MINUTES OF A WORK SESSION
HELD BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA,
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5, 1996
Mayor Waldorf called the
work session to order at 6:05 p.m.
Council Members in attendance were Julie Andresen (arrived at 6:12 p.m.),
Joyce Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark Chilton, Pat Evans, Richard Franck and Lee
Pavao. Council Member Barbara Powell
was absent excused. Also in attendance
were Town Manager Cal Horton, Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and
Florentine Miller, Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney Ralph
Karpinos.
Noting that she was not sure
that the Council would be able to discuss all of the items put forward this
evening, Mayor Waldorf suggested that the Council use a weighted voting process
to determine which items would be discussed.
After polling Council Members, Mayor Waldorf noted that items 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 11 had received four or more votes. Council Member Andresen suggested that the other items could be
discussed by the Council in the future.
Council Member Brown expressed her concurrence. Council Member Franck suggested that the
Council discuss the five items which had received five or more votes this
evening. Mayor Waldorf noted that this
would include items 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
Council Member Evans
requested a definition of "growth management". Mayor Waldorf suggested that the Council
attempt to draw its discussions to a conclusion by 7:45 p.m. Council Member Franck said Council Members
could define growth management in light of the items on this evening's
agenda. Noting that the term's meaning
differed among Council Members, Council Member Evans said it would be helpful
to know what "growth management" meant. Mayor Waldorf suggested that the Council discuss the five items
identified by weighted voting.
Resource Conservation
District Ordinance
Council Member Brown
suggested that the Council examine ways to incorporate a greater level of
citizen involvement in the resource conservation district process. She also suggested the possible development
of a complete Resource Conservation District map and a process for looking at
permitted uses. Council Member Brown
said it was important to have a strong ordinance which would provide
environmental protection to the Town's citizens.
Council Member Andresen said
that some tools were needed to make sure that the ordinance was working well,
including the development of maps detailing floodways and drainageways. She also suggested the possibility of
holding a public forum regarding mapping of the Resource Conservation District.
Council Member Evans
inquired when the Corp of Engineers would complete its drainage remapping
project. Noting that interpretations of
what constituted perennial streams or drainage ditches differed, Council Member
Evans suggested that the Town work with Orange County relative to erosion
control matters, rather than seeking comments on mapping of the Resource
Conservation District. Noting that
erosion control was related to this matter, Council Member Andresen said
determination of a perennial stream was tied to three criteria, including the
presence of plant life. Council Member
Brown said it was important to incorporate citizen input into the RCD mapping
and review process. She also said it
was important to review the definition of resource conservation district in the
near term.
Mayor Waldorf said it was
very important to make clear what the Resource Conservation District was and
what it could and could not do. Mr.
Waldon said there was no schedule in place for mapping of the RCD. He noted that creation of such a map would
entail a great deal of site work.
Council Member Andresen inquired whether or not there had been a mapping
related effort underway at one time.
Noting that there was no accurate Townwide map of the RCD, Mr. Waldon
said staff had attempted to approximate the location of RCD areas at one time.
Stating that a piecemeal and
last minute process tended to leave matters in the hands of developers, Council
Member Brown said that such a process did not give citizens an adequate
opportunity to outline their thoughts.
Council Member Evans inquired what Council Member Brown meant by
"last minute". Council Member
Brown said that the engineer for the Windsor Park subdivision had to go out and
examine a number of matters within one or two days. Mr. Horton explained that this visit was intended to double check
previously submitted information.
Stating that it appeared
that putting together a definitive map of the Resource Conservation District
would be quite expensive, Council Member Andresen inquired whether there were
other solutions. Stating that there was
currently an orderly process in place for making determinations when
applications were made, Mr. Horton said although staff could draft a map of the
estimated location of the Resource Conservation District, it would be
inaccurate in some regards. Council
Member Capowski inquired whether or not efforts to address the concerns of
downstream property owners were effective.
Council Member Andresen said this dealt with stormwater management
related matters. Mr. Karpinos said that
portions of the Resource Conservation District (RCD) were covered by federal
and state regulations.
Council Member Capowski
inquired about the Town of Carrboro's ordinance relative to stormwater
management and developments. Mr. Waldon
said the Town of Carrboro did not have a Resource Conservation District
ordinance or other similar program.
Council Member Brown said
she thought that the Town should begin a mapping process and review permitted
uses in the Resource Conservation District.
Council Member Franck inquired what goals Council Member Brown was
seeking in the development of such a map.
He added that such a map would likely have to be drawn on a development
by development basis. Council Member
Brown said the proposed maps would serve as a body of knowledge relative to
drainage and environmentally sensitive areas.
Council Member Evans
inquired whether there was a staff controversy about Resource Conservation
District matters in the proposed Windsor Park subdivision. Mr. Waldon said no, noting that there was a
very satisfying level of consistency in interpretations relative to
engineering, drainage and other planning matters for Windsor Park and other
proposed developments.
Council Member Evans
suggested that the Council discuss all of the proposed items before making
decisions on overall processes and priorities.
Noting that the concept of
growth management initiatives had been raised at the Council's January planning
retreat, Council Member Andresen said she thought the Council should move ahead
with fine tuning of drainage-related maps before inviting public comment on
this matter. She also suggested that
the Council ask the Mayor to write a letter to the Chair of the Orange County
Commissioners regarding the adequacy of existing soil erosion control
regulations. Council Member Andresen
inquired whether or not the Council could adopt an ordinance prohibiting the
construction of roadways next to streams.
Mr. Karpinos said this would be contingent upon whether or not such a
restriction would permit the reasonable use of a property.
Council Member Chilton said
he liked the idea of examining permitted uses.
He also suggested the possibility of discussing erosion-related concerns
directly with the County Commissioners, rather than indirectly.
Council Member Brown said
greater clarity was needed relative to drainage ditches, streams and their
possible designation in Resource Conservation Districts.
Mayor Waldorf said there
appeared to be some interest in looking at permitted uses in the Resource
Conservation District and in receiving more detail on how RCD areas were
determined. Council Member Andresen
said there was also interest in development of a drainage map. Mr. Horton said staff could draft such a map
and seek additional Council direction on this matter. Council Member Franck suggested appointing a Council Committee to
review RCD-related matters. Council
Member Evans asked whether the proposed committee would prepare a follow-up
report for the Council. Council Member
Franck said yes. Council Member Brown
said it was important for a Council Committee, rather than staff, to prepare
the report as a policymaking document.
Council Member Franck said
it appeared that many Council Members desired some changes in the existing RCD
ordinance. Mayor Waldorf said she was
amenable to the idea of a Council Committee to examine the three items
referenced earlier. Council Member
Pavao inquired whether the Committee would have any funds budgeted for its
activities. Mayor Waldorf suggested
that this could be determined in the future.
Stormwater Management
Mayor Waldorf requested that
staff provide a status report on stormwater activities with the Army Corp of
Engineers. Mr. Horton reported that the
Town Engineer, George Small, was making good progress in encouraging the Corp
of Engineers to proceed with a resurvey of areas previously surveyed by FEMA
(Federal Emergency Management Agency).
He also reported that Town staff was in the process of composing a
report on how stormwater impact statements might be put together and used by
the Council.
Council Member Andresen
requested a follow-up report on current practices relative to stormwater
management review. Noting that she was
pleased to hear that the Corp of Engineers's study was moving ahead, Council
Member Andresen also said she believed that the Town should consider
implementation of a stormwater impact fee.
Mr. Karpinos said the Council had the authority to charge a utility fee,
rather than an impact fee, for stormwater facilities. Council Member Andresen said that the Town of Garner charged a
maintenance fee for detention ponds.
Mr. Horton said the Stormwater Management Committee had examined the
possibility of establishing a utility and had expressed a number of concerns
about such an arrangement.
Council Member Andresen
suggested the possibility of coordinated efforts with the Town of Carrboro and
Orange County relative to special assessments for stormwater management
facilities. Mayor Waldorf noted that Orange
County, Town of Carrboro, the University and the Town were all participants in
the Corp of Engineers study of undeveloped areas.
Council Member Capowski
asked whether or not the Town was receiving stormwater-related complaints
relative to small new developments. Mr.
Horton said problems tended to be related to soil erosion and sedimentation at
new construction sites. Council Member
Capowski asked whether the Town could do anything legislatively to assist with
spot flooding concerns. Mr. Horton
stated that staff was preparing a report on stormwater impact statements and resurveying
of FEMA areas for Council's consideration in the near future. Mr. Karpinos added that the court system
provided a number of remedies to deal with civil liability situations.
Council Member Evans said
that the installation of detention basins was not always the answer to
stormwater-related concerns. Mr. Waldon
said this was correct, adding that detention basins could sometimes compound flooding
and stormwater problems. Council Member
Franck said he looked forward to reviewing the stormwater impact statement item
on Monday evening's agenda. Council
Member Andresen requested that staff prepare a report on funding mechanisms. Noting that the Stormwater Management
Committee had reviewed these mechanisms in depth, Mr. Horton said he could
redistribute copies of the Committee's report to the Council.
Transportation Overlay Zone
Council Member Franck said
he was suggesting the possibility of establishing overlay zones along major
roadway corridors to encourage the use of mass transit, limiting the amount of
parking spaces permitted and not permitting drive-through windows along certain
roadways. Council Member Evans inquired
whether such a proposal was necessary.
Council Member Andresen said Council Member Franck's proposal contained
a lot of good ideas. She inquired
whether or not Council Member Franck would endorse the concept of informal
pedestrian routing, wherein citizens would be encouraged to walk, rather than
drive, between destinations. Council
Member Evans said she thought that the transportation management ordinance
suggested by Dwight Merriam was similar to Council Member Franck's
proposal. Council Member Franck said
Mr. Merriam's report did not emphasize zoning.
Mayor Waldorf inquired
whether rezoning along roadway corridors was the best way to handle
matters. Noting the importance of
examining current and proposed future land uses, Council Member Franck said he
believed that the proposal could stand on its own merits. Stating that the proposal appeared to be
more targeted at undeveloped, rather than developed entryways, Council Member
Capowski inquired why Council Member Franck thought that the proposal might
offer the best solutions. Stating that
past efforts to limit parking and related side effects had been quite
successful, Council Member Franck said it would take some degree of effort to
get people out of their cars and to use mass transit.
Council Member Brown
inquired about next steps relative to Council Member Franck's proposal. Council Member Franck said a zoning category
designation could be drafted and examined in the context of land uses. He added that his proposal was for an
overlay zone similar to the Resource Conservation District (RCD) rather than a
proposal for rezoning. Stating that a
lot of effects on corridors would arise through redevelopment and new
development, Mayor Waldorf said that execution of the proposal could be quite
complex. Stating that the proposal
offered a lot more than roadway-related solutions, Council Member Chilton
suggested that the Durham City Council might also be interested in the concept
of a transportation overlay zone.
Noting that this was an excellent point, Council Member Franck said the
consultant for the U.S. 15-501 corridor study had made a similar suggestion.
Mayor Waldorf suggested the
possibility of establishing a special appearance district. Council Member Andresen said she would be
interested in the aesthetic component of such a proposal. Council Member Evans said some efforts had
already been made in this regard relative to the proposed Meadowmont
development along NC 54. Council Member
Pavao inquired about the next step in the proposed process. Council Member Franck suggested consulting
with Institute of Government staff on what a draft ordinance might
contain. Mayor Waldorf said she was not
sure that she understood enough about the proposal in order to agree with this
next step. Council Member Evans
requested more information on the proposal's goals prior to proceeding in the
matter. Council Member Andresen
suggested that Council Member Franck could possibly bring back the proposals as
a future Council agenda item. Council
Member Chilton said the item could contain additional information about the
goals of the proposed transit overlay zone.
Mayor Waldorf suggested that the item show how an overlay zone might
work along a
roadway corridor.
Council Member Capowski said
although he liked the first two goals of the proposal, he questioned the third
one. Council Member Chilton said the
third proposal was intended to reduce the number of businesses with a reliance
on access by cars. Council Member
Capowski said that many bona fide sit-down restaurants were heavily reliant on
the provision of adequate parking.
There was Council concurrence for Council Member Franck to proceed with
the development of a future Council agenda item.
Transportation Management
Plans
Council Member Franck said
after consulting with Transportation Board and Council Members, he believed
that a number of things could be done to improve the Town's overall
transportation management plan program.
He also said that staff needed to give the staff standards relative to
transportation management plans.
Council Member Franck suggested that a local bill could be drafted,
giving the Town the authority to require implementation in transportation
management plans.
Council Member Brown said it
was important for the Town's transportation management plan to have real
"teeth" in order to reduce the use of single occupant vehicles.
Council Member Capowski
inquired whether or not it was correct that a number of businesses had
initiated transportation management plans because the alternative was making
payments in lieu of providing parking spaces.
Mr. Waldon said this was correct for the downtown area. He stated that outside of the downtown area,
businesses were often required to provide transportation management plans as a
special use permit condition. Council
Member Capowski asked whether there was any reason that the Town could not
impose fines for non-compliance with transportation management plan
conditions. Mr. Karpinos stated that
such matters could possibly be treated as special use permit violations. Mr. Karpinos added that he was not sure how
enforcement could be handled if violations were not unlawful at the time of
special use permit issuance. Council
Member Capowski asked how more enforcement power could be put into existing
regulations. Mr. Karpinos said that
future transportation management plans could possibly have penalty provisions. Council Member Franck inquired about
existing penalty provisions in special use permits. Mr. Karpinos said he could report back to the Council on this
matter.
Stating that she had felt
that participation in the Town's transportation management plan program was
inadequate, Council Member Andresen said she favored mandatory participation in
the program. Noting that the program
was not just directed at the Town center, Council Member Evans said the
collective community was at fault for the lack of success of the transportation
management plan program. Council Member
Andresen said unless the Council was willing to expand the bus system, it could
not make requirements relative to bus ridership. Council Member Franck said the City of Seattle, Washington had
high employer and employee participation in its program to reduce usage of
single-occupant vehicles.
Stating that business owners
had bought bus passes only because it was a requirement of the Town's
transportation management program, Council Member Capowski said there would be
a low level of program acceptance until the program had some "teeth". Council Member Chilton inquired about the
possibility of the Transportation Board assisting in these efforts. Council Member Franck said the Board was
already doing so. Transportation Board
Chair Ruby Sinreich said she was disappointed by participation in
transportation management plans to date.
Council Member Chilton
suggested that the fourth element of Council Member Franck's proposal be
referred to the Transportation Board.
Council Member Chilton also said although he liked points five and six,
nothing could be done about these matters until the next regular session of the
General Assembly. Stating that he was
not sure what to do with items two and three, Council Member Chilton suggested
that the first item be referred to staff for quick follow-up. Council Member Franck said he was willing to
put a little more work into item number two, if the Council was willing to let
him do so. He also stated that the
Council had not told the Manager what criteria to use for approving or not
approving transportation management plans.
Council Member Brown said the Council needed to go forward with item
number two.
Noting that taxes were
increasing, especially at the County level, Council Member Evans expressed
concern that the Council was
establishing another "hoop" for individuals wanting to start up a
business in the Town. Stating that
homeownership economics were pushing many people further and further out of the
Town limits, Council Member Evans said resolving the matter of transportation
management plans was not a simple problem at all.
Council Member Andresen said
it would be interesting to know what other communities required in terms of
parking for new developments or redevelopments in the downtown area. Council Member Brown said existing "hoops"
in the transportation management plan program were essentially
meaningless. Stating that the Manager
had done a good job of establishing reasonable requirements for the program,
Council Member Franck suggested the possibility of amending the Development
Ordinance to impose fines relative to non-compliance with transportation
management plans.
Open Space Preservation
Ordinance
Council Member Brown said
the Town needed to begin to do something to preserve open space and plot a map
of sensitive areas. She also said the
Town needed to develop an open space preservation ordinance. Mayor Waldorf inquired whether Council
Member Brown was suggesting the designation of environmentally sensitive areas
with minimum open space requirements.
Council Member Brown said this was correct. She also that it was important to compile maps in order to see
what was currently lacking.
Council Member Andresen said
it was important to identify wetland and wildlife habitat areas related to
preservation efforts. She also noted
that the community of Iowa City, Iowa had a straightforward program regarding
open space preservation.
Noting that there were
relatively few undeveloped areas within Town limits, Council Member Evans said
there were quite a number of requirements relative to steep slopes and
environmentally sensitive areas already in place. Mayor Waldorf said although there were quite a few such
mechanisms in place, she had not compared these mechanisms to the ones being
proposed. Mayor Waldorf inquired about
the status of the survey of open space facilities. Mr. Horton said staff could compile previously published
information as a starting point for Council discussions.
Stating that the Town had
never had a good map of the Resource Conservation District or other
environmentally sensitive areas due to resource-related constraints, Council
Member Capowski inquired why a map of environmentally sensitive areas was
needed at this time. Council Member
Franck said such a map would be helpful relative to the possible bond
referendum on open space. Council
Member Evans noted that many developments chose to dedicate greenway easements
to the Town.
Council Member Brown
inquired whether or not it would be problematic to put existing maps
together. Mr. Horton said staff would
be glad to attempt to undertake this project.
Council Member Franck requested that staff proceed with the
project.
Concluding Remarks/Items for
Follow-up
Noting that Council Members
Andresen and Brown had volunteered to draft a report on Resource Conservation
District matters for the Council's consideration, Mayor Waldorf inquired
whether the Council Members had a specific target date in mind for the report. Council Member Brown said the report could
be completed by the fall. Council
Member Evans said she hoped that this project would not take up a lot of staff
time. Council Member Brown said she did
not think that much staff time would be needed.
Mr. Horton said staff would
distribute copies of the Stormwater Management Committee's final report to the
Council. Mayor Waldorf noted that this
was agreeable to the Council.
Council Member Franck said
he would prepare a resolution on transit-related goals for consideration at a
future Council meeting.
Council Member Andresen
requested that the staff's follow-up report on drainage maps include
information about special assessments for stormwater facility funding
mechanisms.
Mayor Waldorf said she
welcomed the opportunity to reread the Stormwater Management Committee's report
and recommendations. Mr. Karpinos said
the possible stormwater utility fee would be charged on a monthly basis, rather
than collected up front for improvements.
Mayor Waldorf noted that the
transportation management plan item was being referred to a number of different
persons and entities. Council Member Chilton
said this was not a huge request for follow-up.
Mayor Waldorf said the
Council had asked staff to compile existing maps showing environmentally
sensitive areas. Mr. Horton said staff
could investigate available resources.
Mayor Waldorf said Council
Members Andresen and Brown would report back to the Council on options for open
space requirements.
Council Member Brown said it
was very important to address some of
the other goals not discussed this
evening. Mayor Waldorf said the Council
needed to decide whether and how to address the remaining items not discussed
this evening. Council Member Franck
suggested that Council Members wishing to do so could undertake examinations of
the other items upon their own initiative.
Council Member Evans said it was important that the projects not involve
an excessive amount of staff time.
Council Member Andresen
inquired when the Council would receive follow-up information from its recent
workshop. Mr. Horton said this
information would be distributed in the near future.
The work session concluded
at 8:32 p.m.