CONTINUATION OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CHAPEL HILL TOWN COUNCIL,

TUESDAY, JUNE 24, 1997 AT 7:00 P.M.

 

Mayor Waldorf called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.  Council Members in attendance were Joyce Brown, Joe Capowski, Mark Chilton, Pat Evans, Richard Franck, Lee Pavăo and Edith Wiggins.  Council Member Andresen was absent, but was counted as present for voting purposes, since she had not requested being excused from the meeting.   Also in attendance were Town Manager Cal Horton, Assistant Town Managers Sonna Loewenthal and Florentine Miller,  Planning Director Roger Waldon and Town Attorney Ralph Karpinos.

 

                                                Item 10  Presque Isle Special Use Permit

 

Previously  unsworn persons  wishing to testify in the matter were sworn.

 

Stating that the applicant had submitted a modified proposal in response to Council requests, Mr. Horton said that Mr. Waldon would first review the applicant’s request for a zoning atlas amendment.  Mr. Waldon said that although the applicant was still requesting rezoning of the subject property to R-5C, the applicant had agreed to a voluntary limitation of eight units per acre.  Stating that staff  believed that the request was consistent with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Waldon said approval of the rezoning request was recommended.

 

Planning Board Chairperson said that the Board had reviewed the applicant’s revised application last Tuesday and recommended approval of the rezoning request.

 

Jack Smyre, the applicant’s representative, said that the applicant believed that the rezoning request would conform with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan and the pattern of development in the area.


Council Member Brown inquired about the maximum number of units that would be permitted on the property under current zoning regulations.  Mr. Waldon said that the current zoning of R-2 would permit a maximum of twenty plus units on the subject property.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.  THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).

 

Council Member Brown inquired about the notification sent out for this request. Mr. Waldon said that the notice list was identical to the list for the applicant’s prior proposal.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS, TO AMEND THE PARCEL’S ZONING TO R-5C.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CAPOWSKI, FOR THE COUNCIL TO ACT ON THE MATTER ON ITS NEXT REGULAR MEETING NIGHT, MONDAY, JULY 7TH.

Council Member Chilton noted that this evening was the third time that this project had been before the Council.

 

Stating that Council agendas seemed to be getting more and more packed with items, Council Member Wiggins suggested that the Council act on this matter this evening.   Council Member Pavăo expressed his concurrence with the suggestion to act this evening.

 

THE SUBSTITUTE MOTION WAS PLACED ON THE FLOOR AND FAILED BY A VOTE OF 4-5, WITH COUNCIL MEMBERS ANDRESEN, BROWN, CAPOWSKI AND CHILTON VOTING YES.

 

Noting that she would not be voting against the rezoning request, Council Member Brown said she nonetheless had concerns about the Council’s process in this matter.

 

THE MAIN MOTION, ADOPTION OF REZONING TO R-5C, WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).

 

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CHAPEL HILL ZONING  FOR PRESQUE ISLE   (Chapel Hill Tax Map Number 26..42) (97-6-23/O-12.1)

 

WHEREAS, the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill has considered the application of  Joseph C. and Carol Ghidorzi to amend the Zoning Atlas to rezone property described below from Residential-2 to Residential-5-Conditional Zoning, and finds that the amendment achieves the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan;  and

 

WHEREAS, the Council finds that any special use as limited by Section II below under the Residential-5-Conditional Use Zoning would be suitable for the property proposed for rezoning under the conditions attached to the approved Special Use Permit;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that the Chapel Hill Zoning Atlas be amended as follows:

 

                                                                     SECTION I

 

That the portion of the property identified as now or formerly Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 26, Lot 42 located at the southern corner of the intersection of Sage Road and Erwin Road, within the Residential-2 zoning district, be rezoned from Residential-2 to Residential-5-Conditional with the limitation identified in Section II below.  The legal description of the entire property is as follows (please refer to the attached map):

 

BEGINNING at an existing iron pipe in the southern right-of-way of the intersection of Erwin Road and Sage Road, said point being on the eastern property line of Joseph C. and Carol C. Ghidorzi, Deed Book 1253, Page 482, Orange County Registry; thence along a simple curve to the right having a radius of 655.00 feet, an arc length of 324.06 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 27°12’25” East 320.76 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence South 13°02’01” East 239.04 feet to an existing iron pipe in the northwestern right-of-way of the intersection of Sage Road and Coleridge Drive; thence South 76°33’51” West 20.96 feet along the northern right-of-way of Coleridge Drive to an existing iron pipe; thence along a simple curve to the left having a radius of 280.00 feet, an arc length of 346.17 feet and a chord bearing and distance of South 41°08’48” West 324.54 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence South 05°43’45” West 3.98 feet to an existing iron pipe; thence North 84°09’01” West 48.64 feet to an existing iron pipe at the southern end of the common line between Advent Lutheran Church, Inc., Deed Book 1349, Page 33, Orange County Registry and Joseph C. and Carol C. Ghidorzi, Deed Book 1253, Page 482, Orange County Registry; thence North 33°15’14” West 475.26 feet along the aforementioned common line to an iron pipe set in the southern right-of-way of Erwin Road; thence North 42°53’24” East 503.61 feet to the POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 5.07 acres more or less.

 

SECTION II

 

That the property identified above be rezoned from Residential-2 to Residential-5-Conditional zoning with the following limitation offered by the applicant:

 

1.      That the density be limited to between 7 and 8 dwelling units per acre.

 

                                                                   SECTION III

 

That all ordinances and portions of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

 

This the 24th day of June, 1997.

 

 

Mr. Waldon stated that the applicant was proposing a central recreation and green area.  He also said that the applicant was proposing changes in layout so that there would be 8 units per acre, rather than the earlier proposed 10.8 units per acre.  Mr. Waldon said that staff recommended Council approval of the applicant’s special use permit request.

 

Council Member Capowski said that as a practical matter, the applicant was proposing a smaller number of larger units.

 

Planning Board Chair John Hawkins said that the Board had reviewed the application last week and recommended approval of the applicant’s request by a vote of 4-2.  He stated that although the majority of the Board felt that project was strong from a design standpoint, some members felt that existing bicycle lanes and sidewalks needed to be widened.

 

Mr. Smyre reviewed the revised site plan, noting that although the number of  parking spaces had been reduced, the number of proposed garages for the units was relatively unchanged.

 

Noting that the number of units requested had been reduced by twenty, Mayor Waldorf inquired about the anticipated prices for the townhouse units.  Mr. Smyre said that the townhouse units would need to be in the range of $150,000 to  $200,000 in order for the units to be economically viable.

 

Council Member Franck inquired whether or not the applicant could arrange for a pedestrian connection to Erwin Road.  Mr. Smyre said that the applicant would be pleased to provide such a connection.

 

Council Member Evans inquired whether any original trees would remain as part of the buffering. Mr. Smyre said that the Design Review Board/Appearance Commission recommended new street tree/streetscape plantings.  Council Member Evans inquired about the size of the proposed trees.  Mr. Smyre said this had not yet been determined.  He also noted that the applicant was willing to have an eight-foot cross-section rather than a five-foot cross-section in order to accommodate wider sidewalks or a bicycle lane.   Stating that bicyclist’s safety was enhanced by having wider roadway shoulders, Council Member Franck said that this would be a desirable arrangement.

 

Council Member Chilton inquired about the status of the property across Sage Road from this land parcel.   Mr. Waldon said that this parcel was owned by a church and was currently vacant.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER PAVĂO, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.  THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY

(9-0).

 

COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION A.

 

Mayor Waldorf said it was too bad that the revision to the applicant’s plan meant that there

were twenty less units available which would have sold for less than $150,000.  Mayor Waldorf said she thought the project was a good one and she would vote in favor of the resolution.

 

RESOLUTION A WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY   (9-0).

 

A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR PRESQUE ISLE ‑ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ‑ HOUSING (File Number 26..42) (97-6-24/R-22.1a)

 

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill that it finds that the Special Use Permit application, proposed by Joseph C. and Carol Ghidorzi, on property identified as Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 26, Lot 42, if developed according to the site plan dated June 4, 1997 and the conditions listed below:

 

1.                  Would be located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or promote the public health, safety, and general welfare;

 

2.                  Would comply with all required regulations and standards of the Development Ordinance, including all applicable provisions of Articles 12, 13, 14, and 18, and with all other applicable regulations;

 

3.                  Would be located, designed, and proposed to be operated so as to maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property, and

 

4.                  Would conform with the general plans for the physical development of the Town as embodied in the Development Ordinance and in the Comprehensive Plan.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council hereby approves the application for the Special Use Permit for Presque Isle in accordance with the plans listed above and with conditions listed below:

 

Stipulations Specific to the Development

 

1.                  That construction begin by June 24, 1999 (two years from the date of Council approval) and be completed by June 24, 2000 (three years from the date of Council approval).

 

2.                  Land Use Intensity: This Special Use Permit approves 42 dwelling units and a total Floor Area of 71,660 square feet; Open Space of 193,370 square feet; Livability Space of 148,625 square feet; and Improved Recreation Space of a minimum of 12,952 square feet.

 

Required Improvements

 

3.                  Erwin Road Frontage: That the applicant dedicate half of a 90 foot right‑of‑way along the Erwin Road frontage and that Erwin Road be reconstructed to half of a 51 foot cross section with curb and gutter.

 

4.                  Sidewalk: That a new 5 foot concrete sidewalk be constructed along the Erwin Road frontage.

 

5.                  Handicap Access: That handicap parking shall be provided near the recreation space.

 

6.                  Pedestrian Access: That pedestrian access to Erwin Road and Sage Road be provided along the proposed sewer easements and that a sidewalk be provided from building E to the sidewalk along Coleridge Drive.

 

7.                  Bus Shelter: That the applicant provide a payment‑in‑lieu for a bus shelter and related amenities to be constructed either along Sage Road or Erwin Road at a location to be determined by the Town Manager.

 

Stipulations Related to State and Federal Governments Approvals

 

8.                  Approval of Encroachment Agreements: That any required State permits or encroachment agreements be approved and copies of the approved permits and agreements be submitted to the Town prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

9.                  Approval by NC Department of Transportation: That the North Carolina Department of Transportation review and approve the final plans prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

Stipulations Related to Landscape Elements

 

10.              Landscape Plan Approval: That a detailed Landscape Plan, Landscape Maintenance Plan, and Lighting Plan be approved by the Appearance Commission prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit and that the Landscape Plan be approved by the Town Manager.

 

The Landscape Plan shall include: a) an alternative "D” Type Buffer, along the property's frontage with Sage Road and with Erwin Road, b) a "C" Type Buffer along the southern edge of the property, and c) a "C" type buffer along the property’s frontage with Coleridge Drive.

 

That the conflicts between the landscape buffer and easements be minimized.

 

That the alternative landscape buffer along Sage Road and Erwin Road include walls and appropriate landscaping to screen the parking area

 

Stipulations Related to Building Elevations

 

11.              Building Elevation Approval: That detailed building elevations be approved by the Appearance Commission prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

Stipulations Related to Utilities

 

12.              Fire Flow: That a fire flow report prepared by a registered professional engineer, showing that flows meet the minimum requirements of the Design Manual, and a fire protection water lines/hydrants installation plan be approved by the Town Manager prior to issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

13.              New Hydrant: That one additional triple hydrant be provided at southwest corner of Building "D."

 

14.              Hydrant Locations: That all hydrants be installed on the loop main line system and that all installed hydrants be located on the building side of the street such that fire hose deployed from them will not obstruct additional responding fire apparatus.

 

15.              Fire Flow: That the applicant provide a second source of flow for fire protection line.

 

16.              Fire Lane: That the internal drive lane circling the buildings be designated and signed as a fire lane.

 

17.              Utility/Lighting Plan Approval: That the final utility/lighting plan be approved by Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Duke Power Company, Public Service Company, the applicable telephone company, applicable cable supplier, and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

Miscellaneous Stipulations

 

18.              Solid Waste Management Plan: That a detailed solid waste management plan, including positioning of dumpster pad and including a recycling plan and a plan for managing and minimizing construction debris, be approved by the Town Manager prior to the issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

19.              Dumpster Dimensions: That the plans include a dimensioned detail of the proposed dumpster pads including protective bollards and screening, to be approved by the Town Manager.

 

20.              Pavement Design: That the applicant use a stronger pavement for drive aisles which would carry service vehicles.

 

21.              Detailed Plans: That final detailed site plan, grading plan, utility/lighting plans, stormwater management plan (with hydraulic calculations), which shows the method(s) of conveying the storm water around the building site, and a landscape plan and landscape management plan be approved by the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit, and that such plans conform to the plans approved by this application and demonstrate compliance with all applicable conditions and the design standards of the Development Ordinance and the Design Manual.

 

22.              Drainage Easement: That the applicant provide standard 30 foot drainage easements for all storm drainage infrastructure that receives off‑site drainage from the public street system.

 

23.              Storm Drain under Sage Road:  That any proposed storm drainage pipes under Sage Road be installed by boring under the road rather than open cutting.

 

24.              Pavement Design: That the applicant construct the parking lot to Town standards for pavement design and dimensions.

 

25.              Erosion Control: That a soil erosion and sedimentation control plan be approved by the Orange County Erosion Control Officer and the Town Manager before issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

26.              Construction Sign Required: That the applicant post a construction sign that lists the property owner's representative, with a telephone number; the contractor's representative, with a telephone number; and a telephone number for regulatory information at the time of issuance of a Zoning Compliance Permit.

 

27.              Silt Control: That the applicant take appropriate measures to prevent and remove the deposit of wet or dry silt on adjacent paved roadways.

 

28.              Continued Validity: That continued validity and effectiveness of this approval is expressly conditioned on the continued compliance with the plans and conditions fisted above.

 

29.              Non‑Severability: If any of the above conditions is held to be invalid, approval in its entirety shall be void.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Council hereby approves the application for a Special Use Permit for Presque Isle in accordance with the plans and conditions listed above.

 

This the 24th day of June, 1997.

 

Item 11  Nunn Property

 

Mr. Horton said that this agenda item was prepared  in response to a letter generated by Bruce Ballentine regarding the Nunn property.  Mr. Horton that after reviewing Mr. Ballentine’s proposal, staff felt that it would not be possible to accommodate the proposed development without making significant changes in the Town’s subdivision regulations regarding streets and water and sewer services.  Mr. Horton added that he thought it would be unlikely that Town staff would recommend that the Council agree to these types of changes in development regulations.

 

Irving Nunn said that his family was very disappointed about the Manager’s recommendation in this matter.  Mr. Nunn also said that although he and his family members did not want special treatment, they felt deserving of some consideration.  Mr. Nunn stated that his family had lived on their property for about forty-five years and intended to stay in this location in the future.   Council Member Wiggins inquired whether or not the Nunns were intending to pass land to other family members for building homes on the property.  Mr. Nunn said this was correct.

 

Stating that there had been respect in mediation dialogue to date with the Nunns and their neighbors, Council Member Brown urged the Council and staff to look for ways to accommodate the Nunn’s request.

 

Council Member Chilton said that the problem was really a bit larger than the Nunn’s property, involving a set of parcels near the closed landfill facility.  He stated that these lots were far from water and sewer service and consequently were not very marketable at this point.   Council Member Chilton suggested that there might be a way to amend the Development Ordinance so that properties within a certain distance of the landfill would be subject to slightly different standards.  Mr. Horton said staff would need to do some research on this matter and consultation with the Town Attorney would also be necessary.

 

Noting that she had spoken to Ms. Nunn about her concerns, Council Member Evans said that she shared many of Ms. Nunn’s frustrations.  She suggested that the Town permit certain waivers of development-related standards for properties in this area.  Council Member Chilton noted that direct benefits conferred on particular individuals could only come about as legal compensation for legally recognized injuries.   Council Member Evans said she was referring to landowners immediately adjacent to the landfill site.

 

Mr. Karpinos said that Town staff could examine options for modifying the Development Ordinance to address the Council’s concerns.

 

Council Member Capowski inquired about the possibility of making an exemption to permit an additional house or two on the property, with the further understanding that a road would be required if the property were sold off and subdivided.  Mr. Karpinos said that staff could examine the Council’s options and report back at the Council’s hearing on this matter.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER WIGGINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION CALLING A HEARING ON THE MATTER.

 

Noting that he was not representing the Nunn family, Mr. Ballentine said he had become personally interested in their situation.   Stating that water and sewer service extensions to the site were not feasible, Mr. Ballentine said that water service to the site would need to come down Eubanks Road from NC 86.  Stating that a curb and guttered street was not feasible in this area, Mr. Ballentine stated that Nunn family was happy with the existing gravel roadway.

 

Council Member Brown suggested referring the matter back to the Manager for a report at the August 25th meeting on how to accommodate the Nunn’s request at a minimal cost to the family.

Council Member Evans asked whether or not staff would have time to do this work.  Mr. Horton said that staff could complete preliminary work on this matter by the August 25th meeting.  He noted that staff would examine the matter in a broad manner.

 

Council Members Chilton and Wiggins withdrew their motion.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CHILTON, TO REFER THE MATTER TO THE MANAGER FOR A FOLLOW-UP REPORT ON OPTIONS TO BE PRESENTED AT THE COUNCIL’S AUGUST 25TH MEETING.   THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).

 

Item 12   Recycling, Repairing, Reuse Market-Based Economy  

 

Council Member Franck presented an overview of the proposal from the Landfill Owners Group regarding the establishment of a committee to investigate the concept of encouraging a zero-based society through recycling. repair and reuse programs. 

 

COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN, TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 24, REGARDING THE FORMATION OF  A COMMITTEE.

 

Council Member Brown expressed a desire to serve on the committee.

 

Mayor Waldorf requested additional information about the nature of the committee’s charge.  She also inquired whether staff time or a consultant would be needed to assist the committee.   Council Member Franck said he believed that only a small amount of staff time would be needed.  Stating that the Triangle J Council of Governments had a very active solid waste committee, Council Member Brown said it was important for the Town to undertake outreach and investigation relative to the possibilities for a recycling and reuse market-based economy.

 

Stating that Triangle J had received a $176,000 grant for economic ecosystems for a six-county region and that there were no industries to speak of in Orange County , Council Member Evans said she wondered if the proposal before the Council was premature.

 

Council Member Brown said she did not see any harm in proceeding with the proposal before the Council.

 

Council Member Capowski inquired why companies were not “beating on (communities) doors” if the economy for recycling and reuse was truly market-based. 

 

Council Member Chilton suggested that the committee could work with the Orange County Economic Development Commission and the Triangle J Council of Governments.

 

Council Member Wiggins said that she very much supported regional initiatives if it would save the Town’s resources.

 

Mayor Waldorf inquired whether adoption of  the resolution meant that the Council was interested in jobs and industry only if they were recycling-based.   Council Member Brown said this was not the case.  She stated that the main focus was to encourage sustainable development on a regional basis.

 

Stating that the Orange County Economic Development Commission and the Triangle J Council of Governments were working on similar efforts, Council Member Evans suggested that the Council not adopt the proposed resolution and rely upon the efforts already in progress.

 

Council Member Franck said that Council Members wishing to join Council Member Brown on the proposed task force were welcome to do so.   Council Member Brown said that the recycling, repairing and reusing program could be done on a small, medium or large scale basis.  She also said that the program could be folded into a larger regional effort.

 

Stating that the proposal was not a new one, Council Member Evans said that Triangle J had come up with some very good programs and manuals regarding recycling, reuse and repair programs.  She stated that the main problem with such programs was that they were not viable on a very small scale.

Council Member Wiggins suggested that although Triangle J could handle things on a regional basis, it might be possible to have smaller efforts at the local level.

 

Mayor Waldorf suggested that the committee work with the City of Durham, Durham County, the Orange County Economic Development Commission and the Triangle J Council of Governments and primarily rely on the staff resources of these agencies. Council Member Brown suggested that there could be consultations with Triangle J Council of  Government staff.   Council Member Chilton inquired whether or not the item would come back to the Council for follow-up action.  Council Member Brown said the item would come back for  ultimate approval by the Council.

 

Council Member Pavăo inquired about the size of the proposed task force.  Council Member Franck said that there would be one or two members from each of the four local governments in Orange County.  Council Member Capowski said he did not see how the Town could lose if it were possible to find someone to eat into the waste stream at their own expense.

 

Council Member Evans said she would not endorse the proposed resolution because once the Council moved in this direction, it would be hard to change the process.

 

RESOLUTION 24, AS AMENDED TO INCLUDE DESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN AS THE COUNCIL’S REPRESENTATIVE AND INDICATING THAT THERE WOULD BE COORDINATION OF EFFORTS WITH TRIANGLE J COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE ORANGE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 8-1, WITH COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS VOTING NO.

 

A JOINT RESOLUTION REGARDING ESTABLISHMENT OF A CITIZENS’/ELECTED OFFICIALS’ TASK FORCE TO RESEARCH AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DEVELOPMENT OF A SOLID WASTE RECYCLING, REUSING, AND REPAIRING MARKET-BASED ECONOMY (97-6-24/R-24)

 

BE IT RESOLVED that the Chapel Hill Town Council endorses the establishment of a citizens’/elected officials’ task force to research and make recommendations regarding development of a solid waste recycling, reusing, repairing market-based economy.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chapel Hill Town Council further endorses approaching the City of Durham and Durham County, in consultation with Triangle J Council of Governments and the Orange County Economic Development Commission, to join Orange County governments in this effort.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chapel Hill Town Council hereby appoints Mayor pro tem Joyce Brown to a small committee of elected officials, which shall meet as a public body to further develop a proposed charge and process for such a task force.  The Chair of the Landfill Owners’ Group is authorized to convene the latter committee’s first meeting.

 

This the 23rd day of June, 1997.

 

COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS, FOR THE COUNCIL TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE MEADOWMONT SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS ON JULY 2ND AND, IF NECESSARY, JULY 3RD.  THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).

 

COUNCIL MEMBER FRANCK MOVED, SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER EVANS, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING.  THE MOTION WAS ADOPTED UNANIMOUSLY (9-0).

 

The meeting stood adjourned at 8:50 p.m.