MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA, WEDNESDAY,
MAY 29, 1996,7:00 P.M.
Mayor Waldorf called the
meeting to order, noting that there was a long agenda in front of the Council
this evening.
Council Members in
attendance were Joyce Brown, Mark Chilton, Pat Evans and Lee Pavao. Council Members Julie Andresen, Joe Capowski
and Richard Franck arrived at 7:03 p.m.
Council Member Barbara Powell was absent excused.
There were no hearings or
ceremonies.
COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO RECEIVE AND REFER A PETITION FROM THE
INTERFAITH COUNCIL REGARDING PARKING ARRANGEMENTS ON WILSON COURT. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0).
Steve England, representing
the Black Public Works Association (BPWA), said although the BPWA applauded the
Council's intent to adopt new minimum salaries, other actions were needed. He also said that the BPWA was proposing a
flat, stair step raise system for Town employees. Mr. England stated that the BPWA would be holding a public forum
in the near future. Mayor Waldorf
inquired whether a specific date was proposed for the forum. Mr. England said a specific date had not
been determined.
Valerie Broadwell suggested
that all fees collected from the Bell South PCS telecommunications tower
agreement be used to purchase open space.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRESEN, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MS. BROADWELL'S
PETITION. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Planning Board Chair Mary
Reeb said the Board was recommending that the Council consider adopting a new
ordinance for zoning large tracts of land, rather than limiting the matter
solely to University tracts. She also
said the Board was suggesting that the Council consider setting a public
hearing on Monday, June 17th on this matter.
There were no questions from the Council regarding Ms. Reeb's report on
the Board's recommendations.
Frances Humer, a resident of
Rogerson Drive, said she strongly protested the placement of a pole at the end
of Cleland Drive. Ms. Humer said she
believed that the area had been unfairly targeted by utilities for the
placement of their facilities.
Larry Daquioag, representing
the Housing and Community Development Advisory Board, asked that the Council
consider not cutting $9,000 from public housing rehabilitation activities, as
proposed in agenda item #4.1i of this evening's agenda. A copy of the Housing and Community
Development Board's memorandum is on file in the Town Clerk's Office. Pauline
Grimson said she and residents of the Westwood neighborhood were following up
on an earlier petition regarding a number of items in their neighborhood.
COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MS. GRIMSON'S
PETITION. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Mayor Waldorf inquired
whether or not the Council was agreeable to canceling the previously scheduled
June 3rd work session on budget matters.
Hearing no objections, Mayor Waldorf said the June 3rd session on budget
items was canceled.
Council Member Andresen
suggested the possibility of postponing action on the proposed Windsor Park
development until after the Design Review Board, Appearance Commission and
other boards completed their work on the NC 86 corridor study. Mr. Horton noted that Dianne Bachman of the
Design Review Board/Appearance Commission was in attendance this evening and
was prepared to make a report on the matter if the Council wished. Mayor Waldorf noted that there was Council
consensus to leave the item on this evening's agenda.
There were no additional
petitions from Council Members.
Noting that additional
information had recently been received from Roger Perry regarding the
University Village development, Mr. Horton requested removal of item #14 from
this evening's agenda.
COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO REMOVE ITEM #14 FROM THE AGENDA, FOR
CONSIDERATION AT A FUTURE MEETING. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Referencing Mr. Daquioag's
comments, Council Member Brown requested removal of item i from this evening's
agenda.
COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO,
TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA,
EXCEPTING ITEM I. THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (96-5-29/R-1)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby adopts the following
minutes, resolutions and ordinances as submitted by the Town Manager (excepting
item I) in regard to the following:
a.
Minutes
of April 22 and 27
b.
Calling
a public hearing on proposed landfill site (R-2).
c.
Closing
a drainage easement in Phase 3, Block L of the North Forest Hills subdivision
(R-3).
d.
Authorizing
lease to Brown and Bunch of a Town-owned parking lot on the south side of West
Rosemary Street (lot number six). (R-4).
e.
Changing
the composition of the Library Board of Trustees, Parks and Recreation
Commission and Housing and Community Development Advisory Board (O-1).
f.
Approving
expedited consideration of rezoning and special use applications for Paul J.
Rizzo Conference Center at Meadowmont (R-5).
g.
Traffic
regulations for new streets (O-2).
h.
Combining
two lots in Winding Ridge (R-6).
i.
Revised
one and three year Community Development plans (R-7).
j.
Revised
plan for 1996-97 HOME program (R-8).
k.
Olympic
Torch Relay (R-9, O-3).
l.
Speed
limit on NC 86 (O-4).
This the 29th day
of May, 1996.
A RESOLUTION CALLING A JOINT
PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE PUBLIC COMMENT RELATED TO THE SITING OF THE NEXT
SANITARY LANDFILL IN ORANGE COUNTY (96-5-29/R-2)
WHEREAS, there is a need for
a new landfill once the current facility reaches capacity and that the landfill
be developed as part of an integrated solid waste management plan; and
WHEREAS, a landfill site
search was initiated in 1990, by the governing bodies of Carrboro, Chapel Hill,
and Orange County; and
WHEREAS, the six-year
landfill siting process has concluded with the Landfill Search Committee and
the Landfill Owners Group both recommending site OC-17 as the preferred site;
and
WHEREAS, it is the intention
of the Council to insure that all citizens and property owners be given ample
opportunity to comment on the final recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the Council is
committed to early adoption and implementation of an integrated solid waste
management plan and a goal of a minimum 50% reduction of solid waste requiring
disposal; and
WHEREAS, the Council is
committed to insuring owners of land to be acquired and surrounding neighbors
receive fair and just compensation for any losses; and
WHEREAS, North Carolina
General Statute Section 160A-325 and 153A-136(c) contain specific requirements
for public hearings before any final decision is considered which would result
in OC-17 being selected for a landfill; and
WHEREAS, OC-17 is located
within one mile of the existing Orange Regional Landfill;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council authorizes
a joint public hearing to be scheduled on June 19, 1996, at 7:30 PM, at the
Chapel Hill High School Auditorium, to receive comment regarding the selection
of a landfill site in Orange County.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
A RESOLUTION CLOSING A
DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN PHASE 3, BLOCK L, NORTH FOREST HILLS SUBDIVISION
(96-5-29/R-3)
WHEREAS, closing this
drainage easement would not be contrary to the public interest; and
WHEREAS, the subject
drainage easement is unnecessary for existing and/or foreseeable stormwater
management needs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby
adopts this order permanently closing an existing drainage easement
approximately 150' long by 50' wide located on Lots 4 and 5, Block L as shown
on the recorded plat for North Forest Hills Subdivision, Phase 3; also known as
Lots 5 and 4, Block F; as shown on Orange county Tax Map 24F; said closure
shall be shown on a plat to be provided by the owners of the affected lots,
approved by the Chapel Hill Engineering Department and recorded with the Orange
county Registrar of Deeds.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR THE LEASE OF PARKING SPACES IN LOT #6 WITH
BROWN & BUNCH COUNSELORS AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW (96-5-29/R-4)
WHEREAS, the Town owns and
operates Parking Lot #6 on Rosemary Street which has twelve monthly rental
spaces available; and
WHEREAS, Brown & Bunch
owns and leases property near this lot and has requested that the Town enter
into a new long term lease of these spaces for the use of employees and tenants
of Brown & Bunch; and
WHEREAS, the Town has leased
Parking Lot #6 to Brown & Bunch
since July 1, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the Town has
published its intent to enter into an agreement with Brown & Bunch and has
received no complaints or protests over such an agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council authorizes
the Town Manager to execute the attached agreement on behalf of the Town with
Brown & Bunch for the lease of all 12 parking spaces at Town Lot #6.
This the 29th day of May, 1996.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
TOWN CODE TO CHANGE THE MEMBERSHIP OF CERTAIN COUNCIL ADVISORY BOARDS
(96-5-29/O-1)
BE IT ORDAINED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill as follows:
Section 1. The second paragraph of Section 2-161 of the
Town Code (pertaining to the Housing and Community Development Advisory Board)
is hereby revised to read as follows:
"The
housing and community development advisory board shall be representative of the
entire community. Three (3) members
shall be current residents of public housing of Chapel Hill or Carrboro, one
of whom shall be a representative from the Residents Council. One member shall be a citizen of the Town of
Carrboro."
Section 2. Section 12-17 of the Town Code (pertaining
to the Parks and Recreation Commission) is hereby revised to read as follows:
"Sec. 12-17
Membership.
The Commission
shall consist of ten (10) commissioners, all of whom shall be appointed at
large. All members shall be
residents and citizens of the town. Nine members shall be residents and
citizens of the town appointed by the Town Council. One member shall be a resident of Orange County appointed by the
Orange County Board of Commissioners."
Section 3. Section 2-142 of the Town Code (pertaining
to the Library Board of Trustees) is hereby revised to read as follows:
"Sec.
2-142. Appointment; vacancies.
The Six members shall be
appointed by the mayor and council. One
member shall be a resident of Orange County appointed by the Orange County
Board of Commissioners. Vacancies
shall be filled in the same manner as original appointments."
This the 29th day
of May, 1996.
A RESOLUTION
DIRECTING EXPEDITED PROCESSING IN THE REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PAUL J. RIZZO
CONFERENCE CENTER AT MEADOWMONT (96-5-29/R-5)
WHEREAS, the
Town of Chapel Hill has received a request from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for expedited review
of the application for Rezoning and a Special Use Permit for the Paul J. Rizzo
Conference Center at Meadowmont; and
WHEREAS, the
Paul J. Rizzo Conference Center at Meadowmont is a public facility which will
serve the interests of the community at large; and
WHEREAS, the
Town desires to work with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to
provide adequate facilities in a timely manner;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Town Manager
is directed to expedite processing of the Special Use Permit application of the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for the proposed Paul J. Rizzo Conference
Center at Meadowmont in a manner that will speed review without sacrificing
breadth or depth of analysis.
This the 29th
day of May, 1996.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES (96-5-29/O-2)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill:
SECTION
I
That Section 21-13 of the Town Code of Ordinances,
"right-of-way and stop regulations" is amended by inserting the
following, in appropriate alphabetical order:
Through Streets Stop
Streets
Weaver Dairy Road Perkins
Drive
Weaver Dairy Road Silver
Creek Trail
Silver Creek Trail San
Miguel Place
Silver Creek Trail Silver
Glade
SECTION
II
That Section 21-11 (B) (2) of the Town Code of
Ordinances, "Twenty-five (25) miles per hour on the following streets:
" is amended by inserting the following therein the appropriate
alphabetical order:
Perkins Drive San
Miguel Place
Silver Creek Trail Silver
Glade
SECTION
III
This ordinance shall become effective upon adoption
by the Town Council.
SECTION
IV
All ordinances and portions of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
This the 29th day of May, 1996.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
REALIGNMENT OF THE PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN LOT 26 AND A .34 ACRE RECREATION AREA
WITHIN THE WINDING RIDGE SUBDIVISION (96-5-29/R-6)
WHEREAS, a portion of a
structure on lot 26 of the Winding Ridge Subdivision was inadvertently
constructed approximately 5 inches within the required setback area; and
WHEREAS, the builder, Harry
L. Munson has requested that the property lines be realigned in such a manner
that would leave the structure outside of the required setback area; and
WHEREAS, the proposed
realignment of the property line between would not reduce the amount of
Recreation Area; and
WHEREAS, the proposed
recombination would not negatively affect the scenic or recreational value of
the Recreation Area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby
adopts this order permanently altering the common property line of lot 26 and a
.34 acre Recreation Area dedicated to the Town of Chapel Hill within the Winding
Ridge Subdivision, said lot 26 also being shown on Orange County Tax Map 34,
Block C, Lot 23 and said Recreation Area also being shown on Orange County Tax
Map 34, Block C, Lot 24; said realignment shall be shown on a plat to be
provided by the owner of the affected lot 26, approved by the Town Manager and
recorded with the Orange County Registrar of Deeds.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A
REVISED 1996- 97 HOME PROGRAM PLAN (96-5-29/ R-8)
WHEREAS, the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill held two public hearings to receive citizens comments and
proposals regarding the use of $612,500 of federal HOME Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development has announced that the Orange County HOME
Consortium will receive $386,000 of federal HOME Program funds; and
WHEREAS, the total amount of
funds available for the 1996 - 97 HOME Program has been reduced from $612, 500
to $482,500;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of
the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council approves the following revised HOME
Program plan for 1996 -97:
Activity Amount
1. Transitional Housing $337,000
2. Site Improvements
Orange Comm. Housing Corp. $
50,000
Habitat for Humanity $
16,000
$ 66,000
3. Acquisition $
40,000
4. Administration $ 39,500
$482,500
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Council authorize this revised plan to be incorporated into the 1996-97
Annual Update to the Consolidated Plan developed with Orange County,
Hillsborough and Carrboro for submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
A RESOLUTION CLOSING EAST
FRANKLIN STREET FROM HILLSBOROUGH STREET TO COLUMBIA STREET AND HENDERSON
STREET FROM ROSEMARY STREET TO EAST FRANKLIN STREET ON SUNDAY, JUNE 23RD FOR
THE OLYMPIC TORCH RELAY (96-5-29/R-9)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby directs the closing
of East Franklin Street from Hillsborough Street to Columbia Street and
Henderson Street from Rosemary Street to East Franklin Street on Sunday, June
23, 1996 from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m., or such time as the stage has been removed and
cleanup has been completed, to allow the holding of the Olympic Torch Relay
celebration.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
AN ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY
REMOVING PARKING FROM HENDERSON STREET AND EAST FRANKLIN STREET FROM
HILLSBOROUGH STREET TO COLUMBIA STREET ON SUNDAY, JUNE 23, 1996 FOR THE OLYMPIC
TORCH RELAY (96-5-29/O-3a)
BE IT ORDAINED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill:
That on the 23rd day of
June, 1996 between the hours of 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., or such time as the stage
has been removed and cleanup has been completed, there shall be no parking on
either side of Henderson Street or East Franklin Street between Hillsborough
Street and Columbia Street and on Henderson Street between Rosemary Street and
East Franklin Street between the above hours.
The Police Department of the
Town of Chapel Hill is hereby authorized to cover the parking meters on said
streets during such hours on said date.
The Police Department is further authorized to remove, tow, and impound
automobiles and vehicles of any kind which are parked on said streets during
such hours in contravention of this Ordinance.
In light of the large number of pedestrians expected in this area, the
Council hereby determines that vehicles in the restricted area would constitute
a special hazard requiring prompt removal.
The owner shall be responsible for and pay storage and moving costs of
any vehicle removed pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance, and the Police
Department shall use reasonable diligence to notify the owner of the removal
and storage of such vehicles.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND
"THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1995" (96-5-29/O-3b)
BE IT ORDAINED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Budget Amendment entitled "An
Ordinance Concerning Appropriations and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal
Year Beginning July 1, 1995" as duly adopted on June 5, 1995 be and the
same is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE
I
Current Revised
Budget Increase Decrease Budget
APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL FUND
Manager 800,620 2,500 803,120
Non-Departmental
Contingency 23,821 (2,500) 21,321
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 21 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
(96-5-29/O-4)
BE IT ORDAINED by the
Council of The Town of Chapel Hill:
SECTION
I
That Section 21-11 of the
Town Code of Ordinances "Speed Regulations" is amended by deleting
the following:
(4) "Forty-five miles per hour"
(j) Airport
Road (N.C. 86) from a point .10 mile north of Estes Drive to a point .46 mile
north of Homestead Road.
(k) Airport
Road (N.C. 86) from a point .19 mile south of Weaver Dairy Road northward to
the corporate limits of Chapel Hill.
SECTION
II
That Section 21-11 of the
Town Code of Ordinances "Speed Regulations" is amended by inserting
the following:
(3) "Thirty-five miles per hour"
(d) Airport
Road (N.C. 86) from a point .10 mile north of Estes Drive northward to the
corporate limits of Chapel Hill.
SECTION
III
This ordinance shall become
effective beginning immediately.
SECTION
IV
All ordinances and portions
of ordinances in conflict herein are hereby repealed.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Mayor Waldorf said she found
the report on West Rosemary Street safety concerns to be very interesting.
Council Member Chilton
requested that item number seventeen be removed from the agenda.
Board and Commission Nominations
and Appointments
Appearance Commission Chair
Dianne Bachman requested that the Council defer appointments to the Appearance
Commission and Design Review Board until the Council decided what, if any,
changes would be made to the Board and Commission's missions. Council Member Andresen said this made
sense. There was Council consensus to
postpone appointments to the Appearance Commission and Design Review Board.
The Council made the
following appointments:
Board of Adjustment
Full Town Resident members: Lee Culpepper, Nancy Feder
Town alternates: Victor
Friedman, Madeline Jefferson
County alternate: Lynn Cox
Transportation Board: Laverne Meeks
Appointments to the Parks
and Recreation Commission were deferred in response to a request by the
Commission. An appointment to the vacant seat on the Public Arts Commission was
deferred due to a tied vote.
Original voting ballots are
on file in the Town Clerk’s office.
Nominations to Shaping
Orange County's Future Task Force
Council Member Brown
presented an overview of the mission of the Shaping Orange County's Future Task
Force. She noted that the Task Force
would play a very important, but not exclusive, role in planning the County's
future. Mayor Waldorf noted that the
Steering Committee had met on several occasions to review applications. She also said the Committee had focused on
recommending a diverse group for membership.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO NOMINATE ALL APPLICANTS FOR FUTURE
APPOINTMENT CONSIDERATION.
Council Member Andresen
thanked Council Member Brown and Mayor Waldorf for their work to date on the
matter. She added that persons not
appointed to the Task Force might possibly be appointed to various subcommittees
in the future. Council Member Brown
emphasized that the process had been an inclusive one.
Noting that Public Arts
Commission applicants Betty Cloutier and Joan Page had received four votes
each, Mayor Waldorf suggested that this matter be carried over to a future Council
meeting.
Lei Knight said she was very
pleased by the fact that the Council was continuing its commitment to help
public housing residents better their lives through its support of a variety of
community programs.
Harvey Reid asked that the
Council provide full funding for the Pine Knolls neighborhood revitalization
program.
Item 6 Windsor Park Subdivision
Persons wishing to testify
in the matter were sworn by the Clerk.
Planning Director Roger
Waldon presented an overview of the proposal, noting that key issues included
drainage, stormwater management, dam construction and maintenance and traffic
plans for the widening of Airport Road (NC 86). He noted that if the State of North Carolina decided not to inspect
proposed dam facilities on the site, staff had drafted recommended language
relative to these facilities. Mr.
Waldon said that staff believed that the proposed development met the Town's
Development Ordinance requirements.
Council Member Andresen
inquired about the timing of home construction relative to proposed
improvements to NC 86. Mr. Waldon said
that these improvements would ideally occur in concert with development
activity on the site. He also said that
if NCDOT were delayed in making the improvements, the developer would ideally
be required to make them.
Council Member Capowski
inquired about the status of median cuts along NC 86 and the extent of Council
influence in this regard. Mr. Waldon
said median cuts were proposed at Weaver Dairy Road and Stateside Drive. Mr. Horton said although the State would
have the final say on this project, the NCDOT was always willing to hear from
the Council on these matters.
Dianne Bachman said the
Design Review Board and Appearance Commission were in the process of studying
the NC 86 corridor between Homestead and Weaver Dairy Road. She said a final report on the matter would
be presented to the Council on June 10th.
Ms. Bachman presented the group's preliminary recommendations, including
the possible extension of Westminster Drive to Kingston Drive.
Council Member Brown
inquired whether any sewage and drainage easements were proposed through
private properties. Mr. Waldon said
this would best be addressed by the applicant.
Pat Cabarga, 107 Stateside
Drive, requested that a letter regarding the proposed subdivision be entered
into the record of the hearing. Ms.
Cabarga said she had recently spoken to State officials who had indicated that
the proposed dam on the site would not be within the State's inspection
jurisdiction. She requested that the
criteria for "high hazard" dams be entered into the meeting record
and that the Town require that the proposed dam be built to State dam safety
specifications. Stating that higher
stormwater runoff rates were anticipated, Ms. Cabarga requested that metal
grates be installed at culvert inlets, and that the Council consider enlarging
the culvert under Stateside Drive.
William Battye said he
echoed Ms. Cabarga's comments about the proposed dam. He also said that State officials had indicated to him that the
State would likely not have jurisdiction over the proposed dam structure. He requested that the Council consider a
stipulation requiring that
the dam be built to State standards for moderate hazard dams.
Sherman Lee said he
supported Ms. Cabarga's comments regarding flooding and dam-related
concerns. He also said it was very
important for the Council to take into consideration the rights and interests
of citizens owning properties below the proposed dam.
Denny Dobbin, 105 Stateside
Drive, said he supported his neighbors' comments. Mr. Dobbin also said he did not think that the dam was a bad
idea, if done safely. Mr. Dobbin also
noted that he had not agreed to a sewer easement on his property, as outlined
in the applicant's draft plans.
Council Member Evans said
she favored having sidewalks on both sides of connector streets in the proposed
development. She also suggested having
signs posted at the end of stubout streets, indicating the potential for future
roadway connections.
Council Member Andresen
inquired about the location of pedestrian easements in the development. Mr. Waldon pointed out the relevant
locations. Council Member Andresen
suggested posting small signs to indicate these access points. Mayor Waldorf said she thought that this was
a great idea.
Council Member Andresen said
that it would have been helpful to have a drainageway and context map for the
proposed development. She also
suggested that installation of the culvert grate suggested by Ms. Cabarga was a
very good idea. Council Member Andresen
also said it would be desirable to include language in the stipulations about
what would happen if the pond was not maintained. Mr. Karpinos said private property owners would have the option
of suing the Town if the ponds were not properly maintained.
Council Member Andresen
inquired about the differences between Resolutions A and B regarding
transportation items. Mr. Horton said
that both resolutions met the test of rough proportionality for requiring
turning lanes, sidewalks and other improvements. He added that the developer could not be required to provide a
full range of roadway-related improvements.
Council Member Andresen
asked whether Town Engineering staff had reviewed proposed culvert
improvements. Mr. Small said there had
been no specific review by Engineering staff.
Council Member Andresen asked whether or not Mr. Small the proposed
culvert would be adequate. Noting that
there did not appear to be chronic flooding problems in the area, Mr. Small
said he believed that the culverts would be adequate. Mr. Small added that he could examine the matter in greater
detail. He also said that Lake Ellen
would also likely mitigate peak events.
Council Member Brown said
there had been hundred year flood events in the Town on several occasions
during the last few years. Mr. Small
noted that if the proposed dam were classified under the State's system, it would
likely be considered a low hazard dam.
He added that if a larger impoundment were anticipated, the dam might
categorized as "high hazard".
Mr. Small also noted that it was quite expensive to design a dam for one
hundred year flood events.
Noting that she had walked
the proposed site several times, Council Member Brown inquired about the role
of streambeds in stormwater management for the site. She also asked how water on the eastern side of the dam would
effect stormwater runoff on the site.
Mr. Waldon said that the applicant's stormwater runoff calculations
indicated that the projected runoff rate would be no greater than the present
level after buildout of the project. He added that Engineering staff had
reviewed these calculations and found them to be reasonable.
Council Member Brown
inquired about the proposal to enlarge the culvert under Stateside Drive. Noting that enlarging the culvert might
result in stormwater gathering on someone else's property downstream, Mr. Waldon
said the enlargement of culverts needed to be done very carefully.
Council Member Capowski
asked whether or not the proposed lake would generally be full of water. Mr. Waldon said this was correct, excepting
periods of drought. Council Member
Capowski inquired whether a fence would be installed around the lake. Mr. Horton said no fence would be
required. He noted that other ponds in
the community, such as Lake Ellen and Eastwood Lake, were not fenced. Council Member Capowski asked whether the
proposal was for two runoff points to become one. Mr. Waldon said this was correct. Council Member Brown asked whether or not the stream bed area
would be built on. Mr. Waldon said that
the applicant's drainage plan proposed some channeling and grading improvements
to the stream bed.
Council Member Andresen
inquired about proposed sewer service arrangements. Mr. Horton said the applicant could address this item. Phil Szostak, the applicant, said he hoped that
existing area residents would agree to provide a twenty foot easement in order
to accommodate an easily maintained deep sewer line. He stated that the only other option was the installation of a
pump station. Mr. Szostak said that
sewer connections could possibly be made to a recently installed sewer line
along Stateside Drive. Council Member
Andresen inquired whether this matter could be worked out if the Council
approved the project. Mr. Szostak said
he hoped so. Mr. Szostak expressed his
concurrence with the proposed conditions of approval. Mr. Szostak said he was willing to have the proposed dam
inspected every two years.
Council Member Brown
inquired whether language pertaining to the proposed dam could be
tightened. Mr. Horton said one
possibility was to require that the pond be built to State standards.
Stating that the proposed
median on NC 86 would make trip routing more challenging, Transportation Board
Chair Ruby Sinreich said it was extremely important that roads connect through
the neighborhood.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
Council Member Brown asked
staff to address buffering requirements for the project. Mr. Waldon said there were no regulatory
requirements for buffering between single family residential developments. Council Member Andresen requested that Town
staff ask OWASA not to clear the full width of the easement for sewer-related
improvements. Mr. Horton said staff
would do so.
COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 10A, INCLUDING AN
ADJUSTMENT TO CONDITION I ON PAGE TWELVE, REGARDING THE PROVISION OF SIDEWALKS.
Council Member Franck said
that conditions e and f provided for sidewalks on both sides of streets. Council Member Evans inquired whether this
included the entry street. Council
Member Franck said he believed this was the case. He added that stipulation j could possibly be adjusted. Council Member Evans inquired whether or not
her proposed amendment was understood by staff. Mr. Waldon said yes, stating that Council Member Evans was
proposing sidewalks on both sides of streets one and three and the northern
side of street six.
Council Member Brown
inquired about the staff's proposed language for the protection of the pond
during construction. Mr. Horton said
the Homeowners Association would arrange for the inspection of the pond by a
certified engineer, approved by the Town Manager. Noting that a fair number of dams certified by engineers failed,
Council Member Andresen asked whether it would be possible to add language
requiring that the dam be constructed for a fifty-year flood according to dam
safety laws. Mr. Horton expressed
concern about imposing a requirement on this applicant which was not imposed on
others. Council Member Andresen said
she thought it was a good idea to have a requirement that the dam be inspected
by a registered engineer approved by the Town Manager. Council Member Evans said this was fine
language.
Council Member Chilton said
there was a difference between withholding a fifty year flood and holding it
back with a dam. Mr. Szostak said the
dam was designed so that a fifty year flood event would go over the dam
gradually and not cause damage to the spillway. Council Member Andresen inquired whether or not fifty years
needed to be specified. Council Member
Chilton said he did not think so, noting that dams did not hold back much water
during the actual rain event.
Council Member Brown
inquired about the feasibility of the metal grate option. Mr. Horton said staff could study off-site
grate improvements. Council Member
Andresen asked staff to do this. Mr.
Horton said staff would do so.
Council Member Andresen
suggested the possibility of requiring landscaping around the pond area. Mr. Szostak said his intention was for the
park area to be landscaped as naturally as possible and for large canopied
trees to be left in their natural state.
Council Member Capowski
inquired when the homeowners association would start to have an ownership
role. Mr. Karpinos said this would
occur when the property owner deeded items to the association. Council Member Capowski said he believed
that it would be in the association's best interest to insure that necessary
landscaping was in place. Council
Member Brown inquired whether or not the proposed resolution would be amended
to be required that the pond be certified by an engineer approved by the Town
Manager. Mr. Horton said this was
correct.
RESOLUTION 10A, AS AMENDED,
WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WINDSOR PARK CLUSTER SUBDIVISION (File #
24..18) (96-5-29/R-10a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Windsor Park Cluster
Subdivision, proposed by Philip Szostak, on the property identified as Chapel
Hill Township Tax Map 24, Lot 18, if developed according to the preliminary
site plan dated February 2, 1996, and the conditions listed below, would comply
with the provisions of the Development Ordinance and specifically with the
following cluster development requirements from Subsection 17.8.2 of the
Development Ordinance:
1. The tract proposed for cluster development is at least two
(2) acres in size;
2. Public, separate water
supply and sewerage connections are available for every subdivided lot;
3. The total number of lots proposed for the tract, excluding
parcels of reserved recreation area, is not greater than the number determined
by dividing the total gross land area by the minimum gross land area
established in Section 13.11 for that zoning district;
4. The recreation area within the tract shall conform to the
recreation area standards of Subsection 17.9 of this article; and
5. The minimum amount of land reserved as recreation area shall
be the sum of all reductions in minimum gross land area as a result of the
cluster form of development, or the minimum recreation area reservation
required in Subsection 17.9.2, whichever is greater.
These findings are based on
the following:
Stipulations
Specific to the Development
1. Required Improvements:
A. One-half
of a 120 foot right-of-way be dedicated along the property's NC Highway 86
frontage. Right-of-way shall comply
with the proposed North Carolina Department of Transportation improvement
project.
B. That
a turn lane be constructed on NC Highway 86 to accommodate left turns into the
development.
C. That
improvements be provided to the subdivision entrance on NC Highway 86 to
provide safe and acceptable sight distances.
D. That
a sidewalk be provided along the NC Highway 86 frontage. A payment in lieu covering the cost of
construction is acceptable if sidewalk construction cannot be coordinated with
the North Carolina Department of Transportation planned improvements.
E. That "Street 6" be stubbed out to the
north property line. The section of
"Street 6" north of
"Street 2" shall be constructed to Chapel Hill Town standard to a 27
foot wide cross-section from back-of-curb to back-of-curb with a five foot wide
paved sidewalk on the east side. A sign
shall be posted indicating that the road will be extended in the future
F. That "Street 3" be stubbed out to the
north property line. The section of
"Street 3" north of "Street 2" shall be constructed to
Chapel Hill Town standard to a 27 foot wide cross-section from back-of-curb to
back-of-curb with a five foot wide paved sidewalk on the east side. A sign will be posted indicating the road
will be extended in the future.
G. That
if prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit, the Town Council
approves alternative roadway connections with the abutting northern properties,
the roadway connections identified in E and F above may be adjusted or removed.
H. That
the sidewalk along the east side of "Street 6" connect with the
pedestrian access easement between lots 26 and 27. The pedestrian easement shall be 20 feet wide and terminate at
the east property line, adjacent to the area labeled "unopened future
right-of-way."
I. That
unless specifically stated otherwise, all internal streets be constructed to a
27-foot cross section with curb and gutter and a paved sidewalk on at least one
side within a 50 foot right-of-way,except on the sides of connector roads,
where it shall be both sides, except for existing trails.
J. That
a 24 foot cross section roadway with curb and gutter be permitted for all
internal streets except for "Street 1", the section of "Street
2" beginning at the intersection of
"Street 1" and terminating at the intersection of "Street
6" and the two roadway sections north of
"Street 2" as
identified in E and F above.
2. Steep Slopes: That a detailed Steep Slopes plan be
submitted, showing the potential buildable areas on the house lots, and
committing to certain types of building foundations and construction techniques
for those lots and house sites with slopes of 15% and greater. These restrictions shall be referenced in
the restrictive covenants or Homeowners' Association documents. In addition, the final plat shall show for
each lot the buildable area outside the building setbacks, the Resource
Conservation District, and slopes of over 25%.
Stipulations
Related to Ponds and Recreation Area
3. Ownership and
Maintenance of Pond: The pond shall
be owned and maintained by the homeowners association. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit, the applicant shall submit a maintenance plan for the pond to be
approved by the Town Manager. The pond
shall be certified by a registered
engineer approved by the Town Manager as being built to State standards for dam
construction. Finance mechanisms to
ensure ongoing maintenance shall be included in homeowners association
documents. The homeowner’s association
shall arrange for inspection of the dam by a registered engineer every two
years, with reports submitted to the Town Manager.
A service
vehicle access strip shall be provided to the proposed dam, designed as a 20
foot wide extension of the cul-de-sac that is northeast of the pond.
4. Pedestrian Easements:
All pedestrian corridors shall be part of the recreation area owned and
maintained by the homeowners association; they shall not be in the form of
easements on individual lots.
5. Ownership of
Recreation Areas: All recreation
areas shall be owned and maintained by the homeowners association.
Stipulations
Related to State and Federal Government Approvals
6. State or Federal
Approvals: That any required State
or Federal permits or encroachment agreements be approved and copies of the
approved permits and agreements be submitted to the Town of Chapel Hill prior
to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
7. North Carolina
Department of Transportation Approval: That plans for improvements to
state-maintained roads be approved by North Carolina Department of
Transportation prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
Stipulations
Related to the Resource Conservation District
8. Boundaries: That the boundaries of the Resource
Conservation District be shown on the final plat and the final plans with a
note indicating the "Development shall be restricted within the Resource
Conservation District in accordance with the Development Ordinance." The
boundary identified shall reflect the reconfigured pond.
9. Variances: That all variances necessary for development
within the Resource Conservation District be obtained before application for
final plat or final plan approval.
10. Setbacks for
Preliminary Plat Applications: That
any restrictive covenant applicable to lots adjacent to the Resource
Conservation District not require greater setbacks than those required by the
Development Ordinance.
11. Buildable Lots for Preliminary Plat Applications: That no lots be created that would require a Resource Conservation district
variance in order to be built upon.
Stipulations
Related to Landscape Elements
12. Landscape Plan
Approval: That a detailed landscape
plan (including the buffer plantings) and landscape maintenance plan be
approved by the Town Manager prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit. The Landscape Plan shall
include:
* a Type C buffer (minimum 30 foot width) along the property’s NC
Highway 86 frontage.
Existing vegetation may be used, partially or wholly, to fulfill the
buffer planting requirements, where deemed sufficient by the Town Manager.
13. Ownership
of Landscaped Buffers: That the
landscape buffers not be part of individual lots but be part of land owned and
controlled by the Homeowners’ Association.
14. Tree Preservation:
A. Street
alignment: That the developer shift
"Street 2" to the northeast in the area between "Street 1"
and "Street 3" to save the four oaks that are depicted to be removed
on the submitted plans. The developer
shall shift "Street 3" to save the oak at lot #64.
B. Landscape
Protection Plan: That a Landscape
Protection Plan be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit. The Landscape
Protection Plan shall include the preservation of the two oak trees on lot #48
and the three oak trees on lot #43 that are depicted to be removed on the
submitted plans. The Plan shall also
include fencing for existing vegetation in the following locations:
-in the required landscaped buffers;
-the land designated to be open space and recreation areas; and
-areas adjacent to utility construction, stormwater/erosion control
related grading and devices, and roadway construction.
Miscellaneous
Stipulations
15. Zero
Lot Line Setbacks: The interior and solar setbacks for the lot line between
lot 26 and 27, between lot 35 and 36 and between lot 49 and 50 lot may be
reduced to zero provided the requirements of Subsection 13.9.9 of the
Development Ordinance are met.
16. Fire
Flow: That a detailed fire flow
report be prepared by a registered professional engineer, showing that flows
meet the minimum requirements of the Design Manual, to be approved prior to
issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
17. OWASA
Easements: That easement documents
as required by OWASA and the Town Manager be recorded concurrently with the
final plat.
18. Utility
Service Laterals: That prior to
paving streets, utility service laterals, (including cable and telephone) be
stubbed out to the front property lines of each lot. Sanitary sewer laterals shall be capped off above ground.
19. Utility/Lighting
Plan Approval: That a water and
sewer extension plan be submitted for approval by OWASA and the Town Manager
prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
That the final detailed utility/lighting plan be approved by the Orange
Water and Sewer Authority, Duke Power, Southern Bell or GTE, Public Service
Company, Time Warner Cable, and the Town Manager, before issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit. The property owner
shall be responsible for assuring that these utilities, including cable
television, are extended to serve the development.
20. Solid
Waste Management: Curbside
collection may be required for steeper lots, and a note to this effect shall be
placed on the final plat.
21. Detailed
Plans: That the final detailed site
plan, grading plan, utility/lighting plan, landscape plan and landscape
maintenance plan be approved by the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning
Compliance Permit, and that such plans conform to the plans approved by this
application and demonstrate compliance with all applicable conditions and the
design standards of the Development Ordinance and Design Manual.
22. Homeowners'
Association: That a Homeowners
Association be created that has the capacity to place a lien on the property of
a member who does not pay the annual charges for maintenance of common areas,
however designated. The Homeowners'
Association documents shall be approved by the Town Manager, recorded at the
Orange County Register of Deeds Office and cross-referenced on the final plat.
23. Certificates
of Occupancy: That no Certificates
of Occupancy be issued until all required public improvements are complete; and
that a note to this effect shall be placed on the final plat.
If the Town Manager approves a phasing plan, no Certificates of
Occupancy shall be issued for a phase until all required public improvements
for that phase are complete; no Building Permits for any phase shall be issued
until all public improvements required in previous phases are completed to a
point adjacent to the new phase; and that a note to this effect shall be placed
on the final plat.
24. Sight
Triangle Easements: That sight
triangle easements be provided on the final plat.
25. Traffic
Signs: That the property owners
shall be responsible for placement and maintenance of temporary regulatory
traffic signs including street name signs before issuance of any Certificate of
Occupancy, until such time that the street system is accepted for maintenance
by the Town.
26. Stormwater
Management Plan: That a stormwater
management plan, based on the Town's Hydros computer model, be reviewed and
approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
The storm drainage pipe between lots 46 and 47 shall be shifted to a
location between lots 49 and 50 and be included in a 40' wide sewer, storm
drainage, pedestrian easement.
27. Street
Name and Addresses: That the name
of the development and its street and house numbers be approved by the Town
Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.
28. Erosion
Control: That a detailed soil
erosion and sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion
Control Officer and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance
Permit.
29. Silt
Control: That the applicant take
appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on
adjacent paved roadways.
30. Continued
Validity: That continued validity
and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued
compliance with the plans and conditions listed above.
31. Non-severability: If any of the above conditions is held to be
invalid, approval in its entirety shall be void.
BE
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council hereby approves the application for
Preliminary Plat for Windsor Park Cluster Subdivision in accordance with the
plans and conditions listed above.
This
the 29th day of May, 1996.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 11. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO INSTALL A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE
INTERSECTION OF N.C. HIGHWAY 86 AND STATESIDE DRIVE (96-5-29/R-11)
WHEREAS, the Chapel Hill
Town Council has been studying the N.C. Highway 86 corridor for several years;
and
WHEREAS, the State
Department of Transportation has begun a project to widen the road between
Homestead Road and Interstate 40; and
WHEREAS, there is an
existing need for a traffic signal at the intersection of N.C. Highway 86 and
Stateside Drive; and
WHEREAS this intersection
will be even more significant after the road widening is completed, since it
will be the one median break between Homestead Road and Weaver Dairy Road, and
since it will become an intersection for a new collector road that will be
constructed on the west side of N.C.
Highway 86;
NOW THEREFORE LET IT BE
RESOLVED that the Town Council requests the North Carolina Board of Transportation
to study this intersection and consider installing a traffic signal to manage
and control turning movements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Council authorizes the Mayor to distribute this resolution to appropriate
parties.
This the 29th day
of May, 1996.
Item 7 Status Report on Horace Williams and Mason
Farm Tracts
Mayor Waldorf stated that
Transportation Board Chair Ruby Sinreich had requested that the zoning proposal
be referred to the Transportation Board.
Mayor Waldorf said she also suggested that the matter be referred to the
UNC-Chapel Hill Planning Panel.
COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO REFER THE STATUS REPORT TO THE
MANAGER, UNC-CHAPEL HILL PLANNING PANEL AND THE TRANSPORTATION BOARD.
Planning Board Vice-Chair
Martin Rody said that the proposed mixed-use development district was more
similar to a miniature development ordinance, rather than a zoning
regulation. Mr. Rody
stated that there were some
good points in the proposed development district which might improve the Town's
master plan. He also cautioned that it
was not a good idea to have language pertaining to the proposed district which
was too flexible. He stated that this
would amount to "contract zoning".
Mr. Rody also said that a precinct development plan was a good idea for
a tract this size.
THE MOTION TO REFER WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Item 8 Fire Sprinkler Protection Systems
Chief Dan Jones noted that
fire sprinkler systems were recognized as a means of saving lives in structure
fires. He noted that only one of
twenty-five fraternity and sorority houses in the Town currently had automatic
sprinkler systems, while another six houses had plans to install such systems. Chief Jones noted that staff was
recommending that sororities and fraternities be given a period of five years
to come into compliance with the proposed ordinance requiring the installation
of fire sprinkler systems. He noted
that an alternative course of action would be to call a public hearing on
September 16th. Chief Jones said staff
recommended Council adoption of the proposed ordinance and adoption of a
related resolution.
Council Member Chilton
requested a clarification about the difference between action by the General
Assembly and the North Carolina Building Code Council. Mr. Karpinos reviewed the effects of action
by the two bodies. He noted that a Code
Council statute directed that local governments first adopt an ordinance and
then submit the ordinance to the Building Code Council. Mr. Horton said if the General Assembly
acted on the matter before the Building Code Council, all concerns would be
resolved.
UNC Student Body President
Aaron Nelson noted that he was a member of the Tau Epsilon fraternity. Mr. Nelson stated that he was very concerned
about fire safety on the campus.
Thanking the Town for their interest in the matter, Mr. Nelson urged the
Council to adopt Resolution B, giving University students an opportunity to
comment on fire sprinkler related proposals.
David Pope, president of a
fraternity at UNC, said there was a definite need to consider the situation
fully. Mr. Pope also said he encouraged
the Council to adopt Resolution B, calling a public hearing on the matter in
September.
Council Member Brown said
everyone still felt the tragedy which had occurred and there was a need to look
at this situation very seriously. She
also noted the Town's rich tradition of inviting public comment on matters.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION B.
Council Member Andresen said
she was inclined to support getting a sprinkler ordinance in place as soon as
possible. She requested that staff work
with University officials to solicit comments on the proposed sprinkler
requirement. Council Member Chilton inquired when the North Carolina Building
Code Council met. Mr. Karpinos said he
believed that the Building Code Council met about once every two months. Stating that there was a certain logic to
just seek authority from the General Assembly, Council Member Chilton expressed
his support for holding a public hearing on the possibility of implementing the
proposed standards over a five year period.
Noting that he would support
adoption of Resolution B, Council Member Capowski said it was important for the
Town to initiate a request for OWASA to possibly reduce costs and spread
sprinkler fees across ratepayers. Mayor
Waldorf said he had asked OWASA Board Chair Barry Jacobs to have the OWASA
Board review this matter. Council
Member Chilton said a resolution could possibly be brought forward on the
matter of lowering sprinkler fees.
Council Member Evans
inquired about the difference between type 13 and type 13R sprinkler
systems. She also inquired how the size
of sprinkler lines for individual units was determined. Chief Jones said that type 13 systems were
principally for commercial facilities while 13R systems tended to be used in
residences. He also said that the size
of water service needed was based on the size of the applicable sprinkler system. Council Member Evans inquired whether or not
OWASA had addressed water pressure concerns.
Chief Jones said yes, noting that the system demand in terms of flow was
significantly less as a result of these adjustments. Council Member Evans inquired about methods for dealing with
sprinkler tampering. Chief Jones said
that many systems were equipped with alarms which were set off when tampering
occurred.
Council Member Capowski
asked whether or not the Fire Department's work load would increase if all
fraternities and sororities on the campus chose to install sprinkler
systems. Chief Jones said this would be
the case for a brief time period.
Mayor Waldorf inquired about
the status of sprinkler installation in the University's dormitories. Chief Jones said that the University's
policy was to require sprinkler systems in new and renovated buildings on the
campus. Mayor Waldorf said she believed
that the Council should be resolute in moving ahead in this matter as soon as
possible.
Council Member Franck called
the question.
RESOLUTION B WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION CALLING A
PUBLIC HEARING ON A TOWN ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE INSTALLATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN FRATERNITY AND SORORITY HOUSES (96-5-29/R-12b)
WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel
Hill and University of North Carolina community have recently suffered a tragic
loss of life as a result of a fire at the Phi Gamma Delta Fraternity House on
Cameron Avenue; and,
WHEREAS, the Council finds
that the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in existing and new
buildings used as fraternity and sorority houses would substantially lower the
risks of loss of human life from such a tragedy; and,
WHEREAS, the Council wishes
to consider a proposed ordinance requiring the installation of automatic fire
sprinkler systems in fraternity and sorority houses, subject to approval by the
North Carolina Building Code Council or the enactment of enabling legislation
by the North Carolina General Assembly; and,
WHEREAS, the Council believes
that public comment should be received at a public hearing before it considers
further this proposed ordinance and that it is appropriate to wait until the
fall to consider this matter further in order to allow the entire community an
opportunity to participate in this hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council calls a
public hearing for September 16, 1996, on the proposed ordinance to require
installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in fraternity and sorority
houses within the Town and its extraterritorial jurisdiction.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED
THAT THE MANAGER DRAFT AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING SPRINKLERS IN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS OVER A CERTAIN THRESHOLD FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCIL
AT THE SEPTEMBER 16TH PUBLIC HEARING.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI SECONDED THE MOTION.
Council Member Franck
suggested that staff could possibly bring back the ordinance recently drafted
in this regard. Noting the possibility
for objection by some parties, Council Member Capowski suggested that separate
hearings be held regarding sprinklers in sorority and fraternity houses and
sprinklers in other establishments.
Council Member Evans
inquired how public notification of the proposals would occur. Mr. Horton said notification would
principally be through advertisements and mailings.
Mayor Waldorf said she could
forward a letter to the OWASA Board, requesting that the Board investigate the
possibility of lowering sprinkler fees.
Council Member Franck said it would be desirable to a decision on this
matter from the OWASA Board prior to the September 16th proposed hearing. Council Member Capowski also said it would
be helpful for business persons to know projected costs for fire sprinkler
related costs.
Mayor Waldorf noted that the
proposed September public hearing would include consideration of regulations
relative to new non-residential and existing residential units of a certain
size.
Mr. Horton said there was
some merit relative to the question of whether the items should be combined or
separate. Council Member Brown noted
that the Council had spent a considerable amount of time on this matter
recently. Mr. Horton said far less
staff time would be needed if the items were separated.
Council Member Evans said
she intended to vote against the proposed motion. Council Member Andresen proposed a compromise position of
considering both items and keeping them separated.
Council Member Capowski
asked whether or not staff recommended having two separate legislative items at
the hearing. Mr. Horton said this was
correct. Mayor Waldorf said she
concurred with the proposal to have two separate items.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED BY A
VOTE OF 6-2, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS EVANS AND PAVAO VOTING NO.
Mayor Waldorf said she would
send a letter to the OWASA Board requesting that they consider reducing
availability fees.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO FORWARD A LETTER TO
THE OWASA BOARD REQUESTING REDUCED AVAILABILITY FEES. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Item 9 Proposed Bond Referendum
Mr. Horton presented an
overview of the matter, noting that the County Board of Commissioners had
appeared to announce its intention not to hold a bond referendum in November,
1996.
Stating that comments from
Orange County were relatively vague in this matter, Council Member Pavao said
if the Town chose to delay
consideration of a bond referendum on park needs, it might be many years before
the Town moved ahead on this matter.
Mayor Waldorf said she had
received a letter from Orange County Commission Member Alice Gordon earlier in
the day, indicating that any joint County/Town effort for parks would need to
be tied to school sites. Council Member
Pavao said it was important for the Council to consider the parks and
recreation needs for Town residents, including the future Southern Community
Park.
Stating her belief that
there was substantial support for joint Town/County recreation facilities,
Council Member Andresen urged Council Members to garner the support of County
Commissioners for shared facilties.
Council Member Pavao said there was a genuine feeling that local elected
officials should be working more closely together on joint recreation projects
such as the Northern Community Park.
Mayor Waldorf said the best possible world would include a joint
long-term planning effort with Orange County to address school and parks
needs. She also stated that long-term
fire and public works needs to be jointly examined by the Town and Orange
County. Council Member Andresen said
although the initiative by local government managers in this regard was an
excellent first step, staff did not tend to take bold actions in these types of
matters. Mayor Waldorf said it was up
to local elected officials to direct individual staffs on how aggressive these
efforts should be.
Stating that this fall
appeared to be a good time to put a bond issue before the voters, Council
Member Chilton said although public works and fire matters were not necessarily
exciting to voters, serious consideration should be given to including these
items on the proposed ballot.
Council Member Pavao
expressed concern that the Council kept postponing a decision on the matter of
whether or not to hold a bond referendum.
Council Member Chilton suggested that the Council hold a work session on
June 3rd to discuss the possibility of a bond referendum. Council Member Pavao expressed his
concurrence with this suggestion.
Council Member Capowski said
that a bond referendum held in November, 1996 probably had a good chance of
passage by voters, if a good public education were developed. He requested that staf develop a prioritized
list of possible projects for the proposed June 3rd Council work session. Mr. Horton said he would be pleased to do
so.
Council Member Evans
inquired whether or not any State funds were still available for parks
improvements. Assistant Town Manager
Sonna Loewenthal said such funds were still available and Town staff was
putting together an application to request a portion of these funds.
Mayor Waldorf said the
Council would hold a work session beginning at 6:00 p.m. on Monday, June 3rd to
discuss capital needs.
Item 10 Comprehensive Grant Program
Tina Vaughn said the
resolution before the Council would authorize Town staff to submit a request to
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for a community
development plan totalling $380,000.
She also said that the Housing and Community Development Advisory Board
recommended submittal of the proposed plan.
COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 13.
Noting that she had toured
the South Estes community yesterday, Council Member Evans inquired about the
number of units currently occupied and unoccupied in this community. Ms. Vaughn said that renovation efforts were
underway in nineteen of the community's forty-four units, of which four were
very close to being occupied. She noted
that none of the renovated units were currently occupied. Council Member Evans asked whether or not
the amount earmarked for renovations in the Craig/Gomains neighborhood was
realistic. Mr. Horton said this would
be difficult to determine until bids were actually received by the Town.
RESOLUTION 13 WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
SUBMISSION OF AN ANNUAL STATEMENT FOR A COMPREHENSIVE GRANT PLAN FOR 1996-97
(96-5-29/R-13)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council authorizes the Town Manager
to submit a Comprehensive Grant Plan Annual Statement, as described in the
Manager's memorandum to the Council dated May 29, 1996, to the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), including compliance with all HUD
policies, procedures, and regulations required therein, for a program of
$380,531 in Comprehensive Grant Program funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Manager is hereby designated as the authorized representative of the Town
to act in connection with submittal of an Annual Statement and to provide such
additional information as may be required.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Item 11 Bell South PCS Franchise Agreement
Mr. Horton noted that the
Council was considering the proposed franchise on second reading this
evening. Assistant to the Manager Greg
Feller presented an overview of the proposed agreement.
Alliance of Neighborhoods
member Madeline Jefferson expressed concern that she had not received
notification of the proposed project.
She expressed concern that the proposed seventy foot tall pole and
accompanying base would be an aesthetic intrusion in her neighborhood. Ms. Jefferson also inquired whether or not
the proposed pole was in the Resource Conservation District and how the
proposed tower would impact existing property values. She also expressed her support for the proposal that revenues
from the tower be set aside for the acquisition of open space. Assistant to the Manager Greg Feller said a
notice of the proposed tower had been mailed to residents within one thousand
feet of the proposed location, based on Orange County tax records. He also said staff had no information about
possible impacts on property values
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 6.
Bell South PCS' attorney
Travis Porter said although he was not an expert on property values, the
general experience with cellular towers was that homes in these areas did not
sell any better or worse than homes in other areas.
Council Member Chilton noted
that the proposed ordinance would authorize solely the proposed tower
referenced in Resolution 14. He
inquired whether or not it was correct that proposed future towers on Town
property or right-of-way would need to be approved by the Council. Mr. Horton said this was correct.
Noting that federal
regulations did not permit denial of a tower request based on environmental
health concerns, Council Member Andresen inquired whether or not there were
other bases for denying such requests.
Mr. Karpinos said it was necessary to evaluate each request on an
individual basis. Council Member
Andresen suggested the possibility of the Council establishing a policy of
requiring two weeks notice of application of this type. Noting that she continued to have
neighborhood-related concerns, Council Member Brown said she would continue to
vote against the request.
Stating that homes closest
to the proposed tower were across the bypass, Council Member Capowski said the
impact of the single tower would be very small.
ORDINANCE 6 WAS ADOPTED ON
SECOND READING BY A VOTE OF 6-2, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN AND BROWN VOTING
NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
FRANCHISE TO BELLSOUTH CAROLINAS PCS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TO PROVIDE TELEPHONE
SERVICES IN THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL (96-5-29/O-6)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Town
Council of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby grants a franchise to BELLSOUTH
CAROLINAS PCS Limited Partnership to operate a telephone system in the Town
subject to the following conditions:
Scope of Services
The company may provide the
following services:
Personal
Communications Service provided pursuant to authority granted by the Federal
Communications Commission.
This franchise does not
authorize the company to provide cable television or video services, for which
a separate franchise could be requested.
This franchise does not authorize placement of public use telephones on
Town property or public right-of-way.
Separate lease and
encroachment agreements
for antenna tower locations
This franchise ordinance
does not approve locations for antenna towers on Town street rights-of-way or
other Town-owned land. Such locations may be approved through lease and
encroachment agreements.
Relocation of equipment
Any of the company's
equipment which may be located in public right-of-way of other Town property
shall be subject upon 180 days' written notice by the Town to removal or
relocation at the company's sole expense to other place(s) satisfactory to the
Town Manager; provided that places satisfactory to the Town Manager are
available within such period and will not result in a material adverse affect
on the quality of company's personal communication service provided to the
Town, otherwise, such time period shall be extended as reasonably necessary for
the company to find an adequate relocation site.
Subject to the time frames
referenced in the preceding paragraph, removal or relocation may also be
required by the Town due to street or utility improvements in general, due to
public health and safety problems upon a determination by the Town or for other
just and reasonable cause as may be determined by the Town.
Upon the Town's
determination of an emergency need to remove equipment, such removal shall
occur within the time period determined reasonably necessary by the Town after
consultation with the company.
Emergency needs are not subject to the time limits stated above.
Disturbance of Property
Within a Right-of-Way; Inspections
Any disturbance of property
within or affecting the public right-of-way, as may be necessary for the
installation and/or connection of services by the franchisee, must receive
prior approval of the Town Manager or Manager's designee and shall be subject
to inspection and approval by the Town.
Term of Franchise
The term of the franchise
shall be 10 years from acceptance by the franchisee, with the possibility of
renewal subject to filing of a renewal application at least one year before the
franchise expiration.
Letter of Credit, Fees and
Taxes
The company shall maintain a
letter of credit in the amount of $50,000, or a guarantee of company's general
partner, acceptable to the Town Manager, with the required amount to be
replenished as necessary to maintain the required balance at all times to ensure
compliance with all applicable State or local laws, ordinances and regulations
and directives of the Town, with terms of the franchise and to ensure payment
of any applicable fees and taxes due to the Town. So long as the company is subject to and does pay the state
franchise tax imposed pursuant to N.C.G.S. §105-120, the Town shall not, and
does not currently, charge a license, privilege or franchise tax on the company
which is not authorized by law and applicable to other similar businesses. Should the Town seek to impose a fee or tax
on the company in the future, the company shall have not less than 120 days
notice prior to the effective date of such fee or tax, and shall have the right
to terminate the franchise provided that it shall remove its equipment from the
Town property or public right-of-way within 60 days of termination.
Insurance and
Indemnification of the Town
The company shall maintain
general liability insurance naming the Town as an additional insured party and
in a form satisfactory to the Manager.
General liability coverage shall be in the amount of at least $1,000,000.
The company shall be
required, by acceptance of the terms and conditions of this franchise, to
indemnify the Town from all damages which may arise in connection with the
company's actions and omissions and to defend the Town at the company's sole
expense against any claims in connection with the company's actions and
omissions.
Compliance With All
Applicable Laws, Ordinances and Regulations
The company shall comply
with Town ordinances, construction codes, other policies adopted by the
Council, administrative regulations issued pursuant to Council action or
policy, with directives of the Town which may be issued under the franchise
ordinance terms or general law, provided that such policies directives, codes
and regulations are consistent with State and Federal laws and regulations, and
with all applicable State and federal laws and regulations, including any
requirement for State right-of-way encroachment agreements, etc. Failure to comply shall be grounds for
revoking the franchise.
Acceptance of Franchise
Terms
The company shall within 120
days of adoption of this franchise ordinance on second reading accept all terms
and conditions of the franchise ordinance.
Revocation Procedure
If the franchise is revoked
by the Council for failure to comply with any term or condition of this
franchise, the company shall cease utilizing its facilities located on Town
property or public right-of-way within 120 days of receiving notice of revocation
and remove its equipment from public right-of-way within 180 days. Upon the company's failure to do so, the
Town shall have the right to remove the equipment and to draw funds from the
letter of credit or to call upon the guarantee to cover such costs.
Before a decision to revoke
the franchise, the Council shall adopt a resolution of intent to revoke the
franchise with a statement of the reasons for revocation and shall cause a copy
of the resolution to be delivered or mailed by first class mail to the
company. The company shall have 30 days
from receipt of the resolution to respond in writing to the Council's
resolution of intent to revoke.
Transfer of ownership
A change or changes in
ownership of the franchisee cumulatively totalling a 25% or greater interest in
the company shall be subject to review and reasonable approval by the Town
Council within 120 days of receipt by the Town Manager of a request from the
company for review of such a change(s) in ownership. In the event the Town Council reviews and for good cause, duly
substantiated, objects to the change in ownership it shall have the authority
to revoke the Franchise in accordance with the procedure set forth in the
preceding paragraph. It is acknowledged
that the company is a limited partnership consisting of multiple entities
identified on Exhibit A attached hereto and provided further that a change in
partnership shares among such entities or their affiliates shall not be deemed
a change in ownership pursuant to this paragraph.
This the 29th day of May,
1996. (Second reading)
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 14.
Council Member Chilton
inquired why the $12,000 per year figure was not included in the lease encroachment
agreement before the Council this evening.
Mr. Horton said the figure had been agreed upon after the initial
agreement was drafted.
RESOLUTION 14 WAS ADOPTED BY
A VOTE OF 5-3, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN, BROWN AND CHILTON VOTING NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A
RIGHT-OF-WAY ENCROACHMENT AND LEASE
AGREEMENT (96-5-29/R-14)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Town
Council of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby approves, and authorizes the
Manager to execute on behalf of the Town, a lease and encroachment agreement in
substantially the form submitted by the Manager on May 29, 1996 in connection
with a proposed ordinance granting a franchise to BellSouth Carolinas PCS.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Item 12 Webb Taxicab Driver Permit
Mr. Horton said his
recommendation was unchanged in this matter.
Clarence Webb said that
there was only one isolated, violent incident on his record, in January,
1985. Stating that he had tried to
resolve this matter peacefully, Mr. Webb said he regretted that the incident
had ever happened. He also said that
the background report before the Council did not give all the small details
relative to the matter.
Steve Gomez stated that he
had been addicted to heroin for about twenty years at one time in his
life. Mr. Gomez said people in the
community had reached out to help him better himself. Mr. Gomez also said that he had known and worked with Mr. Webb
for the past five years. He requested
that the Council give Mr. Webb the opportunity to earn an honest living by
operating a taxicab.
Edward Ingram said Mr. Webb
was the first person he met when he came to live in the Town. Stating that Mr. Webb was always willing to
help out his fellow man, Mr. Ingram urged the Council not to judge Mr. Webb on
his past.
Noting the importance of
providing a certain level of safety to citizens, Mayor Waldorf said she
intended to change her vote on this matter.
Stating it was not easy to
make a decision on this matter, Council Member Chilton said as far as he could
tell Mr. Webb had turned his life around.
Council Member Chilton said Mr. Webb ought to be given another
opportunity.
COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ANDRESEN, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 7. THE VOTE ON THE MATTER WAS TIED 4-4, WITH
COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN, BROWN, CAPOWSKI AND CHILTON VOTING YES AND COUNCIL
MEMBERS EVANS, FRANCK, PAVAO AND MAYOR WALDORF VOTING NO.
Mr. Karpinos noted that by
virtue of the tied vote, the matter would be carried over to the next regular
business meeting.
Item 13 Cable Television Franchise
Renewal Process
Noting that a large portion
of the franchise renewal process was governed at the federal level, Assistant
to the Manager Greg Feller said there were two resolutions before the Council
regarding calling a hearing on franchise renewal.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI
MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION A.
Council Member Capowski
noted that the substance of the agreement, excepting public access matters, had
been decided several months ago.
Council Member Evans inquired
whether or not it was correct that forty plus channels would be accessible
without a converter box. Council Member Capowski said this was correct. Council Member Evans inquired whether or not
it was correct that the Learning Channel would not be scrambled. Mr. Feller said this was correct. Council Member Capowski said the proposal
called for CNN and CNN Headline News to be included in the lower forty-one
channels. Mr. Horton noted that
provisions of existing laws prohibited specifying programming in the draft
franchise agreement.
RESOLUTION A WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION CALLING A
PUBLIC FORUM ON JUNE 10TH TO RECEIVE CITIZENS' COMMENTS ON PROPOSED TERMS OF
FRANCHISE (96-5-29/R- 15a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby calls a public forum
at 7 pm on Monday, June 10, 1996 in the Council Chamber at Town Hall to receive
citizens' comments on the proposed terms for renewing the cable television
franchise now held by Time Warner Cable.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Item 15 Parks and Recreation
Services
Mayor Waldorf said the crux
of the proposed resolution was to prepare a process for maximizing joint
capital planning and development of parks facilities.
COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 17.
Council Member Pavao
inquired how this resolution would interface with the task force on joint use
of parks and school facilities. Mayor Waldorf said the resolution was intended
as an expedient to the overall process.
RESOLUTION 17 WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
MANAGER OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL TO WORK WITH THE MANAGERS OF THE TOWNS OF
CARRBORO AND HILLSBOROUGH, AND THE ORANGE COUNTY MANAGER TO PROCEED WITH
PREPARATIONS FOR JOINT CAPITAL PLANNING AND JOINT OPERATIONS FOR THE RESPECTIVE
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTS (96-5-29/R-17)
WHEREAS, in September, 1994,
the Orange County Assembly of Governments recommended that the staffs of
Carrboro, Chapel Hill, Hillsborough and Orange County make recommendations to
their respective governing bodies about opportunities for joint planning for
use of capital improvements for recreation and park services, and that
representatives of both school systems be involved; and
WHEREAS, a work group was
formed and presented its report to the Assembly of Governments on January 30,
1996;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby
authorizes the Town Manager to proceed to:
1. Cooperatively prepare a
recommended process for joint capital planning and joint operations for parks
and recreation services to the people of Orange County;
2. Maximize joint
development and use of facilities by schools, parks and local governments;
3. Address whether this
approach has potential to reduce long-term capital and operating costs;
4. Consider the value of
planning and developing district parks for Orange County;
5. Consider dedicated
revenue sources for parks; and
6. Report to the governing boards by September 16, 1996.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 18.
Council Member Capowski
asked whether or not representatives of the Alliance of Neighborhoods and
Sierra Club were to be included.
Council Member Brown said yes.
Council Member Evans inquired about the possibility of adding a
representative from the League of Women Voters. Council Members Pavao and Brown agreed to add a representative
from the League of Women Voters.
RESOLUTION 18, AS AMENDED,
WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION REGARDING
EXPANSION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE (96-5-29/R-18 )
WHEREAS, the Town Council
has appointed a committee of citizens to make recommendations on how to use
principles of sustainability in planning the future of the Chapel Hill area;
and
WHEREAS, the Council has
received reports from UNC Planning classes led by Professor David Brower
regarding operationalizing sustainability principles and, on April 22,
regarding measures of sustainability; and
WHEREAS, on April 22, the
Council requested recommendations from Mayor pro tem Brown and Council Member
Pavão on expanding the membership of the Sustainability Committee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Council:
1. Invites the following
community organizations to designate representatives to serve on the expanded
Sustainability Committee:
·
Appearance
Commission/Design Review Board
·
Board
of Realtors
·
Chamber
of Commerce
·
Durham-Chapel
Hill Homebuilders' Association
·
Habitat
for Humanity
·
Inter-Faith
Council
·
League
of Women Voters
·
Orange
County Women's Center
·
Resident's
Council
2. Authorizes Mayor pro
tem Brown and Council Member Pavão to contact the above organizations on behalf
of the Council and invite them to designate representatives on the
Sustainability Committee.
3. Authorizes Mayor pro
tem Brown and Council Member Pavão to request the Sustainability Committee to
develop a process which would include interested citizens to work on
prioritized indicators.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Item 17 Purchase/Use of Recycled Paper
Council Member Franck said
it was important to get the Council to agree on the matter of recycling of
paper.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED,
SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 19. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION SETTING
STANDARDS FOR POST-CONSUMER CONTENT IN RECYCLED PAPER PURCHASED BY THE TOWN OF
CHAPEL HILL (96-5-29/R-19)
WHEREAS, a municipality's interest
is served when government agencies can make more efficient use of natural
resources by maximizing recycling and preventing waste wherever possible; and
WHEREAS, the amount of waste
per capita in North Carolina actually rose in 1995, rather than decreasing; and
WHEREAS, Chapel Hill is
determined to strengthen the role of municipal government as an enlightened,
environmentally conscious consumer; and
WHEREAS, Chapel Hill should,
through cost-effective waste prevention and recycling activities, work to
conserve disposal capacity and serve as a model in this regard for private and
public institutions; and
WHEREAS, the use of recycled
and environmentally friendly products and services by Chapel Hill can spur
private sector development of new technologies and use of such products,
thereby creating business and employment opportunities and enhancing regional
and local economies;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill, in celebration of Earth
Day, 1996; that:
Section 1: By the end of 1996, all printing and writing
paper purchased by any municipal department or office will, except when the
cost differential is prohibitive, contain at least 20 percent post-consumer
material. Bids for such paper will be
sought starting immediately upon completion of current contracts. If more cost effective, said paper shall be
purchased by the Town through State contracts.
Printing and writing paper
refers to high-speed copier paper, offset paper, computer printout paper,
carbonless paper, file folders, white woven envelopes, and other uncoated
paper.
Section 2. All municipal departments and offices will,
except when the cost differential is prohibitive, purchase printing and writing
paper with at least 30 percent post-consumer material by the end of 1998.
Section 3. The post-consumer content requirements shall
apply to all printing and writing paper used for typing, computer printing and
photocopying by municipal departments and offices. All materials printed for municipal departments or offices by
outside vendors will, except when the cost differential is prohibitive, also be
printed on papers that meet these standards for post-consumer material.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
Council Member Brown
inquired about the Council's options relative to funding of the revitalization
program. Mr. Horton said the funds
could be taken from the work of the Pine Knolls Association or the IFC training
program. Mr.Horton said the projct
could go ahead, with it taking a little longer for the Craig-Gomains project to
be completed.
COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON
MOVED,SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 7. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A
REVISED 1996-97 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A REVISED 1996-1999 THREE-YEAR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (96-5-29/R-7)
WHEREAS, the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill held two public hearings to receive ideas from citizens
about how federal Community Development Block Grant funds could be spent in
1996-97; and
WHEREAS, on April 22, 1996,
the Town Council of the Town of Chapel Hill approved a one-year plan for action
for 1996-97 based on two alternative
grant amounts and a three-year Community
Development Plan based on a grant of $468,000;
and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development has allocated the Town of Chapel Hill $459,000 of Community Development funds for
fiscal year 1996-97;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the Town's
allocation of Community Development funds, the Town Council approves the
following revised action plan for 1996-97 and three-year plan for 1996- 1999:
One Year Plan Funding Amount
Rehabilitation of Public
Housing $341,000 Neighborhood
Revitalization $
45,000 Community
Services $ 20,000 General Administration $ 53,000 $459,000
Three-Year Plan 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
Rehabilitation of
Public Housing $341,000 $341,000 $341,000
Neighborhood
Revitalization $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000
Community Services $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000
General Administration $
53,000 $ 53,000 $ 53,000
$ 459,000 $ 459,000 $ 459,000
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Council authorizes the revised one-year action plan to be incorporated into
the revised Consolidated Plan developed with Orange County, Hillsborough, and
Carrboro for submission the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
This the 29th day of May,
1996.
The meeting concluded at
11:14 p.m.