MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
OF THE TOWN
OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, MONDAY,
MARCH 1, 1993
The Council convened
in the Council Conference Room at 6:31 p.m. to go into Executive Session to
discuss annual performance reviews of the Town Attorney and Town Manager. Mayor Broun convened the session. Council Members in attendance were Joyce
Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark Chilton, Joe Herzenberg and Barbara Powell. Council Member Chilton moved, seconded by
Council Member Herzenberg to go into Executive Session. Council Member Werner arrived at 6:33 p.m.
No report followed
the session.
Mayor Broun called
the regular meeting to order at 7:33 p.m. in the Council Chamber. Council Members in attendance were Julie
Andresen, Joyce Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark Chilton, Joe Herzenberg, Barbara
Powell, Alan Rimer (arrived at 7:49 p.m.) and Arthur Werner. Also in attendance were Town Manager Cal
Horton, Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and Florentine Miller,
Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney Ralph Karpinos.
There were no
ceremonies or hearings.
Item 3 Petitions
Mayor Broun noted
that a petition concerning funding for bicycle improvements was included in the
agenda packet.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MR.
PEIN'S PETITION.
Council Member
Capowski said he had hoped Mr. Pein would be at the meeting this evening so he
could invite him to tomorrow evening's session concerning budget matters.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Council Member
Herzenberg requested that the Transportation Board and Transportation
Department staff investigate the possibility of changing the Blue Line route on
South Elliott Road to University Mall and changing the C Line route from West
Cameron Avenue to West Franklin Street.
Council Member
Capowski requested that Mayor Broun communicate with Secretary Howes about
environment-related matters at the Top of the Hill development site. Mayor Broun said he would do so.
Council Member Werner
requested that staff respond to a letter from Charles Hebert concerning
flooding in the Ridgefield area.
Council Member
Andresen said she had some concerns about the Top of the Hill site, including
possibly covering the dirt pile and putting a wooden fence around the periphery
of the site. She emphasized the
importance of making the site look better as soon as possible. Council Member Brown noted that the
project's owner had indicated that the matter would be resolved during
March. Council Member Powell said she
had some concern about criminal activity occurring behind the fence. Council Member Werner noted that the
Environmental Management Commission had recently modified rules on leaking
underground storage tanks. He inquired
whether these new regulations would impact the Top of the Hill project. Council Member Werner also inquired how long
it would take to complete the project.
Item 4 Boards and Commissions
Greenways
Commission
Paul Aloisio and
Adrian Patillo were appointed to the Greenways Commission.
Ad Hoc Tree
Committee
Noting that a member
of the committee had not been attending recent meetings, Council Member
Herzenberg suggested that the Council could make four appointments instead of
three. Council Member Werner inquired
about the residency of current committee members. Council Member Herzenberg said all current members were Town
residents.
Council Member
Herzenberg, Nina Ligh, Guy Meilleur and Phillip Townsend were appointed to the
Ad Hoc Tree Committee.
Northwest Area
Planning Group
Mayor Broun noted
that no response had been received from the University to date regarding its
appointee to the group. Council Member
Brown noted that she had received a number of telephone calls from applicants
living north of the Town's urban services boundary, expressing interest in
serving on the planning group. She also
requested that the Council consider appointing a Duke University representative
to the planning group. Council Member
Andresen said this was a good idea.
Council Member Andresen suggested that the Council appoint David
Laudicina and Bruce Guild to the planning group. She also noted the importance of representing neighborhoods in
the area. Council Member Brown noted
that Nancy Gabriel was active in local matters. Council Member Andresen stated that Larry and Sheila Benninger
were both active in the Northwood Neighborhood Association. Council Member Rimer said Bill Rohe and
Aarne Vesilind were interested in serving on the group and would be good representatives. Council Member Andresen noted that there
were no applicants from the Rogers Road area.
Mayor Broun suggested that a representative or representatives from this
area could possibly be appointed in the future.
Larry and Sheila
Benninger, George Love, Jr., Bill Rohe and Aarne Vesilind were appointed as
area representatives. Nancy Gabriel and
David Laudicina were appointed as at-large representatives.
Original voting
ballots for all appointments are on file in the Clerk's Office.
Item 5 Legislative Matters
Mr. Horton briefly
reviewed proposed local legislative requests.
He noted that the proposed entertainment tax would not apply to tickets
purchased with student fees. Mr. Horton
also said that funds from the proposed prepared meals and beverage tax would be
tied to downtown and other business area infrastructure, as previously
discussed by the Council. Mr. Horton
stated that the proposed sprinkler system requirement and authority would
result in safer buildings for all Town residents. He also said that bills concerning housing assistance to
low-income persons, recreation payments-in-lieu, wheel-locking devices for
problem parking violators, funding for restoration of the Chapel Hill cemetery
and a Charter amendment concerning non-discrimination were also offered for the
Council's consideration as follow-up to earlier discussions. Mr. Horton noted that support of several
statewide matters, as follows, was suggested:
a supplemental gas tax, restoration of State-shared local revenues, a
local option real estate tax, continuation of closed meetings for land sales,
litigation issues and personnel matters.
Council Member Werner
inquired how the language of the proposed bills would be determined. Mr. Horton said final language would be
determined by legislative staff in conformance with the General Assembly's
requirements. He added that the Council
could receive draft bills prior to their consideration by the legislature. Council Member Capowski stated that some of
the proposed bills had a better chance of passage than others. He inquired about the best strategy for
increasing chances of passage for high-priority bills. Mr. Horton said the
Council could always choose not to put forward a bill that the Council felt
would fail. He stated that once the
legislative materials were sent forward, Senator Howard Lee would decide how
best to introduce the proposed bills.
Mr. Horton said that Council could pass along suggestions to Senator
Lee. Mayor Broun suggested that the
Council work with the local legislative delegation on the Council's legislative
priorities.
Council Member
Andresen said additional groundwork could be done on some of the legislation
prior to its submittal. She suggested
that the Council meet with University officials to discuss the entertainment
tax proposal. Council Member Andresen
also said she had spoken to Mickey Ewell about the proposed prepared meals
tax. She stated that the North Carolina
Restaurant Association would oppose the proposal. Council Member Andresen stated that proceeds from the proposed
prepared meals tax could be used to fund the proposed downtown streetscape plan
and other downtown infrastructure improvements. She suggested that Council Members speak to Mr. Ewell in an
effort to garner his support. Mayor
Broun suggested that the Council work with the North Carolina Restaurant
Association and University while the bills were under consideration in the
General Assembly. He added that some
modification of draft bill language was likely. Council Member Andresen suggested that the Council might consider
reevaluating the uses of the downtown service district tax.
Council Member
Chilton said he did not think that the Council should proceed with a proposed
local entertainment tax bill. He added
that the Town appeared to satisfy all but one of the North Carolina Restaurant
Association's criteria concerning prepared meals tax bills. Council Member Chilton suggested that the
Council support the prepared meals tax legislation. Council Member Brown suggested that the Council consider support
of an entertainment tax on a statewide basis.
Council Member Brown also said she favored establishment of discussions
with University officials concerning the proposed entertainment tax.
Mayor Broun suggested
that the Council review the proposed resolution (1a) point by point. Noting that OWASA's hook-up fees were quite
high, Council Member Rimer inquired why the fire sprinkler proposal applied to
buildings of three units or more. Mr.
Horton said this would apply to the greatest number of facilities without
including single-family residences.
Council Member Powell
said she was concerned with OWASA's monthly
maintenance fees. She inquired
about the level of maintenance fees in other communities. Council Member Andresen noted that a Council
resolution had been passed on to the Orange Water and Sewer Authority Board
requesting examination of their maintenance fees and upfront charges. Council Member Werner said it might not be a
bad idea to seek wide authorization.
Council Member Rimer expressed his concurrence. Council Member Capowski stated that some of
OWASA's fees were a factor of ten times higher than other utilities around the
State.
Council Member
Andresen inquired whether it was customary to put policies such as the proposed
non-discrimination policy into Charters.
Mr. Horton said he had no survey data on the matter. He added that it was his anecdotal
observation that such practice was not unusual. Mr. Karpinos said he had no information on what other cities had
done in this regard. Noting that she
favored the proposal, Council Member Andresen inquired about the purpose of the
statement. Council Member Herzenberg
noted that the cities of Raleigh and Wilmington had non-discrimination policies
in their Charters. Council Member
Herzenberg noted that some employees in the Town's Transportation Department
had recently been verbally harassed because of their racial background or
sexual orientation. Noting that the proposal had not been discussed very much
by the Council, Council Member Werner suggested that the Council outline its
clear sentiment on the matter. Council
Member Herzenberg said he would be glad to prepare a clarification statement.
Council Member
Capowski inquired whether recent problems in the Transportation Department
would have been handled differently if the proposed non-discrimination policy
had been included in the Charter. Mr.
Horton said it was the Town's policy to affirm the value of all people and to
refrain from and deplore any form of discrimination. Mayor Broun, Council Member Brown and Council Member Rimer
expressed their support for the proposed Charter amendment.
Mayor Broun inquired
there were any comments concerning proposed density bonuses. Council Member Werner said the proposed
criteria seemed a little too open-ended, implying that developers could be
required to provide percentages of low-cost housing much greater than
twenty-five percent. Mayor Broun said
he agreed with Council Member Werner's concerns. Mr. Karpinos said the proposal was for twenty-five percent or any
lesser amount. He suggested that the
language could be modified to read "no more than". Council Member Werner and Mayor Broun
expressed their concurrence.
Council Member
Andresen inquired whether the Council had previously allotted $10,000 relative
to fund-raising at the Chapel Hill Cemetery.
Mr. Horton said he thought the funding amount was between $3,000 and
$5,000. He added that the General Assembly
had a past practice of allocating some funds for cemetery preservation. Council
Member Herzenberg said the Chapel Hill Preservation Society had donated
proceeds of its holiday house tour to the cemetery preservation project.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1A.
Council Member
Andresen urged the Council to follow up on efforts to garner local support for
restaurant owners for the prepared meals tax.
THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM FOR THE 1993 SESSION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL
ASSEMBLY (93-3-1/R-1a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Town Council of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the following
legislative program and authorizes its submittal to the General Assembly
delegation:
1. Requests for local bills
a. authorizing a 1% prepared food and beverage
tax with a requirement that the revenues be used for public infrastructure
and/or supplemental law enforcement services in business areas of the Town.
b. authorizing expanded requirements for
automatic sprinkler systems.
c. amending the Town Charter to include a
non-discrimination policy.
d. authorizing requirements for inclusion of low
to moderate income homes in new developments subject to granting of density
bonuses or other incentives.
e. authorizing requirements for payments in lieu
of recreation area in small developments
f. authorizing use of "Denver boot" or
"wheel lock" parking enforcement devices
g. Requesting funds for the Old Chapel Hill
Cemetery
2. State-wide legislative matters
The Council supports the following items:
a. State funding for operating costs of public
transit systems, from appropriate funding source(s) including a supplemental
vehicle fuels tax if necessary.
b. Proposed legislation recommended by a
legislative study commission to restore growth in State-collected local
revenues.
c. Authorization for local option entertainment
taxes
d. Authorization for local option real estate
transfer taxes up to 1% of the amount of transactions.
e. The concept of "Home Rule" to give
local governments greater flexibility to adopt new kinds of policies and
revenues as alternatives to the property tax.
f. The need for Open Meetings and Public Records
laws with authorization for executive sessions which are in the public interest
on topics such as discussion of amounts to offer for purchase of real estate or
interests in real estate, discussion of legal issues in litigation or personnel
matters covered by existing privacy statutes.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1B.
Council Member Werner
emphasized the importance of discussing the proposed entertainment tax with
University officials. He said springing
the proposal on the University was not tactically wise. Council Member Werner suggested that the
proposal be discussed with the University on a long-term basis. Council Member Rimer said a dialogue between
members of the Consultation and Coordination Committee should have been
initiated several months ago. Council
Member Andresen expressed concern that the proposal was being undertaken a
little too late. Council Member Brown
noted that if the proposal were not pursued, it would be necessary to wait two
additional years for authorization. She
suggested that communications proceed with the University concerning the
proposed local entertainment tax.
Council Member Capowski inquired whether the proposed tax would only
apply at the Smith Activity Center and Kenan Stadium. Mayor Broun said this was correct. Council Member Capowski inquired whether there had been any
opinion from the legislature that the local entertainment tax proposal would be
harmful to the Town's other legislative requests. Council Member Herzenberg noted that the legislative delegation
should ask for what was needed and the delegation would handle other details.
Council Member
Capowski said since he did not think the proposal would pass, it was not worth
sending it forward to the General Assembly.
Council Member
Andresen expressed concern that not putting forward the proposal this year
might send the message that the Town was giving up on the concept of a local
entertainment tax. She also expressed
concern about the realistic chance of the proposal being considered by the
legislature. Council Member Chilton
said he believed that the proposal had to apply statewide in order to be
adopted by the legislature. Noting that
there were twenty or twenty-five similar facilities around the state, Council
Member Capowski said he did not agree that the proposed entertainment tax would
be a factor in reducing the number of events at the Smith Activity Center. He also said that the chances of passage of
a local bill were very low. Council
Member Brown inquired about the perspective of facilities owned by other
municipalities around the state. Mr.
Horton said he did not know whether facilities owned by municipal corporations
were making money. Council Member
Capowski noted that football and basketball were very popular on several
university campuses around the state.
Council Member Werner
said although he sympathized with Council Member Andresen's comments, he still
believed that pursuing authorization for a local entertainment tax. Noting that the Town had lost a significant
amount of other State-shared revenues, Council Member Werner said he would vote
for the proposal because he thought it was still a good idea. Council Member Herzenberg expressed his
concurrence with Council Member Werner's comments. Council Member Powell
inquired about the intent of Resolution 1b.
Mayor Broun said Resolution 1b supported authorization for a local
entertainment tax option but did not address the matter of a statewide
entertainment tax.
THE QUESTION WAS
CALLED AND RESOLUTION 1B WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND PASSED BY A VOTE OF 6-3,
WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS CAPOWSKI, CHILTON AND MAYOR BROUN VOTING NO.
A RESOLUTION
REQUESTING A LOCAL BILL AUTHORIZING AN ENTERTAINMENT TAX (93-3-1/R-1b)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council requests the introduction
and favorable consideration of a local bill authorizing an entertainment tax
substantially in the form requested by the Council in 1991 and with an
additional clause clarifying exclusion for tickets distributed to UNC students
which are paid for with student fees as set forth in a draft bill submitted to
the Council on March 1, 1993.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
Mayor Broun noted
that although he had voted against the proposal, he would provide any
leadership and guidance necessary to move the request through the legislative
process.
Noting his interest
in the matter of citizen-initiated recall of elected officials, James McEnery
said he hoped that the Council would show their commitment to community
interest in this matter. He expressed concern that a person convicted of a
crime and with a lack of integrity was seated on the Council. Mr. McEnery said he did not feel safe with
this type of representation. He
expressed hope that the Council would pass the proposal onto the legislature in
its current form. Mr. McEnery stated
that absentee ballots were available for persons who would be out of town
during the summer break at the University.
Thanking Mr. McEnery
for his comments, Council Member Chilton said he agreed with the need to
proceed with the proposal expeditiously.
Council Member Chilton added that he respectfully disagreed on the
matter of absentee balloting during possible summertime recall events. He expressed concern that holding a recall
election during the summer months could result in discrimination against
University staff, faculty members, students and retirees out of town during
this period.
COUNCIL MEMBER
CHILTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO THREE PARAGRAPHS PERTAINING
TO TIMING OF RECALL ELECTIONS ON PAGE TWO OF THE ATTORNEY'S MEMORANDUM TO THE
COUNCIL.
Council Member
Andresen noted that absentee balloting was a viable option for handling
summertime recall elections. Council
Member Chilton stated that persons out of town for two months might not know
when a recall election was proposed.
Council Member Andresen emphasized the importance of weighing and
balancing student input against accountability to the electorate. Council Member Chilton said he was although
thinking about this aspect. Council
Member Capowski said the Council had a timely responsibility to all
citizens. Noting that only two UNC
students had spoken at the public hearing on the recall proposal, Council
Member Capowski stated that local government operations continued throughout
the summer months. Council Member Rimer
said Council Member Chilton's earlier points were well-taken. He noted that students had a right to
vote. Council Member Rimer also said
that not many speakers had addressed the recall proposal at the public
hearing. Council Member Rimer suggested
that identifying a specific recall election blackout period such as June 1st to
August 1st seemed to be a reasonable compromise. Council Member Werner said he was thinking of something similar
wherein recall elections would not be held for a two month period during the
summer.
Noting that the
Council was in recess for a six to seven week period during the summer, Council
Member Chilton said these were interesting proposals. He said another possibility was not holding recall elections
anytime between the first Monday in July and the last Monday in August. Council Member Chilton inquired whether
anything would preclude this approach.
Mr. Karpinos said no, adding that this approach would provide a clear
indication of the Council's intent to the legislature and the Board of
Elections. Mayor Broun inquired whether
the proposed amendment was acceptable to the seconder of the motion. Council Member Brown said yes, adding that
she hoped that other types of election would not be held during this period
either.
THE MOTION, TO ADOPT
THE DRAFT LANGUAGE, AS AMENDED, WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON TO ADOPT THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL
AMENDMENT AS PARAGRAPH THIRTEEN OF THE PROPOSAL: "NO RECALL PETITION SHALL BE FILED AGAINST AN OFFICER WHO
HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO A RECALL ELECTION AND NOT REMOVED THEREBY, UNTIL AT LEAST
SIX (6) MONTHS AFTER THAT ELECTION."
Council Members
Andresen and Powell inquired about the intent of the proposed language. Mayor Broun stated that if a recall effort
were unsuccessful, another recall election for the same individual could not be
held within six months.
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT
WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 1C AS
AMENDED. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION
REQUESTING A LOCAL BILL AUTHORIZING CITIZEN-INITIATED REFERENDA ON RECALL OF
ELECTED MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS IN THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL (93-3-1/R-1c)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council requests the introduction
and favorable consideration of a local bill authorizing citizens to initiate
referenda on the recall of municipal elected officials as set forth in a draft
bill endorsed by the Council on March 1, 1993.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
Item 6
Better Wrench Request for Special Use Permit
Mr. Waldon said the
application involved a sixteen acre tract on the west side of Airport
Road. He noted that three applications
(Better Wrench SUP, Mercedes Drive Office Building SUP and Northfield
subdivision) were submitted together.
Mr. Waldon stated that the Manager, Planning and Transportation Boards
recommended adoption of Resolution A.
Mayor Broun inquired
whether the applicant had a statement.
Mr. Woods said his client had agreed to construct a two hundred foot
long, four foot high pressure-treated wood fence as requested by an adjoining
property owner, Bridges Pendergraph.
Mr. Intrator was
sworn by the Town Clerk. Roland
Intrator, a homeowner in the Glen Heights subdivision, said he hoped that the
proposed sewer easement would be available for adjoining Glen Heights residents
to tap into the sewer line. He
requested that this be included as a condition of approval. Mr. Intrator said at least three of his
neighbors also wished to receive service from the sewer line at a lesser cost
than other OWASA sewer service alternatives.
Noting that there was
a sewer easement on the site plan, Mr. Waldon said there was no need for
additional language. Council Member
Capowski inquired about the proposed location of sewer lines. Mr. Waldon said the proposal was for the
Better Wrench and Mercedes Drive projects to be constructed followed by
installation of a lateral into the proposed Northfield subdivision site. Council Member Brown inquired about the
impact of the proposed sewer lines on surrounding development. Mr. Woods said the primary impact would be
that sewer service would be available at a comparably lesser cost to homes in
Glen Heights subdivision adjoining Northfield subdivision, and the remaining
Glen Height residents would be left with larger shares of the cost of extending
sewer from a different direction.
Council Member Brown inquired about the applicant possibly recycling
anti-freeze and freon. Mr. Woods said A
Better Wrench currently recycled both freon and anti-freeze.
Council Member
Capowski thanked Mr. Woods for taking the proposal to the Design Review
Board. He noted that the proposed car
repair facility would likely be a very attractive project. Council Member Capowski noted that it had
taken a total of only five months for the project to get through the Town's
development review process. Mayor Broun inquired whether the applicant accepted
the proposed conditions of approval.
Mr. Woods said yes.
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC
HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
HERZENBERG MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION
2A. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE BETTER WRENCH
(SUP-24..p/o 38) (93-3-1/R-2a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Special Use Permit
application, proposed by BRW, Inc., representing Max Scroggs, on property
identified as Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 24, part of Lot 38, if developed
according to the site plan dated September 29, 1992 (revised October 29, 1992),
and the conditions listed below, would:
1. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
2. Comply
with all required regulations and standards of the Development Ordinance,
including all applicable provisions of Articles 12, 13, 14 and 18, and with all
other applicable regulations;
3. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the
value of contiguous property, or be a public necessity; and
4. Conform
with the general plans for the physical development of the Town as embodied in
the Development Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the application for Special Use
Permit for the Better Wrench in
accordance with the plans listed above and with conditions listed below;
Stipulations Specific to the
Development
1. That
construction begin by March 1, 1995 (two years from the date of Council
approval) and be completed by March 1, 1996 (three years from the date of
Council approval).
2. Required
Improvements:
a. That parking lots and drive aisles be
constructed to Town standards, except that the fenced car storage area may be
constructed with a mat and seal surface.
3. Minor
Subdivision Plat: That a minor
subdivision plat, dividing the subject property into three (3) zoning lots and
dedicating right-of-way for a new roadway which extends along the southern
property line to the western boundary of the new Lot #2, as indicated on the
site plan referenced above, shall be recorded in the Orange County Register of
Deeds Office prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
4. Dumpster
Location: That the location of the
dumpsters and fencing be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit.
5. Dumpsters
for Adjacent Development: That
appropriate dumpster agreements be signed by property owners of this and the
adjacent lot, approved by the Town Manager, and recorded prior to the issuance
of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
6. Liquid
Waste Management: That a liquid
waste management plan, including a plan for recycling and/or disposal of waste
oil, be reviewed for approval by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
7. Stormwater
Management: That runoff from the
site be carefully routed and treated to remove oil and other pollutants prior
to drainage into the stormwater sewer in a manner to be approved by the Town
Manager.
Stipulations Related to State and Federal
Government Approvals
8. State
or Federal Approval(s): That plans
for improvements to state-maintained roads or within NCDOT rights-of-ways be
approved by NCDOT prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Landscape
Elements
9. Landscape
Plan Approval: That a detailed
landscape plan, landscape maintenance plan, fence plan, and lighting plan be
approved by the Appearance Commission prior to the issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit. The Landscape Plan
shall include:
20 foot
type B buffers, as shown on the site plan, along the northern and southern
property lines; and
60 foot
type D buffer, as shown on the site plan, along the western property line.
10. Landscape
Protection Plan: That a Landscape
Protection Plan be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
Stipulation related to Building
Elevations
11. Building
Elevation Approval: That detailed
building elevations be approved by the Appearance Commission prior to issuance
of the Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Water, Sewer and
Other Utilities
12. Fire
Flow: That a fire flow report
prepared by a registered professional engineer, showing that flows meet the
minimum requirements of the Design Manual, be approved prior to issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit.
13. Utility/Lighting
Plan Approval: That the final
utility/lighting plan be approved by Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Duke
Power, Public Service Company, Southern Bell, and the Town Manager, before
issuance of Zoning Compliance Permit.
The property owner shall be responsible for assuring these utilities are
extended to serve the development.
Miscellaneous Stipulations
14. Solid
Waste Management Plan: That a
detailed solid waste management plan, including a recycling plan and plan for
management of construction debris, be approved by the Town Manager prior to the
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Consideration shall be given to expanding the refuse collection area to
include a pad and dumpster for cardboard recycling.
15. Detailed
Plans: That final detailed site
plan, grading plan, utility/lighting plans, stormwater management plan (with
hydrologic calculations), landscape plan and landscape maintenance plan be
approved by the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit, and
that such plans conform to the plans approved by this application and
demonstrate compliance with all applicable conditions and the design standards
of the Development Ordinance and the Design Manual.
16. Sight
Triangle Easements: That sight
triangle easements be provided on the final plat.
17. Erosion
Control: That a soil erosion and
sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control
Officer and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
18. Silt
Control: That the applicant take
appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on
adjacent paved roadways.
19. Fence: That the applicant construct a four-foot high wooden
fence along the southern property line for
the width
of its boundary with the Pendergraph
property.
20. Continued
Validity: That continued validity
and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued
compliance with the plans and conditions listed above.
21. Non-severability: If any of the above conditions is held to be
invalid, approval in its entirety shall be void.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the Special Use Permit for the Better
Wrench in accordance with the plans and conditions listed above.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
Item 6
Mercedes Drive Office Building Special Use Permit Request
Mr. Waldon said
Resolution 3a was recommended by the Manager and Transportation Board. He noted that Resolution 3b did not include
a stipulation for a bus shelter or pad.
Mayor Broun inquired whether the applicant agreed to the proposed
conditions of approval. Mr. Woods said
yes.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 3A. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE MERCEDES DRIVE BUILDING
(SUP-24..p/o 38) (93-3-1/R-3a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Special Use Permit
application, proposed by BRW, Inc., representing Max Scroggs, on property
identified as Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 24, part of Lot 38, if developed
according to the site plan dated September 29, 1992 (revised October 29, 1992),
and the conditions listed below, would:
1. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
2. Comply
with all required regulations and standards of the Development Ordinance,
including all applicable provisions of Articles 12, 13, 14 and 18, and with all
other applicable regulations;
3. Be
located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the
value of contiguous property, or be a public necessity; and
4. Conform
with the general plans for the physical development of the Town as embodied in
the Development Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the application for Special Use
Permit for the Better Wrench in
accordance with the plans listed above and with conditions listed below;
Stipulations Specific to the
Development
1. That
construction begin by March 1, 1995 (two years from the date of Council
approval) and be completed by March 1, 1996 (three years from the date of
Council approval).
2. Required
Improvements:
a. That Airport Road be improved to half of a
65-foot cross-section (including curb and gutter) plus a 4-foot bike way and
sidewalk along the property frontage.
b. That all parking lots and drive aisles be
constructed to Town standards.
3. Minor
Subdivision Plat: That a minor
subdivision plat, dividing the subject property into three (3) zoning lots and
dedicating right-of-way for a new roadway which extends along the southern
property line to the western boundary of the new Lot #2, as indicated on the
site plan referenced above, shall be recorded in the Orange County Register of
Deeds Office prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
4. Dumpsters: If the dumpsters for this development are to
be located on adjacent property, that appropriate dumpster agreements be signed
by property owners of this and the adjacent lot and recorded prior to the
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
5. Transportation
Management Plan: That a
Transportation Management Plan be developed, and that the Town Manager review
and approve this plan prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit. The Transportation Management Plan shall
include provisions for reducing single occupant vehicle trip to and from the
site, and for increasing the use of alternative modes of transportation. The Plan shall also include provision for
designation of a Transportation Coordinator and provision of an annual report
to the Town Manager every December.
6. Bus
Pad and Shelter: That a bus stop
pad and shelter be constructed at the existing bus stop at the intersection of
Airport Road and Critz Drive.
Stipulations Related to State and Federal
Government Approvals
7. State
or Federal approval(s): That plans
for improvements to state-maintained roads or within NCDOT rights-of-ways be
approved by NCDOT prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Landscape
Elements
8. Landscape
Plan Approval: That a detailed
landscape plan, landscape maintenance plan, and lighting plan be approved by
the Appearance Commission prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit. The Landscape Plan shall
include:
30'
type D buffer, as shown on the site plan, along the eastern property line;
10'
type B buffers, as shown on the site plan, on the northern and western property
lines;
Type B
buffer along the southern property line; or an alternative Type B buffer along
the southern property line, if requested by the applicant and approved by the
Appearance Commission.
9. Landscape
Protection Plan: That a Landscape
Protection Plan, including preservation techniques for the 36-inch oak and the
16-inch holly existing on the site, be approved by the Town Manager prior to
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulation related to Building
Elevations
10. Building
Elevation Approval: That detailed
building elevations be approved by the Appearance Commission prior to issuance
of the Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Water, Sewer and
Other Utilities
11. Fire
Flow: That a fire flow report
prepared by a registered professional engineer, showing that flows meet the
minimum requirements of the Design Manual, be approved prior to issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit.
12. Utility/Lighting
Plan Approval: That the final
utility/lighting plan be approved by Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Duke
Power, Public Service Company, Southern Bell, and the Town Manager, before
issuance of Zoning Compliance Permit.
The property owner shall be responsible for assuring these utilities are
extended to serve the development.
Miscellaneous Stipulations
13. Solid
Waste Management Plan: That a
detailed solid waste management plan, including a recycling plan and plan for
management of construction debris, be approved by the Town Manager prior to the
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
14. Detailed
Plans: That final detailed site
plan, grading plan, utility/lighting plans, stormwater management plan (with
hydrologic calculations), landscape plan and landscape maintenance plan be
approved by the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit, and
that such plans conform to the plans approved by this application and
demonstrate compliance all applicable conditions and the design standards of
the Development Ordinance and the Design Manual.
15. Sight
Triangle Easements: That sight
triangle easements be provided on the final plat.
16. Erosion
Control: That a soil erosion and
sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control
Officer and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
17. Silt
Control: That the applicant take
appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on
adjacent paved roadways.
18. Continued
Validity: That continued validity
and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued
compliance with the plans and conditions listed above.
19. Non-severability: If any of the above conditions is held to be
invalid, approval in its entirety shall be void.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the Special Use Permit for the
Mercedes Drive Building in accordance with the plans and conditions listed
above.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
Item 7 Northfield
Subdivision Request for Preliminary Plat Approval
Mr. Waldon said
adoption of Resolution 4a was recommended.
Council Member Capowski inquired about the limits of the proposed Class
A street. Mr. Waldon said the proposed
street was reasonably wide and would be median-divided, splitting off into two
local streets. Council Member Capowski inquired whether it was correct that the
automobile repair facility would be constructed right away with the office
building and subdivision getting underway when market conditions improved. Mr. Woods said it was likely that the
automobile facility and commercial building might be built in the near
future. Council Member Capowski
inquired whether the permission to subdivide property existed forever. Mr. Waldon said a preliminary plat was good
for one year and that a final plat had to be filed within this time. Council Member Capowski inquired about the
relationship between final plat recordation and road construction. Mr. Karpinos said that developers had to
provide bonds prior to beginning road construction. Mayor Broun inquired whether the proposed conditions of approval
were acceptable. Mr. Woods said yes.
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(9-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER
CHILTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 4A. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR NORTHFIELD SUBDIVISION
(SD-24..38A) (93-3-1/R-4a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the preliminary plat
application, proposed by BRW, Inc., representing Max Scroggs, on property
identified as Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 24, part of Lot 38A, if developed
according to the preliminary plat dated September 29, 1992 (revised October 29,
1992), and the conditions listed below, would comply with the Development
Ordinance:
Stipulations Specific to the
Development
1. Required Improvements:
a. That Airport Road be improved to half of a
65-foot cross-section with a 4-foot bike way and sidewalk along the property
frontage.
b. That a Class A street, with curb and gutter
and sidewalk, be constructed from Airport Road to a point approximately 500
feet west, where the proposed median begins.
c. That the cul-de-sacs, beginning at the
eastern end of the median, be constructed to Class B street standards, with
curb and gutter and sidewalk.
d. That standard width right-of-way shall be
dedicated along the streets and cul-de-sacs.
e. That at least two, 20-foot wide pedestrian
easements, each labelled as a "public pedestrian and non-motorized vehicle
easement" be indicated on the final plans and final plat. At least one easement shall connect the road
system to the north property line and at lease one easement shall connect the
road system to the western property line.
All easements shall be between, not on, residential lots. These easements shall be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association and signs shall be posted to identify them as
pedestrian connections.
f. That a water line, at least 8 inches in
diameter, be provided from Airport Road.
g. That
if the median is constructed:
i) it be built to Town standards
ii) it be maintained by the
Homeowners' Association
iii) that water and sewer lines be routed around the
median. These lines shall be of ductile
iron extending at least 15 feet from each end of the median island
iv) no manholes be
constructed in this area
Stipulations Related to
Recreation Area
2. Dedication
of Recreation Area for Preliminary Plat applications: That the final plat dedicate and deed the
Recreation Area to the Homeowners' Association for parks and recreation
purposes only. The developer shall
remain responsible for the recreation area unless and until the Homeowners'
Association accepts the property.
Stipulations Related to State and Federal
Government Approvals
3. State
or Federal approval(s): That plans
for encroachments in or improvements to state-maintained roads or within NCDOT
rights-of-ways be approved by NCDOT prior to the issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Landscape
Elements
4. Landscape
Protection Plan: That a Landscape
Protection Plan be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
Stipulations Related to Water, Sewer and
Other Utilities
5. Fire
Flow: That four fire hydrants be
located on the site, in locations approved by the Town Manager. A fire flow report shall be prepared by a
registered professional engineer, showing that flows meet the minimum
requirements of the Design Manual, be approved prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit.
6. Utility/Lighting
Plan Approval: That the final
utility/lighting plan be approved by Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Duke
Power, Public Service Company, Southern Bell, Cablevision and the Town Manager,
before issuance of Zoning Compliance Permit.
The property owner shall be responsible for assuring these utilities,
including cable television, are extended to serve the development.
7. OWASA
Easements for Preliminary Plat applications: That easement documents as required by OWASA and the Town Manager
be recorded before final plat approval.
Miscellaneous Stipulations
8. Solid
Waste Management Plan: That a
detailed solid waste management plan, including a recycling plan and plan for
management of construction debris, be approved by the Town Manager prior to the
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
9. Detailed
Plans: That final detailed site plan,
grading plan, utility/lighting plans, stormwater management plan (with
hydrologic calculations), landscape plan and landscape maintenance plan be
approved by the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit, and
that such plans conform to the plans approved by this application and
demonstrate compliance all applicable conditions and the design standards of
the Development Ordinance and the Design Manual.
10. Certificates
of Occupancy: That no Certificates
of Occupancy be issued until all required public improvements are complete; and
that a note to this effect shall be placed on the final plat.
If the
Town Manager approves a phasing plan, no Certificates of Occupancy shall be
issued for a phase until all required public improvements for that phase are
complete; no Building Permits for any phase shall be issued until all public
improvements required in previous phases are completed to a point adjacent to
the new phase; and that a note to this effect shall be placed on the final
plat.
11. Sight
Triangle Easements: That sight
triangle easements approved by the Town Manager be provided on the final plat.
12. For
Developments with New Streets - Traffic Signs: That the property owners shall be responsible for placement and
maintenance of temporary regulatory traffic signs including street name signs
before issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy until such time that the street
system is accepted for maintenance by the Town.
13. For
Developments with New Streets - Names, Numbers: That the name of the development and its streets and
house/building numbers be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a
Zoning Compliance Permit.
14. Work
Zone Traffic Control Plan: That a
work zone traffic control plan be approved by the Town Manager before issuance
of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
15. Erosion
Control: That a soil erosion and
sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control
Officer and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
16. Silt
Control: That the applicant take
appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on
adjacent paved roadways.
17. Continued
Validity: That continued validity
and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued
compliance with the plans and conditions listed above.
18. Non-severability: If any of the above conditions is held to be
invalid, approval in its entirety shall be void.
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that the Council hereby approves the preliminary plat for Northfield
Subdivision in accordance with the plans and conditions listed above.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
Item 8 Solid Waste Management Goals
Council Member Brown
noted that the Council's earlier comments on proposed solid waste goals and
objectives had been incorporated into the draft at the Council table this
evening. Council Member Rimer added
that the changes discussed at the February 22nd meeting were incorporated into
the proposed goals. Council Member
Brown noted that revised language was proposed for goal number twenty. Council Member Andresen said although she
appreciated the subcommittee's work, it was difficult to evaluate the proposed
goals when the item had been placed at the Council table this evening. Council Member Brown said the committee had
reviewed the proposal goals fairly extensively. Council Member Rimer stated that the goals discussed at the
February 22nd meeting were being returned for the Council's consideration this
evening. Council Member Chilton said
most of the changes were semantic differences or clarification matters.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 4.1. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION
CONCERNING ESTABLISHMENT OF TOWN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT GOALS (93-3-1/R-4.1)
BE IT RESOLVED that
the Chapel Hill Town Council hereby adopts the following solid waste management
goals as initially discussed at the Council's
December 8, 1992 work session and February 22, 1993 regular meeting.
This the 1st day of
March, 1993.
CHAPEL HILL SOLID WASTE GOALS
[Based
on North Carolina Recycling and Solid Waste
Management
Plan, Department of Environment, Health
and
Natural Resources]
(Discussed
at Work Session: December 8, 1992;
Minutes
of Work Session Adopted: January 11, 1993;
Goals
Adopted: March 1, 1993)
SECTION ONE - INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANNING
Goal 1: To plan for and implement solid waste management
systems involving an integrated mixture of program components giving priority
to waste reduction.
Goal 2: To participate in the development of regional
cooperative strategies to manage solid waste when appropriate and consistent
with local waste reduction and cost effectiveness strategies, and that give
equal consideration to minimizing environmental health hazards, conserving
natural resources and energy, and minimizing total costs.
Goal 3: To define the relationships of the governing
bodies of Orange County in order to plan, coordinate, implement, and regulate
the programs and systems needed for effective solid waste management.
Goal 4: To effectively involve the public through
public hearings, Town Committees and advisory boards as appropriate, and other
means, in integrated solid waste management planning and program development by
including the public and addressing public concerns and values at each stage of
the decision making process.
SECTION TWO - UTILIZING WASTE STREAM CHARACTERIZATION DATA
Goal 5: To gather useful, accurate and appropriate data
on the amount and nature of the waste stream as needed to assist in the
planning of solid waste management programs and facilities.
SECTION THREE - COLLECTION, TRANSFER, AND DISPOSAL OF WASTE
Goal 6: To ensure the provision of reasonably
convenient, cost-effective, and sanitary waste collection service to all
residents, businesses, and industry in Chapel Hill, preferably regular
household collection from all residential customers, and adequate collection
arrangements available to all local businesses and industry.
Goal 7: To evaluate the potential for improved waste
management through comparing source separation techniques as well as other
collection and disposal technologies using efficiency, cost, resource
conservation, protection of the environment and public health as the evaluation
criteria.
Goal 8: To ensure that adequate, environmentally sound
disposal capacity is available in the present and ideally for at least the next
twenty years.
Goal 9: To undergo proactive planning, site screening,
site selection, and design of required new landfill capacity and provide
operation of existing facilities that will meet all federal, state and local
requirements and reduce the risk of environmental degradation.
Goal 10: deleted
Goal 11: To effectively reduce and eventually
eliminate littering and illegal dumping of solid waste within Chapel Hill.
SECTION FOUR - ALTERNATIVES TO DISPOSAL: SOURCE REDUCTION, REUSE,
RECYCLING AND COMPOSTING
Goal 12: Through sound management practices
and through the development and expansion of source reduction, reuse, and
recycling opportunities, reduce the amount of Chapel Hill's waste requiring
disposal.
Goal 13: To assess, develop and implement
education programs, policies and incentives which promote source reduction and
reuse and discourage waste generation.
Goal 14: To maximize recovery of materials
while minimizing recycling system cost.
Goal 15: To effectively manage organic waste
materials in an environmentally sound and cost effective manner which diverts
to the greatest extent possible that waste stream from mixed solid waste
facilities.
Goal 16: Design, develop and implement public
information, awareness and education programs designed to increase public
awareness of the need for, and public involvement in the implementation of,
source reduction, recycling and composting, and to promote environmentally
sound and cost-effective integrated solid waste management.
SECTION SIX - SPECIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
Goal 17: To evaluate and establish
alternatives for the management of materials which have been banned from
landfilling or which pose special management problems, with an emphasis on
reducing the need to handle such materials by eliminating them from the waste
stream.
SECTION SEVEN - ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
Goal 18: To budget sufficient funds for
existing solid waste management programs, including public education programs,
recycling, reduction, and composting programs, etc.
Goal 19: To determine the full costs involved
in providing solid waste management services in order to determine how to set
equitable rates which pass the cost of services on to the solid waste producers
as appropriate and provide the basis for enterprise fund development.
SECTION EIGHT - IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Goal 20: To evaluate the solid waste
management system considering efficiency, cost effectiveness, resource
conservation, environmental protection and public health, among others.
Noting that the Council had previously
considered a resolution concerning solid waste generated outside Orange County,
Council Member Brown said she hoped that the Council would consider this
resolution in the future. She stated
that studies had shown a large amount of waste came into Orange County from
other counties. Council Member Brown said she proposed bringing the matter back
at a future meeting.
Council Member Capowski expressed
concern that the solid waste goals and objectives had been placed at the table
for Council consideration this evening.
He said that some advance warning, preferably over a weekend, was
desirable. Noting that the Landfill
Owners Group next meeting was on March 11th, Council Member Rimer said the
matter would have had to wait until March 22nd if it had not been considered
this evening. Council Member Capowski
inquired why the item had not been distributed on Friday evening. Council Member Chilton said the committee
had experienced some meeting scheduling difficulties.
Item
9 Quarterly Report on Violent Crime and Drug Abuse Program
Mayor Broun noted that the good work
and efforts of Jack Schier, Volunteer Program Coordinator and Tom Scott,
Assistant Volunteer Program Coordinator, continued. Mayor Broun said that Mr. Schier was working on a number of grant
proposals and that Vice-Chancellor Donald Boulton had agreed to serve as Chair
of the University/Community Cooperation Committee. Mayor Broun also said the Media Committee had done a good job of
making the community aware of crime and drug-related challenges. He noted that the Law Enforcement and
Criminal Justice Committees also continued their good work.
Steve Wallace commended the TROSA
program as a good alternative for substance abusers. He stated that Great Britain made prescription heroin and cocaine
available to drug addicts as a means of reducing property crime. Mr. Wallace said some recent studies had
questioned the effectiveness of the DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education)
program. He also stated that a speaker
at a recent local conference had indicated that aggression was most frequently
linked to alcohol, rather than drugs.
Expressing his desire to work with the committees of the Violent Crime
and Drug Abuse Program, Mr. Wallace challenged the Council to provide funding
for substance abuse treatment programs.
Council Member Andresen inquired about
the genesis of the Youth Committee's charge.
Mayor Broun said this charge had been developed by the initial task
force. Mr. Horton said the committee
had the longest list of objectives and needed a corresponding amount of
resources and support. Council Member
Capowski inquired about the criminal case study cited in the quarterly
report. Mayor Broun said the study was
intended to be illustrative of the criminal justice system from beginning to
end. Council Member Capowski said he
thought this was a marvelous idea. He
also inquired about the nature of the Quest program. Ms. Loewenthal said this was a program for elementary school
students to help define their values and to make their own choices.
Item
10 Downtown Planning Committee
Josh Gurlitz recognized the members of
the Downtown Planning Committee in attendance this evening and thanked them for
their assistance in preparing the report.
He briefly outlined the committee's work to date, noting that the
committee's recommendations were intended to sustain the downtown's well-being
into the next century. Mr. Gurlitz
emphasized that an appropriate people-sized scale was a necessary ingredient
for success of policies in the downtown area.
He also noted that the downtown was a lively and interesting place,
having a diverse offering of bookstores and other businesses. Mr. Gurlitz also said the area was diverse
from the standpoint of income levels and the ages of those using the downtown
area. He emphasized the importance of
maintaining downtown as a community asset.
Mayor Broun congratulated Mr. Gurlitz
and the Downtown Planning Committee for their hard work and the thoroughness of
their report. Council Member Andresen
expressed interest in the proposed transportation policies outlined in the
report, especially provisions for on-street parking in the downtown area. Noting that parking was always a difficult
issue, Mr. Gurlitz emphasized the need for accessibility to the downtown area
through the availability of convenient parking. He said that the proposals concerning on-street parking and the
need for additional deck parking would likely be controversial.
Council Member Chilton said the report
was a very good one. He stated
that the number and scale of murals in
the downtown area was quite unusual.
Council Member Chilton suggested that the committee follow-up on the
possibility of additional murals in the downtown area. Mr. Gurlitz expressed his concurrence noting
that Glaxo and the Downtown Commission had been instrumental in providing
support for the murals painted to date.
Expressing her appreciation for the committee's work, Council Member
Brown emphasized the importance of scale in the downtown area. She inquired whether the committee had
discussed the proposed University parking deck near the corner of Pittsboro and
Vance Streets. Mr. Gurlitz said
although this specific project had not been discussed, the committee suggested
that the Town and University jointly plan parking decks and pedestrian and
bicycle linkages.
Council Member Capowski thanked Mr.
Gurlitz and the committee for their report.
Noting that he had no objective data to prove it, Council Member
Capowski stated that there had recently appeared to be a net negative in
matters of downtown pride and maintenance.
Council Member Capowski inquired which downtown capital improvements
would be high priorities for the committee.
Mr. Gurlitz said the committee would be happy to discuss where the funds
might be most useful. He also added
that the committee would make funding requests to the Council and other
agencies for near and long-term downtown capital improvements.
Council Member Werner expressed
appreciation to the committee for their work.
He requested the committee's comments on the inherent conflicts between
increasing parking availability and making areas more pedestrian-friendly. Mr. Gurlitz said he would suggest narrower
drive lanes and decreased speeds on Franklin Street to accommodate parking lanes. Mr. Gurlitz stated that parking lanes
generally made pedestrians feel more comfortable. He also noted the importance of bicycles and pedestrians
throughout the committee's report and recommendations. Council Member Werner inquired about the
committee's reaction to the Town's recent policy changes concerning the
provision of parking. Mr. Gurlitz said
it was important to look for ways to decrease the number of automobiles on a
project-by-project basis. Council
Member Rimer thanked the committee for writing a very cogent report. He noted that economics and physical
planning were both critical components of future downtown plans.
Council Member Brown inquired whether
the committee had projected any costs for proposed programs. Mr. Gurlitz said no, adding that one step of
the implementation plan was to create a first year work plan and assign dollar
values to some projects. He noted that
the committee had implemented one goal at no cost. Mr. Gurlitz said a discussion group of persons involved with
downtown arts and cultural facilities was meeting regularly in an effort to
keep the arts and cultural community strong.
Council Member Brown inquired whether any timetable had been developed
for the proposed work plan. Mr. Gurlitz
said that although no timetable had been established, the first step would be
to gather comments from committee members and other interested persons. Noting the importance of the downtown area
as a community resource, Council Member Andresen thanked the committee for its
hard work. Mayor Broun suggested that
Council Members could forward any additional suggestions or comments to Mr.
Gurlitz. Mayor Broun also said he liked
the idea of a one-year plan.
Item
11 Report on Work Plan Items
Mr. Horton said staff welcomed
additional comments on the proposed work plan this evening. Council Member Andresen emphasized the
importance of strengthening coordination processes with the University. Council Member Andresen also expressed her
support for the development of affordable transitional and rental housing
programs. Council Member Brown
expressed her concurrence with the need for these types of programs, including
input from the Orange Community Housing Corporation. Mayor Broun noted that the proposed goals before the Council were
intended to be very broad-based.
Council Member Brown requested that
staff provide information concerning environmental and economic impacts of
individual growth-related decisions.
Council Member Werner requested additional specifics. Council Member Brown said the Council
received limited information of the impact of growth-related decisions on
existing Town services. Council Member
Werner said the staff was limited in the scope of what it could examine. Council Member Andresen said she was not
sure what specifically was being requested.
Council Member Brown said she was requesting some sort of model to give
municipalities a total picture of the impact, including taxes, of approved
developments. Council Member Brown said
she realized that this could not be implemented expeditiously. Mayor Broun said he was not sure that the
Council had set this goal as a priority at the January 16th planning and
reporting session. He suggested that
the item could possibly be considered at a future Council planning and
reporting session. Council Member Capowski
emphasized the importance of tracking the effects of university and hospital
development on the periphery of the campus area.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 5, AS AMENDED. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SUMMARY OF THE
COUNCIL'S POLICY DIRECTION AND WORK PLAN ITEMS BASED ON THE COUNCIL'S JANUARY
16, 1993 PLANNING SESSION (93-3-1/R-5)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Chapel Hill Town
Council that the Council hereby adopts the attached summary of top priority
goals, policy direction to the Manager and work plan items based on the Mayor
and Council's discussion in the Planning Session on January 16, 1993.
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
SUMMARY OF THE
COUNCIL'S PLANNING SESSION ON JANUARY 16, 1993
I.
Top priority goals of the Council
A. Crime, drug
abuse and public safety
Deal
with both crime problems and citizens' fears about crime.
B. Transportation
Continue
working with the NC Board and Department of Transportation
on transit funding allocation issues.
C. Solid Waste
Management
Complete
the process of establishing solid waste goals and objectives in conjunction with Orange
County, Carrboro and
Hillsborough, and move forward with a work plan.
D. Development
Streamline
the development review process.
Strengthen
the planning process with the University and UNC Hospitals.
E. Fiscal Matters
Seek
legislative authorization for new revenue sources.
II.
Policy Direction to the Manager
Enhance the Police Department's
computer capabilities in order to strengthen overall law enforcement.
Town housing assistance should focus
on needs of families with income below 60% of the median (based on discussion
in February 1 work session), and on the need for rental and transitional
housing.
Continue evaluating the need for
employee positions, especially when they become vacant.
Continue developing cost-based
accounting.
III.
Work Assignments
A. Crime and Drug
Problems
Provide
data on national and Chapel Hill crime trends.
B. Transportation
Talk
with NC Department of Transportation regarding limited roadway improvements to
South Columbia Street including the necessity of sidewalks and bikeways.
Evaluate
pedestrian/cyclist crossing needs at the Estes/Franklin intersection; consider
pedestrian signals, crosswalk lines, etc.
Make
recommendations for a bikeways plan.
C. Development
Evaluate
alternatives to improve planning process with the University and UNC Hospitals;
review Office/ Institutional -3 zoning and special use permit/site plan review
aspects.
Review
four findings for evaluating special use permit applications.
Report
on mixed use zoning: history, justification, etc.
Report
on applicability of special appearance and conservation district zoning to UNC
property and to the perimeter of the campus.
D. Fiscal Matters
Evaluate
the structure of Town departments for efficiency improvements; complete in one
year.
Report
on pros and cons of real estate transfer tax.
Prepare
a presentation to the County Commissioners on the Town's Library funding needs.
Make
recommendations on how to pay for capital improvements including Streetscape items, bikelanes and greenways.
E. Council
Meetings
Procedures
Manual Committee is to make recommendations for streamlining meeting calendar.
Mayor
will seek to arrange shortened session for Institute of Government workshop on effectiveness and efficiency (to be scheduled for evening or weekend time).
Schedule
budget work sessions to begin at 5:45 pm.
F. Downtown
Mayor
will write to Bankruptcy Court regarding need to address appearance of
Paliouras building; and to NC Department of Environment, Health and Natural
Resources regarding Top of the Hill site and regulatory process.
G. Water/Sewer
Council's
concerns about rates for sprinkler/standpipe systems will be conveyed to OWASA
Board appointees.
Report
on status of OWASA's consideration of rates for sprinkler/standpipe systems.
H. Volunteers
Recruit
volunteers as part of meeting with civic groups.
Items
in Progress from Work Plan Based on 1992 Planning Session
Propose a process for cooperating with
UNC and UNC Hospitals development
Prepare a proposal on the possibility
of establishing a business incubator.
Pursue the need for air quality
monitoring by the State.
Report on possible alternatives for
construction of low-income housing in new development (to include consideration
of inclusionary zoning).
Complete work on translating the
Design Guidelines into design standards.
Propose pedestrian plan.
Pursue voluntary maintenance of
bikeways.
Prepare preliminary draft addition to
the Strategic Report to address crime and public safety matters.
Recommend addition to the Strategic
Report to address the Town's budgeting and financial management goals and
objectives.
Item
12 Report on Triangle Residential Options for
Substance
Abusers (TROSA) Program
Craig Brown, President of the TROSA
Board of Directors, said the program was a two-year residential program for
persons with substance abuse problems.
He stated that there were currently no programs for hard-core substance
abusers in the Triangle area. Mr. Brown
said that substance abuse prevention programs such as the Delancey Street
program were very successful, with a successful graduation rate of between
eighty and ninety percent. Mr. Brown
said approximately $50,000 had been raised to initiate the TROSA program. He noted that the TROSA needed the general
support of local government bodies, including the Council. Mr. Brown also said the program needed
letters of support from area governments and agencies. He said that once the site plan for the
program's project had been approved, TROSA would likely ask the Council to
consider the establishment of a challenge grant in an effort to attract private
funding. Mr. Brown said a number of
substance abuse treatment programs such as Delancey Street were financially
self-sufficient within a short period of time.
Mayor Broun inquired about the
estimated number of annual program participants. Mr. Brown said the usual program staff ratio was six clients to
one staff person. He added that the
number of participants would depend on the availability of funding although
other similar programs had twenty-five to thirty participants annually. Mr. Brown said that the typical program
enrollment time was two and a half years.
Council Member Capowski inquired about the ratio of voluntary
participants to criminal justice system referrals. Mr. Brown said that approximately sixty to seventy percent of
participants were criminal justice offenders.
Mayor Broun thanked Mr. Brown for outlining the proposed program.
COUNCIL MEMBER RIMER MOVED, SECONDED
BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE MANAGER. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
Item
13 Consent Agenda
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING VARIOUS
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (93-3-1/
R-6)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the following resolutions
and ordinances as submitted by the Town Manager in regard to the following:
a. Bid award for public housing
renovations (R-7).
b. Arrangements for annual Apple
Chill Street Festival (R-8, O-1).
c. Scheduling budget work session
(April 1 at 7:30 p.m.)
(R-9).
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
Trinity Court
Rehabilitation Work
Council Member Werner inquired about
the number of units proposed for rehabilitation. Mr. Horton said all forty units were proposed for rehabilitation. Council Member Werner inquired whether the
estimated cost of $13,000-$14,000 per unit was a typical cost. Mr. Horton said although the Town had not
done this type of work recently, the bids appeared to be reasonable.
COUNCIL MEMBER WERNER MOVED, SECONDED
BY COUNCIL MEMBER POWELL, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 7. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A BID AND
AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE REHABILITATION WORK AT TRINITY COURT PUBLIC HOUSING
NEIGHBORHOOD (93-3-1/R-7)
WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill has
solicited formal bids by advertisement in The Chapel Hill News on
December 29, 1992 and the Challenger Newspaper on January 7-13, 1993 and
in accordance with General Statutes 143-128 for rehabilitation work; and
WHEREAS, the following bids were
received and opened on February 10, 1993:
Single prime
contract for entire project:
Contractors Bid
Amount
Bordeaux Construction Company, Inc. $540,000.00
Superior Construction Company $593,000.00
Central Builders, Incorporated $594,594.00
Albemarle Home Builders $620,000.00
Romeo Guest $634,824.00
Freedom Constructors, Incorporated $648,000.00
Blue Ridge Enterprises $678,500.00
Multiple prime
contract to include renovations and site improvements:
General
Contractors
Bordeaux Construction Company, Inc. $426,394.00
Delta Builders $427,558.00
H. M. Kearn $437,990.00
Central Builders, Incorporated $443,443.00
Romeo Guest $476,811.00
Superior Construction $506,415.00
Albemarle Home Builders $515,200.00
Blue Ridge Enterprises $572,800.00
Plumbing:
Sparrow and Sons Plumbing $107,150.00
Brown Brothers Plumbing Company $129,337.00
Electrical:
Watson Electrical $
24,800.00
Basic Electric Company $
31,765.00
RVM Electrical Company $
33,666.00
Johnson's Modern Electric $
39,000.00
Vaughn Electric Company $
49,753.00
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Town accepts the bid and awards a
contract to Bordeaux Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $540,000.00
for rehabilitation work at the Trinity Court public housing neighborhood.
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
Apple Chill
Street Fair Arrangements
Council Member Herzenberg said he had
read in local newspapers that some consideration was being given to
rescheduling the date of the 1994 Apple Chill Street Fair. He asked the Manager to conduct a poll
among vendors and community groups at this year's Apple Chill concerning
the proposal of changing the date of the 1994 event.
COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 8 AND ORDINANCE 1. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION CLOSING A PORTION OF
FRANKLIN STREET FOR APPLE CHILL STREET FAIR (93-3-1/R-8)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby directs the closing of Franklin
Street between Columbia Street and the western entrance of the Morehead
Planetarium parking lot, and of Henderson Street between Rosemary and Franklin
Streets on Sunday, April 18, or April 25, 1993, from 10:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.,
to allow the holding of the Apple Chill Street Fair and cleanup of the street
following the Fair.
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
AN ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY REMOVING
PARKING FROM PORTIONS OF FRANKLIN AND HENDERSON STREETS (APPLE CHILL '93)
(93-3-1/O-1)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill:
That on the 18th day of April or the
25th day of April, 1993 between the hours of 12:30 and 8:00 p.m., there shall
be no parking on either side of Franklin Street between Columbia Street and the
western entrance of Morehead Planetarium parking lot, or on either side of
Henderson Street between Franklin and Rosemary Street between the above hours.
The Police Department of the Town of
Chapel Hill is hereby authorized to cover the parking meters on said streets
during such hours on said date. The
Police Department is further authorized to remove, tow, and impound automobiles
and vehicles of any kind which are parked on said streets during such hours in
contravention of this Ordinance. In
light of the large number of pedestrians expected in the Street Fair area, the
Council hereby determines that vehicles in the restricted area would constitute
a special hazard requiring prompt removal.
The owner shall be responsible for and pay storage and moving costs of
any vehicle removed pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance, and the Police
Department shall use reasonable diligence to notify the owner of the removal
and storage of such vehicles.
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
Council Member Capowski noted that
last year, a number of the Council's budget work sessions had been
cablecasted. He inquired whether there
had been a decision not to televise the sessions this year. Mr. Horton said the possibility of
cablecasting some of the session had been left open. Council Member Chilton said it seemed to be a worthwhile
investment to televise all budget work sessions. Council Member Andresen said
it might be helpful to change the format of budget work sessions whereby the
Council would work around a table similar to that in the Council conference
room. She said the matter could be
discussed further at a future meeting.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HERZENBERG, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 9. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).
A RESOLUTION SCHEDULING A BUDGET WORK
SESSION (93-3-1/R-9)
BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill hereby schedules a budget work session on Thursday, April
1st at 7:30 p.m.
This the 1st day of March, 1993.
No report followed the executive
session. The meeting concluded at 10:49
p.m.