MINUTES OF A
REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL, NORTH
CAROLINA,
MONDAY, APRIL
14, 1997 AT 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Waldorf called the meeting to order. Council Members in attendance were Joyce
Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark Chilton, Pat Evans, Richard Franck, Lee Pavao, Edith
Wiggins. Council Member Julie Andresen
was absent excused. Also in attendance
were Town Manager Cal Horton, Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and
Florentine Miller, Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney Ralph
Karpinos.
Mayor Waldorf presented a resolution of appreciation
to the members of the Campus Y Service Organization on behalf of the Town
Council. Mayor Waldorf stated that the
students performed many services which were beneficial to the entire
community. Council Member Wiggins, a
past director of th Campus Y, was also recognized for her years of involvement
with the organization during her service as a University administrator.
Mayor Waldorf read the following resolution:
A RESOLUTION
HONORING THE CAMPUS Y FOR ITS SERVICE TO THE CHAPEL HILL COMMUNITY
(97-4-14/R-0.1)
WHEREAS, the Campus Y has been the focal point
of community activism for UNC students for 137 years, guided by its mission
statement: “The pursuit of social justice through the cultivation of pluralism;”
and
WHEREAS, the more than 800 members of the
Campus Y, through participation in 19 committees serving the community through
education, activism, and reflection, log over 10,000 hours of community service
each year; and
WHEREAS, the
Student Environmental Action Coalition and the Student Coalition for Action in
Literacy Education began as Campus Y committees in 1988 and became national
organizations;
NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that Monday, April 14, 1997 is hereby
designated as
CAMPUS Y APPRECIATION DAY
in the Town of
Chapel Hill.
This the 14th
day of April, 1997.
COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION
OF APPRECIATION. THE MOTION WAS PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Representatives of the Campus Y expressed
appreciation to the Council for adoption of the resolution. Council Member Wiggins said she had
thoroughly enjoyed all of her work for, and with, the Campus Y. She also noted that Council Member Chilton
had had a fair degree of involvement with Campus Y activities while he was a
student at the University.
Council Member Chilton noted that a number of
community leaders, including Frank Porter Graham, had been members of the
Campus Y organization.
There were no hearings.
ITEM #3: PETITIONS
Amy Subber and Gretchen Willard, co-chairs of the
Carolina Recreation Society March for Parks said that the March for Parks event
was planned for April 19th.
They noted that proceeds from this year’s event would be used to help
purchase playground equipment at the Community Center Park on Estes Drive. Ms. Subber invited Council Members and all
other interested persons to participate in the March for Parks.
Council Member Franck reminded Council Members and interested persons about the
Triangle Rail Fest, sponsored by the Triangle Transit Authority, slated for April 15th at Carr
Mill Mall. Noting that public transportation, especially on a regional level,
was becoming a topic of greater importance, Council Member Franck said he hoped
that citizens would “jump on the train” in support of regional mass rail
transit.
Stating that recent studies had found that the DARE
program was ineffective, a waste of citizen’s money and student’s time, Steve
Wallace said some communities such as the City of Los Angeles, had discontinued
the program. Mr. Wallace requested that
the Council discontinue the program and spend these funds on a more effective
drug prevention and education program. Mayor Waldorf noted that staff was in
the process of preparing a response to Mr. Wallace’s earlier petition regarding
this same concern. Council Member
Brown requested that staff prepare a follow-up report on alternatives to the
DARE program.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CAPOWSKI, TO REFER THE MATTER TO STAFF AND INCLUDE A FOLLOW-UP IN THE
COUNCIL’S BUDGET DISCUSSIONS. THE
MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Joe Carsanaro expressed his concern about speeding
motorists along Pinehurst Drive. He
said a recent study had found that the average speed along Pinehurst Drive was
42 MPH, even though the speed limit for this road was only 25 MPH. Mr. Carsanaro requested that the Council
evaluate the effectiveness of traffic calming strategies, prior to possibly
connecting Pinehurst Drive to any other roadways. He also said it was important that community residents be
involved in the testing and design of traffic calming strategies. Mr. Carsanaro also expressed concern that his
prior meetings with Town staff about
traffic calming strategies had been ineffective. Mr. Horton said that the Town Engineer and other Town staff were
in the process of developing traffic calming strategies which would
ultimately need to be reviewed by the
Council and Transportation Board.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER FRANCK, TO REFER THE PETITION TO STAFF.
Mayor Waldorf noted that if a citizen had a concern
about speeding through their neighborhood, their first course of action would
be to call the Town Manager’s Office or the Police Department to request
heightened traffic patrol. Mr.
Carsanaro said that despite greater police traffic patrol on Pinehurst Drive,
speeding motorists were still a serious problem along this roadway.
THE MOTION TO REFER WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Fred Brooks presented a petition, signed by about
five hundred citizens, requesting that the present Orange County Landfill be
closed and that another landfill not be opened in Orange County. He urged the Mayor and Town Council to
investigate alternative ways to reduce the generation of trash.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER EVANS, TO RECEIVE AND REFER MR. BROOKS’ PETITION TO STAFF. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
Cal Horton requested that item 4.1c be removed from
the consent agenda and moved to the end of the main agenda. He also noted that the correct date for the
removal of storm debris, referenced in item 4.2c, was June 30th.
ITEM
#4.1: CONSENT AGENDA
Items c, f, k, o and r were removed from the consent
agenda, for discussion at the end of the regular agenda.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA, EXCEPTING ITEMS C, F, K, O AND
R. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
VARIOUS RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
(97-4-14/R-1)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Council hereby adopts the following resolutions and ordinances as
submitted by the Town Manager in regard to the following:
a.
Minutes
of the January 27; February 10; March 3, 4, 13, 14, and 17 Council meetings.
b.
Concurring
with proposed joint hearing date of May 22 on integrated solid waste management
plan (R-2). Council Member Franck.
c.
Rescheduling
budget work session of May 21 to a date to be determined by the Council (R-3).
d.
Landfill
Owner’s Group’s resolution regarding
preparation of a solid waste management plan to meet requirement in State law (R-4). Council Member Franck.
e.
Scheduling
follow-up meeting on May 6 with the Chatham County Commissioners (R-5).
f.
Authorizing
transmittal to the Chatham County Commissioners of a report on potential public transportation services to
Chatham County (R-6).
g.
Resolution
of appreciation for participants in the charette on the future of Town Parking
Lot #5 (R-7). Mayor Waldorf.
h.
Revision
to the guidelines of the Housing Loan Trust Fund (R-8).
i.
Deleted.
j.
Authorization
to publish notice of proposed McDade House lease (R-10).
k.
NC
86 municipal agreement (R-11).
l.
Deleted.
m.
Rejecting
bids for playground equipment (R-13).
n.
Opposing
a State bill to reduce local flexibility regarding lease- purchase agreements
(R-14).
o.
Intent
to consider private proposals regarding future use of part of the Pritchard
Park site after completion of a conceptual plan for the park (response to
petition from the Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission ) (R-15).
p.
Deferring
consideration of the proposed Standish Corner subdivision (R-16).
q.
Budget
changes:
(1)
Charette
regarding future use of Parking Lot #5
(O-1).
(2)
Carrboro
Small Area Plan facilitated meetings (O-2).
(3)
Lakeshore
Drive traffic calming (O-3).
(4)
Historic
Preservation Grant (O-4).
(5)
Community
Development grant project ordinance (O-5).
r. A resolution affirming the policy regarding use of civil leave
by Town employees (R- 16.2). (Alternate ordinance O-5.1 would allow use of civil leave for service
as an election officer.)
This
the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE GOVERNING BOARDS OF CARRBORO, CHAPEL
HILL, HILLSBOROUGH AND ORANGE COUNTY ON INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE PLANNING
(97-4-14/R-2)
WHEREAS, the Landfill Owners Group has adopted a
schedule for development of the integrated solid waste plan that includes a
public hearing on the plan, and
WHEREAS, the State of North Carolina General Statute
GS130A-309.09A(b) requires that each local government hold an advertised public
meeting as a minimum requirement for public participation in development of the
required solid waste plan, and
WHEREAS, the
Landfill Owners Group believes that a single public hearing at which all
elected members of all governments of the owners group are present could be
more effective in communicating citizens’ requests than a series of separate
meetings by each government, and
WHEREAS, the members of the local governments have
not yet given full consideration to the elements of the integrated solid waste
plan
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the
Chapel Hill Town Council that they will host a public hearing, along
with other local governments that adopt similar resolutions, on the integrated
solid waste management at 7:00 p.m. on May 22, 1997, at Stanback Middle School.
This the14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING THE DESIGNATION OF LEAD AGENCY FOR PREPARATION OF THE STATE PLAN FOR
ORANGE COUNTY, CARRBORO, CHAPEL HILL AND HILLSBOROUGH (97-4-14/R-4)
WHEREAS The State of North Carolina requires that
local governments submit a solid waste management plan by July 1, 1997; and
WHEREAS The State of North Carolina encourages
submission of regional plans by cooperating jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS The Orange Regional Landfill Owners Group
has already engaged in a joint planning process for integrated solid waste
management that involves all four governments within the County; and
WHEREAS the Town of Chapel Hill Solid Waste
Department of the Town of Chapel Hill has already acted as staff for that study
and gathered much of the information that would be required in the State
Plan; and
WHEREAS the Town of Chapel Hill Solid Waste
Department has acted as lead staff for
most solid waste planning efforts in Orange County;
NOW,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that they will accept the designation
of lead agency in Orange County for
development and submittal of the State Solid Waste Plan.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
SCHEDULING A JOINT MEETING WITH THE CHATHAM COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON
MAY 6, 1997 (97-4-14/R-5)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Chapel Hill Town Council that
the Council:
1.
Formally
concurs with the previously planned meeting time and date of 6 pm on Tuesday,
May 6, 1997, for a joint meeting with the Chatham County Board of Commissioners
at a location in Siler City to be determined by the Chatham County Board of
Commissioners.
2.
Invites
the Carrboro Board of Aldermen and Orange County Board of Commissioners each to
designate two representatives to attend the joint meeting on May 6th.
3.
Directs
the Manager to give formal notice of the joint meeting to news media and
interested citizens in accord with Town policy when the location of the joint
meeting is determined.
4.
Authorizes
the Mayor to prepare the agenda for the joint meeting in consultation with
Chatham County representatives and in consultation with Council Members.
This the 14th day of April, 1997
A RESOLUTION
EXPRESSING APPRECIATION FOR THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE PARKING LOT NUMBER 5
WORKSHOP (97-4-14/R-7)
WHEREAS, the citizens of Chapel Hill have expressed
interest in the re-location of the Hudson-McDade house and future development
of Parking Lot Number 5; and
WHEREAS, the participation of our citizens in
matters affecting the use and appearance of property in Chapel Hill is of
primary importance to the Council; and
WHEREAS, the expertise of the design community in
Chapel Hill has proved invaluable to this Council in helping address the many
issues raised regarding possible future development of Parking Lot Number 5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and
Chapel Hill Town Council express sincere appreciation to all the designers who
volunteered their time and talents on Saturday, March 15, 1997 in the drafting
of design concepts related to the use of Parking Lot Number 5. The participating designers were Dianne
Bachman, Bruce Ballentine, Teresa Crossland, Dale Dixon, Terry Eason, Gary
Giles, Josh Gurlitz, John Hawkins, Michael Hining, David Swanson and Phil
Szostak.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Town
Council thank the many citizens who participated with ideas and suggestions in
the workshop and express appreciation to Peter Batchelor for his leadership in
organizing and conducting the workshop.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
AMENDING THE REGULATIONS OF THE HOUSING LOAN TRUST FUND (97-4-14/R-8)
WHEREAS, the revised regulations of the Housing Loan
Trust Fund adopted by the Council on October 10, 1994 (94-10-10/R-8) allow a
maximum of $30,000 for a second mortgage;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council amends Section 5.c. of the Housing Loan
Trust Fund to read as follows:
The maximum deferred payment
loan to supplement a first mortgage loan at the time of initial purchase
shall not exceed $30,000; provided, however, that in the case of resale of a
home with an existing outstanding Town deferred payment loan under this
program, the deferred payment loan may be reissued to a new buyer and the
maximum loan shall not exceed the total amount of the Town’s principal and
equity share or interest due at time of resale
This
the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO PUBLISH A NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A LEASE OF
LAND TO MR. THOMAS HEFFNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENABLING THE RELOCATION OF
THE HUDSON-MCDADE HOUSE TO THE TOWN’S
PARKING LOT NO. 5 (97-4-14/R-10)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Council authorizes the Manager to publish a notice of the
Council’s intent to enter into a lease agreement with Mr. Thomas Heffner as
generally described in the Manager’s report to the Council on this matter on
April 14, 1997, a copy of which shall be retained with the records of this
meeting.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION REJECTING
ALL BIDS FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER PLAYGROUND AND AUTHORIZING THE OPENING OF NEW
BIDS ON APRIL 16, 1997 (97-4-14/R-13)
WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill has solicited
formal bids by legal notice in The Chapel Hill News on February 9, 1997
in accordance with General Statute 143-128 for construction of the Community
Center Playground; and
WHEREAS, four bids were received and opened on March
4, 1997, and
WHEREAS, the Town received
only one valid bid;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Town rejects all bids for the construction of the
Community Center Playground project and authorizes the Manager to open new bids
on April 16, 1997.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION OPPOSING SENATE
BILL 317 (97-4-14/R- 14)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Chapel Hill Town Council that
the Council opposes Senate Bill 317, which would unnecessarily limit local
governments’ flexibility to enter into lease-purchase financing agreements.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
A RESOLUTION
TO CONTINUE THE STANDISH CORNER CLUSTER SUBDIVISION PUBLIC HEARING
(97-4-14/R-16)
WHEREAS, the Council has considered a request from
the Standish Corner Cluster Subdivision developer requesting a continuation of
the subdivision’s Public Hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council hereby continues the Public Hearing for
the Standish Corner Cluster Subdivision from April 14, 1997 to September 15,
1997.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND “THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1996” (97-4-14/O-1)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Budget Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance Concerning Appropriations
and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1996” as duly
adopted on June 10, 1996 be and the same is hereby amended as follows:
Current Revised
APPROPRIATIONS Budget Increase Decrease Budget
GENERAL
FUND
Non-Departmental 28,466 3,000 25,466
Contingency
Planning 751,728 3,000
754,728
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND “THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNINGG JULY 1, 1996
(97-4-14/O-2)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Budget Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance Concerning Appropriations
and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1996 as duly
adopted on June 10, 1996 be and the same is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE
I
Current Revised
APPROPRIATIONS Budget Increase Decrease
Budget
Non-Departmental
$19,466 $ 1,800 $17,666
Contingency
Mayor/Council
163,897
1,800 $165,697
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND “THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1996” (97-4-14/O-3)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Budget Ordinance entitled “An Ordinance Concerning Appropriations
and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1996” as duly
adopted on June 10, 1996 be and the same is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE I
Current Revised
Budget Increase Decrease Budget
APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL FUND
Non-departmental
Contingency 23,666 7,247 16,419
Transfer to Capital
Improvements
Fund 170,000 7,247 177,247
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FUND 1,843,838 7,247 1,851,085
ARTICLE II
Current Revised
Budget Increase Decrease Budget
REVENUES
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FUND
Transfer from General Fund 170,000 7,247 177,247
This the 14th day of April,
1997.
AN ORDINANCE
TO AMEND “THE ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS AND THE RAISING OF REVENUE
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1996 (97-4-14/O-4)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that the Budget ordinance entitled “An Ordinance Concerning Appropriations
and the Raising of Revenue for the Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 1996” as duly
adopted on June 9, 1996 be and the same is hereby amended as follows:
ARTICLE I
Current Revised
Budget Increase Decrease Budget
APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL
FUND
Non-Departmental
Contingency 16,419 3,500 12,919
Planning 754,728 7,500 762,228
ARTICLE II
Current Revised
Budget Increase Decrease Budget
REVENUES
Grants 1,606,219 4,000 1,610,219
This
the 14th day of April, 1997.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENTITLEMENT GRANT PROJECT ORDINANCE (97-4-14/O-5)
BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that, pursuant to Section 13.2 of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of
North Carolina, the following grant project ordinance is hereby amended to read
as follows:
SECTION I
The projects authorized are the Community
Development projects as approved by the Council on May 29, 1996, October 16,
1996 and March 24, 1997: funds are as
contained in the Funding Approval and Grant Agreement between the Town and the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The projects are known more familiarly as
the 1996 Entitlement Community Development Block Grant. The grant activities include neighborhood
revitalization, rehabilitation of public housing, and support of organizations
that provide community services to low-income residents.
SECTION II
The Manager of the Town of Chapel Hill is hereby
directed to proceed with the grant project within the terms of the grant
document (s), the rules and regulations of the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, and the budget contained herein.
SECTION III
The
following revenues are anticipated to be available to complete this project:
Current
Budget Revised Budget
Community Development Grant 459,000 459,000
Program Income 108,770 76,050
TOTAL 567,770 535,050
SECTION IV
Appropriations for the project are amended to
include the following for the 1996 - 97 grant year:
Current
Budget Revised Budget
Rehabilitation of Public
Housing 341,000 341,000
Property Acquisition
(EmPOWERment) 70,000 0
Neighborhood Revitalization 45,000 82,280
Site Improvements (OCHC) 23,770 23,770
Community Services (IFC,
YMCA, 30,000 30,000
Community School for People Under 6)
Capital Improvements
(Parking Lot) 5,000 5,000
Administration 53,000 53,000
TOTAL 567,770 535,770
SECTION V
The Finance Director is hereby directed to maintain
within the Grant Project Fund sufficient specific detailed accounting records
to provide the accounting to HUD as required by the grant agreement (s) and
Federal and State regulations.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
ITEM
#4.2: INFORMATION REPORTS
Council Member Evans requested the removal of item b
for discussion. There was Council
concurrence to receive citizen comments at the present time, rather than later in the meeting.
George Wretch-Bogart requested the Council’s
assistance to find locations for skateboarding facilities
Brian Oglivie said that a number of young people
were interested in building small ramps for skateboarding practice at the park
and ride lot on Eubanks Road. Mr.
Oglivie stated that the skateboarding enthusiasts were in the process of
raising funds to build the ramps.
Mayor Waldorf stated that the Council was ready and
willing, but not able at the moment, to take any kind of action on this
matter. Mayor Waldorf said that she
supported the effort to try to find a place for skateboarding prior to the
opening of an official skateboarding facility at the Northern Community Park.
Stating that liability matters were an important
consideration, Mr. Horton said that skateboarding could possibly take place on
an informal basis at some Town facilities (other than on downtown
sidewalks). He noted that the Town was
not presently able to provide a supervised, controlled skateboarding facility
at present.
Stating that the City of Fayetteville had a very
good skateboarding facility, Council Member Capowski asked whether the Town
could be sued if someone broke an ankle while participating in a
Town-sanctioned softball game. Mr.
Horton said if someone chose to sue in this instance, the Town could be covered
in terms of liability. He noted that
the Town had not been able to find insurance coverage for a skateboarding
facility.
Council Member Chilton inquired about circumstances
in which some smaller municipalities dropped all insurance and were therefore
immune from these types of lawsuits.
Mr. Karpinos said the situation was somewhat more complex than suggested
by this hypothetical scenario.
Expressing frustration that the Town had not been
able to come up with a plan for a skateboarding facility over the past 3 ½
years, Council Member Evans encouraged skateboarders to find a facility which
met the parameters outlined by the Manager. She also said that the Council
would continue to attempt to meet the needs of skateboarders.
Council Member Pavao asked whether the proposed
Northern Community Park skateboarding facility would be insured. Mr. Horton said this was correct, since the
proposed facility would be supervised and controlled by the Town.
ITEM #5:
REPORT ON ORANGE COUNTY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL ORDINANCE
Orange County Erosion Control Officer Warren Faircloth presented a brief overview of
erosion and sedimentation controls,
noting that greater emphases was being placed on keeping area streams and
bodies of water cleaner.
Council Member Evans inquired whether or not Mr.
Faircloth’s jurisdiction included construction projects on the University
campus. Mr. Faircloth said that the
University was not included in his jurisdiction. He noted that the University system had three inspectors to
handle a fifteen to seventeen county area.
Council Member Capowski inquired whether or not
there was sufficient staff to respond to individual complaints about erosion
and sedimentation control concerns. Mr.
Faircloth said although it might be desirable to have additional personnel at
some times, there was not always a sufficient amount of development activity to
hire additional staff.
Council Member Franck asked how often new “skimmer”
techniques were used. Mr. Faircloth replied that many developers,
including Southern Village, when contacted, were being convinced to use these
new measures. Mayor Waldorf inquired
whether or not fines were sometimes imposed.
Mr. Faircloth stated that fines of $500 per day were only imposed after
stop work orders were issued or grading permits were revoked. Council Member Brown inquired about the
extent of Mr. Faircloth’s overview of development plans in the Chapel Hill
area. Mr. Faircloth stated that since
1986, Orange County had enforced provisions of the erosion and sedimentation
control ordinance within the Town’s limits.
ITEM # 6: RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE HUMAN SERVICES
ADVISORY BOARD REGARDING HUMAN SERVICES PERFORMANCE AGREEMENTS
Ed Devaney, Chair of the Human Services Advisory
Board, noted that although the total
allocation for human service performance agreements was only $130,000, funding
requests totalling $242,537 had been received from thirty-one local non-profit
agencies. He said that the Board was
requesting that the Council allocate the overall funding allocation by $10,000
to $140,000.
Council Member Chilton, Council liaison to the Human
Services Board, suggested that funding of the Middle Schools After School
Program be reviewed by the Human Services Board.
ITEM #7: PUBLIC HEARING ON REQUESTED CHANGE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE PARKSIDE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Planning Director Roger Waldon noted that one of the
conditions of approval for the Parkside development was that there would be no
connection to NC 86 during construction.
He stated that given problems with construction traffic using Longbrook
Drive, staff was proposing that existing wording be modified to permit
construction access from NC 86 to the proposed Parkside development.
Don Fraley, President of M/I Homes, the developer of
Parkside, said he supported the proposed change.
Carol Ortiz, a resident of the Northwood V
development, said she also supported the proposed resolution. She also requested that signs be posted to
prohibit construction traffic along Longbrook Drive. Mr. Horton said if the developer were willing to post such a
sign, the Town would concur with this suggestion. Mr. Fraley concurred with the proposal, adding that there might
be times in the future when the proposed access from NC 86 would not be usable,
therefore necessitating the use of
Longbrook Drive. He added that
this was a slight possibility and might not happen at all.
COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER EVANS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC
HEARING. THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER EVANS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 17.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR PARKSIDE CLUSTER
SUBDIVISION (97-4-14/R-17)
WHEREAS, the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill
approved a Preliminary Plat for Parkside Cluster Subdivision on March 13, 1996;
and
WHEREAS, conditions of the approval referenced NC
Highway 86 access and road improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council received a petition on
March 24, 1997 from neighbors in the Northwood V Subdivision which requested
interpretation of the March 13, 1996 stipulations regarding construction access
to NC Highway 86; and
WHEREAS, the Town Council called a Public Hearing to
consider adjustments to the Preliminary Plat Approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of
the Town of Chapel Hill hereby modifies the conditions of the March 13, 1996
Preliminary Plat Approval for Parkside Cluster Subdivision to allow the replacement
of stipulation #32 with the following language:
32.
Phasing: The Town Manager shall not
approve a phasing plan for this preliminary plat if the first phase of the
phasing plan includes the connection of road “A” to NC Highway 86 other than a construction access.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
ITEM #8
PRESQUE ISLE REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUESTS
Planning Director Roger Waldon noted that the
location of the proposed Presque Isle was near the intersection of Sage and
Erwin Roads. Stating that rezoning of
the subject property would not be consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive
Plan, Mr. Waldon said that staff was recommending denial of the applicant’s
rezoning and special use permit requests.
He stated that if the Council chose to approve the requests, staff
recommended that the Council require the applicant to provide improvements to
Erwin Road which were
consistent with existing conditions and
improvements.
Jack Smyre, the applicant’s representative, said his
main point to the Council was that the current zoning was not the right one for
his client’s property. He added that
all of the Town’s development-related advisory boards had reviewed the proposal
and recommended its approval to the Council.
Council Member Evans asked whether Mr. Smyre was
saying that zoning for adjoining projects was less dense than zoning proposed
for Presque Isle. Mr. Smyre said that
the proposed Presque Isle development would be less dense than many other
projects in the area. Responding to a
question from Council Member Andresen regarding on-site stormwater, Mr. Smyre
said that the applicant was proposing the use of a retention pond, supplemented
by a fountain for visual appeal.
Council Member Wiggins requested additional
information regarding the wall being proposed by the applicant. Mr. Smyre said that the wall would be
articulated with bricks with a wrought iron gate, forty feet long, four and
half feet high and setback about twenty-five feet from the sidewalk.
Council Member Franck expressed concern about the
inaccuracy of a diagram showing the current condition of the intersection of
Erwin and Sage Roads. He expressed
frustration that the roadway was not striped for bicyclists, although adequate
pavement exists for it to be striped.
Mr. Smyre stated that the roadway had been widened to forty feet plus in
this area by two recent site developments. Mr. Smyre said that his client was
planning to rebuild and widen an existing five foot sidewalk to eight
feet.
Mayor Waldorf noted that she had recently received a
call from Linda Convissor, a member of the U.S. 15-501 Major Investment Study
Group. Mayor Waldorf said that Ms.
Convissor had expressed her support for the proposed development, noting that
it was a good place for a multi-family project.
COUNCIL MEMBER PAVAO MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER EVANS, TO ADJOURN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BROWN, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION A, DENYING THE REQUEST FOR REZONING.
Stating that this had been a difficult conclusion to
reach, Council Member Brown noted that although traffic was increasing in this
area, there were no plans to widen
Erwin Road or to provide additional mass transit service.
Noting that the planned development might be a
beneficial one, Council Member Chilton said that the Council had to deny the
rezoning because it was not consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.
Expressing concurrence with Council Member Chilton’s
observation that the proposed project was not consistent with the Town’s
Comprehensive Plan, Council Member Franck said he could support a project
having medium density of four to eight units per acre.
Noting that new development, including the new East
Chapel Hill High School, were proposed for the area, Council Member Evans said
roadway and transit improvements would ultimately be needed in this area. Stating that the subject property was a
good place for multi-family development, Council Member Evans expressed her
support for the proposed project.
Noting that she placed a great deal of weight on the
staff’s recommendations to the Council, Council Member Wiggins asked how this
project differed from others which had been recommended for rezoning. Mr. Horton said although it was a close
call, the proposed project did not pass the basic test based on the Council’s
land use plan, policies and existing ordinances.
Council Member Pavao said he concurred with Council
Member’s Evans thoughts on the matter.
Noting that all of the advisory board’s had favored the proposed
project, Council Member Pavao said he would not support the resolution of
denial.
Mayor Waldorf said the proposed project was a good
one in a good location and she would
therefore not be voting for the resolution of denial.
THE RESOLUTION OF DENIAL PASSED BY A VOTE OF 5-3,
WITH MAYOR WALDORF AND COUNCIL MEMBERS EVANS AND PAVAO VOTING NO.
A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR
PRESQUE ISLE (File Number 26..42)
(97-4-14/R-19a)
BE IT RESOLVED by the
Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Special Use Permit
application proposed by Joseph C. Ghidorzi,
on property identified as Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 26, Lot 42, if
developed according to the site plan dated June 11, 1996 and revised January
13, 1997 and the conditions listed below, would not:
1. Be located, designed,
and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health,
safety, and general welfare;
2. Comply with all
required regulations and standards of the Development Ordinance, including all
applicable provisions of Articles 12, 13, 14, and 18, and with all other
applicable regulations;
3. Be located, designed,
and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the value of
contiguous property, or be a use or development that is a public necessity; and
4. Conform with the
general plans for the physical development of the Town as embodied in the
Development Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Council finds:
1. The development as proposed does not meet the requirements of a
Residential-2 zoning district.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the Council hereby denies the application for a Special Use Permit for Presque
Isle.
This the 14th day of April,
1997.
COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON MOVED TO REFER THE SPECIAL
USE PERMIT REQUEST BACK TO THE MANAGER,
STAFF AND APPLICANT.
Council Member Chilton explained that there was a
chance that the applicant could revise plans and request a different zoning
without having to go through the whole process from the beginning Mr. Horton said if the Council chose to
deny the rezoning and special use permit application this evening, then any
development plans would have to be completely reworked and resubmitted by the
applicant. He added that if Council
Member Chilton’s suggestion were accepted by the Council, then the applicant
could revise and possibly come back with a plan having a lower density in line
with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.
Council Member Capowski said he wished to clarify that the Council was
not inviting another rezoning.
COUNCIL MEMBER’S CHILTON’S MOTION WAS SECONDED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK. THE MOTION WAS
ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
ITEM #9: RESOLUTION REGARDING TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Transportation Planner David Bonk said that the
Transportation Advisory Committee was scheduled to take final action in early
May regarding a transportation improvement program, at which point negotiations
would begin with the State Department of Transportation. He stated that the Manager’s recommendation
was to endorse the plan as presented.
COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 20.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
ENDORSING THE DRAFT DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO URBAN AREA 1998-2004
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL BY
THE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (97-4-14/R-20)
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Town of Chapel Hill
to develop a balanced transportation system for the citizens of Chapel Hill, to
include roadways, public transit services, bicycle and pedestrian facilities;
and
WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill has considered its
transportation needs and identified projects that would meet the Town’s
transportation goals; and
WHEREAS, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro
Transportation Advisory Committee has prepared a draft Metropolitan
Transportation Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the Council has reviewed the draft
1998-2004 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council recommends to the Transportation Advisory
Committee that the draft 1998-2004 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement
Program be approved.
This the 14th day of April, 1997.
ITEM #11
PETITION TO RECONSIDER COUNCIL’S VOTE ON DISCUSSION OF COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED TO RECONSIDER COUNCIL’S
VOTE OF OCTOBER 28, 1996 TABLING DISCUSSION OF THE REWRITING OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. COUNCIL MEMBER
EVANS SECONDED THE MOTION.
Noting that the Council was in the process of
discussing budget matters, Council Member Brown said that the rewriting of the
Plan would cost an estimated $50,000, excluding contracting out of some of the
work. She added that the Comprehensive
Plan was slated to be reworked as part of the Shaping Orange County’s Future
plan. Council Member Brown said she
thought that $50,000 was too much to expend for the sake of gaining a few
months.
Council Member Wiggins said that there was no
specific date included in her proposed resolution. Council Member Wiggins added that she was only requesting a
Council discussion of the matter, rather than voting on whether or not to initiate
work on the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.
Council Member Capowski asked whether a date could
be added to the resolution to make it clearer.
Mayor Waldorf reminded the Council that if the
resolution passed, there should be close attention paid to scheduling and
costs.
Council Member Capowski asked Town staff to report
back to the Council with the cost of how much it would cost if the
Comprehensive Plan were to be incorporated in conjunction with Shaping Orange
County’s Future efforts, and how much it would cost if the Town staff independently revised the Comprehensive
Plan.
Noting that the proposed Presque Isle was a good
example of how the Comprehensive Plan was out of date in some respects, Ruby Sinreich said she supported the
proposed resolution. She also noted
the importance of integrating topic
areas such as transit overlay zones into the Town’s Comprehensive Plan.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER CHILTON, TO SUBSTITUTE A MOTION TO MAKE REWORKING OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN A PART OF THE EFFORT OF THE
SHAPING ORANGE COUNTY’S FUTURE TASK
FORCE. THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION FAILED BY
A VOTE OF 3-5, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS BROWN, CHILTON AND FRANCK VOTING IN FAVOR
OF THE MOTION.
Council Member Capowski made a friendly amendment
which would schedule the discussion on May 12th. The friendly amendment was accepted by the
mover and seconder.
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE
OF 5-3, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS BROWN, CHILTON AND FRANK VOTING NO.
MOTION MADE BY COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS TO RECONSIDER
ACTION TAKEN BY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 28TH . MOTION PASSED 5 TO 3 WITH
BROWN, CHILTON AND FRANCK VOTING NO.
Mayor Waldorf suggested that the Council clarify any
additional information needs relative to the Comprehensive Plan. She also said that cost and scheduling were
clearly the key issues at stake.
Council Member Wiggins stated that there was also a cost of not having a
Comprehensive Plan which gave clear direction.
Council Member Chilton requested that the Council
address item #14 at the next meeting,
since he had not been able to meet with Mr. R.D.
Smith on this matter.
ITEM #15: 1997-98 OUTSIDE AGENCY FUNDING
COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BROWN, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 23,
INCLUDING AN AMENDMENT THAT THE HUMAN SERVICES BOARD, RATHER THAN THE
COUNCIL, WOULD REVIEW THE FUNDING REQUEST OF THE MIDDLE SCHOOLS AFTER SCHOOL
PROGRAM.
Council Member Franck said although he favored
having the Human Services Board review funding of the After Schools program, he
would vote against the resolution because it had the effect of putting a cap on
human services spending.
Council Member Chilton replied that these figures
were there to help the Human Services Board anticipate what was available so as
to be able to dole out the money accordingly.
Council Member Capowski inquired whether this
resolution was in addition to Resolution 23.
Mr. Horton said this was correct.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 7-1, WITH COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK VOTING NO.
A RESOLUTION
REGARDING THE OVERALL LEVEL OF TOWN CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUTSIDE AGENCIES IN
1997-98 (97-4-14/R-23)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill
that the Council hereby expresses intent not to increase the overall level of
contributions to outside agencies in the 1997-98 service year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
the After Schools Middle School Program shall submit its funding requests to
the Human Services Advisory Board and that total available human service
funding for FY 1997-98 shall be $167,000.
This the 14th day
of April, 1997.
ITEM #15: RESOLUTION OF BUDGET WORK SESSION
Mr. Horton said that the Council could possibly hold
a budget work session on May 29th.
After discussion, the Council decided to leave the
budget work session on May 21st, as originally scheduled.
ITEM #4f:
PROVISION OF BUS SERVICE TO CHATHAM COUNTY
Council Member Capowski said although staff had
drafted an excellent report, it was ultimately up to Chatham County residents
to determine when and where buses might run in Chatham County. Council Member Franck said that this was
implicit in the staff’s report. He
inquired about anticipated usage figures for buses in Chatham County. Mr. Horton said at this point there was no
way to determine the possible service demand.
COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER FRANCK, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 6.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED
UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MANAGER TO SEND A REPORT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF TRANSIT SERVICE
FOR NORTHERN CHATHAM COUNTY TO THE CHATHAM COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (97-4-14/R-6)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Chapel Hill Town Council that
the Council authorizes the Manager to send a report on the feasibility of
transit service in northern Chatham County to the Chatham County Commissioners.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this report on transit
service in Chatham County, will be included on the agenda for discussion
between the Council and the Chatham County Commissioners at as meeting
scheduled for May 6, 1997.
This
the 14th day of April, 1997.
ITEM #
4k: NC 86 MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT
Council Member Capowski expressed his displeasure
that the Town was going to have to pay twenty percent of the cost of widening
Airport Road. Council Member Capowski
said it was his understanding that the North Carolina Department of
Transportation would be paying all of these costs.
COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER EVANS, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 11.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MUNICIPAL AGREEMENT WITH THE NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE N.C.86 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT BETWEEN
HOMESTEAD ROAD AND WHITFIELD ROAD (97-4-14/R-11)
WHEREAS, the Town of Chapel Hill and the North
Carolina Department of Transportation have agreed upon and funded a roadway
improvement project for Route N.C.86 between Homestead Road and Whitfield Road;
and
WHEREAS, the Town has requested that the project
include a center median, sidewalks, and bike lanes; and
WHEREAS, the Town has agreed to share in the cost of
the requested median, sidewalks, and bikelanes; and
WHEREAS, a municipal agreement has been prepared
which outlines the project elements, cost sharing arrangements, and
responsibilities of the Town and State regarding this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
Town of Chapel Hill that the Council herewith authorizes the Mayor to execute
the municipal agreement (copy attached) between the Town and the North Carolina
Department of Transportation regarding the N.C.86 Improvement Project between
Homestead Road and Whitfield Road.
This is the 14th day of April, 1997.
#4.1o: FUTURE USE OF PRITCHARD PARK
Mr. Horton introduced the matter by noting that the
Town was ready to consider any reasonable private offer to jointly develop Pritchard Park. He added that the Town staff had not yet
authorized the architects to start work on a conceptual plan for Pritchard
Park.
Richard Gurlitz expressed a desire to be involved in
the plans for Pritchard Park, including the possibility of a public/private venture to develop the
portion of the park immediately behind the Hotel Siena.
Council Member Capowski inquired about the
long-range master plan for the development of Town parks. Parks and Recreation Director Mike Loveman
said that these plans were outlined in the Community Facilities Plan. Council Member Capowski said he wanted to
make sure that going ahead with the Hotel Siena proposal would not result in
any sacrifices in the Northern Community Park or other project currently
underway. Stating that there was no
connection between Northern Community Park and Pritchard Park, Mr. Horton said
that funding of $100,000 for this project was coming from the Pritchard family
and could only be spent for this site.
Council Member Brown suggested changing wording in the
proposed resolution so it was clear that there was an emphasis to proceed with
site analysis and a conceptual plan.
Council Member Pavao, Council liaison to the Parks
and Recreation Commission, said that the Commission was ready, willing and
eager to move ahead with this process.
Council Member Franck wanted Council Member Brown to
see that the wording of this resolution, as is, states exactly what it is she
was concerned about.
COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER PAVAO, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 15.
Mayor Waldorf suggested adding a friendly amendment
to address Council Member Brown’s concerns.
Council Member Pavao inquired whether or not
citizens, including the owners of the Hotel Siena would be allowed to
participate in the conceptual plan process.
Mr. Horton said that any citizen wishing to do so would have the
opportunity to participate in the conceptual plan process.
RESOLUTION 15, AS AMENDED, WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY
(8-0).
A RESOLUTION
OF INTENT TO CONSIDER PRIVATE PROPOSALS REGARDING FUTURE USE OF PRITCHARD PARK
AFTER PREPARATION OF A SITE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR THE PARK
(97-4-14/R-15)
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel
Hill that a site analysis and conceptual plan for Pritchard Park be developed.
This plan should contain various options for the use of the site with pros and
cons. The Council will consider private proposals, if any are made, for
possible public-private development of part of the park.
This
the 14th day of April, 1997.
ITEM #4r: CIVIL LEAVE FOR TOWN EMPLOYEES
Council Member Chilton asked that the item be put on
the next meeting as he knew of a citizen who wanted to speak but was not able
to make it to this evening’s meeting.
COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER PAVAO TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.
THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (8-0).
The meeting concluded at 9:37 p.m.