MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN
OF CHAPEL
HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 AT 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Broun
called the meeting to order.
Council
Members in attendance were Julie Andresen, Joyce Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark
Chilton, Joe Herzenberg, Alan Rimer, Arthur Werner and Roosevelt Wilkerson,
Jr. Also in attendance were Town
Manager Cal Horton, Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and Florentine
Miller, Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney Ralph Karpinos.
Item 1 Ceremonies
Mayor Broun
said that there were two very important ceremonies this evening. He asked Mr. Ben Murray to come
forward. Mayor Broun read a proclamation
recognizing the month of March as Mental Retardation Awareness Month. Mr. Murray, representing the Association for
Retarded Citizens, accepted the proclamation from Mayor Broun.
Mayor Broun
requested that Rachel Willis and Dan Coleman come forward. He read a proclamation recognizing the week
of April 20th through 26th as Alternative Transportation Week. Mayor Broun noted that the Town would host a
bus and van rodeo would be hosted by the Town on April 26th. Mayor Broun presented the proclamation to
Ms. Willis and Mr. Coleman. Ms. Willis
noted that the Transportation Board was preparing a report to the Council on
reducing the use of single-occupancy vehicles.
She urged the Mayor and Council and Town residents to take part in
Alternative Transportation Week. Mr.
Coleman said that members of the Transportation Board had volunteered their
expertise in a number of areas concerning Alternative Transportation Week
events.
There were no
hearings.
Item 3 Petitions
Pierre Morell,
representing Power Plant Neighbors, expressed concern about operations and
noise levels at the University boiler plant.
A copy of Mr. Morell's remarks are on file in the Town Clerk's
Office. Council Member Andresen
requested that Manager return to the Council with suggestions for action to
address Mr. Morell's concerns. She
noted that neighbors of the plant were becoming very frustrated with the
University. Council Member Andresen
said she believed that by mutual agreement, one could arrive at better
decisions for both parties. She
suggested that the Council sponsor a group to negotiate an agreement with the
University to address boiler plant concerns.
Council Member Andresen noted that it might not be possible for the
University to make major changes until its final acceptance from the contractor
of the boiler plant facility. Mr.
Morell said although he appreciated the concept of conflict resolution, there
was no implication of bad faith in the situation. Mr. Morell stated that the basis of the problem appeared to be a
lack of funds to make necessary improvements.
Council Member
Andresen inquired about possible liability by the plant contractor. Mr. Morell said he had no concept of this
possibility. He stated that there
appeared to be problems in the design of the plant which should have been
addressed earlier. Council Member
Herzenberg said the situation was depressing.
He stated that the situation was actually worse than outlined by Mr. Morell. Council Member Herzenberg said it appeared
very unlikely that the new plant would be quieter than the former plant. Council Member Herzenberg said he was
troubled by persistent violations of the noise ordinance by the boiler
plant. He inquired why the Town was not
enforcing the noise ordinance for the plant and why repeated
"emergencies" were being tolerated.
Council Member
Capowski said he admired the patience of the boiler plant's neighbors. He inquired what percentage of noise came
from inside and outside sources. Mr.
Morell said most noise appeared to be background noise from inside the plant,
including turbine and boiler operations.
Council Member Capowski inquired whether buffering sound through glass
at the plant would significantly help neighbors of the plant. Mr. Morell said yes. Council Member Capowski said the Town's
noise ordinance did not address the issue of long-term industrial noise and its
frequency. Council Member Capowski
inquired what Mr. Morell would like the Town to do regarding concerns at the
boiler plant. Mr. Morell requested that
the Town make the boiler plant a high priority in its meetings and negotiations
with the University.
Council Member
Brown said she was very concerned about air pollution and potential human
health problems. She requested
additional information on potential health problems and ways to prevent such
problems. Council Member Werner said
Mr. Morell was correct that resolving the situation would involve large amounts
of money. Council Member Werner said
there were clear faults in design of the plant which result in the excessive
noise. He emphasized that the
Council needed to make clear to the University the importance of
resolving concerns of the boiler plant's neighbors. He noted that no one on the Town's staff had the background
necessary to address Council Member Brown's concerns about air pollution and
health concerns. Council Member Werner
said that air pollution concerns were more easily addressed than the
noise problems. He suggested that
the Council request a written plan from the University outlining proposals on
how to address the plant's problems.
Noting the need for a commitment from the University, Mr. Morell said he
applauded this suggestion. He expressed
concern that boiler plant officials had been unwilling to spend money to
monitor pollution at the plant.
Council Member
Brown said she did not expect to receive a scientific response to her earlier
inquiry. She noted that the Manager was
proficient at finding resources to address the Council's inquiries. Council Member Werner noted that information
and studies of this type could be provided and conducted by the
University. Council Member Brown said
she was requesting a basic report from the Manager. Council Member Rimer suggested that the University could seek
funding from the legislature to address special use permit violations at the
boiler plant. He added that the impasse
on the matter should have been resolved several months ago.
Council Member
Andresen emphasized the importance of a written plan from the University
outlining how matters could be resolved and when. Council Member Andresen noted that a major argument made by the
University when proposing the plant at that location was the amount of money it
would save compared to relocating it elsewhere. Council Member Andresen said she did not know whether the
Consultation and Coordination Committee would be an appropriate forum for
addressing the situation. Mayor Broun
said the situation at hand was a delicate and frustrating one for all involved,
especially neighbors of the boiler plant.
He suggested that an emphasis be placed on making things better. Mayor Broun said Council Member Werner's
suggestion of a written plan of action by the University was a good one.
Council Member
Werner noted the importance of removing the situation from the political
realm. He said it was important to
receive a realistic response from the University, including an outline of a
proposed timeframe and budget for resolving problems at the boiler plant. Council Member Herzenberg requested that the
University administration be encouraged to change its policy to encourage
timely responses to phone call concerns about the boiler plant.
Mayor Broun
suggested that the matter be referred to the Manager, with a request being
forwarded to the University for an action plan to address concerns of boiler
plant neighbors. Council Member Werner
requested that the Manager request a written response from the University,
addressing current issues and outlining a plan to correct problems.
COUNCIL MEMBER
WERNER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE
MANAGER, WITH THE MANAGER REQUESTING A WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM THE UNIVERSITY,
ADDRESSING CURRENT ISSUES AND OUTLINING A PLAN OF ACTION.
Council Member
Capowski inquired whether there were any stipulations between the University
and the boiler plant contractor concerning noise limits of the plant. Mr. Morell said he had spoken to an
acoustical engineer at North Carolina State University who had indicated that
stipulations pertaining to noise were generally excluded from contracts of this
type. He added that certain pieces of
equipment at the boiler plant did not meet specifications. Council Member Capowski inquired whether the
Council wished to include the construction company in the referral to the
Manager. Mayor Broun suggested that the
inquiry be directed to the University, since the University had a contract with
the construction company.
THE MOTION TO
REFER WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Mr. Morell
thanked the Mayor and Council for taking positive steps to address concerns
about the boiler plant.
Nancy Gabriel,
Chairperson of the Appearance Commission, requested that the Town implement an
Annual Appearance Awards Program. She
noted that Joan Page had done most of the work on devising the proposal. Ms. Gabriel said that most of the work would
be done by the Commission, rather than by Town staff. She also stated that the awards program would be much more
valuable than the $500 in funding being requested. Ms. Gabriel noted that additional funding sources were being
requested. She stated that the program
offered a positive and fun experience for the Town and its residents. Ms. Gabriel requested that the Council
consider the proposal favorably.
Council Member
Andresen said she supported the concept.
She stated that such a program would be beneficial to the
community. Council Member Rimer noted
that the amount of money requested, $500, was quite small. He requested that the Manager attempt to
include these funds in his proposed budget.
Mr. Horton indicated that could be done, if the Council desired. Mr. Horton said he expected to recommend
inclusion of funding for the program in his proposed budget.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE
TOWN MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Timothy
Kimbrough, pastor of the Church of the Holy Family, requested expedited review
of a special use permit modification project.
COUNCIL MEMBER
CHILTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE
TOWN MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Council Member
Chilton requested that the Manager provide information on future potential
participation by Chatham County in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro transit system,
relevant to the widening of U.S. 15-501.
Council Member Chilton also requested ten to fifteen years of
information concerning the percentage of transit system operating costs paid by
bus riders. Council Member Brown
requested information on street redesign programs to encourage more pedestrian
traffic in the downtown area. Council
Member Andresen requested an analysis of the degree of bus fare increases
compared to possible decreases in bus ridership.
Council Member
Herzenberg noted that Council Members Andresen, Capowski and himself had
attended a conflict management workshop on March 21st. He thanked Council Member Andresen for her
work on the program. Council Member
Herzenberg also requested that the staff broaden public notification for
proposed development projects.
Mr. Horton
requested that agenda item number six be removed from this evening's
agenda. He noted that the Town had
received a letter from the State's Division of Environmental Management,
stating that Bolin Creek Interceptor moratorium had been lifted.
Council Member
Brown noted that Colin Hall had requested to speak on this matter.
Dr. Hall said
he was surprised by the withdrawal of the moratorium. Dr. Hall stated that he had purchased his house near the Bolin
Creek trail in late 1976. Dr. Hall
noted that he had been in frequent contact with OWASA officials since October,
1977 about sewage overflows along the Bolin Creek Interceptor. Dr. Hall said that sewer overflows posed a
serious health hazard. He stated that
there had been three major sewage leaks since the beginning of the year along
the Bolin Creek Interceptor. Dr. Hall
said he was very concerned that the current situation was not going to change
substantially. He stated that the
Orange Water and Sewer Authority had a sizable appropriation of up to $40
million for capital improvements. Dr.
Hall said he had no faith that the matter would be resolved expeditiously. He requested that the Mayor and Council
pressure Orange Water and Sewer Authority officials to expend funds to remedy
problems with the Bolin Creek interceptor.
Mayor Broun
said he had concern and sympathy with the points raised by Dr. Hall. He noted that the Orange Water and Sewer
Authority needed to place a higher priority on sewer system maintenance. Council Member Andresen expressed her
concurrence with Mayor Broun' remarks, adding that problems with the Bolin
Creek interceptor needed constant attention.
Item 4
Board and Committee Nominations & Appointments
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO NOMINATE ALL APPLICANTS
FOR APPOINTMENT CONSIDERATION TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
WERNER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRESEN, TO NOMINATE ALL APPLICANTS
FOR APPOINTMENT CONSIDERATION TO THE HOUSING ADVISORY BOARD. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Council Member
Andresen suggested that Council Members Herzenberg and Rimer continue their
service on the Facility Naming Committee.
Council Member Herzenberg suggested that a third member of the Council
serve on the committee, since the Council's adopted resolution provided for
membership by two or more Council Members.
COUNCIL MEMBER
WERNER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRESEN, TO APPOINT COUNCIL MEMBERS
HERZENBERG AND RIMER TO SERVE ON THE FACILITY NAMING COMMITTEE. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
Council Member
Wilkerson requested that the Council not make appointments to the Cable
Television Advisory Committee this evening, since the committee had not had the
opportunity to discuss appointment recommendations. Council Member Rimer noted that there was currently only one Town
resident application on file for the commission. He suggested that the Council consider changing its procedures to
permit non-Town residents to be appointed to non-permanent committees. Council Member Wilkerson said that other
applicants were being recruited for the Cable Television Advisory
Committee. Council Member Herzenberg
suggested that the Council adopt a short-term policy compromise waiving
existing restrictions for ad hoc groups until a firm policy was in place. Council Member Capowski requested that the
Manager provide a map of the cable television service area when the appointment
item returned for Council consideration.
Mr. Horton noted that the service area for the new cable television
franchisee included areas such as Wake County in its area although the Town's
franchise is effective only within the Town limits. Council Member Capowski inquired whether non-Town resident
applicants for the Cable Television Advisory Committee were customers of the
Town's cable franchise. Mr. Horton said
efforts could be made to make this determination. Mayor Broun said the Council had removed item 4d from the agenda
by unanimous consent.
Item 5 Parking Regulations DOTA
Planning
Director Roger Waldon said the last presentation to the Council on parking
regulations had taken place on February 10th.
He said the Transportation Board and staff recommend adoption of
Ordinance A, while the Planning Board recommended adoption of Ordinance C. He briefly reviewed Resolutions A, B and C,
noting that adoption of all three was recommended.
Council Member
Herzenberg inquired whether any of the ordinances or resolutions addressed
parking requirements for late-night businesses such as clubs. Mr. Waldon said any business downtown could
take advantage of the provision to operate or expand without meeting off-street
parking requirements.
Council Member
Capowski inquired whether any businesses other than Burger King had elected to
make a payment-in-lieu for parking to the Town. Mr. Waldon said no, noting that some businesses provided parking,
while others leased parking from other businesses. Council Member Andresen inquired about the objectives of the
Transportation Management Plan. Mr.
Waldon said that property owners choosing the Transportation Management Plan
option would provide incentives and disincentives to get to and from their businesses
by means other than single-occupant automobiles, including bicycles,
ridesharing, buses and walking. Council
Member Andresen inquired how parking needs for retail customers would be met. Mr. Waldon said it was not likely that the
proposed ordinance would impact the behavior of retail customers. He stated that there would be a continued
need for municipal parking in the downtown area. Council Member Andresen noted the need to balance office and
retail uses.
Council Member
Brown inquired about the extent of discussions with the Transportation Board
concerning downtown parking regulations. Mr. Horton said the Transportation
Board had been a key actor in developing the proposed text amendment and
policy. He noted the Transportation
Board had unanimously recommended adoption of Ordinance A. Council Member Capowski inquired whether the
transportation management plan of Pleasanton, California, instituted in 1989
and included in the Council's agenda materials, had been successful. Mr. Waldon said the plan had been provided
as an example only and that Town staff had not contacted Pleasanton staff to
inquire about the success of their program.
Corleen
Thompson, a resident of South Columbia Street, said she opposed the proposed
change in parking regulations. She
noted that the Town might lose some of its federal funding for transit
operations. Ms. Thompson stated that if
new businesses provided less parking spaces, available parking would be
overburdened. She requested that the
Council postpone action on the item until funding for the transit system was
finalized.
Antoine Puech,
representing West Franklin Preservation Partners, said he favored the
proposal. Mr. Puech said the 74,000
square foot Pavilion project would require one hundred and sixty spaces under
the building, at an estimated cost of $2.2 million. Mr. Puech said it would be impractical to recover the cost of the
parking spaces. He stated that the
project would become financially feasible with the elimination of parking
requirements. Mr. Puech requested that the Council not require developers to
pay in-lieu parking fees. He stated
that the West Franklin Preservation Partners had invested about $3.2 million in
the Pavilion project to date.
Mayor Broun
noted that he had previously represented the West Franklin Preservation
Partners. Mayor Broun said the Town
Attorney had advised him that he could not be excused from voting on the
proposal because of this affiliation. He
felt, however, that he should disclose this prior representation.
Council Member
Andresen noted that waiving parking requirements would provide a subsidy to a
particular development and could lead to a parking shortage. Council Member Andresen said she was more
inclined to favor the Planning Board's recommendation concerning parking
regulations. She inquired whether
developments such as The Pavilion would be required to provide parking for
residents. Mr. Horton said the staff
would need to evaluate proposals on their individual merits in relation to
existing development requirements.
Council Member
Andresen said there were arguments for enacting flexible or restrictive parking
requirement ordinances.
Council Member
Werner said the Town's Comprehensive Plan contained a number of
conflicting principles concerning parking requirements. He cited the trade-off between making the
downtown more vital and decreasing downtown traffic at certain times of the
day. Council Member Werner suggested
that the Council discuss underlying priorities prior to acting on the proposed
text amendment.
Council Member
Rimer said he concurred with Council Member Werner concerning conflicting
principles in the Comprehensive Plan.
He stated that the proposed changes in parking regulations were a step
in the right direction. Council Member
Rimer said the proposed regulations supplemented the regulations in place,
providing developers with additional options.
He added that the proposed resolutions addressed the Council's concerns
raised at the earlier public hearing.
Council Member
Capowski noted that current development regulations had similar square footage
minimum requirements for people and automobiles. He said that parking regulations should encourage people not to
bring their cars downtown and encourage new businesses by imposing fewer fees
and less red tape. Council Member
Capowski said people would use alternative means of transportation when given
positive incentives.
Council Member
Wilkerson said he concurred with Council Member Werner concerning conflicting
objectives in the Comprehensive Plan. He said the proposed requirements
were a step in the right direction.
Council Member Wilkerson said he hoped a compromise could be reached
without decreasing the community's quality of life.
Council Member
Chilton noted that the East Rosemary Street parking deck would be paid for by
its users. He stated that the proposed
development ordinance text amendment would reduce the extent to which downtown
business customers would help pay for downtown parking. Council Member Chilton said this was unfair
to persons who frequented the downtown area but did not drive to the area.
Council Member Andresen thanked Council Member Chilton for his remarks. Council Member Chilton noted that if the
Manager did not agree with individual transportation management plans, he did
not have to accept them as proposed.
Council Member Andresen said that if developers requested changes under
the new rules, the Council would not have many options. Mr. Karpinos stated that the proposed
standards for modification would require making the same findings as in the
initial special use permit.
Council Member
Herzenberg noted that the proposed amendment would replace parking requirements
with a requirement for a transportation management plan. Council Member Andresen said she favored an
ordinance including a transportation management plan. Council Member Chilton said the proposal was not to do away with
requirements. Council Member Werner
noted that the Council could extract necessary parking requirements for current
and future projects. He added that the
Council would not waive all parking requirements for major projects. Council Member Werner also said the proposed
amendment would provide greater flexibility than current regulations.
Council Member
Capowski noted that businesses would elect to fill out forms for a
transportation management plan rather than paying a fee of $7,000 per parking
space. Council Member Herzenberg
concurred. Council Member Herzenberg
expressed his concern about inadequacies of the Town's public transit
system. Council Member Andresen noted
that the amended proposal presented the Council with a number of options. Council Member Brown said that parking was
currently not a problem in the downtown area.
She said the option of providing transportation management plan was a
step in the right direction. Council
Member Brown noted the need to plan for future transportation needs, including
the possibility of rerouting NC 86.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING.
Council Member
Andresen inquired about the feasibility of amending Ordinance A to add language
incorporating the substance of Resolution A.
Mr. Horton said it would not be possible to draft language with
confidence on the floor this evening.
Council Member Andresen withdrew her proposal. Council Member Werner suggested that the words "in concert
with parking as required" be added to Ordinance A. Council Member Andresen said this addition
would be an improvement. Mayor Broun
asked whether there might be a situation in which there would be no parking
requirements. Council Member Werner
said yes, as or if required. Mr.
Karpinos said he had drafted some language that might address these concerns in
Ordinance A and Resolution C. He read
the proposed language. Mr. Horton said
the proposed text amendment would allow the Council a full range of
possibilities.
COUNCIL MEMBER
CHILTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 1A, AS
AMENDED.
Council Member
Rimer said that since proposed Resolution A was time-dependent, it was a bad
idea to amend Ordinance A to include language from the resolution. Council Member Capowski said Ordinance A
with the proposed modification applied to the town center area. Council Member Capowski said he was somewhat
hesitant about adopting an ordinance which was amended on the floor. He asked whether Ordinance A as amended
would permit the Council to accept payments in lieu for parking
requirements. Mr. Karpinos said he did
not believe the ordinance would permit payments in lieu. He stated that the Council's options under
the ordinance would permit submittal of transportation management plans or the
provision of off-street parking.
Council Member Capowski said the ordinance would not remove the
developer's option to provide on-site parking.
ORDINANCE 1A
AS AMENDED WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CHAPEL HILL DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE REGARDING DOWNTOWN PARKING
REGULATIONS (92-3-23/O-1a)
WHEREAS, the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill has considered the proposed amendment to the
Chapel Hill Development Ordinance to adjust Town Center parking requirements,
and finds that the amendment is appropriate due to changed or changing conditions
in a particular area or in the jurisdiction generally and achieves the purposes
of the Comprehensive Plan;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the Chapel Hill Development Ordinance shall be
amended as follows:
SECTION I
ADD a new
Subsection 14.6.2(c) to read as follows:
c)For
uses located within either Town Center zoning district, compliance with parking
requirements may be achieved by providing a Transportation Management Plan subject to approval by the Town Manager or
subject to the approval by the Town Council if the proposed use requires Town
Council approval. The Transportation
Management Plan shall identify efforts to promote the use of alternate modes of
transportation and may include required parking.
SECTION II
That all
ordinances and portions of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
COUNCIL MEMBER
ANDRESEN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
1A. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING TOWN CODE PROVISION FOR PAYMENT-IN-LIEU OF PROVIDING REQUIRED
DOWNTOWN PARKING (92-3-23/R-1a)
WHEREAS, a
Public Hearing was held on January 21, 1992 to consider adjustments to the
Development Ordinance regarding downtown parking regulations; and
WHEREAS,
during discussion of changes to the downtown parking regulations, the Town Code
provisions regarding payment-in-lieu of providing required downtown parking
spaces were questioned;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council requests that the Town Manager and the Town Attorney investigate
adjustments to the Town Code provisions regarding payments to the Town Parking
Fund which would enable an individual to make annualized payments rather than
the current, one-time $7,200 payment per required parking space now
established;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council requests that the Planning Board and Transportation
Board review and comment on this draft amendment;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council requests that the Town Manager bring this item back
before the Council at a Public Hearing date to be determined by the Town
Manager.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1B.
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 23
(92-3-23/R-1b)
WHEREAS, a
Public Hearing was held on January 21, 1992 to consider adjustments to the
Development Ordinance regarding downtown parking regulations; and
WHEREAS,
during discussion of changes to the downtown parking regulations, the
Development Ordinance enforcement provisions of Article 23 were questioned;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council requests that the Town Manager and the Town Attorney prepare draft amendments to the Chapel Hill
Development Ordinance that would strengthen the Town's enforcement provisions
of Article 23;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council requests that the Planning Board and Transportation
Board review and comment on this draft amendment;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council requests that the Town Manager bring this item back
before the Council at a Public Hearing date to be determined by the Town
Manager.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
Council Member
Andresen inquired whether the intent of the resolution was to strengthen
transportation management plans. Mr.
Horton said yes.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
WILKERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1C, AS
AMENDED. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING AN ANNUAL REPORT TO THE COUNCIL ON TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLANS
(92-3-23/R-1c)
WHEREAS, a
Public Hearing was held on January 21, 1992 to consider adjustments to the
Development Ordinance regarding downtown parking regulations; and
WHEREAS,
during discussion of changes to the regulations which would allow a developer
to provide a Transportation Management Plan, a suggestion was made to provide a
report each year to the Council regarding any Transportation Management Plans
provided;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council requests that the Town Manager provide a report to the Council each
January which identifies those who have opted to provide a Transportation
Management Plan. This report to the
Council shall summaries the content of each of the required annual
Transportation Management Plan report provided by these developers;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council requests that the Planning Board and Transportation
Board review and comment on the report to the Council;
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
Item 6 was
deleted from the agenda.
Item 7 OWASA Report
Mr. Horton
said the staff had exercised diligence in putting information on the Orange
Water and Sewer Authority (OWASA) in a fair and balanced manner. He noted that the staff was ready to discuss
any questions by the Mayor and Council.
Assistant to
the Manager Greg Feller noted that there were currently restrictions on the
extension of OWASA service in the University Lake watershed. He said there had been a few exceptions made
on the basis of public health and other emergencies. Mr. Feller also stated that the OWASA Board of Director had no
policies concerning service extension into the rural buffer. He said there was nothing to indicate that
OWASA would serve the rural buffer in the future. Mr. Feller briefly reviewed OWASA's service and rate policies,
noting that the utility did not currently reduce fees for low and
moderate-income families. He also noted
that water and sewer service requests by petition were assessed at 100% of
cost. Mr. Feller said that all of
OWASA's scheduled capital improvements, with one exception, were in the urban
services area. He said the one
exception was a possible future intake from Jordan Lake. Mr. Feller said additional public comment could
be received on the matter of whether OWASA customers preferred to share the cost
of maintaining laterals in the street or make this a private
responsibility. He added that the staff
was proposing that the Council be consulted on OWASA's proposed capital program
in terms of major spending priorities and land use and transportation.
Council Member
Rimer thanked the staff for an excellent report. He said Mr. Feller had done a good job of putting comprehensive
issues together in a cogent way.
Council Member Rimer emphasized the importance of good maintenance in
the management of a water and sewer utility.
He said that maintenance issues were integral to the rate base.
Council Member
Brown said she appreciated the staff's report.
She inquired about the estimated duration of OWASA's water supply. Council Member Brown also asked whether
growth projections were considered in the supply calculations. Mr. Feller noted that a new capital program
had not been adopted since the population projections were released. He said the estimated water supply was ten
to fifteen years, with possible use of Jordan Lake water in the future.
Council Member
Andresen thanked the staff for an excellent report. She noted that the Council's recent session with the Town's OWASA
board representatives had been a good one.
Council Member Andresen also noted that OWASA Board Town appointees Tom
McCurdy and Riley Wilson were in attendance this evening. She noted the importance of Town input in
OWASA's capital program planning.
Council Member
Wilkerson inquired whether it was correct that OWASA had $40 to $50 million set
aside for capital projects. OWASA Board
representative Tom McCurdy said the utility's five year capital program
totalled approximately $25 million. He
added that the utility's fifteen year capital program might be approximately
$40 million. Mr. McCurdy noted that
OWASA was placing an emphasis on sewer maintenance in the near future.
Council Member
Brown inquired when the next meeting between the Council and Town OWASA Board
appointees would take place. She also
inquired about the next step in the Division of Environmental Management's
monitoring of the Bolin Creek interceptor.
Mr. Horton said he was not sure he could answer the latter question, but
could make inquiries to Division of Environmental Management staff. He also noted that there were no meetings
currently scheduled between the Council and the Town's OWASA Board
appointees. Council Member Andresen
noted that the OWASA Board had been invited to make quarterly reports to the
Council.
COUNCIL MEMBER
RIMER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 3.
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING CONSULTATION AMONG REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ORANGE WATER AND SEWER
AUTHORITY, ORANGE COUNTY AND THE TOWNS OF CARRBORO AND CHAPEL HILL REGARDING
THE AUTHORITY'S CAPITAL PROGRAM (92-3-23/R-3)
WHEREAS, the
planning and extension of water and sewer services are closely related to local
governments plans and policies regarding land use, transportation and other
matters; and
WHEREAS, in
the Purchase and Sale Agreements between OWASA and the Towns of Chapel Hill and
Carrboro, OWASA agreed to notify in writing and confer with representatives of
the Towns' governing boards before approval or implementation of any expansion
program for its sewer utility system or treatment facility; and
WHEREAS, the
Orange County Board of Commissioners, Carrboro Board of Aldermen and Town
Council of Chapel Hill in 1989 entered into a Memorandum of Understanding
regarding consultation and comment among OWASA and the three local governments;
and
WHEREAS, the
OWASA Board of Directors' Goals Statement provides in part that OWASA will be
guided by the land management plans approved by the government units in the
area the Authority serves;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council
proposes that OWASA, Orange County, Chapel Hill and Carrboro representatives
meet annually to review and discuss the preliminary capital improvements
programs as prepared by OWASA staff, and that the local governing boards should
have the opportunity to comment on OWASA's capital program before it is adopted
by the OWASA Board.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
Council Member
Andresen suggested that the Council initiate and schedule another meeting with
its OWASA representatives.
THE MOTION TO
ADOPT RESOLUTION 3 WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Council Member
Andresen suggested that the Council use the document before the Council this
evening as a basis for formulating a series of conceptual policies for OWASA
matters. She added that the policies
could be periodically updated. Council
Member Andresen said conceptual goals would be a great aid to the OWASA
Board. Council Member Capowski
requested a clarification of Council Member Andresen's principal goals. Council Member Andresen said she was proposing to develop a policy goal document
for the OWASA Board. Council Member Capowski said he agreed with the need to
provide such a document. He suggested
that the document could also cover customer relations.
Noting that a
major planning task was involved, Mayor Broun suggested that the Council
consider the matter at the upcoming Assembly of Governments meeting and the
Council's planning and reporting session.
Council Member Andresen inquired whether it would be preferable for the
Council to have an open dialogue or have individual Council Members provide
lists of suggestions. Council Member
Herzenberg suggested that the previously established Mayor's Committee on OWASA
(Council Members Andresen, Chilton, and Herzenberg) address the situation. Mayor Broun said this was a good idea. Council Member Andresen invited suggestions
from other Council Members.
Mayor Broun
noted that the Council would have an opportunity to discuss the Chatham County
water supply request at the Assembly of Governments meeting. Council Member Wilkerson concurred. Mayor Broun said it was reasonable to defer
discussion of the item.
Item 8 Library Bid Package Proposal
Former Mayor
Jonathan Howes said he was pleased to present a unanimous recommendation from
the Library Committee concerning the bid package proposal. Mr. Howes noted that several members of the
Library Committee, Berry Credle, Ruth Thomas, Ed Hinsdale and Joe Herzenberg,
were in attendance this evening. He
expressed the Committee's appreciation for the capable assistance of Library
Director Kathleen Thompson, Assistant Town Manager Sonna Loewenthal and Project
Architect Josh Gurlitz. Mr. Howes noted
that the memorandum before the Council provided an overview of the project to
date. Mr. Howes said he delighted that
the Division of Environmental Management's moratorium had been lifted. Mr. Howes noted that the lifting of the
moratorium made it necessary to make a minor revision in the proposed
resolution. He said that the proposed
facility would be sited in natural terrain and would be handicapped-accessible
and cost-efficient to operate.
Mr. Gurlitz
said he had spent a great deal of time with Town staff pulling together a
collective vision of the library project.
He noted that the resolution before the Council requested the
advertising of bids for the library project.
Mr. Gurlitz said the proposed library would occupy a central high space
in the middle of Pritchard Park. He
briefly reviewed the projects landscaping and tree planting plans. Mr. Gurlitz said the building exterior would
harmonize with the surrounding park and would be very energy-efficient. He briefly reviewed proposed uses for the
interior of the library building. Mr.
Gurlitz said the library's interior plan was very flexible and accessible to
the handicapped. He noted that some
recycled materials would be used in the building's construction.
Council Member
Brown inquired what type of recycled materials would be used in the building
and what type of materials would be used to keep heat in the building. Mr. Gurlitz said the building's ceiling
tiles would contain up to eight percent recycled materials. He added that the buildings wallboard would
contain up to twenty-five percent recycled materials. Mr. Gurlitz stated that recycled carstops and loading dock
bumpers were also specified.
Mr. Gurlitz
said that the project would use low heat glass with metallic coating on the
inside, to reduce the amount of heat gain.
He noted that canopy trees were being preserved around the site. Council Member Brown said she appreciated
the concern about heat gain. She
inquired whether any treatments for heat loss had been incorporated into the
building plans. Mr. Gurlitz noted that
the interiors package addressed this matter but was not part of the bid package
before the Council this evening. He
noted that special blinds, curtains, chairs and stacks would reduce heat loss.
Council Member
Andresen requested additional information on the building's main entryway
orientation. Mr. Gurlitz said the main
lobby area was similar to a large air lock which would be minimally heated. He stated that the northern entryway would
have the smallest amount of exposure and fewest number of windows of any of the
exposures. Council Member Rimer
inquired whether the building's plan included conduit for computer upgrades. Mr. Gurlitz said yes, noting that the
building had been upfit for flat wire connections. Council Member Rimer inquired whether Mr. Credle favored the
proposed computer plans. Mr. Credle
said yes. Council Member Andresen
inquired when the bonds would be sold and the anticipated level of additional
debt service for the library bonds. Mr.
Horton said the bonds would be sold after June 1st, with the first full year
payment occurring in 1993. He noted
that the payment was included in the preliminary budget report to the Council.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 4, AS
AMENDED, DELETING LANGUAGE PERTAINING TO THE BOLIN CREEK INTERCEPTOR
MORATORIUM.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE CHAPEL HILL
PUBLIC LIBRARY (92-3-23/R-4)
WHEREAS, the
Library Committee, Library Board of Trustees and staff have thoroughly reviewed
the attached drawings; and
WHEREAS, the
construction drawings and specifications reflect the intent of the building
program accepted by the Council in December 1990: and
WHEREAS, the
construction drawings and specifications incorporate all requirements
established in the Special Use Permit approval by the Council in April 1991;
and
WHEREAS, the
design incorporates energy saving features whenever possible;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council hereby authorizes the Manager to advertise for bids for construction of
the Chapel Hill Public Library, according to the designs presented to the
Council on March 23.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
Council Member
Capowski noted that a book drop was proposed in the circle in front of the
library. He inquired whether a bookdrop
was also proposed on Estes Drive. Mr.
Gurlitz said only one bookdrop was proposed at present. Council Member Capowski inquired about left
turning movements out of the library site onto Estes Drive. Mr. Gurlitz said a left-turn stacking lane
was proposed out of the library site.
Council Member Capowski inquired whether a traffic light was proposed
out of the site. Mr. Horton said
no. Council Member Rimer inquired when
building site location flags would be in place. Mr. Gurlitz said this would occur when contracts for building
construction had been let.
RESOLUTION 4,
AS AMENDED, WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Mr. Howes
inquired when groundbreaking was proposed.
Mr. Horton said groundbreaking was proposed this summer.
Item 10 Traffic Management System
Traffic
Engineer Saleem Khattak presented a slide show depicting traffic conditions
around the Town and the proposed automated integrated signal system. He noted that funding for the signal system
consisted of $1.2 million from the State and $123,000 plus utility costs from
the Town. Mr. Khattak said the system
would include a total of seventy-one traffic signals. He provided a brief
overview of the system's wiring and computerized capabilities. Mr. Khattak said the proposed system would
improve traffic operations by reducing travel time and delays and air pollution
and gasoline consumption. He noted that
the system also had the capability of facilitating emergency and transit
vehicle priorities. Mr. Khattak also
stated that some existing traffic controller equipment was no longer
serviceable.
Council Member
Rimer inquired whether traffic control by zones would be possible within twelve
to eighteen months. Mr. Khattak said
this was correct. He noted that initial
preference would be given to control zones one, two and six. Mr. Khattak said the system's design was 95%
complete, while the aerial communication design was completed. Mayor Broun inquired about the system's susceptibility
to a central computer malfunction. Mr.
Khattak said there were two back-up levels of redundancy, one of which was
traffic-responsive. Council Member
Capowski inquired who was writing the system's software. Mr. Khattak said several vendors were
writing the software since a closed-loop system was involved. He noted that the Town would have access to
the system's source code.
Item 11 Home Rule Legislation
Council Member
Brown noted that although local governments had many services to provide, they
had limited fiscal means to pay for them.
Council Member Brown said the resolution before the Council supported
home rule and the provision of greater flexibility in alternatives to the
property tax.
COUNCIL MEMBER
BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 5.
A RESOLUTION
SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF HOME RULE AND THE NEED FOR GREATER LOCAL FLEXIBILITY
TO CHOOSE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPERTY TAX (92-3-23/R-5)
WHEREAS,
municipal and county governments are closest to the people; and
WHEREAS, local
governments are required to hold public hearings on annual budgets including
revenue sources and services to citizens; and
WHEREAS, the
property tax is one of the most unpopular of all taxes, but local governments
have limited discretion to enact alternative revenue sources to balance annual
budgets without property tax increases; and
WHEREAS,
federal and State requirements of many types add to the cost of providing local
services, but such requirements often do not include additional resources to
provide such services; and
WHEREAS, some
States' legislators have given local governments greater flexibility to meet
local needs and to provide resources through alternatives to the property tax;
and
WHEREAS, House
Speaker Daniel T. Blue has noted the need for local governments to have
additional revenue sources available for municipal and county services;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council:
1. Supports
the concept of "home rule," which refers to giving local governments
greater flexibility to use alternatives to the property tax, to provide new
services to citizens and to adopt ordinances addressing areas of special local
concern.
2. Reaffirms
in particular its support for broader authorization of local revenue sources as
alternatives to the property tax.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
Council Member
Herzenberg suggested that the Council's adopted resolution be forwarded to
Speaker Blue, members of the local legislative delegation, and the North
Carolina League of Municipalities.
Council Member Brown suggested that the resolution be personally
presented to Speaker Blue.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Item 12 Consent Agenda
COUNCIL MEMBER
WILKERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
6. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS (92-3-23/R-6)
BE IT RESOLVED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the
resolutions as submitted by the Town Manager in regard to the following:
a. Minutes
of March 2, 1992.
b. Bids
for Skid-steer loader (R-7).
c. Bids
for street resurfacing (R-8).
d. Surplus
property disposition (R-9).
e. 1992-93 Comprehensive Improvement Assistance
Program submittal (R-10).
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
AWARDING A BID FOR THE PURCHASE OF A LOADER WITH ATTACHMENTS (92-3-23/R-7)
WHEREAS, the
Town of Chapel Hill solicited formal bids by legal notice in The Chapel Hill
Newspaper on February 19, 1992, in accordance with G.S. 143-129 for a
Skid-Steer Loader with attachments; and
WHEREAS, the
following bids were received and opened on March 2, 1992:
Case Power &
Rammax
Equipment Machinery Company
Loader Unit $13,500.00 $15,232.00
Attachments:
Backhoe w/ trenching
bucket 5,022.00 6,897.00
60" Utility bucket
387.00 692.00
60" bucket w/teeth
1,400.00 1,740.00
Hydraulic trencher 2,373.00 No Bid
Total Cost $22,682.00 $24,651.00
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Town accepts the bid of Case Power
& Equipment Company for a loader with attachments in the amount $22,682.00.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR RESURFACING OF STREETS (92-3-23/R-8)
WHEREAS, the
Town of Chapel Hill has solicited formal bids by legal notice in The Chapel
Hill Newspaper on March 11, 1992, in accordance with G.S. 143-129 for the
resurfacing of streets; and
WHEREAS, the
following bids were received, opened and publicly read on March 10, 1992:
BIDDER BASE
BID ALTERNATE I Total
Riley Paving
Co.
$136,515.00 $ 18,000.00 $154,515.00
Nello L. Teer
Co.
149,510.00 25,560.00
175,070.00
Thompson-Arthur
Co.
178,242.00 24,600.00 202,842.00
C.C. Mangum
Inc.
179,620.00 24,300.00 203,920.00
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council accepts the March 28 bid of Riley Paving Company for street resurfacing
in the amount $136,515.00 received in response to the Town's request for bids
published March 1 and opened March 10 in accord with G.S. 143-129.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Manager is authorized to execute a contract with Riley Paving
Company in the amount $136,515.00 and to initiate and sign change orders that
will increase the amount of street resurfacing work within the budgeted amount.
This the 23rd
day of March, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
DECLARING THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DISPOSAL OF SAID PROPERTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS (92-3-23/R-9)
WHEREAS,
Article 12 of NC General Statutes 160A and Section 4.16 of the Charter of the
Town of Chapel Hill authorizes the Town to dispose of surplus property; and
WHEREAS, the
Town desires to dispose of certain items of personal property;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill;
1. That
the following items of personal property are hereby declared surplus:
QUANTITY ITEM
(1) 1981 Mercury 4S
(6) 1989 Ford 4S
(1) 1988 Chevrolet 4S
(1) 1978 Dodge Van
(1) 1982 Dodge Pick Up
(1) 1985 GMC Rear Loader Garbage Truck
(1) 1986 White Front Loader Garbage Truck
(1) 1985 Chevrolet Cab & Chassis
(1) 1978 Chevrolet Bucket Truck
(1) 1979 Chevette 4S
(2) 1986 Plymouth Reliant K Cars
(2) 1986 Dodge Lift Equipped Vans
(1) 1968 GMC Bus
(1)
1974 GMC Bus
(1) 1979 Datsun Truck
(1) 1983 Chevrolet Pick Up
(1) Assorted Light Fixtures
(2) Electric Chandeliers
(1) Assorted Plumbing Fixtures
(1) 28' Extension Ladder
(1) Assorted Hydraulic Fittings
(1) Parts Washer Vats
(1) 453 Detroit Diesel Engine
(1) Pallet of Assorted Auto Parts
(1) Gerber Sign Making Machine
(1) Assorted Push Lawn Mowers & Parts
(1) Chain Saw
(4) Weedeaters
(1) Backpack Leaf Blower
(2) IBM Computer Monitors
(1) IBM Personal Computer
(1) Home Dishwasher
(10) Riot Helmets and Face Shields
(12) Gas Masks and Filters
(1) Sound Level Meter
(2) Radiation Detection Instruments
(1) IBM Typewriter
(1) Edcor Microphone Mixer, MX200
(1) Rauland Microphone Mixer, Model 3535
(1) Rauland Equalizer, Model 6209
(1) Epson Printer
(2) CRTs, Keyboard, Microdata Terminal
QUANTITY ITEM
(continued)
(2) Small Oxygen Tanks
(1) Small Fire Hatchet
(1) Kodak Ektaflex Print Maker Model 8
(1) Rotary Dial Desk Telephone, Beige
(2) Westinghouse Photocopier Lamps
(6) CRP Shields, Samaritan
(1) Grey Change Box, 10" x 7"
(2) Pairs Crutches
(1) Compaq Portable Computer
(2) Microwave Ovens
(4) Boxes of Clothing
(4) Rowing Machines
(6) Electric Stoves
(50) Gas Ranges
(1) Lot of Fareboxes
(2) Metal Doors, 36" x 83"
(61) Refrigerators
(1) Quietwriter Printer Unit
(1) Electric Stapler
(1) MacIntosh Computer
(6) Bags of Transit Uniforms
(1) Planner-Molder, Sears Model 12
(1) Kazoo-Kohler Lawn Mower, 5 HP
(1) Kut-Kwick Lawn Mower, 48' Cut, 16 HP
(1) Apple Computer
(2) Allison V Drive Transmissions
(1)
V Drive Plate
(1) Pallet of Glass
(1) Emerson Microwave Oven
(1) Miscellaneous Office Supplies
(1) Microfilm Reader
(20) Metal Lockers
(1) Tow Bar for GMC Bus
(6) Pallets of Brake Drums and Scrap Metal Parts
(1) RTS Engine Cradle
2. That
the Purchasing Agent of the Town of Chapel Hill shall be and is hereby
authorized to dispose of this surplus personal property in accordance with
statutory requirements.
3. That
the public auction is to take place on Saturday, April 25, 1992, at 10:00 a.m.
at the Municipal Operations Facility, 1099 Airport Road, Chapel Hill with a
rain date of May 9, 1992.
4. That
prior to the public auction the Purchasing Agent is authorized to dispose of
any of this person property by sales, lease, exchange, or transfer to other
governmental units in conformity with NC General Statues 160A-266.
5. That
the terms of sale shall be to the highest bidder for cash or other form of cash
equivalent acceptable to the Purchasing Agent. All sales shall be designated
final on the day of the auction.
6. That
all items shall be sold on an "as is" and "where is" basis
and the Town makes no guarantee of and assumes no responsibility for any of the
items.
7. That it
shall be condition of sale that all items purchased shall be picked up and
removed from the premises of the Municipal Operations Facility by 3:00 p.m. on
the day of the auction. Successful
bidders shall bear the sole risk for loss of any items remaining on said
premises past the designated time.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that any surplus property not sold at the public auction or leased,
exchanged or transferred to a another governmental agency shall be sold by the
Purchasing Agent by private negotiation and sale in conformity with NC General
Statute 160A-267, and that the Town may dispose of all metal surplus by selling
to a metal recycler.
This the 23rd
day of March 1992.
Item 13 Information Reports
Mayor Broun noted
that the Council had previously discussed boiler plant concerns at length.
Mayor Broun
said no executive session was needed.
The meeting
concluded at 11:22 p.m.