk be constructed along this site's frontage.
4.The
project developer shall provide a payment-in-lieu or letter of credit for the
installation of traffic-actuated traffic signals at the intersections of the
main road entrance or the northern entrance, and at the intersection of NC 86
and Eubanks Road. The letter of credit
or payment-in-lieu will be held by the Town until a traffic signal(s) is
warranted and installed or until three years after the project site is
completely developed, whichever comes first.
The traffic signal warrant study will be based on the actual traffic
conditions at the site and not on projected estimates. The determination will be based on the
guidelines of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices published by
the Federal Highway Administration. If
a traffic signal(s) is not warranted, the payment-in-lieu or the letter of
credit will be returned to the project developer. If the actual cost of an installed traffic signal(s) is less than
that amount of payment-in-lieu provided for the installation of that signal(s),
the surplus will be refunded to the project developer.
The
payment-in-lieu or letter of credit shall be in the amount of 100% of the
estimated cost of the proposed traffic signal(s).
b)Weaver
Dairy Road:
1.Dedication
of one-half of a 90-foot right-of-way.
2.One-half
of a 65-foot cross-section (back-of-curb to back-of-curb), plus a 4-foot bike
lane and 30" curb and gutter, be
installed.
3.A
5-foot sidewalk provided along the north side.
4.Design
and improvements to the traffic signal at the intersection of NC 86 to provide
a minimum of an 8-phase operation.
17. That
public improvements that are a part of any phase be completed prior to issuance
of any Certificate of Occupancy for that phase.
18. That
pedestrian-actuated traffic signals and painted cross-walks be provided on NC
86 and Weaver Dairy Road if approved by the North Carolina Department of
Transportation.
19. That no
vehicular driveway or street connection be made to Sedgewood Drive and Old
University Station Road until Sedgewood Drive and Old University Station Road
are built to Town standards and accepted by the Town for maintenance.
20. That if
the park-ride lot is not a component of the development, the area formerly
reserved for a park-ride be accommodated in one of the following ways:
-keep
the 195 parking spaces on the site plan and add a corresponding 30,000 square
feet of office space to the proposed main office building; or
-use
the 195 spaces to serve some of the parking requirements for proposed
buildings, and reduce parking elsewhere on the site. In this case, a direct 1:1 replacement/reduction would not be
expected, since the park-ride spaces were expected to serve double-duty for
counter-cyclical uses. Land not used
for parking as a result of this reduction would be reserved for future
development in a subsequent phase of this project.
21. That
the gas station building, canopy, and site be designed so that tractor-trailer
trucks cannot approach and use the fuel pumps, but so that access is provided
for service vehicles, and that hours of operation for the gas station and
convenience store be limited to daily operation between 6:00 a.m. and 11:00
p.m.
22. That
the underground storage tanks for fuel at the gas station be double-walled and
equipped for interstitial monitoring with an automatic alarm system; or that
they be designed, constructed, and monitored to meet a greater safety rating. The gas station owner shall register all
underground storage tanks and pay annual tank fees in conformance with State
regulations.
23. That
piping from the underground storage tanks be double-walled. Underground piping that conveys fuel under
pressure must be equipped with an automatic line leak detector.
24. That a
monitoring well be drilled on the gas station site. Final plans showing the location and depth of the test well are
to be submitted to the Town Manager and the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural resources, Division of Environmental
Management/Groundwater Section for approval.
Testing shall be conducted at time intervals approved by the State and
the Town Manager, and reports shall be submitted to the State.
25. That
final plans demonstrate that the development meets or exceeds all applicable
local, State, and federal regulations regarding underground fuel tanks and
groundwater protection.
26. That
surface runoff from the gas station be routed to an oil-sand separator for
liquid waste collection, and that the filtered water drain into the sanitary
sewer system for treatment downstream.
The liquid waste must be disposed of in a manner deemed appropriate by
local, State, and federal agencies.
27. That
the site plan be adjusted in the southwest corner of the site to preserve at
least one of the two stands of significant trees, identified as "Stand
#1" and "Stand #2" on the attached blow-up of the overall
landscape protection plan sheet L-1.
28. That
the following features be included in the physical design of the commercial
and/or office areas:
-significant
landscaped pedestrian ways;
-architectural
design on the commercial area to be as pedestrian-oriented as possible,
including building offsets, main entry courts, pedestrian amenities and
appropriate foundation landscaping; and
-appropriate
size, architectural and landscape criteria for any outparcels to achieve
overall consistency and harmony with the overall development.
29. That
landscape islands/medians be at least 8 feet wide for plantings of small trees;
10 feet wide for plantings of large trees; and 12 feet wide if they include
pedestrian paths.
30. That a
bus pull-off area be added at each of the two proposed bus shelters.
31. That a
30-foot corridor be reserved within the 100-foot Interstate 40 buffer for
greenway purposes, in a location identified as part of final plan preparation,
and that the area be labeled on all plans, plats, deeds, and other official
documents, in one of the following ways:
"Dedicated to the Town of Chapel Hill for Parks and Recreation
Purposes Only" or "Public Pedestrian and Non-motorized Vehicle
Easement". A final plat shall be
recorded prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
32. That a
set of landscape and architectural performance standards be developed to assure
general compliance with the Town's Master Landscape Plan for Entranceways
Corridors along NC 86, and full compliance to the Type D buffer, and that the
compliance be demonstrated to the Town Manager and the Appearance Commission
for Phase I.
These
performance standards should address harmonious architectural standards for the
entire project, and architectural criteria for buildings and outparcels, and
how adequate screening of parking and service areas from NC 86 can be
achieved. The standards may
include: terracing or lowering/raising
of parking areas; specific earth berm
designs; specified vegetation; utilization of over-sized vegetation when
appropriate. Landscape plans should
include retention of existing vegetation as buffer material where
possible. Where existing vegetation
cannot preserved, detailed plans for new plantings should be submitted and
approved by the Town Manager and the Appearance Commission.
33. That
the following buffers be installed:
-Type D
buffer of at least 30 feet in width along Highway 86 and Weaver Dairy Road,
with the section of buffer in front of
the gas station expanded to 50 feet in width;
-Type E
buffer of at least 100 feet in width along Interstate 40;
-Alternative
Type C buffers for the south and east sides of the park-ride lot, if a
park-ride lot is developed;
-Type C
buffer of at least 20 feet in width along the other Chapel Hill North
boundaries.
34. That a
Landscape Protection Plan, including a tree survey for the NC 86 buffer, be
approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit. The landscape plan must conform
with the Entranceways Master Plan along the NC 86 frontage.
35. That
the detailed building elevations, lighting plan, landscape maintenance plan and
landscape plan, including the buffer plans, be approved by the Appearance
Commission and the Design Review Board prior to issuance of the Zoning
Compliance Permit.
36. That
the conceptual sign plan be deleted from this application.
37. That
the outparcels be restricted to prohibit fast-food type commercial use, and any
non-banking retail use requiring a drive-through window facility.
38. That a
solid waste management plan, including a recycling plan, be approved by the
Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
39. That a
soil erosion and sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County
Erosion Control Officer before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
40. That
the final utility/lighting plan be approved by Orange Water and Sewer
Authority, Duke Power, Carolina Cable, Public Service Company, Southern Bell,
and the Town Manager, before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit. The developer shall be responsible for
assuring that these utilities, including cable television, are extended to
serve the development.
41. That
any required State or federal permits or encroachment agreements be approved
and copies of the approved permits and agreements be submitted to the Town of
Chapel Hill prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
42. That
right-of-way for the transit route be dedicated to the Town, with the
dedication plat recorded prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit; or
that appropriate access easements and maintenance agreements be approved and
recorded prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
43. That
final plans to be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit (detailed site plan, utility plan/lighting plan, grading and stormwater
management plan with hydrologic calculations, fire flow report) conform to the
approved preliminary plans and demonstrate compliance with the above conditions
and the design standards of the Development Ordinance and the Design Manual.
44. That
the fire protection water supply be upgraded in the following ways:
-all
water lines serving hydrants be at least 8-inch diameter, with a residual
pressure of 20 pounds per square inch and a flow rate of 2,500 gallons per
minute;
-that a
loop system be designed to serve the entire site;
-installation
of automatic sprinkler systems in buildings over fifty feet in height. (Automatic sprinkler systems are suggested
for all other buildings.)
45. That a
Transportation Management Plan be prepared and submitted along with final plans
for any phase involving office uses, and approved by the Town Manager prior to
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
The Management Plan shall follow the general guidelines as presented by
the applicant as part of this Special Use Permit application, and shall
include:
a.Provision
for designation of a Transportation Coordinator;
b.Provisions
for an annual Transportation Survey and Annual Report to the Town Manager;
c.Quantifiable
traffic reduction goals and objectives;
d.Ridesharing
incentives; and
e.Public
Transit incentives.
46. That
the applicant take appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of
wet or dry silt on adjacent paved roadways.
47. That
the continued validity and effectiveness of this approval is expressly
conditioned on the continued compliance with the plans and conditions listed
above.
48. That if
any of the above conditions is held invalid, approval shall be void.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the application for the Chapel Hill
North Phase I Special Use Permit in accordance with the plans and conditions
listed above.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Council Member
Wilkerson said he had met earlier in the day with business persons who had
stressed that the project would be of tremendous quality and beauty if
approved. Council Member Wilkerson
expressed hope that the project's developers would follow through on this
commitment to the Town. Council Member
Wilkerson said he had voted against the proposal due to the inclusion of a
service station.
Item 6 - Deleted
Item 7 - Manager's Preliminary Budget
Recommendation
Town Manager Horton
said that his basic budget proposal would continue current services without the
need for an increase in the property tax rate.
He added that the some new items worthy of further consideration
included the addition of eight public safety officers at an estimated cost of
$312,000. Mr. Horton noted that the
officers would help to reduce current response times and permit staff to do
more traffic safety patrols and other non-emergency tasks. He also noted that the allocation of funds
for a park and ride lot on NC 86 could play a role in reducing the number of
vehicles driving into the community.
Mr. Horton said that these inclusion of these programs would necessitate
a total tax rate increase of two cents, composed of 1.7 cents for the public
safety officers and 0.3 cents for the park and ride lot proposal.
Mr. Horton said that
a number of reasonable assumptions were being made about anticipated budgetary
actions of the State Legislature. He
noted that the proposed budget included $400,000 for continuation of the small
capital improvements program and funding for continuation of the Town's debt
service and performance-based pay plans.
He added that $150,000 was included for low-income housing programs.
Mr. Horton stated
that no increase in bus fares or passes was anticipated. He said that transportation funding of
approximately $1.3 million was anticipated from the federal government. Mr. Horton noted that the Orange County
Commissioners had committed $53,000 for leasing space for a senior activity
center on Elliott Road. He said that
the Senior Center Task Force would do some fund-raising programs to cover some
operational costs. Mr. Horton said that
primary staffing would be provided by the Orange County Department on Aging.
Council Member
Preston inquired whether tax rates for the General and Transportation Funds
were broken out on individuals tax bills.
Mr. Horton said no, noting that these rates were combined into one Town
rate. Mayor Howes said he was
particularly interested in the justification for proceeding with a park and
ride lot on NC 86 at this time, since a lot already served University commuters
in this corridor. Mr. Horton said that
the Town staff was being somewhat opportunistic, tying its recommendation to
the availability of outside funding of such a facility.
Council Member
Andresen inquired about the viability of adapting the traffic engineer from
full-time to one-quarter or one-half time once the traffic signal system was
fully operational. Mr. Horton responded
that traffic engineering was a highly specialized field wherein it would be
difficult to secure services on a less than full-time basis. Mr. Horton said that the staff was prepared
to discuss the matter further at the Council's budget work sessions. Council Member Wilkerson noted that a
technician position was also proposed for system operation. Mr. Horton said this was correct. Council Member Rimer stated that the Town's
engineering staff currently handled both traffic engineering and drainage
programs. He noted that the drainage
program would require a great deal of attention in the future. Council Member Wilkerson said he did not
think that the proposed technician position had been presented in the original
program proposal to the Council. Mr.
Horton said there may have been some delay in the discussions about proposed
program staffing, but proposed positions had been outlined in the current year
budget proposal. Council Member
Herzenberg noted that traffic was often a source of concern for citizens.
Council Member
Andresen said she hoped to discuss the proposal for additional public safety
officers at a future Council budget work session. Council Member Brown inquired about the status of the public
safety system study relative to the proposed new positions. Mr. Horton responded that the two items were
separate matters, but new officers were needed on the street to meet rising
service demands.
Mr. Horton noted that
the principal focus of the Council's April 23rd work session would be a joint
meeting with the Parks and Recreation and Greenways Commissions, discussion of
the proposed capital improvements program, and other topics as desired by the
Council. Mayor Howes suggested that the
Council could also attempt to develop a listing of topic areas for its future
budget work sessions. Council Member
Brown expressed her support for greater citizen involvement in the budget
review process. Council Member Rimer
suggested that the Council could possibly discuss reducing the total amount of
merit pay incentives. Mr. Horton noted
that one possible approach along these lines was outlined in the materials
presented to the Council for its April 23rd work session. Council Member Werner noted that the Manager
had previously expressed his willingness to work with the Council desires on
the matter of merit pay.
Item 8 - Proposed 1991-1996 Capital
Improvements Program
Town Manager Horton
briefly reviewed the proposed program, outlining major expenditures by
category. He noted that the Parks and
Recreation and Greenways Commission would discuss parks and open space needs
with the Council at the April 23rd budget work session.
Council Member Werner
inquired about the status of the University Playing Field Committee report on
the Glen Lennox playing fields. Mr.
Horton said the report had not yet been received. Mr. Horton said he would continue to work with Dr. Tuchi and
University officials on this matter.
Council Member Werner inquired about the amount of sidewalk that could
be constructed with $68,000 of proposed funding. Mr. Horton responded that the staff could pull this information
together. Council Member Wilkerson inquired
about funding for the purchase of lots in the Pine Knoll neighborhood. Mr. Horton said that funding was currently
available for this project. Council
Member Wilkerson asked whether funding was available for improvements at the
post office building. Mr. Horton said
that improvements had been made in the court room and improvements were planned
for the District Attorney's Office.
Council Member
Andresen commended the staff's efforts concerning the Glen Lennox fields. She inquired about the nature of the
proposed consultant fee for the fields.
Mr. Horton said the fee would pay to determine how to restore the fields
to good condition. Council Member
Andresen asked whether it was possible to make shared arrangements for an
aerial ladder fire truck. Mr. Horton
said the primary difficulty was that individual departments did not want to
make such arrangements on a long-term priority call basis. He added that there was a very strong need
for a good piece of aerial equipment in the Town. Council Member Andresen inquired about funding for renovation of
the existing library. Mr. Horton said
that approximately $225,000 was proposed in fiscal year 1993-1994.
Council Member Brown
inquired about the status of a report on community beautification. Mr. Horton said that the staff was
completing the report, rather than continuing to use a consultant. He noted that the report would be presented
to the Council in the fall. Council
Member Brown inquired about the proposed use of $25,000 for community
beautification. Mr. Horton said the
funds would pay for sidewalk and lighting improvements in the downtown
area. Council Member Brown asked why
funding was recommended for paving the Cedar Falls parking lot instead of parks
and play equipment for pre-schoolers.
Mr. Horton said that the parking lot was very heavily used and would be
easier to maintain once repaved.
Council Member Preston asked how long the Cedar Falls facility had been
in use. Mr. Horton said about ten
years, with the parking lot having deteriorated rapidly in this time.
Item 9 - Resolution supporting Brady
Bill
Mayor Howes noted
that a number of groups urged the Council to adopt resolutions on the Brady
Bill. Mayor Howes said that North
Carolina already had a seven-day waiting period for the purchase of handguns. Council Member Herzenberg said he encouraged
fellow Council Members to support the resolution. He noted that he was also conferring with the Carrboro Board of
Aldermen on the matter.
COUNCIL MEMBER
PRESTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
3. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING THE BRADY BILL TO REQUIRE A 7-DAY WAITING PERIOD BEFORE PURCHASE OF
A HANDGUN (91-4-22/R-3)
WHEREAS, every year
in the United States handguns are involved in an average of 9,200 murders,
12,100 rapes, 210,000 robberies, 407,600 assaults and thousands of suicides;
and
WHEREAS, the United
States has by far the highest rate of handgun deaths among all Western
industrialized nations; in 1988, handguns killed seven in Great Britain, eight
in Canada, thirteen in Australia and 8,915 in the United States; and
WHEREAS, current law
is inadequate, with most states selling handguns over the counter with no
background check to see if the purchaser is a felon, fugitive, drug addict or
mentally ill; and
WHEREAS, a number of
reliable polls show that the American public, including gun owners,
overwhelmingly supports handgun waiting periods; and
WHEREAS, every major
law enforcement group and a large number of national, religious, legal, labor,
medical and civic organizations, including the National League of Cities, and
the United States Conference of Mayors support handgun control;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby
urges the North Carolina delegation to the United States Congress and the
President of the United States to support immediate passage of the Brady Bill,
which mandates a national seven-day waiting period to allow local law
enforcement to conduct background checks on handgun purchasers.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Item 10 - Potential Revenue
Sources
Council Member
Andresen said she had shared her proposed resolution with State Representative
Joe Hackney. Council Member Andresen
said she hoped that the Mayor's Office would share the resolution with appropriate
parties.
COUNCIL MEMBER
ANDRESEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 4.
Council Member
Preston said it was a good idea to bring the Council's ideas to the State
Legislature. She requested that the
first proposed source be deleted, since it was too broadly focused and too
vague. Council Member Andresen said she
was willing to drop references to high income brackets. Council Member Werner noted that additional
sales taxes were extremely regressive means of taxation. He suggested the need to exempt food from
sales taxes. Mayor Howes expressed
concurrence that the sales tax was very regressive. He added that existing corporate and individual income taxes were
quite low. Mayor Howes also noted that
the General Assembly was currently wrestling with alternative revenue means.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG PROPOSED A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO DELETE THE REFERENCES TO HIGH
INCOME BRACKETS AND ADDITIONAL SALES TAXES.
Stressing the need
for broad support of the resolution, Council Member Andresen agreed to an
amendment striking the high income reference and including an exception for
sales tax on food.
RESOLUTION 4 AS
AMENDED WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY'S CONSIDERATION OF THE 1991-92 STATE BUDGET, AND
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF ADDITIONAL REVENUE (91-4-22/R-4)
WHEREAS, the State is
facing a fiscal crisis of such critical proportions that revenues are far short
of expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the Council
shares deep concern with other citizens about the effect of budget cuts on our
State's public schools, universities, town services and basis State programs;
and
WHEREAS, the
predicted budget shortfall of $800 million for FY 91-92 would severely affect
educational and other basic State services we value;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED that the Town Council of Chapel Hill strongly endorses the work of our
State legislators seeking solutions to this crisis by working for the passage
of a package of revenue bills to match the projected deficit. These revenues could include but are not
limited to the following:
* a personal income tax increase;
* additional sales taxes (possibly
excepting food);
* closing tax loopholes;
* taxes on luxury cars, boats and
aircraft;
* taxes on beer, wine, liquor and
cigarettes; and
* entertainment taxes.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Item 11 - Public Hearing on Pilot Roll
Cart Program
Town Manager Horton
said the pilot roll cart refuse collection program was proposed in the Colonial
Heights, Mount Bolus, Elkin Hills and Ironwoods neighborhoods. Council Member Preston said it was
particularly important to make sure that area residents were notified of the
proposal by letter or a leaflet on their door.
Mr. Horton said it was possible to do this type of notification. He noted the importance of public discussion
on the proposal.
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 5.
Council Member
Wilkerson asked whether it would be possible to discuss other refuse collection
options such as once per week rearyard collection at the hearing. Mr. Horton said it would be possible to
discuss this and other options. Council
Member Wilkerson asked whether the Council could choose to pursue different
refuse collection methods. Mr. Horton
said other options were always available.
RESOLUTION 5 WAS
PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC HEARING ON MAY 6, 1991, TO CONSIDER A ONCE/WEEKLY CURBSIDE
ROLL CART PILOT PROGRAM (91-4-22/R-5)
WHEREAS, the Council
evaluated alternative refuse collection methods; and
WHEREAS, additional
information is desired concerning the feasibility of a once/weekly curbside
roll cart residential refuse collection service; and
WHEREAS, a pilot
curbside residential collection program will provide such information; and
WHEREAS, a pilot
program has been developed of once-per-week curbside roll cart residential
refuse collection for the Colonial Heights, Mt. Bolus, Elkin Hills and Ironwoods
neighborhoods; the program would commence during the early part of Fiscal
1991-92; and funding for the pilot program would be provided from the 1991-92
operating budget for the Sanitation Division within the Public Works
Department;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby
calls a public hearing to hear comments on this pilot program on May 6, 1991,
at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the Town Hall.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Item 12 - Proposed East Franklin Street
Corridor Study
Planning Director
Roger Waldon said that adoption of Resolution 6 would direct the staff and
Design Review Board to examine a short stretch of East Franklin Street. He briefly reviewed proposed development in
the proposed study area. Mr. Waldon
stated that other communities had found similar studies and approaches to be
very useful. Mr. Waldon said that the
proposed schedule was an ambitious one, with a report to be brought back to the
Council prior to their summer break.
Mr. Waldon noted that the planning staff had spoken with a number of
property owners in the proposed study area.
Mr. Waldon said the staff recommended adoption of Resolution 6.
Gretchen Vickery, an
area property owner, said that well-designed office and institutional uses
would serve as a good buffer to residential uses. She said that the study offered a wonderful opportunity for the
Town and property owners to work together.
Ms. Vickery expressed her support for the proposed resolution. Bruce Martindale similarly expressed his
supported for the proposal.
Johnny Martindale,
representing the Martindale and Williams families, said he applauded the
Planning staff's efforts to set the proposed process in place. He noted that there was a growing need for
office space in the study area.
Council Member Brown
stressed the importance of citizen involvement in the planning process. Mr. Horton responded that the staff hoped to
receive a good deal of citizen input.
Mayor Howes noted that area property owners appeared to favor the
proposal. Council Member Andresen said
she thought that the proposal could produce many good results. She inquired about the linkage between staff
recommendations and actual outcomes.
Mr. Horton said the principal objective was to provide additional
flexibility for the Council while not giving up the protection of existing
codes.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PRESTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
6. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION
INITIATING DESIGN STUDY OF EAST FRANKLIN STREET CORRIDOR (91-4-22/R-6)
WHEREAS, the area
along East Franklin Street, as indicated on the attached map, has been
designated in Chapel Hill's Land Use Plan and Zoning Atlas as suitable for high
density residential use; and
WHEREAS, the Town has
received requests for non-residential use of properties along this corridor;
and
WHEREAS, the Town
Council finds value in the concept of studying these properties to prepare
design concepts that indicate how the area could develop in a manner that is
consistent with Town Policies and Objectives;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED that the Council directs the Town Manager to begin an East Franklin
Street Corridor Study to develop such design concepts.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Design Review Board is requested to participate actively in
the preparation of these design concepts.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Town Manager and Design Review Board are requested to report
back to the Council by July, 1991.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Item 12 - Advisory Board
Nominations
All applicants to the
Library Board of Trustees, Orange Water and Sewer Authority and Planning Board
were unanimously nominated.
Item 13 - Quarterly Reports
Council Member
Herzenberg noted that the Noise Ordinance Monitoring Committee was winding down
its activities and would report to the Council in the near future. Mayor Howes said he would share information
with the Council concerning funding for the Triangle Transit Authority. Mr. Horton said he would be happy to answer
any quarterly report questions from the Council.
Item 14 - Consent Agenda
Council Member
Preston requested that items d and e be removed for discussion. Council Member Andresen requested that the
staff distribute copies of agenda item g and resolution 14 to appropriate State
legislative committees.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER, TO ADOPT THE CONSENT
AGENDA, EXCEPTING ITEMS D AND E.
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS AND AN ORDINANCE (91-4-22/R-7)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the
resolutions and ordinance as submitted by the Town Manager in regard to the
following:
a.Purchase
of Taylor property for Tanyard Branch Greenway and Umstead Park (R-8).
b.Scheduling
May budget work sessions (R-9).
c.Revision
to Housing grievance procedure (R-10).
f.Closing
Cameron Avenue (R-13).
g.Resolution
regarding proposed transfer of water between river basins (R-14).
h.Advertisement
of assessment liens (R-15).
i.Fuel
contract with Triangle Transportation Authority (R-16).
j.CIAP
application (R-17).
k.Amendment
to the Noise Ordinance (O-1).
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF 6,862 SQUARE FEET OF THE JEAN TAYLOR PROPERTY FOR
THE TANYARD BRANCH GREENWAY AND UMSTEAD PARK (91-4-22/R-8)
WHEREAS, the Council
of the Town of Chapel Hill has adopted the 1985 Greenways Report; and
WHEREAS, the 1985
Greenways Report recommended the construction of a trail along Tanyard Branch;
and
WHEREAS, the trail
was initially constructed on the private property of Jean Taylor (Tax Map 94,
Block B, Lot 19A); and
WHEREAS, the
Greenways Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend the
purchase of a portion of the Taylor Property as part of the Tanyard Branch
Greenway and Umstead Park;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council authorizes
the Town Manager to purchase 6,682 square feet of the Jean Taylor property to
be included as part of the Tanyard Branch Greenway and Umstead Park, and that
the purchase price of $1,320 be taken from proceeds of the 1989 Parks and Open
Space bonds.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION
SCHEDULING BUDGET WORK SESSIONS (91-4-22/R-9)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby schedules budget
work sessions in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. on May 8 and May 15, 1991.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION CLOSING
PORTIONS OF CAMERON AVENUE (91-4-22/R-13)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby authorizes the
closing of Cameron Avenue between Raleigh Street and South Columbia Street on
Sunday, May 12, 1991 from 11:30 a.m. until 5:30 p.m in order to facilitate
traffic and parking operations on the day of the University of North Carolina
Commencement Ceremony.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council authorizes the Manager to approve closing of Cameron
Avenue in the area of the University campus in connection with future
commencement ceremonies.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO REQUIRE PERMITS FOR INTER-BASIN TRANSFER OF
WATER (91-4-22/R-14)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Town Council of Chapel Hill that the Council encourages deferral of
consideration of House Bill 125 and Senate Bill 129 pending further study as
supported by the Orange County Board of Commissioners, City Council of Durham,
and North Carolina Waterworks Association, North Carolina Water Pollution Control
Federation and other parties.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION
SELECTING THE DATE FOR THE ADVERTISEMENT OF DELINQUENT ASSESSMENT LIENS
(91-4-22/R-15)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council directs the Manager to
advertise the Town of Chapel Hill delinquent assessment liens in the month of
May, 1991 in accord with G.S. 105-369.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE TRIANGLE
TRANSIT AUTHORITY FOR THE PURCHASE OF FUEL FOR VANPOOLS (91‑4‑22/R-16)
WHEREAS, the Town of
Chapel Hill has benefited from the operation of a successful regional vanpooling
program since 1985; and
WHEREAS, the success
of such a program helps to reduce our
dependance on the private auto, thereby reducing highway congestion and
reducing air pollution; and
WHEREAS, we have
received a request from the Triangle Transit Authority to assist them in the
provision of fuel for local vanpools;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Manager is
authorized to negotiate and execute a contract with the Triangle Transit
Authority for the purchase of fuel for vanpools.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Assistant Town
Manager Sonna Loewenthal said that the staff was very pleased to have received
lower than expected bids for street resurfacing. Council Member Preston inquired whether it would be possible to
apply the $53,000 to help offset next year's anticipated budget shortfall. She also asked whether it would be possible
to use the funds for sidewalk construction instead of street resurfacing. Mr. Horton responded that earlier in the
year it had been very difficult to estimate the cost of petroleum-based
products. He added that there was
strong justification for street repaving, although the Council could choose to
defer paving of some of the streets.
Mayor Howes noted that the Town tended to run behind on paving of
streets. He suggested that the $53,000
could be used to pave additional streets.
Council Member Preston said that the Town had $53,000 available that did
not need to be expended as originally anticipated. Mr. Horton suggested that it would be possible to reduce the
1991-92 resurfacing budget by $50,000, but that it would make sense to accept
this favorable bid now. Council Member
Preston said this was a good idea.
COUNCIL MEMBER
PRESTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM D. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION AWARDING
A CONTRACT FOR RESURFACING OF STREETS (91-4-22/R-11)
WHEREAS, the Town of
Chapel Hill has solicited formal bids by legal notice in The Chapel Hill Newspaper
on March 13, 1991, in accordance with G.S. 143-129 for the resurfacing of
streets; and
WHEREAS, the
following bids were received, opened and publicly read on March 28, 1991:
BIDDER BASE BID ALTERNATE I
Blythe Industries
$197,215.00 $ 30,712.50
Lee Paving Co.
199,090.00 30,375.00
Riley Paving Co.
228,400.00 30,875.00
Nello L. Teer Co.
248,725.00 32,662.50
C. C. Mangum
253,341.00 32,500.00
Rea Construction
282,200.00 52,500.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council accepts the
March 28 base bid of Blythe Industries for street resurfacing in the amount of
$197,215.00 received in response to the Town's request for bids published March
13 and opened March 28 in accord with G.S. 143-129.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Manager is authorized to execute a contract with Blythe
Industries in the amount of $197,215.00 and to initiate and sign change orders
that will increase the amount of street resurfacing work within the budgeted
amount.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
Council Member
Preston inquired whether a difference of $1,700 was a fair reason for not
taking the lowest bid. Ms. Loewenthal
emphasized the need for hot patching material on a year-round basis. Council Member Preston asked why bids had
been accepted when they did not meet all specifications. Ms. Loewenthal responded that only one local
hot-mix plant was open all year long.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA ITEM
E. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION AWARDING
A CONTRACT FOR I-2 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, H-B ASPHALT AND TACK COAT (91-4-22/R-12)
WHEREAS, the Town of
Chapel Hill has solicited formal bids by legal notice in The Chapel Hill
Newspaper on March 20, 1991, in accordance with G.S. 143-129 for I-2
Asphaltic Concrete, H-B Asphalt and Tack Coat for street patching; and
WHEREAS, the
following bids have been received and opened on April 2, 1991:
CC Mangum Lee
Paving Nello Teer
I-2 Asphaltic
Concrete 20.60/Ton
22.50/Ton 23.00/Ton
H-B Asphalt 19.40/Ton
23.50/Ton 21.50/Ton
Tack Coat (AC-20) 2.00/Ton 1.50/Ton 1.90/Ton
Tack Coat (CRS-2)
2.00/Ton No Bid 1.90/Ton
Total $56,750.00 $59,550.00
WHEREAS, the
additional costs to the Town caused by the difference in distance between the
Lee Paving plant and the Nello Teer plant are estimated to be approximately
$45,311; and
WHEREAS, the
year-round availability of hot-mix asphalt is important to the Town's ability
to maintain its street system;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Town accepts the
bid of Nello Teer Company in the amounts as stated above in the tabulation.
This the 22nd day of
April, 1991.
There was no need for
an Executive Session.
COUNCIL MEMBER
WILKERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PRESTON, TO ADJOURN THE
MEETING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
The meeting stood
adjourned at 10:26 p.m.