MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN OF
CHAPEL HILL, NORTH
CAROLINA, MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 1992 AT 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Broun called
the meeting to order at 7:36 p.m.
Council Members in attendance were Joyce Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark
Chilton, Joe Herzenberg, Alan Rimer, Arthur Werner and Roosevelt Wilkerson, Jr. Council Member Julie Andresen was absent
excused. Also in attendance were
Assistant to the Mayor Lisa Price, Town Manager Cal Horton, Assistant Town
Manager Sonna Loewenthal, Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney
Ralph Karpinos.
Item 0.1
Resolution Concerning Council Member Herzenberg
Mayor Broun noted
that none of the Council Members were happy to see the first item on this
evening's agenda. He added that several
persons had signed up to speak on the matter.
Noting the Council's policy on speaker's petitions, Mayor Broun
requested that speakers limit their remarks to three minutes.
Mayor Broun noted
that earlier in the day he had received a statement from Council Member
Herzenberg resigning his position as Mayor pro tempore, effective immediately.
Council Member Werner
said the matter before the Council was difficult for himself and the entire
Council. He noted that the Town's
political spectrum included a broad and unique range of opinions. Council Member Werner said that he and his
colleagues had listened to citizen's comments concerning Council Member
Herzenberg during the past two weeks.
He stated that the Council had carefully considered how to most
appropriately respond to the situation.
Noting that he had worked with Council Member Herzenberg for many years,
Council Member Werner noted that Council Member Herzenberg had worked hard for
the community and its residents.
Council Member Werner also emphasized the importance of the integrity of
individual council members. He stated
that public confidence in the Council appeared to be at an all-time low as a
result of Council Member Herzenberg's recent situation. Council Member Werner stressed the
importance of council members being held to the same standards as other
citizens. Council Member Werner said it
was with a great deal of sadness that he offered the following resolution:
A RESOLUTION
CENSURING JOE HERZENBERG AND SUGGESTING THAT HE RESIGN FROM THE COUNCIL
(92-8-24/R-0.1)
WHEREAS, Joe
Herzenberg has served as a member of the Chapel Hill Town Council from 1979 to
1981 and from 1987 to the present; and
WHEREAS, Mr.
Herzenberg has been a strong advocate for the less fortunate and a hard-working
public servant; and
WHEREAS, on August
10, 1992,. Mr. Herzenberg was found guilty of failing to file North Carolina
state income tax and intangible tax returns; and
WHEREAS, a major
responsibility of the Town Council and its members is to responsibly and
honorably take care to set tax rates and allocate tax funds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council censures
Mr. Herzenberg for his failure to pay taxes,
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council recognizes that it has no power to remove Mr.
Herzenberg from his position as a Council member and that his continuing
membership on the Council is a matter between the citizens of Chapel Hill and
him. Nevertheless, the Council urges
Mr. Herzenberg to recognize the impact
of his conviction on the continuing effectiveness of this Council should he
remain a member. Based on these
considerations, we believe that it is in the best interests of the Town of
Chapel Hill that Mr. Herzenberg resign from the Council.
This the 24th day of
August, 1992.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 0.1.
Mayor Broun noted
that the proposed resolution had been slightly revised, to reflect Mr.
Herzenberg's resignation as Mayor pro tempore earlier in the day. He said that, with the Council's
concurrence, he would accept comments from the audience.
Tom Moore requested
that the Council strike the last paragraph from the proposed resolution. He noted that previous Councils had
tolerated personal shortcomings by other Council members in the past. Mr. Moore said Council Member Herzenberg
represented a unique segment of the community.
Kirby Smith noted
that he had previously worked on Council Member Herzenberg's council campaigns
in the past. He stated that Council
Member Herzenberg had been an excellent Council member, particularly in regard
to minority, environmental and student issues.
Mr. Smith said Council Member Herzenberg's tax situation involved a
matter of trust and the maintenance of the Council's oath of office. Mr. Smith said he was saddened that he had
to support the proposed resolution.
Emphasizing the
importance of respect for law, Bill Peacock stated that Council Member Herzenberg's
representation of special interests was dangerous ground. Mr. Peacock stated that respect for the law
was the basis for democratic government.
Joe Straley, a former
Town Council Member, said he opposed the resolution requesting Council Member Herzenberg's
resignation. Mr. Straley commended
Council Member Herzenberg for his work on a variety of local, State and
international matters, including serving as a poll observer in San Jorge,
Nicaragua. Mr. Straley stated that
Council Member Herzenberg had an excellent record as an elected
representative. He also said that Mr.
Herzenberg was not a single-issue Council member. Mr. Straley noted Council Member Herzenberg's involvement in a
variety of community activities including civil and human rights, historic
preservation and student-related matters.
He expressed concern that balanced coverage of Council Member
Herzenberg's situation had not been provided.
Mr. Straley also said the Council had erred in meeting in closed session
to discuss Mr. Herzenberg's situation.
He stated that the session resulted in a loss of awareness of options,
and ultimately, liberty.
Calisa McKnight urged
the Council to leave the matter of whether or not to continue service in
Council Member Herzenberg's hands.
Noting that the matter had been legally resolved, Ms. McKnight said she
did not want her vote for Council Member Herzenberg negated. She said that the voters could decide
whether or not to re-elect Mr. Herzenberg upon the expiration of his current
term.
Iris Schwintzer said
she had known Council Member Herzenberg for many years and felt he was doing an
outstanding job. She stated that the
matter was most appropriately resolved at the polls.
Phillip Gallagher
said he had supported Council Member Herzenberg of many years. Mr. Gallagher said Council Member Herzenberg
was an important member of the community who had worked very hard in his
capacity as council member. Noting that
neither the Code or State Statutes provided Council recall or removal
provisions, Mr. Gallagher expressed concern that Council Member Herzenberg's
situation was not a proper item for consideration by the Council. He stated that voters, rather than the
Council, had standing in the matter.
Dan Coleman expressed
concern that the situation under discussion had been blown out of
proportion. Mr. Coleman said he had
been disgusted by the media's treatment of Council Member Herzenberg's
situation. Mr. Coleman also said he had
complete confidence in Council Member Herzenberg's competence and service to
the community. Noting his opposition to
last paragraph of the resolution under consideration, Mr. Coleman stated that
he would support any decision made by Council Member Herzenberg concerning his
Council tenure.
Mark Donahue said he
was hard-pressed to think of a stronger advocate for down-trodden persons. Mr. Donahue said Council Member Herzenberg
had an exemplary record of over twenty years of public service. He also stated that non-payment of taxes was
a serious offense and just and fair punishment had occurred. Mr. Donahue said requesting Council Member
Herzenberg's resignation did not serve the needs of the Town. Mr. Donahue urged the Council to permit
Council Member Herzenberg to prove his worth to the Town.
Phillip Sullivan said
he supported the proposed resolution.
Mr. Sullivan stated that Mr. Herzenberg had violated the trust of his
office by his non-payment of taxes for fourteen years. Mr. Sullivan urged the Council to adopt the
proposed resolution.
Roscoe Reeve said he
realized the matter before the Council was a painful one. Mr. Reeve said Council Member Herzenberg was
a friend and he would stand by his decision to continue serving or resign. Mr. Reeve also said he opposed the last
portion of the proposed resolution. He
stated that Council Member Herzenberg's past personal actions would not impact
the Council's effectiveness. Mr. Reeve
said it was important to consider the context of the entire situation. He also expressed concern about the sanctimonious
and cruel comments of some persons concerning Council Member Herzenberg's
situation. Commending the Council for
its frank exchange of ideas on the matter, Mr. Reeve said he hoped the
community-building process would continue.
Council Member Brown
said the entire Council had suffered through the situation. Council Member Brown said she was personally
concerned whether the proposed resolution was a proper act by the Council. Council Member Brown suggested amending the
final paragraph of the resolution by adding the words "the Council urges
to take into consideration individual member's opinions..." Council Member Brown suggested that the
Council leave the matter to be handled on a personal basis.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO MAKE A SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO THE
RESOLUTION ON THE FLOOR.
Mayor Broun requested
remarks from individual Council members.
Council Member
Wilkerson said the matter before the Council this evening had torn the
community apart. Council Member
Wilkerson said the community looked to the Council for leadership on
decision-making on the actions of Council Member colleagues. Council Member Wilkerson said he had the
utmost respect and love for Council Member Herzenberg. Noting Council Member Herzenberg's long
record of service to the community, Council Member Wilkerson expressed hope
that Council Member Herzenberg would make his decision in best interest of the
entire community. Council Member
Wilkerson said he would vote in favor of the original resolution, urging
Council Member Herzenberg to resign as a Council member.
Noting Council Member
Andresen's absence this evening, Council Member Capowski stated that Mayor
Broun had read the proposed resolution to Council Member Andresen earlier in the
day. He noted that Council Member
Andresen had expressed her support for the proposed resolution. Council Member Capowski read a statement
from Council Member Andresen noting that payment of taxes was a fundamental
civic duty. Council Member Andresen also
stated that Council Member Herzenberg had not met the standards for serving in
public office. She also expressed
concern that the continuing presence of the issue would hinder his future
duties as a Council member. Council
Member Andresen said Council Member Herzenberg's resignation as a Council
member appeared to be the best decision.
Council Member
Capowski said Council Member Herzenberg had been a tireless worker for the
Town. Council Member Capowski also said
he was in Council Member Herzenberg's debt for his past assistance. Council Member Capowski stated that since
the Council levied taxes, it was essential that Council members be immaculate
in paying them. He expressed concern
that the Council had already spent too much time in considering this
matter. Council Member Capowski said
the only way to resolve the matter once and for all would be for Council Member
Herzenberg to resign. Council Member
Capowski said he supported adoption of the resolution without the amendment.
Council Member Brown
said Council Member Herzenberg's situation was a matter between himself and the
voters, rather than the Council.
Council Member Brown stated that she could not condone Council Member
Herzenberg's actions. She added that
the Council asking for Council Member Herzenberg's resignation could set a
dangerous precedent. Council Member
Brown urged the Council to adopt the proposed substitute motion.
Council Member Rimer
noted that he had been out of town recently and had been unable to confer with
others on Council Member Herzenberg's situation. Council Member Rimer said he found Council Member Herzenberg's
situation untenable regardless of whether or not taxes were willfully
paid. Noting that Council Member
Herzenberg had done a great deal for the community in the past, Council Member
Rimer said he did not understand whether the Council had the right to do
anything beyond censuring Council Member Herzenberg. Mayor Broun inquired whether there were any legal problems with
the proposed original motion. Mr.
Karpinos said no. Council Member Rimer
said it was a sad time because the Council and Town stood to lose a colleague
with a great deal of stature.
Council Member
Chilton said he supported Council Member Brown's substitute motion. Council Member Chilton said it was not the
Council's place to tell Council Member Herzenberg what to do. He said the matter was between the voters
and Council Member Herzenberg. Council
Member Chilton said if Council Member Herzenberg believed he could continue to
serve on the Council, he would not be afraid of serving along side him.
Council Member Werner
said it was appropriate for the Council to go on record on the matter. Council Member Werner said he was
comfortable with the original resolution, requesting that Council Member
Herzenberg resign as a Council member.
Mayor Broun said
Council Member Herzenberg had an outstanding record, representing the best of
all of us. He noted that the Council
was limited by the actions it could take in the matter. Mayor Broun said the Council had an
obligation to make a collective statement on Council Member Herzenberg's
situation. He noted that his initial
statement on the situation had been based on a weighing process. Mayor Broun added that the law was tempered
with justice and compassion. Mayor
Broun said he had found it difficult to reach the decision that he could not
ask his constituents to have confidence in Council Member Herzenberg's
continued service as a Council member.
He noted that the original resolution (0.1) accurately set out what the
Council could and should do in the matter.
Mayor Broun said he would vote for the original resolution.
Council Member
Herzenberg offered an apology for what he had done and said he could not say
how sorry, contrite and ashamed he was. Council Member Herzenberg said he did
not ask people to forget the misdemeanors for which he had been charged and
convicted. Council Member Herzenberg
noted that he had resigned as Mayor pro tempore earlier in the day. Council Member Herzenberg also said he
intended to pay back taxes beyond the statute of limitations. Council Member Herzenberg also said he had
no intention of evading the payment of taxes.
He added that the Town was withholding from his salary checks twice the
necessary amount for taxes at his request.
Council Member Herzenberg said it was highly appropriate for the Council
to censure him for his failure to pay taxes.
He also said there were strong and principled arguments against asking
for his resignation from the Council.
Council Member Herzenberg said he had been punished by the court system
and public opinion. He requested that
forgiveness of citizens for his past mistakes.
Council Member Herzenberg said that most people who had contacted him
had been supportive. He added that
about ten percent of the persons who had called him had asked him to leave
office. Council Member Herzenberg said
he had let people down and lost their trust.
Council Member
Herzenberg stated that he took his responsibilities as a Council member very
seriously. Council Member Herzenberg
said he had a responsibility to all citizens of the Town and those who elected
him. Council Member Herzenberg said it
was up to voters to remove him from office.
He also said he would try very hard to make it up to all those he had
let down. Council Member Herzenberg
said he would continue to serve as a Council member to the best of his ability.
Mayor Broun noted
that the substitute motion was on the floor. Council Member Rimer inquired
whether it would still be up to Council Member Herzenberg to resign in the
event that the original resolution were adopted. Mayor Broun said yes, noting that it was up to Council Member
Herzenberg as to whether or not he should resign. Council Member Rimer said the net impact of the main and
substitute resolutions appeared to be quite similar.
Mayor Broun said the
resolution proposed by Council Member Werner was a statement of collective judgment
of how the Council felt on a particular issue.
Mayor Broun said the Council not only had the right, but an obligation,
to pass the proposed resolution. He
stated that there were no legal problems with either resolution.
THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION
WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND FAILED BY A VOTE OF 4-4, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS
BROWN, CHILTON, HERZENBERG AND RIMER VOTING AYE.
Council Member Brown
inquired whether it was possible to separate the resolution into two portions,
one concerning censure and the other concerning the request for
resignation. Mayor Broun said he
assumed Council Member Brown wished to amend the motion into two parts. Council Member Brown said this was correct. Mr. Karpinos said if five Council members
supported separating the motion into two parts, it was permissible. Mayor Broun inquired whether the mover and
seconder concurred. Council Members
Werner and Capowski said yes.
THE ORIGINAL MOTION
CONCERNING CENSURE WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR.
Council Member Werner
inquired whether it was appropriate for Council Member Herzenberg to vote on
the matter. Mayor Broun said Council
Member Herzenberg could be excused if he so requested and the Council approved.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
THE SECOND PORTION OF
THE MOTION, CONCERNING THE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG'S RESIGNATION,
WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR.
Council Member
Herzenberg requested excusal from voting on the matter. Mayor Broun noted that there were no
objections to the request.
THE MOTION WAS PLACED
ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 5-2, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS BROWN AND
CHILTON VOTING "NO".
Mayor Broun suggested
a recess at 8:56 p.m.
The meeting
reconvened at 9:07 p.m.
Item 3 Petitions
Mr. Horton suggested
that annual reports could possibly be considered at the Council's planning and
reporting session on August 31st. The
Council concurred. Council Member Rimer
added that it would also be possible to defer consideration of agenda item
number seven, concerning the Landfill Owner's Group, to the September 14th
meeting. Mayor Broun said that item
number seven was removed by Council consent.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON, TO RECEIVE AND REFER A PETITION BY
GINNY TURNER CONCERNING THE REMOVAL OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON ONE SIDE OF THE
200 BLOCK OF NORTH BOUNDARY STREET FOR LIBRARY PARKING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
George Shaw requested
that the Council consider naming the proposed North Forest Hills Park in honor
of Jonathan Irwin, a young boy recently killed in a tragic bicycle/car
accident. Mr. Shaw said residents of
his neighborhood unanimously supported the proposed petition. Council Member Werner suggested that Mr.
Shaw make his proposal again when the special use permit for the North Forest
Hills Park was considered by the Council.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MR. SHAW'S
PETITION TO THE MANAGER AND NAMING COMMITTEE.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Mr. Shaw also said
that residents of his neighborhood had met to discuss ways to reduce traffic
areas in the area. He stated that
safety could be improved by opening and maintaining two pedestrian easements in
the area.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MR. SHAW'S
PETITION CONCERNING PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Baird Grimson thanked
the Manager and staff for their responses to the concerns of Westside neighborhood
residents. He also expressed the
neighborhood's appreciation for recent sidewalk improvements in the area. Mr. Grimson said area residents were also
looking forward to future safety improvements such as pedestrian crosswalks and
four-way stops.
Council Member
Capowski noted that there had been several serious and fatal accidents on East
Franklin Street in the past few years.
He requested that staff provide a statistical report on the accidents,
including the speed of cars, the influence of alcohol and drugs in accidents,
and driving habits in the area. Council
Member Capowski also requested that staff provide problem-solving options and
costs. Noting that the area had been
recognized as dangerous in the past, Council Member Wilkerson inquired how this
report would differ from past reports.
Mr. Horton said the report would include updated accident data and an
evaluation of possible design solutions.
Council Member Werner said it was important to recognize that the
roadway was a state road. He inquired
whether state transportation officials would concur with possible roadway
design changes. Mr. Horton said that
state transportation officials were also examining options to address safety
concerns in the East Franklin Street/Stroud Hill area. Mayor Broun noted that the matter was
referred to the staff.
Council Member Rimer
requested that the Manager and Attorney prepare a background document on how
remote voting by Council members might occur by telephone or television. Mayor Broun said staff could provide
additional information on this matter.
Item 4 Appointments
Council Member
Wilkerson said he and the Leadership Committee recommended the appointment of
committee chairs and members to various committees of the Community Response to
Violent Crime and Illegal Drug Abuse.
He noted that efforts continued to fill all committee vacancies. Council Member Wilkerson also said that
Council Member Andresen had expressed interest in serving on the Law
Enforcement Committee.
COUNCIL MEMBER WILKERSON
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Criminal Justice
Committee Joel Booker Ben Callahan
Sandi Brownstein Shelton Edmonson
Harry Derr Nancy Hayes
Carl Fox Julia Joyner
Warren Jones Mary McAllister
Arnold Lau Ben Perkowski
Mae McLendon James Williams
Chawanda C. Sims
Downtown Committee Mildred Council
Mickey Ewell
(Chair)
Todd Zapolski Erwin Shatzen
Joe Herzenberg Johnny Williams
Robert Humphreys Bill Loeser
Economic
Opportunities Ted Abernathy (Chair)
Law Enforcement and James Brittain Rebecca S. Clark
Support Services Alana Ennis James Huegerich
Paul E. Knight Caroline B. Long
Elsie Pickett Darren Skeen
Vince Stevens Howard L. Watson
Julie Andresen
(Council Member)
Rosemary Waldorf
(Chair)
News Media Committee Mark Chilton Robert Parks
Beth Deacon Rafael Paul
Stan Hojnacki Doug Rogers
Clifton Metcalf Mark Schultz
Peter Wallsten Kevin Schwartz
Neil Offen (Chair)
Sexual Assault and Melida Colindres Polly Guthrie
Domestic Violence Jan Stone Carolyn Hutchison
Adam Goldstein Tom Maynard
Ruth
Schor
Kit Gruelle
(Co-Chairperson)
Sabrina Garcia
(Co-Chairperson)
Youth Committee Jacqueline Gist Carol Calloway
Frank Loda Betsy Jones
George Price Darryl Roseboro
Susan Worley Annette Zarriello
Jay Bryan (Chair) Steven Mullinix
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO APPOINT BETTY CLOUTIER TO THE
ENDOWMENT FOR PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, DIRECTING STAFF TO SOLICIT
APPLICATIONS FOR FIVE TOWN REPRESENTATIVES ON THE TRIANGLE FIXED GUIDEWAY
ADVISORY GROUP. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Item 5 North Street Subdivision, Phase 4
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Mr. Horton requested
that materials pertaining to the application be entered into the record of the
hearing. Mayor Broun concurred with the
request.
Planning Director
Roger Waldon said the applicant was seeking preliminary plat approval for seven
lots in the North Street Subdivision, Phase 4.
He said the revised plat included seven lots with increased buildable
area on steep slopes than the earlier proposed nine-lot subdivision. Mr. Waldon said the staff believed that the
proposal would comply with the Town's Development Ordinance and addressed
concerns raised at earlier public hearings.
Council Member
Chilton requested additional information on a proposed t-turnaround. Mr. Waldon provided information, noting that
the proposed arrangement was adequate.
Council Member Rimer inquired about the meaning of "L" on one
of the lots. Mr. Waldon said this
depicted a landscape protection easement.
Council Member Rimer inquired whether it was possible for the applicant
to request additional resubdivisions of lots in the application in the
future. Mr. Waldon said yes. Council Member Rimer asked whether there was
any way to stipulate that this could not be done. Mr. Waldon said he believed this was not possible. Council Member Rimer asked whether future requests for
resubdivision would have to be considered by the Council. Mr. Waldon said this was correct. Council
Member Rimer said the proposed subdivision was a reasonable compromise.
Gerry Barrett said he
accepted the proposed conditions of approval outlined in Resolution 1a.
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC
HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1A. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR NORTH STREET
SUBDIVISION PHASE IV (SD-79B-25) (92-8-24/R-1a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the subdivision proposed
by Gerry Barrett for The Little Creek Company, on property identified as Chapel
Hill Township Tax Map 79B, Lot 25, if developed according to Preliminary Plat
dated May 9, 1992 (revised July 31,
1992) and the conditions listed below, would comply with the Development
Ordinance:
Stipulations Specific to the
Development
1. Flag
Lots: That this approval shall not
permit the creation of any flag lots and the total number of lots approved
shall not exceed seven (7).
2. Historic
District Commission Approval: That
all proposals for structures, including houses, fences, guardrails or other
permanent safety barriers, garages, and storage sheds, be reviewed for approval
by the Historic District Commission. A
Certificate of Appropriateness will be required prior to issuance of a Building
Permit. A note to this effect will be
added to the final plat.
3. Curbside
Collection for Steep Lots: That a
note be added to the final plat indicating that refuse collection may be
restricted to curb-side service.
4. Required
Improvements:
a. Sidewalk: That a 4-foot brick sidewalk be provided along the uphill (south)
side of North Boundary Street. The
sidewalk plans must be reviewed and approved by the Historic District Commission
before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
b. Street Improvements: That the extension of North Boundary Street
be constructed to Town standards, except that the pavement width be limited to
23 feet. Curb and gutter shall be
provided. The street and T-turn around
shall include appropriate right-of-way widths.
c. Side Slopes and Safety Barriers: That steep side slopes of 1.5:1 - 2:1 be
constructed along the street to minimize the area necessary for grading. A slope stabilization plan will be required
for slopes of 2:1 or steeper.
Guardrails or other safety barriers will be required on the downhill
side of the street.
d. Parking: That on-street parking be prohibited, and that a note to this
effect be placed on the final plat.
e. Turnaround: That the T-turnaround near the end of the street be at least 55
feet long, and that a 10-foot wide right-of-way be provided beyond the
pavement.
5. That
there shall be no vehicular access to Lots 4, 5, and 6 from the east (Tenney
Circle/North Street).
6. That
vehicular access to Lots 5 and 6 be restricted to a shared driveway.
Stipulations Related to Landscape
Elements
7. Landscape
Easement: That the proposed
landscape easement be indicated on the final plat and the final plans as an
easement which prohibits land disturbance or the removal of vegetation and
which prohibits the location of structures.
Notes on the plat shall include the following:
This
area is to remain as undisturbed vegetated buffer. No grading, building, clearing, or cutting of live healthy trees
is permitted in this area.
8. Landscape
Protection Plan: That a Landscape
Protection Plan be reviewed and approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance
of a Zoning Compliance Permit; and that tree protection fences be shown on the
final plans and installed at the limits of clearing to protect existing trees
and their root systems before the initiation of land-disturbing activities.
Stipulations Related to the Resource
Conservation District
9. Boundaries: That the boundaries of the Resource
Conservation District be shown on the final plat and final plans with a note
indicating that "Development shall be restricted within the Resource
Conservation District in accordance with the Development Ordinance."
10. Setback: That any restrictive covenant applicable to
lots adjacent to the Resource Conservation District not require greater
setbacks than those required by the Development Ordinance.
11. Variances: That all variances necessary for development
within the Resource Conservation District be obtained before application for
final plat or final plan approval.
12. Buildable
Area: That buildable area for the
lots be indicated on the final plat.
Buildable area shall indicate the limits of clearing and grading for
houses and garages.
Stipulations Related to Water, Sewer, and
Other Utilities
13. Detailed
Plans: That final detailed site
plans, grading plans, utility/lighting plans, stormwater management plans (with
hydrologic calculations), and landscape plans and landscape maintenance plans
be approved by the Town Manager before issuance of Zoning Compliance Permit or
application for final plat approval, and that such plans conform to plans
approved by this application and demonstrate compliance with all applicable
conditions and the design standards of the Development Ordinance and the Design
Manual.
14. Hydrant: That a triple hydrant be installed along the
street at a location approved by the Town Manager.
15. Water
Line: That an 8-inch water line be
installed along the street to serve the hydrant and the new lots.
16. Fire
Flow: That a fire flow report
prepared by a registered professional engineer, showing that flows meet the
minimum requirements of the Design Manual, be approved prior to issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit.
17. Utility
Service Laterals for Preliminary Plat Applications: That prior to paving streets, utility
service laterals (including cable and telephone) shall be stubbed out to the
front property lines of each lot.
Sanitary sewer laterals shall be capped off above ground.
18. OWASA
Easements for Preliminary Plat Applications: That easement documents as required by OWASA and the Town Manager
be recorded before final plat approval.
19. Utility/Lighting
Plan Approval: That the final
utility/lighting plan be approved by OWASA, Duke Power, Cablevision, Public
Service Company, Southern Bell, and the Town Manager, before issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit. The property
owner shall be responsible for assuring these utilities, including cable
television, are extended to serve the development.
In
addition, the lighting plan must be reviewed and approved by the Historic
District Commission prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Miscellaneous Stipulations
20. Traffic
Signs: That the property owner
shall be responsible for placement and maintenance of temporary regulatory
traffic signs, including street name signs, before issuance of any Certificate
of Occupancy until such time that the street system is accepted for maintenance
by the Town.
21. For
Developments with New Street Names/Numbers: That name of the development and its streets and house/building
numbers be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
22. Silt
Control: That the applicant take
appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on
adjacent paved roadways.
23. Soil
Erosion: That a soil erosion and
sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control
Officer before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
24. Certificate
of Occupancy: That no Certificate
of Occupancy be issued until all required public improvements are completed;
and that a note to this effect shall be placed on the final plat.
If the
Town Manager approves a phasing plan, no Certificate of Occupancy shall be
issued for a phase until all required public improvements for that phase are
complete; no Building Permits for any phase shall be issued until all public
improvements required in previous phases are completed to a point adjacent to
the new phase; and that a note to this effect shall be placed on the final
plat.
25. Continued
Validity: That continued validity
and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued
compliance with the plans and conditions listed above.
26. Non-Severability:
That if any of the above conditions is
held to be invalid, this approval in its entirety shall be void.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the application for Preliminary Plat
approval of North Street Subdivision Phase IV in accordance with the plans and
conditions listed above.
This the 24th day of
August, 1992.
Mayor Broun noted
that he had inadvertently omitted Mike Hoffer from petitioners earlier in the
meeting. Mr. Hoffer requested that the
Council direct staff to examine the possibility of revising parking
requirements for small development projects.
COUNCIL MEMBER
WILKERSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MR.
HOFFER'S PETITION.
Council Member Werner
said it might make sense to change parking requirements for smaller development
projects.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Item 6
Report on Reducing Violent Crime & Illegal Drug Abuse
Council Member
Wilkerson said the task force had a total of forty-nine recommendations cutting
across the community, with an emphasis on the need for involvement by a number
of different agencies. He stated that
action had been taken on sixteen of the forty-nine recommendations, including
provision of an office skills training program for public housing
residents. He added that dynamic and
innovative drug elimination programs were underway as was a Business Watch
program in the downtown and Pine Knolls area.
Council Member Wilkerson also noted that staff was working on adding a
third Head Start class in the community.
He stated that the Town's Parks and Recreation Department had
coordinated a variety of activities including a summer basketball league and a
variety of programs, in concert with the Mission for Excellence, at the Hargraves
Center. Council Member Wilkerson noted
that the community response was still seeking a volunteer coordinator.
Council Member Werner
said the amount of activity by the task force in just nine to ten months was
impressive. Council Member Wilkerson
commended Town staff, especially Ms. Loewenthal and Toni Pendergraph for their
efforts related to the program. He
added that Council Members Chilton and Herzenberg had also been very
supportive.
Item 7, concerning
Landfill Owners Group matters, was deferred to September 14th.
Item 8 Parking Ordinance Amendments
Transportation
Director Bob Godding briefly reviewed changes in the Town Code pertaining to
parking and towing provisions. He noted
that the Transportation Board had reviewed the proposed changes and recommended
adoption of Ordinance 1.
Council Member
Capowski inquired how frequently cars were abandoned on Town streets. Mr. Godding said this was infrequent
occurrence. Council Member Capowski
asked how cars parked overtime were handled by the Town. Mr. Godding stated that cars left over seven
days were considered to be abandoned and were towed without a pre-towing notice. Council Member Capowski asked when cars were
towed from metered spaces. Mr. Godding
said that cars would have to be parked in spaces for at least seven days prior
to towing. Council Member Chilton
requested a clarification of Section 21-25.1 concerning notices for vehicle
abandonment on Town property. Mr.
Godding said that towing from Town property did not generally occur until after
at least forty-eight hours. Mr. Karpinos
said this was consistent with state law.
Council Member
Capowski asked whether other towns had fines greater than $50 for illegally
parking in handicapped spaces. Mr.
Godding said comparisons of this fine had not been made with other
communities. Council Member Rimer noted
that signs at his place of business called for a $100 fine for persons
violating handicapped parking provisions.
He also inquired whether the Town would have to enact new regulations to
enact the use of a Denver boot for illegally parked vehicles. Mr. Godding said the University had the
authority to use the device, but the Town did not have similar authority. Mr. Godding said Town staff would continue
to monitor the situation. Mayor Broun
said the North Carolina League of Municipalities might have additional
information on the use of devices such as the Denver boot. Council Member Brown asked how much the
devices cost and how many would be needed by the Town. Mr. Godding said this situation had not been
examined by the Town.
Council Member
Capowski asked whether fines for illegal handicapped parking could be higher
than $50. Mr. Karpinos said he could
examine the matter in greater detail.
Council Member Capowski said he felt strongly about non-handicapped
persons parking in spaces for handicapped persons.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 1. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
AN ORDINANCE REVISING
CHAPTER 21 OF THE TOWN CODE RELATED TO PARKING VIOLATIONS AND TOWING OF
VEHICLES FOUND IN VIOLATION OF THE TOWN CODE (92-8-24/O-1)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill as
follows:
SECTION I
Sec. 21‑2.
Traffic bureau. is hereby revised to read as follows:
"Sec. 21.2.
Reserved."
SECTION II
Article IIIA. TOWING
PROCEDURES is hereby revised to read as follows:
"ARTICLE IIIA. TOWING PROCEDURES
Sec. 21‑18.2. Towing of illegally parked vehicles.
(a)
The Police and Transportation Departments of the Town of Chapel Hill are
hereby authorized to remove to a storage garage or area any vehicle which has
been left upon a street or highway or sidewalk within the Town in violation of
any State law prohibiting parking.
(b)
The Police and Transportation Departments of the Town of Chapel Hill are
hereby authorized to remove to a storage garage or area any vehicle which has
been left upon a street or highway or sidewalk within the Town in violation of
any of the following provisions of the Town Code prohibiting or regulating
parking:
1. Sec. 21‑20. Interference with traffic.
2. Sec. 21‑20.1. Parking on sidewalk
prohibited.
3. Sec. 21‑20.2. Fire lanes.
4. Sec. 21‑20.3. Use of certain fire
lanes.
5. Sec. 21‑20.4. Restrictions on use
of certain public alleys
6. Sec. 21‑27.1. No parking during
certain hours.
7. Sec. 21‑27.3 Bike lane overlay zones.
8. Sec. 21‑28. No parking, miscellaneous regulations.
9. Sec. 21‑28.1 Bus stops.
10. Sec. 21‑35. Loading and unloading of delivery vehicles.
11. Sec.
21‑36. Parking space reserved for handicapped individuals.
The
listing of specific sections in this subsection does not limit the authority of
the Town to tow and impound vehicles where that authority is otherwise
specifically stated in a provision of State law or Town ordinance.
(c) The Police and Transportation Departments of
the Town of Chapel Hill are hereby authorized to remove to a storage garage or
area any vehicle which has been left upon a street or highway or sidewalk
within the Town in violation of any other provision of the Town Code
prohibiting or regulating parking if, upon determination of a violation and
checking of the records of the Town, it is determined that there are four or
more outstanding violations of any Town parking regulations for the same
vehicle which have not been paid or otherwise cleared of record.
(d) The Police and Transportation Departments of
the Town of Chapel Hill are hereby authorized to remove to a storage garage or
area any vehicle which is parked in a Town‑owned parking lot in violation
of any ordinance adopted regulating the parking in said lot; provided, however,
that said lot is clearly marked by a sign no smaller than 24 inches by 24
inches, displayed at the entrance to said lot, stating the ordinance
regulations with respect to that lot.
Sec. 21‑18.3. Post‑towing notice procedures.
(a) Whenever a vehicle has been removed, towed
in and impounded under this ordinance, the Town Manager or his designee shall
immediately notify the last known registered owner of the vehicle. If the vehicle has a North Carolina registration
plate or registration, notice shall be given to the owner within 24 hours. If the vehicle is not registered in this
State, notice shall be given to the owner within 72 hours. This notice shall, if feasible, be given by
telephone. Whether or not the owner is
reached by telephone, notice shall be mailed by certified mail to his or her
last known address unless the owner or the owner's agent waives this notice in
writing. A record of the form and
manner of notice to the owner shall be maintained in the Town's records.
(b) The notice required shall include the
following:
(1) A description of the vehicle, including any
license plate number;
(2) The location from which it was towed and the
location where the vehicle is stored;
(3) A summary of this article, including the
procedures for requesting a hearing and reacquiring possession of the impounded
vehicle;
(4) A statement that the vehicle is alleged to
have violated a traffic or parking ordinance of the Town or State and the
specific violation alleged;
(c) If
reasonable means fail to locate the owner or the owner's agent, the notice
required by this section shall be given by publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in Orange County.
Sec. 21‑18.4. Post‑towing procedures for return of vehicle and hearing.
(a) The owner of a vehicle impounded under this
Article, or his agent, may request an administrative hearing within seven (7)
days after the delivery of the notice, or the equivalent publication thereof,
or seven (7) days after he learns such vehicle has been impounded, whichever
occurs first, to determine if there was probable cause to impound the vehicle
under this Article. The hearing shall
be conducted before an official designated by the Town Manager, who shall not
be any person who is in the chain of command of the Town employee effecting the
impoundment. The hearing shall be
conducted as soon as possible, but in any event within forty‑eight (48)
hours after a request for it unless a later time is agreed to in writing by the
person requesting the hearing.
Failure
of the owner or his agent to request or attend a scheduled hearing shall waive
his right to such hearing.
(b) The hearing officer shall determine only if
there was probable cause to impound the vehicle under the provisions of this
Article. "Probable cause to
impound" shall mean such a state of facts as would lead a person of
ordinary care and prudence to believe that there was a sufficient breach of
local, State or federal law to grant legal authority for the removal of the
vehicle and that all required procedures were followed. The person requesting the hearing shall have
the burden of establishing his right to possession of the vehicle. The officer effecting the tow shall have the
burden of establishing that there was probable cause to impound the vehicle.
The
hearing officer shall render his decision in writing and provide a copy to the
person requesting the hearing.
(c) (1) If
no probable cause is found, the hearing officer shall refund or cause to be
refunded any bond previously posted and shall direct in writing that the
vehicle be released from impoundment to its owner or his agent. If no probable cause if found, towing and
storage fees shall be paid by the Town in accordance with its contractual
arrangements for such services. If the
vehicle's owner or his agent fails to claim it from impoundment by 5:00 p.m. on
the first working day after the date of the decision, he shall assume liability
for all subsequent storage charges.
(2)
If probable cause is found to have impounded the vehicle, the hearing
officer shall so notify the Town Manager or his designee in writing and shall
direct that the vehicle be released only upon payment to the Town of its towing
and storage fees and related notification costs.
(d) If no hearing is requested or if it is
waived, the owner of an impounded vehicle or his agent may regain possession of
the vehicle by paying to the Town its towing and storage fees and related
notification costs.
(e) The owner of a vehicle impounded under this
Article, or his agent, may regain possession of it prior to the hearing by
posting a cash bond in the amount of the Town's towing and storage fees and
related notification costs. The cash
bond shall be forfeited to the Town if such person does not request a hearing
hereunder or if he fails to attend a scheduled hearing.
(f) All witnesses at the hearing shall be sworn
before a notary public or other such official authorized to administer
oaths. The hearing officer's decision
shall be based on material, substantial and competent evidence presented at the
hearing. The owner or his agent shall
be given the opportunity to present evidence and arguments and to ask questions
of persons who testify. A record of the
hearing officer's decision shall be made that contains his decision and a
brief, concise statement of the reason for it.
(g) Any decision of the hearing officer may be
appealed to Orange County District Court as provided by N.C.G.S. Sec. 160A‑
303(d)(2)(c).
Sec. 21‑18.5. Storage and towing fees and related notification
costs.
(a) All storage and towing fees and related
notification costs incurred by the Town or imposed upon the owner of the
vehicle or his agent as a result of its towing‑in and impoundment shall
constitute a lien upon such vehicle.
The vehicle may not be released until these costs have been paid or
until the owner or his agent has posted the appropriate bond under this
Article, unless the hearing official conducting a hearing under section 21‑
18.4 determines that no probable cause to tow and impound the vehicle exists.
(b) In the event any vehicle towed under the
provisions of this Article is not returned to the owner following a hearing, or
as a result of fees and charges being paid, the Town may proceed to sell or
otherwise dispose of said vehicle as authorized by N.C.G.S. Sec. 160A‑303(d)(2)(e).
Sec. 21‑18.6. Reserved.
Sec. 21‑18.7. Reserved."
SECTION III
Article IV. Stopping, Standing and Parking is
hereby revised by adding the following:
"Sec. 21‑25.1. Abandoned vehicles on Town property.
It
shall be unlawful to leave any motor vehicle on property owned or operated by
the Town for longer than 24 hours. Any
motor vehicle left on property owned or operated by the Town for longer than 24
hours shall be considered abandoned and shall be subject to towing and
impoundment; provided, however, that such vehicle shall not be subject to being
towed under the provisions of this article for such a violation until notice of
violation shall be placed on the vehicle 48 hours prior to said towing.
Sec. 21‑25.2. Abandoned vehicles on public streets.
It
shall be unlawful to leave any motor vehicle on a public street or highway for
longer than seven days . Any motor
vehicle left on a public street or highway for longer than seven days shall be
considered abandoned and shall be
subject to towing and impoundment; provided, however, that such vehicle shall
not be subject to being towed under the provisions of this article for such a
violation until notice of violation shall be placed on the vehicle for 48 hours
prior to said towing."
SECTION IV
Sec. 21‑28. No parking, miscellaneous
regulations. is hereby amended by adding
the following to the end of the section:
"(g) It shall be unlawful to park so as to create a hazard or
significant obstruction to the normal movement of traffic.
(h) It
shall be unlawful to park a motor vehicle so as to block a private driveway.
(i) It
shall be unlawful to park within fifteen (15) feet in either direction of a
fire hydrant.
(j) It
shall be unlawful to park so as to hinder egress from the entrance to a fire
station or otherwise significantly impede provision of an essential Town
service.
(k) It
shall be unlawful to obstruct a fire lane or a bicycle lane."
SECTION V
Sec. 21‑28.2. Parking in off‑street parking facilities owned or operated
by the Town. is hereby amended by rewriting the last sentence of paragraph (a)
as follows:
"Any
person who removes a vehicle pursuant to this section shall not be held liable
for damages for the removal of the vehicle to the owner, lienholder or other
person legally entitled to the possession of the vehicle removed; however, any
person who intentionally or negligently damages a vehicle in the removal of
such vehicle, or intentionally or negligently inflicts injury upon any person
in the removal of such vehicle, may be held liable for damages."
SECTION VI
Sec. 21‑38. Civil Penalties. is hereby
rewritten as follows:
"Sec. 21‑38. Civil Penalties.
(a) The
penalty for any violation of sections 21‑29, 21‑30, 21‑32, 21‑33,
and 21‑37.1 shall be five dollars ($5.00).
(b) The
penalty for any violation of section 21‑36 shall be fifty dollars
($50.00).
(c) The
penalty for violation of any other parking regulations of Articles IV and V of
Chapter 21 of this Code shall be twenty‑five dollars ($25.00).
(d)
Upon receiving a citation, serving as notice of a violation of the parking
regulations set forth in this chapter, the owner or operator of the vehicle found
in violation shall be responsible for the penalties herein established.
(e) Any
penalty for a parking violation that is not paid within fifteen (15) days of
issuance will accrue an additional penalty of five dollars per fifteen (15)
days it remains unpaid.
(f) The
maximum total combined fine and penalties for a five dollar ($5.00) violation
shall be twenty‑five dollars ($25.00). The maximum total combined fine
and penalties for a twenty‑five dollar ($25.00) violation shall be forty‑five
dollars ($45.00). The maximum total combined fine and penalties for a fifty
dollar ($50.00) violation shall be seventy dollars ($70.00). When the maximum is reached for either a
single violation or more than one violation for the same owner or operator,
he/she will be notified in writing of the intent of the Town to pursue claims
through appropriate civil action or through referral to a collections
agency. Once a civil action is
initiated, any fees involved in the civil action will be added to the
settlement in each action.
(g) The penalties imposed under this section
shall be collected solely as civil penalties and no parking penalties or fines
provided in Articles IV and V of Chapter 21 of this code shall be enforced
through criminal misdemeanor or infraction process. This section shall not be construed as limiting any authority of
the Town to tow or remove any vehicle violating any provision of Chapter 21 for
which said removal is otherwise authorized and to charge the owner of such
vehicle with the costs of removal and storage in accordance with the process
and procedures contained in this chapter."
SECTION VII
That ordinances or portions of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION VIII
That this ordinance shall be effective on September
1, 1992.
This the 24th day of August, 1992.
Item 9 Council Meeting Calendar
Mr. Horton briefly reviewed the proposed
calendar, noting that the Council might wish to make adjustments in the
proposed budget review calendar. He
noted that the proposed meeting to discuss OWASA matters was scheduled for
Thursday, September 3rd at 6:00 p.m.
Council Member Rimer said he did not think enough would be accomplished
on OWASA matters to justify holding another meeting. Council Member Herzenberg said he believed that Council Member
Andresen would argue against Council Member Rimer's position on the
matter. He noted some OWASA matters
arising from the last Assembly of Governments meeting remained unresolved. Council Member Werner suggested that OWASA
matters might be worth discussing when OWASA was ready to respond. Mr. Horton suggested that the Council might
consider referring OWASA matters to the Mayor's Committee on OWASA
matters. Council Member Chilton said
this was a very good idea. Mayor Broun
said the Council consensus appeared to be to refer current OWASA matters to the
Mayor's Committee on OWASA matters, rather than holding a meeting on September
3rd.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 6.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CALENDAR OF COUNCIL
MEETINGS INCLUDING QUARTERLY PLANNING AND REPORTING SESSIONS, AND A PROCESS AND
CALENDAR FOR DEVELOPING THE 1993-94 BUDGET, 1993‑1998 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AND 1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION (92‑8‑24/R‑6)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of
Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the attached calendar of meetings
through 1992 and for 1993.
Except as otherwise noted above or hereafter
otherwise specified by the Council, meetings held pursuant to this resolution
shall begin at 7:30 pm.
This the 24th day of August, 1992.
Item 10, Annual Reports, was deferred to August
31st.
Item 11 Consent Agenda
Council Member Herzenberg requested removal of
item e. Council Member Brown requested
removal of items c and k. Council
Member Werner requested removal of items l and g.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADOPT THE BALANCE OF THE CONSENT AGENDA. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIOUS ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS
(92-8-24/R-7)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of
Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the resolutions and ordinances as
submitted by the Town Manager in regard to the following:
a. Minutes of June 22, 23, July 6 and August 20.
b. Budget amendment for sales taxes and Erwin
Village funding (O-2).
c. Budget amendment for cable consulting (O-3).
d. Triangle Transit Authority budget and
personnel changes (O-4, 5, 6).
e. Fund-raising for old cemetery (R-9).
f. Trolley advertising rates (R-10).
g. Calling public hearing on R-2a DOTA (R-11).
h. Calling public hearing on 5-acre Development
Ordinance Text Amendment (R-12).
i. Hamilton Road parking restrictions (O-7).
j. Senlac Road parking restrictions (O-8).
k. NCDOT state maintenance of roads
rights-of-way
(R-13).
l. Continuation of roll-cart refuse collection
(R-14).
m. HOME grant fund allocation (R-15).
This the 24th day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING
APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY
1, 1992 (92-8-24/O-2)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of
Chapel Hill that the Council hereby amends the Ordinance entitled "An
Ordinance Concerning Appropriations and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal
Year Beginning July 1, 1992 as duly adopted on June 8, 1992, be and the same is
hereby amended as follows:
SECTION I
That $290,000 in the Capital Reserve Fund
formerly reserved for water and sewer purposes is hereby removed from the
Capital Reserve Fund and transferred to the Capital Improvements Fund in the
amounts and for the purposes as follows:
Fire
Hydrants and Water Line Improvements $230,000
Availability
Charges for Erwin Village homes $
60,000
This the 24th day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND "THE ORDINANCE
CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
BEGINNING JULY 1, 1992" (92‑8‑24/O-4)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of
Chapel Hill that the Budget Ordinance entitled "An Ordinance Concerning
Appropriations and The Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1,
1992" as adopted on June 8, 1992 be and the same is hereby amended as
follows:
ARTICLE I
APPROPRIATIONS
Current Revised
Budget Increase
Decrease Budget
TRANSPORTATION FUND
Administration 486,476 16,308 0 502,784
Operations 3,193,740 156,397 0 3,350,137
Maintenance 730,294 12,015 0 742,309
ARTICLE II
REVENUES
Current Revised
Budget Increase
Decrease Budget
TRANSPORTATION FUND 4,621,052 184,720 4,805,772
This the 24th day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE POSITION CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN (92‑8‑24/O-5)
BE IT ORDAINED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby amends the
"Ordinance Establishing a Position Classification and Pay Plan and
Longevity Plan for Employees of the Town of Chapel Hill and Bonds of Officials
Beginning July 1, 1992 (92‑6‑8/O‑2) as follows:
IN Section IV,
C, DELETE the lines:
Full‑time
Part‑time
No. Hrs. No.
Hrs. Grade
Bus Driver I 52 37.5‑40 28 varies 14
and ADD the
lines:
Bus Driver I 54 37.5‑40 31 varies 14
This the 24
day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE POSITION CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLAN (92‑8‑24/O-6)
BE IT ORDAINED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby amends the
"Ordinance Establishing a Position Classification and Pay Plan and
Longevity Plan for Employees of the Town of Chapel Hill and Bonds of Officials
Beginning October 1, 1992 (92‑6‑8/O-3) as follows:
IN Section IV,
C, DELETE the lines:
Full‑time
Part‑time
No. Hrs. No.
Hrs. Grade
Bus Driver I 52 37.5‑40 28 varies
15
and ADD the
lines:
Bus Driver I 54
37.5‑40 31
varies 15
This the 24
day of August, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO AMEND THE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE CHAPEL
HILL/CARRBORO DOWNTOWN COMMISSION TO PROVIDE FOR THE SALE OF TROLLEY AND BUS
ADVERTISING (92‑8‑24/R‑10)
WHEREAS, the
Town of Chapel Hill operates public transportation services within the Towns of
Chapel Hill and Carrboro, and currently sells advertising space on its
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the
Chapel Hill/Carrboro Downtown Commission currently contracts with the Town for
certain services in the downtown area including the operation of trolley
shuttle service and the sale of advertising on those vehicles; and
WHEREAS, The
Town would like to expand the revenue received from the sale of advertising
space;
WHEREAS, The
Chapel Hill/Carrboro Downtown Commission has requested that the Town reduce the
rates for trolley and bus advertising and contract with the Commission for the
sale of such advertising in return for a commission of 50% of the gross
revenues from any such sale.
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Town Manager is authorized to negotiate and execute an agreement with the
Chapel Hill/Carrboro Downtown Commission for the sale of trolley and bus
advertising rates. Furthermore the
Council amends the advertising rates contained in the Transportation User Fee
Policy as follows:
TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE OF BUS CARD ADVERTISING
RATES
(Effective September 1, 1992)
STANDARD
ADVERTISING (Includes buses or trolleys)
Full Showing Half Showing
(54 buses or 2
trolleys) (27 buses or 1 trolley)
1‑2
Months..........$69/mo. 1‑2 Months..........$42/mo.
3‑5
Months..........$65/mo. 3‑5 Months..........$39/mo.
6‑8
Months..........$62/mo. 6‑8 Months..........$37/mo.
9‑11
Months.........$59/mo. 9‑11 Months.........$35/mo.
12 Months and
up....$55/mo. 12 Months and up....$33/mo.
COMBINATION RATE
(Includes buses and trolleys)
Standard rate
plus 25%.
Bulkhead Cards (Full Showing Only)
1‑2
Months................$106/mo.
NON‑PROFIT
ORGANIZATION ADVERTISING
Rates above
less a 50% Discount.
PUBLIC SERVICE
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Public Service
Announcements will be placed for a maximum of 90 days for a $25 service fee, as
space is available.
AD REPLACEMENT
FEE
Any advertiser
who has paid for an ongoing ad may replace the ad copy for a service fee of
$25. New ads should be delivered to
Chapel Hill Transit.
TRANSIT GUIDE
ADVERTISING
Limited
advertising space may be available on annual Transit Guides. Rates will be established on a cost plus
basis and will vary depending on the size, location, and costs of printing. In all cases, rates should include a profit
of 10‑50% over the cost of the ad.
DEFINITIONS:
Non‑Profit
Organizations are those which
are legally set up as Non‑Profit Corporations and whose advertisements
are placed to encourage the use of that organization's goods and services. Social service agencies are considered to be
Non‑Profit Organizations if they charge for their services. Religious
groups and partisan political organizations are included in this category.
Public
Service Announcements (PSA's)
are those placed to promote services which will benefit the general
public. Notices for public meetings,
voter registration and charity drives are typical Public Service
Announcements. Public agencies and
charitable organizations are examples of groups eligible to place PSA's.
GUIDELINES:
1. 10%
discount for full rate advertisers with 2 or more ads per bus.
2. No Agency discounts.
3. Advertisers will be invoiced monthly.
4. Chapel
Hill Transit owns 54 buses and two trolleys. Advertisers should supply an
additional 10% cards for runs of 1 to 3 months, 25% for 3 to 6 months, and 100%
for 6 months or more.
5. Cards
will be placed in the buses on the first Saturday following delivery of the
cards to the Transportation Office, located at 1089 Airport Road.
6. Card specifications:
a. Ads must be printed on at least 5 ply
cardboard stock.
b. Cards for bus overhead racks must be 11"
top to bottom, 25" ‑ 28" side to side, with no printing within
3/8" of any edge.
c. Bus Bulkhead cards must be 21 1/2" top
to bottom, 21" side to side, with no printing within 3/8" of any
edge.
d. Trolley ad dimensions are 17.5" wide X
23.5" tall or 38" wide X 7" tall.
7. Chapel
Hill Transit reserves the right to review and approve any bus cards before
placement.
a. Advertisements should be of a reputable
character, should conform to recognized business standards, and should not
conflict with any federal, state or local laws or regulations, including those
established by the Appearance Commission for the Town of Chapel Hill.
b. Liquor (including beer and wine), cigarette,
and massage parlor advertising will not be acceptable.
c. Advertisements must be professionally designed
and printed.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
REGARDING CREATION OF NEW ZONING DISTRICTS (92-8-24/R-12)
WHEREAS, the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill adopted the Southern Small Area Plan as a
component of the Town's Comprehensive Plans on June 23, 1992;
WHEREAS, the
Council on June 23, 1992 directed the Manager to pursue the schedule for
implementation outlined in the Discussion Paper, Implementation of the Small
Area Plan, dated June 22, 1992; and
WHEREAS, an
element of the discussion paper involved the creation of new zoning districts;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council calls a Public Hearing to be held on Monday, October 19, 1992 to
discuss possible changes to the Chapel Hill Development Ordinance involving the
creation of new residential zoning districts.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES (92-8-24/O-7)
BE IT ORDAINED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill:
SECTION I
That section
21-27 of the Town Code of Ordinances, "No parking as to particular
streets" is amended by inserting the following therein in appropriate
alphabetical order:
Street |
Side |
From |
To |
|
|
|
|
Hamilton Rd |
West |
The Center of N.C. 54 |
A point 200
feet north. |
Hamilton Rd |
East |
The Center of N.C. 54 |
A point 100
feet north. |
Hamilton Rd |
East |
The Center of Audley Ln |
A point 60 feet north. |
Hamilton Rd |
East |
The Center of Audley Ln |
A point 60 feet south. |
SECTION II
That Section
21-27.1(c) "No parking during certain hours" is amended by inserting
the following therein in appropriate alphabetical order.
(c) 9:00 am - 4:00 pm Monday through Friday
|
|
|
|
Street |
Side |
From |
To |
Hamilton Rd |
East |
A point 100
feet north of the center of NC
54 |
A point 60
feet south of the center of
Audley Ln |
Hamilton Rd |
East |
A point 60
feet north of the center of
Audley Ln |
A point 110
feet north of the center of
Audley Ln |
Hamilton Rd |
West |
The center
of NC 54 |
A point 200
feet north |
SECTION III
These
ordinances shall be effective on Monday, September 21, 1992.
SECTION IV
All ordinances
and portions of ordinances in conflict are hereby repealed.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES (92-8-24/O-8)
BE IT ORDAINED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill:
SECTION I
That section
21-27.1 (c) of the Town Code of Ordinances, "No parking during certain
hours" is amended by deleting the following therein:
9:00am - 4:00pm Monday - Friday
Street |
Side |
From |
To |
Senlac Road |
South |
Full Length |
Full Length |
SECTION II
That Section
21-27.1 (d) of the Town Code of Ordinance, "No parking during certain
hours" is amended by inserting the following therein in appropriate
alphabetical order.
10:00pm - 6:00am
Street |
Side |
From |
To |
Senlac Road |
South |
Full Length |
Full Length |
SECTION III
That Section
21-27.1 of the Town Code of Ordinance, "No parking during certain
hours" is amended by adding a new item (e) 9:00am to 4:00pm and inserting
the following therein in appropriate alphabetical order.
9:00am - 4:00pm
Street |
Side |
From |
To |
Senlac Road |
South |
Full Length |
Full Length |
SECTION IV
These
ordinances shall be effective on Monday, September 28, 1992.
SECTION V
All ordinances
and portions of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING AN APPLICATION BY ORANGE COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE ORANGE COUNTY
HOUSING CONSORTIUM FOR HOME GRANT FUNDS
(92-8-24/R-15)
BE IT RESOLVED
by the Town Council of Chapel Hill that the Council approves the proposal
described in the Manager's report on this matter dated August 24, 1992 to
increase the requested amount for moderate rehabilitation of housing from
$450,000 to $650,000 in the 1992 HOME grant application to be submitted by
Orange County, as the designated lead entity in the Orange County Housing
Consortium, to the North Carolina Department of Economic and Community
Development.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
Council Member
Brown inquired about the anticipated cost and need for a consultant on cable
television matters. Assistant to the
Manager Greg Feller said proposals had been received from nine firms, with a
variety of skills and expertise, and estimated costs ranging between $60,000
and $70,000. Mr. Feller said review of
the Town's cable television franchise involved technical and legal expertise
beyond the scope of Town staff. Council
Member Brown asked whether additional cable consultant fees would be incurred
in the future. Mr. Feller said this
possible due to the need for extensive legal assistance. Council Member Brown said the staff's
reasoning on the need for consultant services seemed logical. Council Member inquired about the estimated
annual revenues from the Town's cable television franchise fee. Mr. Feller said $150,000 to $160,000.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE
3. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND "THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF
REVENUE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1992 (92-8-24/O-3)
BE IT ORDAINED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the budget ordinance entitled
"An Ordinance Concerning Appropriations and the Raising of Revenue for the
Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1992" as adopted on June 8, 1992 be and the
same is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE I
Current Revised
APPROPRIATIONS Budget Increase Decrease Budget
GENERAL FUND
Manager 719,724
10,000 729,724
REVENUES
GENERAL FUND
Fund Balance 605,000 10,000 615,000
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
Council Member
Herzenberg suggested that the staff investigate the feasibility of making the
old cemetery a little larger. Mary
Arthur Stoudemire indicated that University officials had opposed this proposal
in the past. Council Member Herzenberg
asked whether the proposal was a bad one.
Ms. Stoudemire said it could be attempted. Council Member Herzenberg requested that the staff explore the
matter further.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 9.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF A FUND FOR IMPROVEMENTS AT THE OLD CHAPEL HILL
CEMETERY (92-8-24/R-9)
WHEREAS, the
Town Council approved a master plan for improvements to the Old Chapel Hill
Cemetery on October 12, 1987; and
WHEREAS, the
master plan called for the creation of a fund for improvements using funds from
various sources; and
WHEREAS, the
firm of Swanson & Associates was involved in the development of the
original master plan and subsequent implementation;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Manager is authorized to enter into an agreement with Swanson & Associates
to coordinate the creation of a fund for improvements at the Old Chapel Hill
Cemetery, create a brochure about the cemetery and the fund drive, and directly
solicit contributions.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
Council Member
Brown said Council Member Andresen had inquired why an additional $5,000 was
needed to supplement $10,000 of anticipated pledges. Mr. Horton said the funds were needed to employ the consultant. He noted that the consultants had expert
knowledge and great credibility concerning the cemetery.
THE MOTION WAS
PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Mr. Horton
said the proposed hearing would be set to discuss setback requirements.
COUNCIL MEMBER
BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 11. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
REGARDING RESIDENTIAL-2A SETBACKS AND SETBACK EXCEPTIONS (92-8-24/R-11)
WHEREAS, the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill adopted the Residential-2A zoning district
on October 29, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the
Oaks Villas Owners Association has requested adjustments to the
Residential-2A setbacks and adjustments
to setback exceptions;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Council calls a Public Hearing to be held on Monday, October 19, 1992 to
discuss possible changes to the Chapel Hill Development Ordinance to adjust the
Residential-2A setbacks and setback regulations.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
Council Member
Capowski inquired whether the streets under consideration were up to State
standards. Mr. Heflin said the street
sections were in less than desirable condition.
COUNCIL MEMBER
CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 13. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
REQUESTING THAT ROADS IN STATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY BE MAINTAINED BY THE NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(92-8-24/R-13)
BE IT RESOLVED
by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby requests that
the North Carolina Department of Transportation accept for State maintenance
the following roads which have been built in State right-of-way:
Name of Road Length Description
Dobbins Drive 1,874' Brendles/Sage Road to Eastowne Drive
Eastowne Drive
230' US 15-501 pavement to
margin of right-of-way
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council authorizes the Town Manager to request in the future
that roads which may be built in State rights-of-way in the Town limits be
accepted for maintenance by North Carolina Department of Transportation.
This the 24th day
of August, 1992.
Council Member
Werner inquired about additional costs for continuing the rollcart pilot refuse
collection program. Mr. Horton said it
would be necessary to spend funds on surveying residents of the pilot area. Mr. Heflin said the survey could largely be
accomplished by Town staff. Council
Member Werner asked whether sixty-gallon trash containers would be
purchased. Mr. Heflin said the
containers would be leased, rather than purchased. Council Member Brown inquired about the possibility of acquiring
forty-gallon cans. Mr. Heflin said
manufacturers made sixty and ninety-gallon canisters. He added that a normal residential refuse container was thirty
gallons.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
14. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO CONTINUE THE ONCE/WEEKLY CURBSIDE ROLL CART
PILOT PROGRAM (92-8-24/R-14)
WHEREAS, the
Council authorized a pilot once/weekly curbside roll cart program for
collection of residential refuse in certain areas of the Town; and
WHEREAS, the
pilot program commenced in September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the
Council amended Sec. 8-37 of the Town Code to require that the Council
reapprove any pilot program if it is to be extended beyond twelve months;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the
Town Manager will continue the pilot program of once/weekly curbside roll cart
residential refuse collection in the neighborhoods of Bolin Heights, Ironwoods,
the Cobb Terrace area and Colonial Heights for a period of one year through
August, 1993.
This the 24th
day of August, 1992.
Item 12 Information Reports
Council Member
Herzenberg said the intervention of Town staff on odor problems in downtown
trash receptacles was rapid and spectacular.
Council Member Rimer inquired where trash receptacle containers were
flushed. Mr. Heflin said flushing occurred
in gutters. Council Member Rimer said
it would be preferable to flush containers at a bus garage or similar
facility. Mr. Heflin noted that some of
the receptacles were not moveable.
Council Member
Brown suggested that staff consult with Westside neighborhood residents to
examine options other than removal of a tree in the area.
Council Member
Capowski said the Town had the best library in the state. He said Sunday use statistics argued for
longer library hours on Sundays.
Council Member Capowski said there was no reason to wait eighteen months
to initiate longer Sunday hours. He
suggested that the matter be referred to the Library Committee for further
review. Mayor Broun said he was a
little nervous about changing library hours prior to the opening of the new
library facility. Council Member
Capowski said he saw no tie between the new library facility and the possible
change in Sunday service. Mayor Broun
noted the needed to examine staffing questions. Mr. Horton said a scientific study of library patrons would be
conducted. He stated that the survey
would be ready to consider as part of the budget process. He stated that changes in library hours
would be possible as early as July 1, if the Council desired.
Council Member
Rimer noted that noise cancellation techniques had been found to be very
effective in noisy industrial environments such as boiler plants. Mr. Horton noted that at a Consultation and
Coordination Committee with University officials earlier in the day, Tom
Grisham, University Boiler Plant project engineer, had indicated that there
were currently twelve major issues at the plant. Mr. Grisham indicated that three problems had been resolved, six
others were in the resolution process and three others remained unresolved.
COUNCIL MEMBER
CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO ADJOURN THE REGULAR MEETING
AND MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Mayor Broun
noted that no report would follow the Executive Session.
The regular
meeting concluded at 10:47 p.m.